Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
PRIORITI: Phase 4 study of triptorelin or active surveillance in high-risk prostate cancer.
Matveev, Vsevolod; Gao, Xin; Kopyltsov, Evgeny; Luo, Jindan; Wei, Qiang; Ye, Dingwei; Zhou, Fangjian; Cabri, Patrick; Houchard, Aude; Mahmood, Adnan; Xie, Li-Ping.
Afiliação
  • Matveev V; N. N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russia.
  • Gao X; Department of Urology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Kopyltsov E; Budgetary Healthcare Institution of Omsk Region, Clinical Oncological Dispensary, Omsk, Russia.
  • Luo J; Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
  • Wei Q; Department of Urology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • Ye D; Department of Urology, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China.
  • Zhou F; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
  • Cabri P; Department of Urology, Ipsen, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
  • Houchard A; Department of Urology, Ipsen, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
  • Mahmood A; Department of Urology, Ipsen, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
  • Xie LP; Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38958195
ABSTRACT

AIM:

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of triptorelin after radical prostatectomy (RP) in patients with negative lymph nodes.

METHODS:

PRIORITI (NCT01753297) was a prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled, phase 4 study conducted in China and Russia. Patients with high-risk (Gleason score ≥ 8 and/or pre-RP prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≥ 20 ng/mL and/or primary tumor stage 3a) prostate adenocarcinoma without evidence of lymph node or distant metastases were randomized to receive triptorelin 11.25 mg at baseline (≤ 8 weeks after RP) and at 3 and 6 months, or active surveillance. The primary endpoint was biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS), defined as the time from randomization to biochemical relapse (BR; increased PSA > 0.2 ng/mL). Patients were monitored every 3 months for at least 36 months; the study ended when 61 BRs were observed.

RESULTS:

The intention-to-treat population comprised 226 patients (mean [standard deviation] age, 65.3 [6.4] years), of whom 109 and 117 were randomized to triptorelin or surveillance, respectively. The median BRFS was not reached. The 25th percentile time to BRFS (95% confidence interval) was 39.1 (29.9-not estimated) months with triptorelin and 30.0 (18.6-42.1) months with surveillance (p = 0.16). There was evidence of a lower risk of BR with triptorelin versus surveillance but this was not statistically significant at the 5% level (p = 0.10). Chemical castration was maintained at month 9 in 93.9% of patients who had received triptorelin. Overall, triptorelin was well tolerated and had an acceptable safety profile.

CONCLUSION:

BRFS was observed to be longer with triptorelin than surveillance, but the difference was not statistically significant.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Asia Pac J Clin Oncol Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Federação Russa

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Asia Pac J Clin Oncol Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Federação Russa