Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Partial nephrectomy in elderly patients: a systematic review and analysis of comparative outcomes.
Lasorsa, Francesco; Bignante, Gabriele; Orsini, Angelo; Bologna, Eugenio; Licari, Leslie Claire; Bertolo, Riccardo; Del Giudice, Francesco; Chung, Benjamin I; Pandolfo, Savio D; Marchioni, Michele; Fiori, Cristian; Ditonno, Pasquale; Lucarelli, Giuseppe; Autorino, Riccardo.
Afiliação
  • Lasorsa F; Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
  • Bignante G; Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA; Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy.
  • Orsini A; Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA; Urology Unit, Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University, Chieti, Italy.
  • Bologna E; Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Maternal-Child and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University Rome, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy.
  • Licari LC; Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Maternal-Child and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University Rome, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy.
  • Bertolo R; Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, AUOI Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
  • Del Giudice F; Department of Maternal-Child and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University Rome, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy.
  • Chung BI; Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Pandolfo SD; Department of Urology, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy; Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
  • Marchioni M; Urology Unit, Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University, Chieti, Italy.
  • Fiori C; Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy.
  • Ditonno P; Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
  • Lucarelli G; Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
  • Autorino R; Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA. Electronic address: ricautor@gmail.com.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 50(10): 108578, 2024 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39121634
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The management of renal masses in the elderly population is particularly challenging, as these patients are often more frail and potentially more susceptible to surgical morbidity. This review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the outcomes of partial nephrectomy (PN) for treating renal masses in elderly individuals.

METHODS:

A systematic electronic literature search was conducted in May 2024 using the Medline (via PubMed) database by searching publications up to April 2024. The population, intervention, comparator, and outcome (PICO) model defined study eligibility. Studies were deemed eligible if assessing elderly patients (aged 70 years or older) (P) undergoing PN (I) with or without comparison between a different population (non-elderly) or a different treatment option (radical nephrectomy, ablation or active surveillance) (C) evaluating surgical, functional, and oncological outcomes (O).

RESULTS:

A total of 23 retrospective studies investigating the role of PN in elderly patients were finally included. PN emerged as a safe procedure also for older patients, demonstrating good outcomes. Preoperative evaluation of frailty status emerged to be paramount. Age alone was discredited as the sole reason to reject the use of PN. The main limitation is the retrospective nature of included studies and the lack of the assessment of elderly patients' frailty.

CONCLUSIONS:

The surgical treatment of renal masses in older patients is a challenging scenario. PN should be chosen over RN whenever possible since it can better preserve renal function. The use of minimally invasive techniques should be favored in this extremely fragile group of patients.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Renais / Nefrectomia Limite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Surg Oncol Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Renais / Nefrectomia Limite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Surg Oncol Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália