Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Perception of pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) prophylaxis in glioma patients receiving concurrent temozolomide and radiation- a patient and physician survey.
Beltran-Bless, Ana-Alicia; Alshamsan, Bader; Jia, Jason; Lo, Victor; Climans, Seth; Nicholas, Garth; Ng, Terry L.
Afiliação
  • Beltran-Bless AA; Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa and the Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada.
  • Alshamsan B; Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Qassim University, Qassim, 52571, Saudi Arabia.
  • Jia J; Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa and the Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada.
  • Lo V; Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa and the Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada.
  • Climans S; Department of Oncology, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
  • Nicholas G; Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa and the Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada.
  • Ng TL; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, K1Y 4E9, Canada.
J Neurooncol ; 2024 Aug 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39105955
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) prophylaxis is required by provincial and national drug monographs during glioma treatment using temozolomide (TMZ) concurrently with radiation (TMZ-RT). However, real-world data suggest the potential benefits of PJP prophylaxis may not outweigh its potential harms in this population.

METHODS:

We conducted a single-center patient survey and a national physician survey to explore the role of PJP prophylaxis amongst glioma patients undergoing TMZ-RT.

RESULTS:

23% (31/133) of physicians and 60% (44/73) of patients completed a survey. The median patient age was 42 (range 20-77); 85% (34/40) had completed adjuvant TMZ. Although only 2.4% (1/41) of patients received PJP prophylaxis, only one person (without PJP prophylaxis) was hospitalized for pneumonia. When presented with hypothetical PJP risks, 13.2% (5/38) of patients were concerned about PJP infection, while 26% (10/38) were concerned about potential side effects from prophylactic antibiotics. Most physicians (77%, 17/22) perceived the evidence for PJP prophylaxis as weak; 58% (11/19) did not routinely prescribe prophylaxis, and 73% (16/22) felt that PJP prophylaxis should be limited to patients with additional risk factors. Over 95% of physicians estimated that the incidence of PJP was < 1% in their last 5 years of practice regardless of PJP prophylaxis. For 73% (16/22) of physicians, to prescribe PJP prophylaxis, the risk of PJP infection needed to be 3-8%.

CONCLUSION:

The current recommendation to routinely prescribe PJP prophylaxis in patients receiving TMZ-RT in the absence of other risk factors warrants reconsideration.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Neurooncol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Neurooncol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá