Evaluación de la eficacia de la N-acetilcisteína y la bromhexina en comparación con la atención estándar en la prevención de la hospitalización de pacientes ambulatorios con COVID-19: un ensayo clínico aleatorizado doble ciego / Evaluation of the efficacy of N-acetylcysteine and bromhexine compared with standard care in preventing hospitalization of outpatients with COVID-19: a double blind randomized clinical trial

Introducción y objetivo Desde su aparición en diciembre de 2019, la enfermedad por coronavirus causada por el síndrome respiratorio agudo severo coronavirus2 se ha convertido en una emergencia mundial, propagándose rápidamente por todo el mundo. En respuesta a la derivación temprana de estos pacientes a centros de salud ambulatorios, decidimos buscar tratamientos más eficaces en las primeras etapas de su derivación. Este estudio tiene como objetivo prevenir tanto la progresión como el deterioro de las condiciones físicas de los pacientes con COVID-19, reducir la tasa de derivaciones y mitigar los riesgos de hospitalización y de muerte. Material y métodos Realizado en el Centro Terapéutico Dibaj, ciudad de Hamadan, Irán, un ensayo controlado aleatorizado doble ciego abarcó 225 pacientes con COVID-19 de abril a septiembre de 2022. Se obtuvo la aprobación ética de la Universidad de Ciencias Médicas de Hamadan (Aprobación n.° IR.UMSHA .REC.1400.957), con el protocolo registrado en el Registro Iraní de Ensayos Clínicos (Registro n.° IRCT20220302054167N1). Los pacientes cumplieron con el diagnóstico de COVID-19 a través de la presentación de síntomas y la confirmación por PCR, excluyendo aquellos con antecedentes de vacunas y afectación de órganos. Los pacientes con una saturación de oxígeno superior al 92% se asignaron a tres grupos: el grupoA recibió N-acetilcisteína, el grupoB recibió bromhexina y el grupoC recibió atención estándar. Los seguimientos de los niveles de oxígeno, los síntomas y las necesidades de hospitalización se realizaron los días7 y 14, con pacientes hospitalizados monitorizados durante un mes después de la hospitalización. Resultados El estudio encontró que tanto la N-acetilcisteína como la bromhexina pueden reducir efectivamente las tasas de hospitalización y la mortalidad y acortar la duración de la hospitalización... (AU)

Introduction and aim Since its emergence in December 2019, the coronavirus disease caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus2 has become a global emergency, spreading rapidly worldwide. In response to the early referral of these patients to outpatient health centers, we decided to seek more effective treatments in the early stages of their referral. This study aims to prevent both the progression and deterioration of the physical conditions of COVID-19 patients, reduce the rate of referrals, and mitigate the risks of hospitalization and death. Material and methods Conducted at Dibaj Therapeutic Center, Hamadan City, Iran, a double-blind randomized controlled trial encompassed 225 COVID-19 patients from April to September 2022. Ethical approval was obtained from Hamadan University of Medical Sciences (Approval No.: IR.UMSHA.REC.1400.957), with the protocol registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (Registration No.: IRCT20220302054167N1). In this study, we included patients who tested positive for COVID-19 PCR and were symptomatic, excluding those who were pregnant or had received a COVID-19 vaccine. Patients with oxygen saturation above 92% were allocated to three groups: GroupA received N-acetylcysteine, GroupB received Bromhexine, and GroupC received standard care. Follow-ups on oxygen levels, symptoms, and hospitalization needs were conducted on days 7 and 14, with hospitalized patients monitored for one month post-hospitalization. Results The study found that both N-acetylcysteine and Bromhexine can effectively reduce hospitalization rates and mortality and shorten the duration of hospitalization. The third visit of patients who received N-acetylcysteine showed an increase of 1.33% in oxygen saturation compared to their first visit, and in patients who received Bromhexine, this increase was 1.19%. The mortality rate was 9.33% in the control group and zero in both groups of patients who received medication... (AU)

Evaluación de la eficacia de la N-acetilcisteína y la bromhexina en comparación con la atención estándar en la prevención de la hospitalización de pacientes ambulatorios con COVID-19: un ensayo clínico aleatorizado doble ciego / Evaluation of the efficacy of N-acetylcysteine and bromhexine compared with standard care in preventing hospitalization of outpatients with COVID-19: a double blind randomized clinical trial

Introducción y objetivo Desde su aparición en diciembre de 2019, la enfermedad por coronavirus causada por el síndrome respiratorio agudo severo coronavirus2 se ha convertido en una emergencia mundial, propagándose rápidamente por todo el mundo. En respuesta a la derivación temprana de estos pacientes a centros de salud ambulatorios, decidimos buscar tratamientos más eficaces en las primeras etapas de su derivación. Este estudio tiene como objetivo prevenir tanto la progresión como el deterioro de las condiciones físicas de los pacientes con COVID-19, reducir la tasa de derivaciones y mitigar los riesgos de hospitalización y de muerte. Material y métodos Realizado en el Centro Terapéutico Dibaj, ciudad de Hamadan, Irán, un ensayo controlado aleatorizado doble ciego abarcó 225 pacientes con COVID-19 de abril a septiembre de 2022. Se obtuvo la aprobación ética de la Universidad de Ciencias Médicas de Hamadan (Aprobación n.° IR.UMSHA .REC.1400.957), con el protocolo registrado en el Registro Iraní de Ensayos Clínicos (Registro n.° IRCT20220302054167N1). Los pacientes cumplieron con el diagnóstico de COVID-19 a través de la presentación de síntomas y la confirmación por PCR, excluyendo aquellos con antecedentes de vacunas y afectación de órganos. Los pacientes con una saturación de oxígeno superior al 92% se asignaron a tres grupos: el grupoA recibió N-acetilcisteína, el grupoB recibió bromhexina y el grupoC recibió atención estándar. Los seguimientos de los niveles de oxígeno, los síntomas y las necesidades de hospitalización se realizaron los días7 y 14, con pacientes hospitalizados monitorizados durante un mes después de la hospitalización. Resultados El estudio encontró que tanto la N-acetilcisteína como la bromhexina pueden reducir efectivamente las tasas de hospitalización y la mortalidad y acortar la duración de la hospitalización... (AU)

Introduction and aim Since its emergence in December 2019, the coronavirus disease caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus2 has become a global emergency, spreading rapidly worldwide. In response to the early referral of these patients to outpatient health centers, we decided to seek more effective treatments in the early stages of their referral. This study aims to prevent both the progression and deterioration of the physical conditions of COVID-19 patients, reduce the rate of referrals, and mitigate the risks of hospitalization and death. Material and methods Conducted at Dibaj Therapeutic Center, Hamadan City, Iran, a double-blind randomized controlled trial encompassed 225 COVID-19 patients from April to September 2022. Ethical approval was obtained from Hamadan University of Medical Sciences (Approval No.: IR.UMSHA.REC.1400.957), with the protocol registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (Registration No.: IRCT20220302054167N1). In this study, we included patients who tested positive for COVID-19 PCR and were symptomatic, excluding those who were pregnant or had received a COVID-19 vaccine. Patients with oxygen saturation above 92% were allocated to three groups: GroupA received N-acetylcysteine, GroupB received Bromhexine, and GroupC received standard care. Follow-ups on oxygen levels, symptoms, and hospitalization needs were conducted on days 7 and 14, with hospitalized patients monitored for one month post-hospitalization. Results The study found that both N-acetylcysteine and Bromhexine can effectively reduce hospitalization rates and mortality and shorten the duration of hospitalization. The third visit of patients who received N-acetylcysteine showed an increase of 1.33% in oxygen saturation compared to their first visit, and in patients who received Bromhexine, this increase was 1.19%. The mortality rate was 9.33% in the control group and zero in both groups of patients who received medication... (AU)

Evaluation of the efficacy of N-acetylcysteine and bromhexine compared with standard care in preventing hospitalization of outpatients with COVID-19: a double blind randomized clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION AND AIM: Since its emergence in December 2019, the coronavirus disease caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 has become a global emergency, spreading rapidly worldwide. In response to the early referral of these patients to outpatient health centers, we decided to seek more effective treatments in the early stages of their referral. This study aims to prevent both the progression and deterioration of the physical conditions of COVID-19 patients, reduce the rate of referrals, and mitigate the risks of hospitalization and death. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Conducted at Dibaj Therapeutic Center, Hamadan City, Iran, a double-blind randomized controlled trial encompassed 225 COVID-19 patients from April to September 2022. Ethical approval was obtained from Hamadan University of Medical Sciences (Approval No.: IR.UMSHA.REC.1400.957), with the protocol registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (Registration No. : IRCT20220302054167N1). In this study, we included patients who tested positive for COVID-19- PCR and were symptomatic, excluding those who were pregnant or had received a COVID-19 vaccine. Patients with oxygen saturation above 92% were allocated to three groups: Group A received N-acetylcysteine, Group B received Bromhexine, and Group C received standard care. Follow-ups on oxygen levels, symptoms, and hospitalization needs were conducted on days 7 and 14, with hospitalized patients monitored for one month post-hospitalization. RESULTS: The study found that both N-acetylcysteine and Bromhexine can effectively reduce hospitalization rates and mortality and shorten the duration of hospitalization. The third visit of patients who received N-acetylcysteine showed an increase of 1.33% in oxygen saturation compared to their first visit, and in patients who received Bromhexine, this increase was 1.19%. The mortality rate was 9.33% in the control group and zero in both groups of patients who received medication. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the results of this study indicate that NAC and bromhexine may be effective in the treatment of patients with positive COVID-19, with a lower hospitalization rate, shorter hospitalization, faster recovery time, and reduced mortality compared to the control group.

[Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of a combination drug containing ambroxol, guaifenesin, and levosalbutamol versus a fixed-dose combination of bromhexine/guaifenesin/salbutamol in the treatment of productive cough in adult patients with acute bronchitis].

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a combination drug containing ambroxol, guaifenesin, and levosalbutamol, oral solution, versus Ascoril Expectorant, syrup (combination of bromhexine, guaifenesin, and salbutamol) in the treatment of productive cough in adult patients with acute bronchitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This open-label, randomized, phase III study included patients with acute bronchitis who had a productive cough with difficulty in sputum expectoration. 244 patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio and received 10 mL of the study drug or reference drug 3 times daily for 2 weeks. After 7 and 14 days of treatment, the physician evaluated patient's subjective complaints and the efficacy of therapy. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with high and very high efficacy. RESULTS: The primary endpoint was reached by 70 (0.5738) patients in the study drug group and 54 (0.4426) in the reference drug group (p=0.04). The intergroup difference was 0.1311 [95% confidence interval: 0.0057; 0.2566]. The lower limit of the 95% confidence interval was above zero, which confirms the superiority of therapy with the study drug over therapy with Ascoril Expectorant. The proportion of patients with a 1-point total score reduction and with complete resolution of all symptoms according to the Modified Cough Relief and Sputum Expectoration Questionnaire after 7 and 14 days was numerically higher in the study drug group versus the reference drug group. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in the incidence of adverse events. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of a new combination drug containing ambroxol, guaifenesin, and levosalbutamol in the treatment of productive cough in adult patients with acute bronchitis is superior to the efficacy of Ascoril Expectorant. The safety profiles of the study drug and the reference drug were comparable.

Degradation kinetics and formation of regulated and emerging disinfection by-products during chlorination of two expectorants ambroxol and bromhexine.

Ambroxol hydrochloride (AMB) and bromhexine hydrochloride (BRO) are classic expectorants and bronchosecretolytic pharmaceuticals. In 2022, both AMB and BRO were recommended by medical emergency department of China to alleviate cough and expectoration for symptoms caused by COVID-19. The reaction characteristics and mechanism of AMB/BRO with chlorine disinfectant in the disinfection process were investigated in this study. The reaction of chlorine with AMB/BRO were well described by a second-order kinetics model, first-order in both AMB/BRO and chlorine. The second order rate reaction constant of AMB and BRO with chlorine at pH 7.0 were 1.15 × 102 M-1s-1 and 2.03 × 102 M-1s-1, respectively. During chlorination, a new class of aromatic nitrogenous disinfection by-products (DBPs) including 2-chloro-4, 6-dibromoaniline and 2, 4, 6-tribromoaniline were identified as the intermediate aromatic DBPs by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The effect of chlorine dosage, pH, and contact time on the formation of 2-chloro-4, 6-dibromoaniline and 2, 4, 6-tribromoaniline were evaluated. In addition, it was found that bromine in AMB/BRO were vital bromine source to greatly promote the formation of classic brominated DBPs, with the highest Br-THMs yields of 23.8% and 37.8%, respectively. This study inspired that bromine in brominated organic compounds may be an important bromine source of brominated DBPs.

Therapeutic potential of bromhexine for acute itch in mice: Involvement of TMPRSS2 and kynurenine pathway.

Itching is an unpleasant sensation on the skin that could negatively impact the quality of life. Over the years, many non-pharmacological and pharmacological approaches have been introduced to mitigate this burdensome condition; However, the effectiveness of these methods remains questioned. Bromhexine, derived from the Adhatoda vasica plant, is a safe drug with minimal side effects. It has been widely used in managing respiratory symptoms over the years. The results of our study revealed that bromhexine has the potential to alleviate acute itch induced by Compound 48/80, a known mast cell destabilizer. According to our findings, bromhexine exerts its antipruritic effects primarily by inhibiting the Transmembrane Protein Serine Protease 2 (TMPRSS2) and, to a lesser extent, by decreasing the activation of the Kynurenine Pathway (KP). We further investigated the KP involvement by administrating 1-Methyl Tryptophan (1-MT), a known indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) inhibitor. 1-MT was found to be effective in reducing the itch itself. Moreover, co-administration of bromhexine and 1-MT resulted in synergistic antipruritic effects, suggesting that KP plays a role in acute itch. To conclude, we have presented for the first time a repositioning of bromhexine as a treatment for acute itch. In addition, we addressed the involvement of TMPRSS2 and KP in this process.

Effect of bromhexine in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Bromhexine is a potent inhibitor of transmembrane serine protease 2 and appears to have an antiviral effect in controlling influenza and parainfluenza infection; however, its efficacy in COVID-19 is controversial. METHODS: A group of hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia were randomized using 1:1 allocation to either standard treatment lopinavir/ritonavir and interferon beta-1a or bromhexine 8 mg four times a day in addition to standard therapy. The primary outcome was clinical improvement within 28 days, and the secondary outcome measures were time to hospital discharge, all-cause mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, the temporal trend in 2019-nCoV reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction positivity and the frequency of adverse drug events within 28 days from the start of medication. RESULTS: A total of 111 patients were enrolled in this randomized clinical trial and data from 100 patients (48 patients in the treatment arm and 52 patients in the control arm) were analyzed. There was no significant difference in the primary outcome of this study, which was clinical improvement. There was no significant difference in the average time to hospital discharge between the two arms. There were also no differences observed in the mean intensive care unit stay, frequency of intermittent mandatory ventilation, duration of supplemental oxygenation or risk of death by day 28 noted between the two arms. CONCLUSION: Bromhexine is not an effective treatment for hospitalized patients with COVID-19. The potential prevention benefits of bromhexine in asymptomatic postexposure or with mild infection managed in the community remain to be determined.

Normal-Phase TLC and Gradient Reversed-Phase HPLC for the Simultaneous Determination of Enrofloxacin and Bromhexine HCl in Presence of Two of Their Official Impurities.

In this work, two chromatographic methods are developed and validated for the determination of enrofloxacin and bromhexine (BRM) HCl in the presence of two of their specified impurities, ciprofloxacin and BRM impurity C. The suggested chromatographic methods included the use of thin layer chromatography (TLC-densitometry) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). In case of TLC-densitometry, good separation was achieved by using mobile phase of n.butanol:acetone:water:glacial acetic acid:triethylamine (10:3:1:0.5:0.5, by volume) on silica gel stationary phase at 254-nm detection. The developed HPLC method used BDS HYPERSIL C18 column with a mobile phase of water:acetonitrile:methanol:triflouroacetic acid. A linear gradient elution of 75-10%, 20-50% and 5-40% for water, acetonitrile and methanol, respectively, was applied in 13 min at a flow rate of 1.5 mL min-1. These methods were sufficient to separate the four substances simultaneously, and they are validated as per International Conference on Harmonization guidelines.

Kinetics of Drug Molecule Interactions with a Newly Developed Nano-Gold-Modified Spike Protein Electrochemical Receptor Sensor.

In March 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared COVID-19 a pandemic, and the spike protein has been reported to be an important drug target for anti-COVID-19 treatment. As such, in this study, we successfully developed a novel electrochemical receptor biosensor by immobilizing the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and using AuNPs-HRP as an electrochemical signal amplification system. Moreover, the time-current method was used to quantify seven antiviral drug compounds, such as arbidol and chloroquine diphosphate. The results show that the spike protein and the drugs are linearly correlated within a certain concentration range and that the detection sensitivity of the sensor is extremely high. In the low concentration range of linear response, the kinetics of receptor-ligand interactions are similar to that of an enzymatic reaction. Among the investigated drug molecules, bromhexine exhibits the smallest Ka value, and thus, is most sensitively detected by the sensor. Hydroxychloroquine exhibits the largest Ka value. Molecular docking simulations of the spike protein with six small-molecule drugs show that residues of this protein, such as Asp, Trp, Asn, and Gln, form hydrogen bonds with the -OH or -NH2 groups on the branched chains of small-molecule drugs. The electrochemical receptor biosensor can directly quantify the interaction between the spike protein and drugs such as abidor and hydroxychloroquine and perform kinetic studies with a limit of detection 3.3 × 10-20 mol/L, which provides a new research method and idea for receptor-ligand interactions and pharmacodynamic evaluation.

Chromatographic analysis of bromhexine and oxytetracycline residues in milk as a drug analysis medium with greenness profile appraisal.

Tetracyclines are frequently employed in animal husbandry. Bromhexine is a mucolytic drug that improves the efficacy of tetracyclines. It has been reported that residues of tetracyclines in milk may have negative effects on humans. Two versatile and accurate methods were developed for concurrent analysis of oxytetracycline (OTC) and bromhexine (BR) residues in spiked milk samples. Sample preparation was carefully considered for extraction and cleanup using the ecofriendly chemicals acetic acid, 0.1 N EDTA and ethanol or methanol. The first method was a TLC-densitometric method in which TLC plates previously treated with 10% EDTA (pH 9 with 40% sodium hydroxide) were used as a stationary phase. A solvent mixture of methanol : methylene chloride : 2% aqueous acetic acid (8 : 2 : 0.5, by volume) was the developing system, and detection was carried out at 254 nm. Metformin was used as the internal standard, and linearity was achieved in the ranges of 0.2-10 and 0.04-2 µg per band for OTC and BR, respectively. The second method was a RP-HPLC method; separation was performed on a C18 column using an isocratic mixture of ethanol : 7.5% aqueous acetic acid (70 : 30, v/v). Separation was achieved within 10 minutes, and linearity was proven in the ranges of 0.05-50 and 0.05-30 µg mL-1 for OTC and BR, respectively. Diclofenac sodium was used as an internal standard. The proposed methods were validated in accordance with the FDA Center for Veterinary Medicine guidelines. Moreover, the performance and health and environmental impacts of the methods were evaluated using several greenness metrics, namely, the National Environmental Methods Index (NEMI), modified NEMI, Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI), Analytical Eco-Scale and Analytical GREEnness (AGREE) metric approaches. All the obtained results proved the validity of the developed methods concerning its performance and ecological effects. The methods can be used to investigate the presence of OTC residues in various marketed milk samples to maintain public health.

Direct detection of the crystal form of an active pharmaceutical ingredient in tablets by X-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy.

Different crystal forms of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) may display variations in physicochemical properties. During the drug development process, the definitive purpose is to maintain homogeneous quality in a single crystalline form. Hence, it is important to evaluate and understand the properties of each crystal form of APIs in pharmaceutics. In this study, forms 0, Ⅰ, Ⅱ, III of bromhexine hydrochloride, and form S of bromhexine were characterized by the commonly used methods X-ray powder diffraction, thermogravimetry-differential thermal analysis, and single crystal structure X-ray diffraction. Additionally, X-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy (XAFS), a seldom used method in the pharmaceutics discipline was also applied to explore the chemical environment of bromine atoms in forms 0, Ⅰ, Ⅱ and S as well as chloride ions in forms 0 to Ⅱ. The XAFS spectra of each form were different from each of the other forms which indicated the chemical environment around target elements in the crystal polymorphs were distinct. Then, we measured the commercial bromhexine hydrochloride tablets with XAFS measurement and found that XAFS could distinguish the crystal form in the tablets. Hence, we demonstrated that XAFS measurements would be applicable as one of the methods for the direct detection of APIs in the tablets.

Electrodeposition of Cobalt Oxides on Carbon Nanotubes for Sensitive Bromhexine Sensing.

We develop an electrochemical sensor for the determination of bromhexine hydrochloride (BHC), a widely use mucolytic drug. The sensor is prepared by electrodeposition of cobalt oxides (CoOx) on a glassy carbon electrode modified with carboxylated single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNT). A synergistic effect between CoOx and SWCNT is observed, leading to a significant improvement in the BHC electrooxidation current. Based on cyclic voltammetry studies at varying scan rates, we conclude that the electrochemical oxidation of BHC is under mixed diffusion-adsorption control. The proposed sensor allows the amperometric determination of BHC in a linear range of 10-500 µM with a low applied voltage of 0.75 V. The designed sensor provides reproducible measurements, is not affected by common interfering substances, and shows excellent performance for the analysis of BHC in pharmaceutical preparations.

[Bromhexine is a potential drug for COVID-19; From hypothesis to clinical trials].

COVID-19 (novel coronavirus disease 2019), caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, has various clinical manifestations and several pathogenic pathways. Although several therapeutic options have been used to control COVID-19, none of these medications have been proven to be a definitive cure. Transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2) is a protease that has a key role in the entry of SARS-CoV-2 into host cells. Following the binding of the viral spike (S) protein to the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors of the host cells, TMPRSS2 processes and activates the S protein on the epithelial cells. As a result, the membranes of the virus and host cell fuse. Bromhexine is a specific TMPRSS2 inhibitor that potentially inhibits the infectivity cycle of SARS-CoV-2. Moreover, several clinical trials are evaluating the efficacy of bromhexine in COVID-19 patients. The findings of these studies have shown that bromhexine is effective in improving the clinical outcomes of COVID-19 and has prophylactic effects by inhibiting TMPRSS2 and viral penetration into the host cells. Bromhexine alone cannot cure all of the symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, it could be an effective addition to control and prevent the disease progression along with other drugs that are used to treat COVID-19. Further studies are required to investigate the efficacy of bromhexine in COVID-19.

Inhibitory mechanism of Ambroxol and Bromhexine Hydrochlorides as potent blockers of molecular interaction between SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and human angiotensin-converting Enzyme-2.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infects the host cells through interaction of its spike protein with human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (hACE-2). High binding affinity between the viral spike protein and host cells hACE-2 receptor has been reported to enhance the viral infection. Thus, the disruption of this molecular interaction will lead to reduction in viral infectivity. This study, therefore, aimed to analyze the inhibitory potentials of two mucolytic drugs; Ambroxol hydrochlorides (AMB) and Bromhexine hydrochlorides (BHH), to serve as potent blockers of these molecular interactions and alters the binding affinity/efficiency between the proteins employing computational techniques. The study examined the effects of binding of each drug at the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the spike protein and the exopeptidase site of hACE-2 on the binding affinity (ΔGbind) and molecular interactions between the two proteins. Binding affinity revealed that the binding of the two drugs at the RBD-ACE-2 site does not alter the binding affinity and molecular interaction between the proteins. However, the binding of AMB (-56.931 kcal/mol) and BHH (-46.354 kcal/mol) at the exopeptidase site of hACE-2, significantly reduced the binding affinities between the proteins compared to the unbound, ACE-2-RBD complex (-64.856 kcal/mol). The result further showed the two compounds have good affinity at the hACE-2 site, inferring they might be potent inhibitors of hACE-2. Residue interaction networks analysis further revealed the binding of the two drugs at the exopeptidase site of hACE-2 reduced the number of interacting amino residues, subsequently leading to loss of interactions between the two proteins, with BHH showing better reduction in the molecular interaction and binding affinity than AMB. The result of the structural analyses additionally, revealed that the binding of the drugs considerably influences the dynamic of the complexes when compared to the unbound complex. The findings from this study suggest the binding of the two drugs at the exopeptidase site reduces the binding effectiveness of the proteins than their binding at the RBD site, and consequently might inhibit viral attachment and entry.

Facile approaches for determination of Bromhexine Hydrochloride and its active metabolite Ambroxol Hydrochloride using Eosin Y.

New validated Spectroscopic methods were developed to assay Bromhexine Hydrochloride and its active metabolite Ambroxol Hydrochloride separately in pure form and pharmaceutical formulations. The spectrophotometric assay (method I) shows complex formation between each of the drugs and Eosin Y at 540nm at pH 3.6 and 3.4mL of 4×10-4M Eosin for Bromhexine and Ambroxol. The Spectrofluorimetric assay (method II) depends on quenching eosin native fluorescence by the studied drugs, which measured at 540nm after excitation at 302nm. The spectrophotometric absorbance-concentration plot is rectilinear over the ranges (1.0-5.0) and (1.0-10.0) µg/mL for bromhexine and ambroxol with LOD of 0.31 and 0.14µg/mL and LOQ of 0.94 and 0.42µg/mL for the two drugs respectively. The fluorometric-concentration plot is linear along the range (1.0-5.0) µg/mL and (1-10) µg/mL for the two drugs respectively with LOD of 0.13µg/mL and 0.22µg/mL and LOQ of 0.4µg/mL and 0.65µg/mL for the two drugs, respectively. Developed assays have been validated in agreement with ICH recommendations and they were used in the analysis of commercial drug formulations containing the two mucolytic drugs and the results were matching with those obtained by the comparison method.

Bromhexine and its inhibitory effect on lipase - kinetics and structural study.

Lipase hydrolyses the ester bonds in triglyceride. It is an important enzyme in medicine and industry. Some pathogen bacteria use this exoenzyme to disrupt the extracellular matrix of host organisms. Pseudomonas uses various extracellular enzymes such as lipase to invade its host. In this report, for the first time, bromhexine was introduced as an inhibitor of lipase. Bromhexine is a mucolytic drug which is used in the treatment of respiratory tract disorders. The results showed that bromhexine inhibited the enzyme by competitive inhibition. IC50 and Ki values of the drug were 0.049 mM and 0.02 mM, respectively. Arrhenius plot showed that the drug reduced the activation energy. The enzyme was purified and SDS-PAGE showed that its molecular weight is 13 kDa. Fluorescence measurement revealed that binding of the drug to lipase could make structural changes in the enzyme. Inhibition of lipase by bromhexine could be applicable in medicine.

New prophylaxis regimen for SARS-CoV-2 infection in health professionals with low doses of hydroxychloroquine and bromhexine: a randomised, double-blind placebo clinical trial (ELEVATE Trial).

INTRODUCTION: SARS-CoV-2 infection in Mexico has caused ~2.7 million confirmed cases; around 20%-25% of health workers will be infected by the virus at their workplace, with approximately 4.4% of mortality. High infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 is related with cell entry mechanism, through the ACE receptor. SARS-CoV-2 requires transmembrane protease serine 2 to cleave its spike glycoprotein and ensure fusion of host cell and virus membrane. We propose studying prophylactic treatment with hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and bromhexine (BHH), which have been shown to be effective in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection progression when administered in early stages. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of HCQ and BHH as prophylactic treatments for SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthy health workers exposed to the virus. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Double-blind randomised clinical trial, with parallel allocation at a 1:1 ratio with placebo, of low doses of HCQ plus BHH, for 60 days. Study groups will be defined as follows: (1) HCQ 200 mg/day+BHH 8 mg/8 hours versus (2) HCQ placebo plus BHH placebo. Primary endpoint will be efficacy of both interventions for the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection, determined by the risk ratio of infected personnel and the absolute risk. At least a 16% reduction in absolute risk is expected between the intervention and placebo groups; a minimum of 20% infection is expected in the placebo group. The sample size calculation estimated a total of 214 patients assigned: two groups of 107 participants each. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol has been approved by the local Medical Ethics Committee (National Institute of Rehabilitation 'Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra', approval number INRLGII/25/20) and by the Federal Commission for Protection against Sanitary Risks (COFEPRIS, approval number 203 300 410A0058/2020). The results of the study will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated through conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04340349.

Simultaneous analysis of oxytetracycline hydrochloride, lidocaine, and bromhexine hydrochloride in the presence of many interfering excipients.

A gradient elution high-performance liquid chromatographic method with a diode array detector is introduced for the first time for the simultaneous estimation of three drugs, namely, oxytetracycline hydrochloride (OXT), lidocaine (LDC), and bromhexine hydrochloride (BRH), in a veterinary formulation (OxyClear® solution) that contains many interfering additives. The method used a C-8 column. The chromatographic eluting solution included acidified water (0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in water) and acetonitrile at a 1-ml/min flow rate and 254 nm as a nominated detection wavelength. The chromatographic process was assessed in terms of linearity, precision, accuracy, LOD, and LOQ. OXT, LDC, and BRH were linear in the range of 1-60, 5-100, and 1-60 µg/ml, respectively. The three drugs were determined successfully without the interference of three excipients having UV absorbances. Furthermore, the purities of the peaks of the three drugs were confirmed by comparing the UV spectra of investigated peaks to the UV reference spectra in Clarke's Analysis of Drugs and Poisons. The greenness value of the method was 0.69 with a faint green-colored pictogram using the AGREE tool. These merits recommend the application of the planned method in QC laboratories for purity testing and concentration assays for the pure drugs and commercial formulations.

[Stability of Six Drugs in Total Parenteral Nutrition Solution].

Elneopa NF No. 1 and No. 2 infusions are total parenteral nutrition solutions packaged in four-chambered infusion bags. They have been used as home parenteral nutrition, with various drugs injected into the infusion bags, for treating patient symptoms. In this study, we investigated the stability of six drugs, including famotidine, scopolamine butylbromide, furosemide, bromhexine hydrochloride, betamethasone sodium phosphate, and metoclopramide hydrochloride in the infusion bags under dark conditions at 4℃ for 7 days. Additionally, we developed a high-performance liquid chromatography method to determine drug concentrations in the infusions. The concentrations of injected famotidine, scopolamine butylbromide, and betamethasone sodium phosphate remained unchanged when the four chambers of Elneopa NF No. 1 and No. 2 were opened and the infusions were mixed. Their respective concentrations in the upper and lower chambers also remained unchanged. The concentration of furosemide in the upper chamber of the No. 1 infusion bag decreased after 5 days, although no change was observed in the other chambers and the mixed infusions with the four chambers opened. The concentration of bromhexine hydrochloride slightly decreased in the upper chambers (approximately 3%) after the co-infusion but decreased significantly in the other chambers and the mixed infusions with the four chambers opened. The concentration of metoclopramide hydrochloride significantly decreased in the upper chambers after the co-infusion; however, no change in concentration was observed in the other chambers and the mixed infusion with the four chambers opened. The results of this study provide useful information on home-based parenteral nutrition.

Interventions for treatment of COVID-19: Second edition of a living systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses (The LIVING Project).

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 is a rapidly spreading disease that has caused extensive burden to individuals, families, countries, and the world. Effective treatments of COVID-19 are urgently needed. This is the second edition of a living systematic review of randomized clinical trials assessing the effects of all treatment interventions for participants in all age groups with COVID-19. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We planned to conduct aggregate data meta-analyses, trial sequential analyses, network meta-analysis, and individual patient data meta-analyses. Our systematic review was based on PRISMA and Cochrane guidelines, and our eight-step procedure for better validation of clinical significance of meta-analysis results. We performed both fixed-effect and random-effects meta-analyses. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes were admission to intensive care, mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, quality of life, and non-serious adverse events. According to the number of outcome comparisons, we adjusted our threshold for significance to p = 0.033. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence. We searched relevant databases and websites for published and unpublished trials until November 2, 2020. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed trial methodology. We included 82 randomized clinical trials enrolling a total of 40,249 participants. 81 out of 82 trials were at overall high risk of bias. Meta-analyses showed no evidence of a difference between corticosteroids versus control on all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79 to 1.00; p = 0.05; I2 = 23.1%; eight trials; very low certainty), on serious adverse events (RR 0.89; 95% CI 0.80 to 0.99; p = 0.04; I2 = 39.1%; eight trials; very low certainty), and on mechanical ventilation (RR 0.86; 95% CI 0.55 to 1.33; p = 0.49; I2 = 55.3%; two trials; very low certainty). The fixed-effect meta-analyses showed indications of beneficial effects. Trial sequential analyses showed that the required information size for all three analyses was not reached. Meta-analysis (RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.82 to 1.07; p = 0.31; I2 = 0%; four trials; moderate certainty) and trial sequential analysis (boundary for futility crossed) showed that we could reject that remdesivir versus control reduced the risk of death by 20%. Meta-analysis (RR 0.82; 95% CI 0.68 to 1.00; p = 0.05; I2 = 38.9%; four trials; very low certainty) and trial sequential analysis (required information size not reached) showed no evidence of difference between remdesivir versus control on serious adverse events. Fixed-effect meta-analysis showed indications of a beneficial effect of remdesivir on serious adverse events. Meta-analysis (RR 0.40; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.87; p = 0.02; I2 = 0%; two trials; very low certainty) showed evidence of a beneficial effect of intravenous immunoglobulin versus control on all-cause mortality, but trial sequential analysis (required information size not reached) showed that the result was severely underpowered to confirm or reject realistic intervention effects. Meta-analysis (RR 0.63; 95% CI 0.35 to 1.14; p = 0.12; I2 = 77.4%; five trials; very low certainty) and trial sequential analysis (required information size not reached) showed no evidence of a difference between tocilizumab versus control on serious adverse events. Fixed-effect meta-analysis showed indications of a beneficial effect of tocilizumab on serious adverse events. Meta-analysis (RR 0.70; 95% CI 0.51 to 0.96; p = 0.02; I2 = 0%; three trials; very low certainty) showed evidence of a beneficial effect of tocilizumab versus control on mechanical ventilation, but trial sequential analysis (required information size not reached) showed that the result was severely underpowered to confirm of reject realistic intervention effects. Meta-analysis (RR 0.32; 95% CI 0.15 to 0.69; p < 0.00; I2 = 0%; two trials; very low certainty) showed evidence of a beneficial effect of bromhexine versus standard care on non-serious adverse events, but trial sequential analysis (required information size not reached) showed that the result was severely underpowered to confirm or reject realistic intervention effects. Meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses (boundary for futility crossed) showed that we could reject that hydroxychloroquine versus control reduced the risk of death and serious adverse events by 20%. Meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses (boundary for futility crossed) showed that we could reject that lopinavir-ritonavir versus control reduced the risk of death, serious adverse events, and mechanical ventilation by 20%. All remaining outcome comparisons showed that we did not have enough information to confirm or reject realistic intervention effects. Nine single trials showed statistically significant results on our outcomes, but were underpowered to confirm or reject realistic intervention effects. Due to lack of data, it was not relevant to perform network meta-analysis or possible to perform individual patient data meta-analyses. CONCLUSIONS: No evidence-based treatment for COVID-19 currently exists. Very low certainty evidence indicates that corticosteroids might reduce the risk of death, serious adverse events, and mechanical ventilation; that remdesivir might reduce the risk of serious adverse events; that intravenous immunoglobin might reduce the risk of death and serious adverse events; that tocilizumab might reduce the risk of serious adverse events and mechanical ventilation; and that bromhexine might reduce the risk of non-serious adverse events. More trials with low risks of bias and random errors are urgently needed. This review will continuously inform best practice in treatment and clinical research of COVID-19. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020178787.