Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 21.873
Filtrar
1.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 155(3): 1735-1746, 2024 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38436425

RESUMO

Fan sounds are often quantified using A-weighted sound pressure levels, silently acknowledging their limitations to fully capture the perceived unpleasantness. To overcome this limitation, level adjustments are a way to quantify the subjective preference of spectrally different sounds in listening experiments by adjusting the level of a test sound until it is equally preferred to a fixed reference sound. Since equal loudness contours differ, depending on the overall level, level adjustments might vary for different levels of the reference sound. This study aims to quantify the effects of spectral manipulations on level adjustments for loudness and preference judgements at reference sound pressure levels of either 45, 60, or 75 dB(A). Level adjustments of up to 12 dB were measured to make the stimuli equally preferred to the reference, particularly for sounds with prominent high-frequency components. The loudness and preference judgements were closely linked with each other, but an offset of about 3.5 dB at a reference level of 45 dB(A) indicates that equal loudness is not synonymous with equal preference. A linear regression model to predict level adjustments based on the reference level and an index reflecting the ratio of mid- to high-frequency loudness explains 73% of the variance.


Assuntos
Julgamento , Som , Modelos Lineares
2.
Sci Adv ; 10(9): eadi9294, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38427730

RESUMO

Previous research shows that the beauty of natural images is already determined during perceptual analysis. However, it is unclear which perceptual computations give rise to the perception of beauty. Here, we tested whether perceived beauty is predicted by spatial integration across an image, a perceptual computation that reduces processing demands by aggregating image parts into more efficient representations of the whole. We quantified integrative processing in an artificial deep neural network model, where the degree of integration was determined by the amount of deviation between activations for the whole image and its constituent parts. This quantification of integration predicted beauty ratings for natural images across four studies with different stimuli and designs. In a complementary functional magnetic resonance imaging study, we show that integrative processing in human visual cortex similarly predicts perceived beauty. Together, our results establish integration as a computational principle that facilitates perceptual analysis and thereby mediates the perception of beauty.


Assuntos
Córtex Visual , Percepção Visual , Humanos , Visão Ocular , Córtex Visual/diagnóstico por imagem , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Julgamento , Mapeamento Encefálico
3.
Cogn Sci ; 48(3): e13422, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38482688

RESUMO

People can be uncertain in their moral judgments. Philosophers have argued that such uncertainty can either refer to the underlying empirical facts (empirical uncertainty) or to the normative evaluation of these facts itself (normative uncertainty). Psychological investigations of this distinction, however, are rare. In this paper, we combined factor-analytical and experimental approaches to show that empirical and normative uncertainty describe two related but different psychological states. In Study 1, we asked N = 265 participants to describe a case of moral uncertainty and to rate different aspects of their uncertainty about this case. Across this wide range of moral scenarios, our items loaded onto three reliable factors: lack of information, unclear consequences, and normative uncertainty. In Study 2, we confirmed this factor structure using predefined stimulus material. N = 402 participants each rated eight scenarios that systematically varied in their degree of uncertainty regarding the consequences of the described actions and in the value conflict that was inherent to them. The empirical uncertainty factors were mainly affected by the introduction of uncertainty regarding consequences, and the normative uncertainty factor was mainly affected by the introduction of value conflict. Our studies provide evidence that the distinction between empirical and normative uncertainty accurately describes a psychological reality. We discuss the relevance of our findings for research on moral judgments and decision-making, and folk metaethics.


Assuntos
Julgamento , Princípios Morais , Humanos , Incerteza
4.
PLoS One ; 19(3): e0295051, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38470901

RESUMO

Currently, most diagnoses of depression are evaluated by medical professionals, with the results of these evaluations influenced by the subjective judgment of physicians. Physiological studies have shown that depressed patients display facial movements, head posture, and gaze direction disorders. To accurately diagnose the degree of depression of patients, this paper proposes a comprehensive framework, Cross-Channel Attentional Depression Detection Network, which can automatically diagnose the degree of depression of patients by inputting information from the facial images of depressed patients. Specifically, the comprehensive framework is composed of three main modules: (1) Face key point detection and cropping for video images based on Multi-Task Convolutional Neural Network. (2) The improved Feature Pyramid Networks model can fuse shallow features and deep features in video images and reduce the loss of miniscule features. (3) A proposed Cross-Channel Attention Convolutional Neural Network can enhance the interaction between tensor channel layers. Compared to other methods for automatic depression identification, a superior method was obtained by conducting extensive experiments on the depression dataset AVEC 2014, where the Root Mean Square Error and the Mean Absolute Error were 8.65 and 6.66, respectively.


Assuntos
Julgamento , Médicos , Humanos , Movimento , Redes Neurais de Computação , Postura
5.
J Nurs Educ ; 63(3): 149-155, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38442394

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Nearly 17 years ago, the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR) was published to provide a common language and trajectory of students' development to think like a nurse. METHOD: This article traces the uses of the LCJR from creation to the present and cites lessons learned from its use. RESULTS: During the intervening years, the LCJR has been used effectively as a debriefing guide in simulation and as a research instrument, as well as for formative assessment. The LCJR has been translated or is in process in 19 languages besides English. CONCLUSION: This article provides evidence of the efficacy of the LCJR and discusses important lessons learned. [J Nurs Educ. 2024;63(3):149-155.].


Assuntos
Raciocínio Clínico , Julgamento , Humanos , Simulação por Computador , Idioma
7.
J Nurs Educ ; 63(3): 156-162, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38442395

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the extent to which clinical judgment is important in entry-level nursing practice. METHOD: A task analysis linkage study methodology based on a large-scale, comprehensive practice analysis was used for the study. The practice analysis validated more than 200 entry-level nursing tasks, and the linkage study sought to evaluate the importance of clinical judgment overall and for each specific task expectation. RESULTS: The results provide confirmatory evidence of the importance of clinical judgment. In addition, the work provides a comprehensive list of entry-level tasks and their associated clinical judgment importance. CONCLUSION: Clinical judgment is a vital skill at entry into the profession and is expected to grow over time. This study offers insights on the extent to which clinical judgment is a necessary skill and provides direct evidence of its importance for specific entry-level tasks. [J Nurs Educ. 2024;63(3):156-162.].


Assuntos
Raciocínio Clínico , Julgamento , Humanos
9.
J Nurs Educ ; 63(3): 182-185, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38442403

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The complexity of health care requires entry-level nurses to have competent clinical judgment skills. In response, a nursing program created Reflective Clinical Judgment Questions (RCJQ) to guide students in the development of clinical judgment. METHOD: The RCJQ incorporates the Clinical Judgment Measurement Model, the National Council of State Boards of Nursing's action questions, and the American Association of Colleges of Nursing's core competencies for professional nursing education. The RCJQ includes cognitive process questions and self-reflection questions aligned to the prelicensure subcompetencies to direct student thinking and build a routine for clinical decision making. RESULTS: The RCJQ provides faculty with a framework to teach clinical judgment and incorporates self-reflective questions to guide decision making for safe and effective client care. CONCLUSION: The RCJQ streamlines the clinical judgment process and guides students to achieve essential outcomes in classroom, clinical, and simulation settings to prepare for clinical practice. [J Nurs Educ. 2024;63(3):182-185.].


Assuntos
Julgamento , Estudantes , Humanos , Raciocínio Clínico , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Competência Clínica
10.
J Nurs Educ ; 63(3): 188-191, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38442392

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is a growing demand for classroom creativity to increase engagement and build clinical judgment skills for nursing students. This article describes the design and implementation of an interactive classroom activity to enhance the development of clinical judgment while simultaneously orienting students to the new NCLEX Next Generation testing model. METHOD: Faculty developed an interactive unfolding case study incorporating the six dimensions of the NCSBN Clinical Judgment Measurement Model. The case study question types were adapted to use an interactive learning platform for first-year nursing students. Students' perceptions of learning, engagement, and clinical judgment were surveyed. RESULTS: Student responses regarding the case study implementation indicated this method was effective in maintaining engagement and persistence, as well as promoting nursing decision making. CONCLUSION: The time used for building innovative classroom activities is well spent to meet the objective of enhancing clinical judgment in the next generation of nursing students. [J Nurs Educ. 2024;63(3):188-191.].


Assuntos
Estudantes de Enfermagem , Humanos , Competência Clínica , Raciocínio Clínico , Julgamento , Aprendizagem
11.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 5108, 2024 03 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38429404

RESUMO

Self-agency is the awareness of being the agent of one's own thoughts and actions. Self-agency is essential for interacting with the outside world (reality-monitoring). The medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) is thought to be one neural correlate of self-agency. We investigated whether mPFC activity can causally modulate self-agency on two different tasks of speech-monitoring and reality-monitoring. The experience of self-agency is thought to result from making reliable predictions about the expected outcomes of one's own actions. This self-prediction ability is necessary for the encoding and memory retrieval of one's own thoughts during reality-monitoring to enable accurate judgments of self-agency. This self-prediction ability is also necessary for speech-monitoring where speakers consistently compare auditory feedback (what we hear ourselves say) with what we expect to hear while speaking. In this study, 30 healthy participants are assigned to either 10 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to enhance mPFC excitability (N = 15) or 10 Hz rTMS targeting a distal temporoparietal site (N = 15). High-frequency rTMS to mPFC enhanced self-predictions during speech-monitoring that predicted improved self-agency judgments during reality-monitoring. This is the first study to provide robust evidence for mPFC underlying a causal role in self-agency, that results from the fundamental ability of improving self-predictions across two different tasks.


Assuntos
Memória , Fala , Humanos , Memória/fisiologia , Estimulação Magnética Transcraniana/métodos , Córtex Pré-Frontal/fisiologia , Julgamento
12.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 5591, 2024 03 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38454068

RESUMO

When someone violates a social norm, others may think that some sanction would be appropriate. We examine how the experience of emotions like anger and disgust relate to the judged appropriateness of sanctions, in a pre-registered analysis of data from a large-scale study in 56 societies. Across the world, we find that individuals who experience anger and disgust over a norm violation are more likely to endorse confrontation, ostracism and, to a smaller extent, gossip. Moreover, we find that the experience of anger is consistently the strongest predictor of judgments of confrontation, compared to other emotions. Although the link between state-based emotions and judgments may seem universal, its strength varies across countries. Aligned with theoretical predictions, this link is stronger in societies, and among individuals, that place higher value on individual autonomy. Thus, autonomy values may increase the role that emotions play in guiding judgments of social sanctions.


Assuntos
Asco , Humanos , Julgamento , Princípios Morais , Ira , Emoções
13.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 6434, 2024 03 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38499578

RESUMO

Perceptual grouping is impaired following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). This may affect visual size perception, a process influenced by perceptual grouping abilities. We conducted two experiments to evaluate visual size perception in people with self-reported history of mTBI, using two different size-contrast illusions: the Ebbinghaus Illusion (Experiment 1) and the Müller-Lyer illusion (Experiment 2). In Experiment 1, individuals with mTBI and healthy controls were asked to compare the size of two target circles that were either the same size or different sizes. The target circles appeared by themselves (no-context condition), or were surrounded by smaller or larger circles (context condition). Similar levels of accuracy were evident between the groups in the no-context condition. However, size judgements by mTBI participants were more accurate in the context condition, suggesting that they processed the target circles separately from the surrounding circles. In Experiment 2, individuals with mTBI and healthy controls judged the length of parallel lines that appeared with arrowheads (context condition) or without arrowheads (no context condition). Consistent with Experiment 1, size judgements by mTBI participants were more accurate than size judgements by control participants in the context condition. These findings suggest that mTBI influences size perception by impairing perceptual grouping of visual stimuli in near proximity.


Assuntos
Concussão Encefálica , Ilusões , Ilusões Ópticas , Humanos , Percepção Visual , Percepção de Tamanho , Julgamento
14.
J Vis ; 24(3): 5, 2024 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38506794

RESUMO

The ability of humans to identify and reproduce short time intervals (in the region of a second) may be affected by many factors ranging from the gender and personality of the individual observer, through the attentional state, to the precise spatiotemporal structure of the stimulus. The relative roles of these very different factors are a challenge to describe and define; several methodological approaches have been used to achieve this to varying degrees of success. Here we describe and model the results of a paradigm affording not only a first-order measurement of the perceived duration of an interval but also a second-order metacognitive judgement of perceived time. This approach, we argue, expands the form of the data generally collected in duration-judgements and allows more detailed comparison of psychophysical behavior to the underlying theory. We also describe a hierarchical Bayesian measurement model that performs a quantitative analysis of the trial-by-trial data calculating the variability of the temporal estimates and the metacognitive judgments allowing direct comparison between an actual and an ideal observer. We fit the model to data collected for judgements of 750 ms (bisecting 1500 ms) and 1500 ms (bisecting 3000 ms) intervals across three stimulus modalities (visual, audio, and audiovisual). This enhanced form of data on a given interval judgement and the ability to track its progression on a trial-by-trial basis offers a way of looking at the different roles that subject-based, task-based and stimulus-based factors have on the perception of time.


Assuntos
Metacognição , Percepção do Tempo , Humanos , Teorema de Bayes , Julgamento
15.
PLoS One ; 19(3): e0300893, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38512821

RESUMO

In the artistic sports program, the referee' scores directly determine the final results of the athletes. Wushu is a artistic sport that has a Chinese characteristic and has the potential to become an official competition at the Summer Olympic. In this study we tested whether a red uniform color affects Wushu Routine practitioners' ratings of athletes' position or movement of Wushu Routine. We also tested whether the effect varied depending on the gender of the athlete and the practitioner, and depending on whether female practitioners were in the ovulation phase of their menstrual cycle. Male (Experiment 1: N = 72) and female (Experiment 1: N = 72; Experiment 2: N = 52) participants who major in Wushu Routine were recruited to take a referee's perspective and rate the movement quality of male and female athletes wearing red or blue uniforms. The results of Experiment 1 showed that both male and female athletes wearing red uniform (compared to blue uniform) received higher ratings (p = .002, η2 = .066; p = .014, η2 = .043), and the red effect was especially strong when male practitioners rated female athletes (p = .002, η2 = .069). The results of Experiment 2, in an all-female sample, showed that in most cases there was no difference in ratings made by women in the ovulation and non-ovulation phases of their menstrual cycle, with the exception of their ratings of male athletes wearing red; in this condition, women gave higher ratings when they were in the ovulation phase of their cycle (p = .026). The results suggest that there is a red effect in an artistic sport like Wushu Routine, in which gender and the female menstrual cycle play an important role.


Assuntos
Julgamento , Artes Marciais , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Atletas , Ciclo Menstrual , Ovulação
16.
Traffic Inj Prev ; 25(3): 364-371, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38426905

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Given the prevalence of illegal mobile phone use while driving and reliance upon messaging campaigns in deterring the behavior, there is a need to explore to what extent comparative judgements may influence desired outcomes of such campaigns. This exploratory study investigated (a) the perceived relevance and influence of different mobile phone road safety campaigns within a sample of Queensland motorists who reported using their mobile phone while driving and (b) if these varied depending on whether participants believed that their crash risk whilst using a phone was higher (comparative pessimism), lower (comparative optimism) or similar to the same-age and sex driver. METHODS: A total of 350 licensed drivers residing within Queensland (Australia) were included in this study, of which 200 reported using their hand-held phone on some occasion. Participation involved completing a 20-25 min online anonymous survey, which included viewing three mobile phone road safety campaigns (injury-based, sanction-based and humor) and responding to questions about the perceived relevance and impact of each campaign. RESULTS: A total of 64 (32%) participants displayed comparative optimism, 50 displayed similar judgements (25%) and 86 (43%) exhibited comparative pessimism. First, it was found that the injury-based campaign was perceived to be significantly more relevant than the humor campaign. Second, whilst the relevance of each campaign did not vary as a function of group membership, the campaigns were significantly less relevant to those displaying comparative optimism relative to those with similar judgements and comparative pessimism. Finally, the injury-based campaign was perceived to be significantly more influential than the other campaigns. However, overall, participants displaying comparative optimism believed that they would be less influenced by the campaigns compared to those with comparative pessimism. CONCLUSIONS: Although preliminary, these findings suggest that low perceptions of risk may dilute or extinguish the desired behavioral outcomes of mobile phone road safety campaigns. Nonetheless, experimental research is needed to examine these effects directly.


Assuntos
Condução de Veículo , Telefone Celular , Humanos , Acidentes de Trânsito , Julgamento , Inquéritos e Questionários
17.
J Environ Manage ; 355: 120496, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38437742

RESUMO

The contamination detection technology helps in water quality management and protection in surface water. It is important to detect sudden contamination events timely from dynamic variations due to various interference factors in online water quality monitoring data. In this study, a framework named "Prediction - Detection - Judgment" is proposed with a method framework of "Time series increment - Hierarchical clustering - Bayes' theorem model". Time to detection is used as an evaluation index of contamination detection methods, along with the probability of detection and false alarm rate. The proposed method is tested with available public data and further applied in a monitoring site of a river. Results showed that the method could detect the contamination events with a 100% probability of detection, a 17% false alarm rate and a time to detection close to 4 monitoring intervals. The proposed index time to detection evaluates the timeliness of the method, and timely detection ensures that contamination events can be responded to and dealt with in time. The site application also demonstrates the feasibility and practicability of the framework proposed in this study and its potential for extensive implementation.


Assuntos
Julgamento , Abastecimento de Água , Teorema de Bayes , Qualidade da Água , Poluição da Água
18.
Cognition ; 246: 105758, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38442587

RESUMO

We propose a method to achieve better wisdom of crowds by utilizing anchoring effects. In this method, people are first asked to make a comparative judgment such as "Is the number of new COVID-19 infections one month later more or less than 10 (or 200,000)?" As in this example, two sufficiently different anchors (e.g., "10" or "200,000") are set in the comparative judgment. After this comparative judgment, people are asked to make their own estimates. These estimates are then aggregated. We hypothesized that the aggregated estimates using this method would be more accurate than those without anchor presentation. To examine the effectiveness of the proposed method, we conducted three studies: a computer simulation and two behavioral experiments (numerical estimation of perceptual stimuli and estimation of new COVID-19 infections by physicians). Through computer simulations, we could identify situations in which the proposed method is effective. Although the proposed method is not always effective (e.g., when a group can make fairly accurate estimations), on average, the proposed method is more likely to achieve better wisdom of crowds. In particular, when a group cannot make accurate estimations (i.e., shows biases such as overestimation or underestimation), the proposed method can achieve better wisdom of crowds. The results of the behavioral experiments were consistent with the computer simulation findings. The proposed method achieved better wisdom of crowds. We discuss new insights into anchoring effects and methods for inducing diverse opinions from group members.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Julgamento , Humanos , Simulação por Computador , Aglomeração
19.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 5400, 2024 03 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38443486

RESUMO

Neurotypical (NT) individuals and individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) make different judgments of social traits from others' faces; they also exhibit different social emotional responses in social interactions. A common hypothesis is that the differences in face perception in ASD compared with NT is related to distinct social behaviors. To test this hypothesis, we combined a face trait judgment task with a novel interpersonal transgression task that induces measures social emotions and behaviors. ASD and neurotypical participants viewed a large set of naturalistic facial stimuli while judging them on a comprehensive set of social traits (e.g., warm, charismatic, critical). They also completed an interpersonal transgression task where their responsibility in causing an unpleasant outcome to a social partner was manipulated. The purpose of the latter task was to measure participants' emotional (e.g., guilt) and behavioral (e.g., compensation) responses to interpersonal transgression. We found that, compared with neurotypical participants, ASD participants' self-reported guilt and compensation tendency was less sensitive to our responsibility manipulation. Importantly, ASD participants and neurotypical participants showed distinct associations between self-reported guilt and judgments of criticalness from others' faces. These findings reveal a novel link between perception of social traits and social emotional responses in ASD.


Assuntos
Transtorno do Espectro Autista , Transtorno Autístico , Humanos , Julgamento , Emoções , Culpa
20.
Artif Intell Med ; 149: 102769, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38462271

RESUMO

AI has long been regarded as a panacea for decision-making and many other aspects of knowledge work; as something that will help humans get rid of their shortcomings. We believe that AI can be a useful asset to support decision-makers, but not that it should replace decision-makers. Decision-making uses algorithmic analysis, but it is not solely algorithmic analysis; it also involves other factors, many of which are very human, such as creativity, intuition, emotions, feelings, and value judgments. We have conducted semi-structured open-ended research interviews with 17 dermatologists to understand what they expect from an AI application to deliver to medical diagnosis. We have found four aggregate dimensions along which the thinking of dermatologists can be described: the ways in which our participants chose to interact with AI, responsibility, 'explainability', and the new way of thinking (mindset) needed for working with AI. We believe that our findings will help physicians who might consider using AI in their diagnosis to understand how to use AI beneficially. It will also be useful for AI vendors in improving their understanding of how medics want to use AI in diagnosis. Further research will be needed to examine if our findings have relevance in the wider medical field and beyond.


Assuntos
Julgamento , Médicos , Humanos , Emoções
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...