Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Systematic Review of Patient Decision Aids for Stroke Prevention Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation Management.
Baers, Justin H; Adekanye, Joel; Hazlewood, Glen; Davies, Jan M; Caird, Jeff K; Wilton, Stephen B.
Afiliação
  • Baers JH; Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada.
  • Adekanye J; Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada.
  • Hazlewood G; Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada.
  • Davies JM; Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 2TP, Canada.
  • Caird JK; Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada.
  • Wilton SB; Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.
Rev Cardiovasc Med ; 23(10): 353, 2022 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39077149
ABSTRACT

Background:

Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is a major cause of stroke. Oral anticoagulation can reduce the risk of AF-associated stroke by 65% but it remains underused. Stroke prevention therapy in patients with AF has been considered a good target for shared decision making with patient decision aids as it is a long-term, preference-sensitive decision with known risk-benefit trade-offs. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize published literature on the effectiveness of patient decision aids on the choice of and adherence to stroke prevention therapy in individuals with AF.

Methods:

We conducted a structured literature search for prospective studies evaluating decision aids for AF stroke prevention therapy in adult patients with nonvalvular AF. We included studies that compared those exposed to a decision aid with a control condition for outcomes including choice of therapy, adherence, decisional conflict and patient knowledge. Quantitative meta-analysis was not feasible due to excessive between-study heterogeneity.

Results:

Eight studies met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Six studies were randomized clinical trials and two were pre-post comparisons. Of the 8 studies, each evaluated a different decision aid, with only three including all contemporary oral anticoagulant drugs. All decision aids improved AF knowledge compared to baseline or control and decision aids reduced decisional conflict in four of six studies. However, there were inconsistent effects of the studied decision aids on initiation of oral anticoagulation. Adherence to initial stroke prevention therapy choice appeared to benefit from decision aid use in 2 studies that addressed this issue.

Conclusions:

Decision aids for stroke prevention increased AF patients' knowledge and decisional confidence but had variable impacts on choice of and adherence to stroke prevention therapy. The results highlight the need for well-designed decision aids that present patients with all contemporary therapeutic options.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Rev Cardiovasc Med Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Rev Cardiovasc Med Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá