Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of the clinicoradiological features and outcomes of lymphoepithelioma-like cholangiocarcinoma and conventional intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A propensity score matching analysis.
Peng, Yan-Chih; Liao, Sih-Han; Tsai, Jia-Huei; Chen, Po-Ting; Chang, Chin-Chen; Kao, Jia-Horng; Liu, Kao-Lang.
Afiliação
  • Peng YC; Department of Medical Imaging, National Taiwan University Hospital Yunlin Branch, Yunlin, Taiwan.
  • Liao SH; Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Tsai JH; Department of Pathology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Chen PT; Department of Medical Imaging, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Chang CC; Department of Medical Imaging, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Kao JH; Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei City, Taiwan.
  • Liu KL; Department of Medical Imaging, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. Electronic address: kaolangliu@gmail.com.
J Formos Med Assoc ; 2024 Aug 14.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39147686
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/

PURPOSE:

Lymphoepithelioma-like cholangiocarcinoma (LELCC) is a rare variant of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). We aim to analyze the differences in the clinical and radiological features of LELCC and ICC.

METHODS:

Between January 2003 and December 2019, a total of 21 patients diagnosed with LELCC were retrospectively enrolled, and 84 patients with ICC were selected through propensity score matching by sex, age, and initial cancer stage. The clinical characteristics, pathological findings, and radiological features were analyzed. The differences in overall survival (OS) between LELCC and ICC were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS:

The serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) level was higher in the ICC group than in the LELCC group (77.9 vs 30.0 U/mL, p = 0.004). Non-rim arterial phase hyperenhancement (47.1% vs 13.7%, p = 0.005) and portovenous washout (35.3% vs 4.1%, p = 0.001) were more frequently observed in the LELCC group than in the ICC group. Intrahepatic duct dilatation was a distinct feature of the ICC group. The 5-year OS rates in the LELCC and ICC groups were 69.3% and 58.2%, respectively (p = 0.047). The 5-year OS of patients with stages I and II LELCC between ICC were not significantly different (90.0% vs 83.4%, p = 0.464). However, the 5-year OS of patients with stages III and IV LELCC was more favorable than that of patients with ICC (29.2% vs 23.0%, p = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS:

LELCC had a favorable outcome and several different clinicoradiological features compared with ICC.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Formos Med Assoc Assunto da revista: MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Taiwan

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Formos Med Assoc Assunto da revista: MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Taiwan