Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sustained Benefit of Zanubrutinib vs Ibrutinib in Patients With R/R CLL/SLL: Final Comparative Analysis of ALPINE.
Brown, Jennifer R; Eichhorst, Barbara; Lamanna, Nicole; O'Brien, Susan M; Tam, Constantine S; Qiu, Lugui; Jurczak, Wojciech; Zhou, Keshu; Simkovic, Martin; Mayer, Jirí; Gillespie-Twardy, Amanda; Ferrajoli, Alessandra; Ganly, Peter Stephen; Weinkove, Robert; Grosicki, Sebastian; Mital, Andrzej; Robak, Tadeusz; Osterborg, Anders; Yimer, Habte A; Wang, Megan Der Yu; Salmi, Tommi; Wang, Liping; Li, Jessica; Wu, Kenneth; Cohen, Aileen Cleary; Shadman, Mazyar.
Afiliação
  • Brown JR; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
  • Eichhorst B; University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
  • Lamanna N; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, United States.
  • O'Brien SM; Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center at UC Irvine Medical Center, Orange, California, United States.
  • Tam CS; Alfred Health and Monash University, East Melbourne, Australia.
  • Qiu L; State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematological Disorders, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Tianjin, China.
  • Jurczak W; Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Krakow, Poland.
  • Zhou K; Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China, Zhengzhou, China.
  • Simkovic M; 4th Department of Internal Medicine - Haematology, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, University Hospital and Charles University in Prague, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
  • Mayer J; University Hospital Brno.
  • Gillespie-Twardy A; Blue Ridge Cancer Care, Roanoke, Virginia, United States.
  • Ferrajoli A; the University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States.
  • Ganly PS; Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand.
  • Weinkove R; Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand Capital Coast & Hutt Valley, Wellington, New Zealand.
  • Grosicki S; Silesian Medical University in Katowice, Chorzow, Poland.
  • Mital A; Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
  • Robak T; Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
  • Osterborg A; Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Yimer HA; Texas Oncology, Tyler, Texas, United States.
  • Wang MY; BeiGene USA, Inc., San Mateo, California, United States.
  • Salmi T; BeiGene International GmbH, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Wang L; BeiGene (Beijing) Co., Ltd., China.
  • Li J; Beigene, San Mateo,, California, United States.
  • Wu K; BeiGene USA, Inc., San Mateo, California, United States.
  • Cohen AC; BeiGene, San mateo, California, United States.
  • Shadman M; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Blood ; 2024 Sep 24.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39316666
ABSTRACT
ALPINE (NCT03734016) established the superiority of zanubrutinib over ibrutinib in patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia and small lymphocytic lymphoma (R/R CLL/SLL); here we present data from the final comparative analysis with extended follow-up. Overall, 652 patients received zanubrutinib (n=327) or ibrutinib (n=325). At an overall median follow-up of 42.5 months, progression-free survival benefit with zanubrutinib vs ibrutinib was sustained (HR 0.68 [95% CI, 0.54-0.84]), including in patients with del(17p)/TP53 mutation (HR 0.51 [95% CI, 0.33-0.78]) and across multiple sensitivity analyses. Overall response rate remained higher with zanubrutinib compared with ibrutinib (85.6% vs 75.4%); responses deepened over time with complete response/complete response with incomplete bone marrow recovery rates of 11.6% (zanubrutinib) and 7.7% (ibrutinib). While median overall survival has not been reached in either treatment group, fewer zanubrutinib patients have died than ibrutinib patients (HR 0.77 [95% CI, 0.55-1.06]). With median exposure time of 41.2 and 37.8 months in zanubrutinib and ibrutinib arms, respectively, the most common non-hematologic adverse events included COVID-19-related infection (46.0% vs 33.3%), diarrhea (18.8% vs 25.6%), upper respiratory tract infection (29.3% vs 19.8%), and hypertension (27.2% vs 25.3%). Cardiac events were lower with zanubrutinib (25.9% vs 35.5%) despite similar rates of hypertension. Incidence of atrial fibrillation/flutter was lower with zanubrutinib vs ibrutinib (7.1% vs 17.0%); no cardiac deaths were reported with zanubrutinib vs six cardiac deaths with ibrutinib. This analysis, at 42.5 months median follow-up, demonstrates that zanubrutinib remains more efficacious than ibrutinib with an improved overall safety/tolerability profile.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Blood Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Blood Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos