fNIRS analysis of rostral prefrontal cortex activity and perception of inspiratory loads.

It is well-established that the brainstem is responsible for the automatic control of breathing, however, cortical areas control perception and conscious breathing. This study investigated activity in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) during breathing difficulty using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). It was hypothesized that extrinsic inspiratory loads will elicit regional changes in PFC activity and increased perception ratings, as a function of load magnitude and type. Participants were exposed to varying magnitudes of resistive (R) and pressure threshold (PT) inspiratory loads to increase breathing effort. Perception ratings of breathing effort and load magnitude were positively correlated (p < 0.05). PT loads were rated more effortful than R loads (p < 0.05). Differences in perceived effort were a function of inspiratory pressure-time-product (PTP) and inspiratory work of breathing (WoB). PFC activity increased with the largest PT load (p < 0.01), suggesting that the PFC is involved in processing respiratory stimuli. The results support the hypothesis that the PFC is an element of the neural network mediating effortful breathing perception.

A Systematic Review of Methods Used to Determine the Work of Breathing during Exercise.

INTRODUCTION: Measurement of the work of breathing (Wb) during exercise provides useful insights into the energetics and mechanics of the respiratory muscles across a wide range of minute ventilations. The methods and analytical procedures used to calculate the Wb during exercise have yet to be critically appraised in the literature. PURPOSE: The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the quality of methods used to measure the Wb during exercise in the available literature. METHODS: We conducted an extensive search of three databases for studies that measured the Wb during exercise in adult humans. Data were extracted on participant characteristics, flow/volume and pressure devices, esophageal pressure (P oes ) catheters, and methods of Wb analysis. RESULTS: A total of 120 articles were included. Flow/volume sensors used were primarily pneumotachographs ( n = 85, 70.8%), whereas the most common pressure transducer was of the variable reluctance type ( n = 63, 52.5%). Esophageal pressure was frequently obtained via balloon-tipped catheters ( n = 114, 95.0%). Few studies mentioned calibration, frequency responses, and dynamic compensation of their measurement devices. The most popular method of measuring the Wb was pressure-volume integration ( n = 51, 42.5%), followed by the modified Campbell ( n = 28, 23.3%) and Dean & Visscher diagrams ( n = 26, 21.7%). Over one-third of studies did not report the methods used to process their pressure-volume data, and the majority (60.8%) of studies used the incorrect Wb units and/or failed to discuss the limitations of their Wb measurements. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this systematic review highlight the need for the development of a standardized approach for measuring Wb, which is informative, practical, and accessible for future researchers.

Work of breathing and lung volume during forward leaning supported by the upper limbs.

This study compared work of breathing (WOB) and the pressure time product (PTP) to verify whether WOB and PTP decrease in the forward-leaning posture compared with erect sitting. Seven healthy adults (two females and five males) adopted three sitting postures: upright, and two forward-leaning postures of 15° and 30°. The WOB was obtained using the modified Campbell diagram, and PTP was calculated as the time integral of the area between esophageal and chest wall pressure. End-expiratory lung volume and transpulmonary pressure were significantly increased in the 15° and 30° forward-leaning postures compared with erect sitting (p â‰¦ 0.05). End-inspiratory lung volume was significantly increased in the 30° forward-leaning posture compared to erect sitting (p â‰¦ 0.05). PTP and inspiratory resistive WOB were significantly lower in the 15° and 30° forward-leaning postures compared to erect sitting (p â‰¦ 0.05). Forward leaning increases lung volume, which may dilate the airways, decrease resistant WOB, and reduce respiratory muscle activity.

Work of Breathing During Proportional Assist Ventilation as a Predictor of Extubation Failure.

BACKGROUND: Despite decades of research on predictors of extubation success, use of ventilatory support after extubation is common and 10-20% of patients require re-intubation. Proportional assist ventilation (PAV) mode automatically calculates estimated total work of breathing (total WOB). Here, we assessed the performance of total WOB to predict extubation failure in invasively ventilated subjects. METHODS: This prospective observational study was conducted in 6 adult ICUs at an academic medical center. We enrolled intubated subjects who successfully completed a spontaneous breathing trial, had a rapid shallow breathing index < 105 breaths/min/L, and were deemed ready for extubation by the primary team. Total WOB values were recorded at the end of a 30-min PAV trial. Extubation failure was defined as any respiratory support and/or re-intubation within 72 h of extubation. We compared total WOB scores between groups and performance of total WOB for predicting extubation failure with receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: Of 61 subjects enrolled, 9.8% (n = 6) required re-intubation, and 50.8% (n = 31) required any respiratory support within 72 h of extubation. Median total WOB at 30 min on PAV was 0.9 J/L (interquartile range 0.7-1.3 J/L). Total WOB was significantly different between subjects who failed or were successfully extubated (median 1.1 J/L vs 0.7 J/L, P = .004). The area under the curve was 0.71 [95% CI 0.58-0.85] for predicting any requirement of respiratory support and 0.85 [95% CI 0.69-1.00] for predicting re-intubation alone within 72 h of extubation. Total WOB cutoff values maximizing sensitivity and specificity equally were 1.0 J/L for any respiratory support (positive predictive value [PPV] 70.0%, negative predictive value [NPV] 67.7%) and 1.3 J/L for re-intubation (PPV 26.3%, NPV 97.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The discriminative performance of a PAV-derived total WOB value to predict extubation failure was good, indicating total WOB may represent an adjunctive tool for assessing extubation readiness. However, these results should be interpreted as preliminary, with specific thresholds of PAV-derived total WOB requiring further investigation in a large multi-center study.

Bench Assessment of Work of Breathing During a Spontaneous Breathing Trial on Zero Pressure Support and Zero PEEP Compared to T-Piece.

BACKGROUND: Analysis of observational data suggests that both a T-piece and zero pressure support ventilation (PSV) and zero PEEP impose work of breathing (WOB) during a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) similar to what a patient experiences after extubation. The aim of our study was to compare the WOB imposed by the T-piece with zero PSV and zero PEEP. We also compared the difference in WOB when using zero PSV and zero PEEP on 3 different ventilators. METHODS: This study was conducted by using a breathing simulator that simulated 3 lung models (ie, normal, moderate ARDS, and COPD). Three ventilators were used and set to zero PSV and zero PEEP. The outcome variable was WOB expressed as mJ/L of tidal volume. RESULTS: An analysis of variance showed that WOB was statistically different between the T-piece and zero PSV and zero PEEP on all the ventilators (Servo-i, Servo-u, and Carescape R860). The absolute difference was lowest for the Carescape R860, which increased WOB by 5-6%, whereas the highest for Servo-u, which reduced the WOB by 15-21%. CONCLUSIONS: Work may be imposed or reduced during spontaneous breathing on zero PSV and zero PEEP when compared to T-piece. The unpredictable nature of how zero PSV and zero PEEP behaves on different ventilators makes it an imprecise SBT modality in the context of assessing extubation readiness.

Effort and work-of-breathing parameters strongly correlate with increased resistance in an animal model.

BACKGROUND: Effort of Breathing (EOB) calculations may be a reliable alternative to Work of Breathing (WOB) calculations in which Respiratory Inductance Plethysmography (RIP) replaces spirometry. We sought to compare EOB and WOB measurements in a nonhuman primate model of increasing extrathoracic inspiratory resistance simulating upper airway obstruction (UAO). METHODS: RIP, spirometry, and esophageal manometry were measured in spontaneously breathing, intubated Rhesus monkeys utilizing 11 calibrated resistors randomly applied for 2-min. EOB was calculated breath-by-breath as Pressure Rate Product (PRP) and Pressure Time Product (PTP). WOB was calculated from the Pressure-Volume curve based on spirometry (WOBSPIR) or RIP flow (WOBRIP). RESULTS: WOB, PRP and PTP showed similar linear increases when exposed to higher levels of resistive loads. When comparing WOBSPIR to WOBRIP, a similar strong correlation was seen for both signals as resistance increased and there were no statistically significant differences. CONCLUSION: EOB and WOB parameters utilizing esophageal manometry and RIP, independent of spirometry, showed a strong correlation as a function of increasing inspiratory resistance in nonhuman primates. This allows several potential monitoring possibilities for non-invasively ventilated patients or situations where spirometry is not available. IMPACT: EOB and WOB parameters showed a strong correlation as a function of increasing inspiratory resistance in nonhuman primates. There was a strong correlation between spirometry-based WOB versus RIP-based WOB. To date, it has remained untested as to whether EOB is a reliable alternative for WOB and if RIP can replace spirometry in these measurements. Our results enable additional potential monitoring possibilities for non-invasively ventilated patients or situations where spirometry is not available. Where spirometry is not available, there is no need to apply a facemask post extubation to a spontaneously breathing, non-intubated infant to make objective EOB measurements.

The impact of kangaroo mother care on work of breathing and oxygen saturation in very low birth weight infants with respiratory insufficiency.

BACKGROUND: Kangaroo mother care (KMC) is defined as prolonged skin to skin care between a mother and infant with the infant lying in prone position on mom's chest. KMC decreases morbidity and mortality and promotes physiologic stability. The aim of this study is to measure work of breathing (WOB) during KMC in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants on non-invasive respiratory support. METHODS: A prospective observational pilot study was conducted comparing WOB indices during standard care (SC) and KMC. Respiratory inductive plethysmography (RIP) measured WOB indices non-invasively: phase angle and labored breathing index. VLBW infants who were stable on non-invasive respiratory support were randomized to receive RIP measurements during KMC or during SC first. Summary statistics and mixed linear models were used to compare WOB and vital signs. RESULTS: A total of 32 infants were consented for the study, data collection and analysis was completed on 28 infants. There were no significant differences in mean phase angle during KMC or SC (73.5±4.6 SE deg vs 66.8±3.9 SE deg, p = 0.25). No differences in WOB and vital signs were detected. Controlling for respiratory support or randomization/first location did not change the results. CONCLUSION: In this pilot cohort, infants demonstrated no differences in work of breathing indices or oxygen saturation during KMC or SC while receiving non-invasive respiratory support. KMC appears to be safe and well tolerated with no worsened WOB. Larger studies should be performed to confirm our findings.

Effects of Ketamine Infusion on Breathing and Encephalography in Spontaneously Breathing ICU Patients.

BACKGROUND: Preclinical studies suggest that ketamine stimulates breathing. We investigated whether adding a ketamine infusion at low and high doses to propofol sedation improves inspiratory flow and enhances sedation in spontaneously breathing critically ill patients. METHODS: In this prospective interventional study, twelve intubated, spontaneously breathing patients received ketamine infusions at 5 mcg/kg/min, followed by 10 mcg/kg/min for 1 h each. Airway flow, pressure, and esophageal pressure were recorded during a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) at baseline, and during the SBT conducted at the end of each ketamine infusion regimen. SBT consisted of one-minute breathing with zero end-expiratory pressure and no pressure support. Changes in inspiratory flow at the pre-specified time points were assessed as the primary outcome. Ketamine-induced change in beta-gamma electroencephalogram power was the key secondary endpoint. We also analyzed changes in other ventilatory parameters respiratory timing, and resistive and elastic inspiratory work of breathing. RESULTS: Ketamine infusion of 5 and 10 mcg/kg/min increased inspiratory flow (median, IQR) from 0.36 (0.29-0.46) L/s at baseline to 0.47 (0.32-0.57) L/s and 0.44 (0.33-0.58) L/s, respectively (p = .013). Resistive work of breathing decreased from 0.4 (0.1-0.6) J/l at baseline to 0.2 (0.1-0.3) J/l after ketamine 10 mcg/kg/min (p = .042), while elastic work of breathing remained unchanged. Electroencephalogram beta-gamma power (19-44 Hz) increased compared to baseline (p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: In intubated, spontaneously breathing patients receiving a constant rate of propofol, ketamine increased inspiratory flow, reduced inspiratory work of breathing, and was associated with an "activated" electroencephalographic pattern. These characteristics might facilitate weaning from mechanical ventilation.

Higher Work of Breathing During Exercise in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

BACKGROUND: It is unknown if pulmonary alterations in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) impact respiratory mechanics during exercise. RESEARCH QUESTION: Are the operating lung volumes, work of breathing (Wb), and power of breathing (Pb) abnormal in patients with HFpEF during exercise? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients with HFpEF (n = 8; median age, 71 years [interquartile range (IQR), 66-80 years]) and control participants (n = 9; median age, 68 years [IQR, 64-74 years]) performed incremental cycling to volitional exhaustion. Esophageal pressure, end-expiratory lung volume (EELV), inspiratory lung volume (EILV), and ventilatory variables were compared at similar absolute (30 and 50 L/min) and relative (45% of peak, 70% of peak, and 100% of peak) minute ventilation (V.E) during exercise. RESULTS: During exercise, EELVs were not different between patients with HFpEF and control participants (P > .13 for all). EILVs were lower in patients with HFpEF than control participants at 45% and 70% V.E peak (P < .03 for all). Dynamic lung compliance was lower in patients with HFpEF than control participants at 30 L/min, 50 L/min, 45% V.E peak, and 100% V.E peak (P < .04 for all). Compared with control participants, patients with HFpEF showed higher total Wb and Pb at 30 L/min (Wb: median, 1.08 J/L [IQR, 0.93-1.82 J/L] vs 0.52 J/L [IQR, 0.43-0.71 J/L]; Pb: median, 36 J/min [IQR, 30-59 J/min] vs 17 J/min [IQR, 11-23 J/min] and 50 L/min; Wb: median, 1.40 J/L [IQR, 1.27-1.68 J/L] vs 0.90 J/L [IQR, 0.74-1.05 J/L]; Pb: median, 73 J/min [IQR, 60-83 J/min] vs 45 J/min [IQR, 33-63 J/min]; P < .01 for all). At 30 and 50 L/min, inspiratory and expiratory resistive Wb and Pb were higher in patients with HFpEF than control participants (P < .04 for all). Total Wb was higher for patients with HFpEF than control participants at 45% of V.E peak (P = .02). Total Pb was higher for control participants than patients with HFpEF at 100% V.E peak because of higher inspiratory resistive Pb (P < .04 for both). INTERPRETATION: These data demonstrate the HFpEF syndrome is associated with pulmonary alterations eliciting a greater Pb during exercise resulting from greater inspiratory and expiratory resistive Pb.

Predicting tracheal work of breathing in neonates based on radiological and pulmonary measurements.

Tracheomalacia is an airway condition in which the trachea excessively collapses during breathing. Neonates diagnosed with tracheomalacia require more energy to breathe, and the effect of tracheomalacia can be quantified by assessing flow-resistive work of breathing (WOB) in the trachea using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling of the airway. However, CFD simulations are computationally expensive; the ability to instead predict WOB based on more straightforward measures would provide a clinically useful estimate of tracheal disease severity. The objective of this study is to quantify the WOB in the trachea using CFD and identify simple airway and/or clinical parameters that directly relate to WOB. This study included 30 neonatal intensive care unit subjects (15 with tracheomalacia and 15 without tracheomalacia). All subjects were imaged using ultrashort echo time (UTE) MRI. CFD simulations were performed using patient-specific data obtained from MRI (airway anatomy, dynamic motion, and airflow rates) to calculate the WOB in the trachea. Several airway and clinical measurements were obtained and compared with the tracheal resistive WOB. The maximum percent change in the tracheal cross-sectional area (ρ = 0.560, P = 0.001), average glottis cross-sectional area (ρ = -0.488, P = 0.006), minute ventilation (ρ = 0.613, P < 0.001), and lung tidal volume (ρ = 0.599, P < 0.001) had significant correlations with WOB. A multivariable regression model with three independent variables (minute ventilation, average glottis cross-sectional area, and minimum of the eccentricity index of the trachea) can be used to estimate WOB more accurately (R2 = 0.726). This statistical model may allow clinicians to estimate tracheal resistive WOB based on airway images and clinical data.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The work of breathing due to resistance in the trachea is an important metric for quantifying the effect of tracheal abnormalities such as tracheomalacia, but currently requires complex dynamic imaging and computational fluid dynamics simulation to calculate it. This study produces a method to predict the tracheal work of breathing based on readily available imaging and clinical metrics.

A Bench Comparison of the Effect of High-Flow Oxygen Devices on Work of Breathing.

BACKGROUND: Oxygen therapy via high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has been extensively used during the COVID-19 pandemic. The number of devices has also increased. We conducted this study to answer the following questions: Do HFNC devices differ from the original device for work of breathing (WOB) and generated PEEP? METHODS: Seven devices were tested on ASL 5000 lung model. Compliance was set to 40 mL/cm H2O and resistance to 10 cm H2O/L/s. The devices were connected to a manikin head via a nasal cannula with FIO2 set at 0.21. The measurements were performed at baseline (manikin head free of nasal cannula) and then with the cannula and the device attached with oxygen flow set at 20, 40, and 60 L/min. WOB and PEEP were assessed at 3 simulated inspiratory efforts (-5, -10, -15 cm H2O muscular pressure) and at 2 breathing frequencies (20 and 30 breaths/min). Data were expressed as median (first-third quartiles) and compared with nonparametric tests to the Optiflow device taken as reference. RESULTS: Baseline WOB and PEEP were comparable between devices. Over all the conditions tested, WOB was 4.2 (1.0-9.4) J/min with the reference device, and the relative variations from it were 0, -3 (2-4), 1 (0-1), -2 (1-2), -1 (1-2), and -1 (1-2)% with Airvo 2, G5, HM80, T60, V500, and V60 Plus devices, respectively, (P < .05 Kruskal-Wallis test). PEEP was 0.9 (0.3-1.5) cm H2O with Optiflow, and the relative differences were -28 (22-33), -41 (38-46), -30 (26-36), -31 (28-34), -37 (32-42), and -24 (21-34)% with Airvo 2, G5, HM80, T60, V500, and V60 Plus devices, respectively, (P < .05 Kruskal-Wallis test). CONCLUSIONS: WOB was marginally higher and PEEP marginally lower with devices as compared to the reference device.

Effect of pediatric ventilation weaning technique on work of breathing.

BACKGROUND: Ventilator liberation is one of the most challenging aspects in patients with respiratory failure. Most patients are weaned through a transition from full to partial respiratory support, whereas some advocate using a continuous spontaneous ventilation (CSV). However, there is little scientific evidence supporting the practice of pediatric ventilator liberation, including the timing of onset of and the approach to weaning mode. We sought to explore differences in patient effort between a pressure controlled continuous mode of ventilation (PC-CMV) [in this cohort PC assist/control (PC-A/C)] with a reduced ventilator rate and CSV, and to study changes in patient effort with decreasing PS. METHODS: In this prospective physiology cross-over study, we randomized children < 5 years to first PC-A/C with a 25% reduction in ventilator rate, or CSV (continuous positive airway pressure [CPAP] + PS). Patients were then crossed over to the other arm. Patient effort was measured by calculating inspiratory work of breathing (WOB) using the Campbell diagram (WOBCampbell), and by pressure-rate-product (PRP) and pressure-time-product (PTP). Respiratory inductance plethysmography (RIP) was used to calculate the phase angle. Measurements were obtained at baseline, during PC-A/C and CPAP + PS, and during decreasing set PS (maximum -6 cmH2O). RESULTS: Thirty-six subjects with a median age of 4.4 (IQR 1.5-11.9) months and median ventilation time of 4.9 (IQR 3.4-7.0) days were included. Nearly all patients (94.4%) were admitted with primary respiratory failure. WOBCampbell during baseline [0.67 (IQR 0.38-1.07) Joules/L] did not differ between CSV [0.49 (IQR 0.17-0.83) Joules/L] or PC-A/C [0.47 (IQR 0.17-1.15) Joules/L]. Neither PRP, PTP, ∆Pes nor phase angle was different between the two ventilator modes. Reducing pressure support resulted in a statistically significant increase in patient effort, albeit that these differences were clinically negligible. CONCLUSIONS: Patient effort during pediatric ventilation liberation was not increased when patients were in a CSV mode of ventilation compared to a ventilator mode with a ventilator back-up rate. Reducing the level of PS did not lead to clinically relevant increases in patient effort. These data may aid in a better approach to pediatric ventilation liberation. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov NCT05254691. Registered 24 February 2022.

Blood pressure and coeliac artery blood flow responses during increased inspiratory muscle work in healthy males.

NEW FINDINGS: What is the central question of this study? Increased work of breathing and the accumulation of metabolites have neural and cardiovascular consequences through a respiratory muscle-induced metaboreflex. The influence of the respiratory muscle-induced metaboreflex on splanchnic blood flow in humans remains unknown. What is the main finding and its importance? Coeliac artery blood flow decreased gradually during inspiratory resistive breathing, accompanied by a progressive increase in arterial blood pressure. It is possible that the respiratory muscle-induced metaboreflex contributes to splanchnic blood flow regulation. ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to clarify the effect of increasing inspiratory muscle work on coeliac artery blood flow. Eleven healthy young males completed the study. The subjects performed voluntary hyperventilation with or without inspiratory resistance (loading or non-loading trial; tidal volume of 40% of vital capacity and breathing frequency of 20 breaths/min). The loading trial was conducted with inspiratory resistance (40% of maximal inspiratory pressure) and was terminated when the subjects could no longer maintain the target tidal volume or breathing frequency. The non-loading trial was conducted without inspiratory resistance and was of the same duration as the loading trial. Arterial blood pressure was recorded using finger photoplethysmography, and coeliac artery blood flow was measured using Doppler ultrasound. Mean arterial blood pressure increased gradually during the loading trial (mean ± SD; from 89.0 ± 10.8 to 103.9 ± 17.3 mmHg) but not in the non-loading trial (from 88.7 ± 5.9 to 90.4 ± 9.9 mmHg). Coeliac artery blood flow and coeliac vascular conductance decreased gradually during the loading trial (from 601.2 ± 155.7 to 482.6 ± 149.5 mL/min and from 6.9 ± 2.2 to 4.8 ± 1.7 mL/min/mmHg, respectively) but were unchanged in the non-loading trial (from 630.7 ± 157.1 to 635.6 ± 195.7 mL/min and from 7.1 ± 1.8 to 7.2 ± 2.9 mL/min/mmHg, respectively). These results show that increasing inspiratory muscle work affects splanchnic blood flow regulation, and we suggest that this might be mediated by the inspiratory muscle-induced metaboreflex.

Respiratory drive, inspiratory effort, and work of breathing: review of definitions and non-invasive monitoring tools for intensive care ventilators during pandemic times. / Impulso, esfuerzo y trabajo respiratorio: revisión de definiciones y herramientas no invasivas de ventiladores de cuidados intensivos durante tiempos de pandemia.

Technological advances in mechanical ventilation have been essential to increasing the survival rate in intensive care units. Usually, patients needing mechanical ventilation use controlled ventilation to override the patients respiratory muscles and favor lung protection. Weaning from mechanical ventilation implies a transition towards spontaneous breathing, mainly using assisted mechanical ventilation. In this transition, the challenge for clinicians is to avoid under and over assistance and minimize excessive respiratory effort and iatrogenic diaphragmatic and lung damage. Esophageal balloon monitoring allows objective measurements of respiratory muscle activity in real time, but there are still limitations to its routine application in intensive care unit patients using mechanical ventilation. Like the esophageal balloon, respiratory muscle electromyography and diaphragmatic ultrasound are minimally invasive tools requiring specific training that monitor respiratory muscle activity. Particularly during the coronavirus disease pandemic, non invasive tools available on mechanical ventilators to monitor respiratory drive, inspiratory effort, and work of breathing have been extended to individualize mechanical ventilation based on patients needs. This review aims to identify the conceptual definitions of respiratory drive, inspiratory effort, and work of breathing and to identify non invasive maneuvers available on intensive care ventilators to measure these parameters. The literature highlights that although respiratory drive, inspiratory effort, and work of breathing are intuitive concepts, even distinguished authors disagree on their definitions.

Los avances tecnológicos de la ventilación mecánica han sido parte esencial del aumento de la sobrevida en las unidades de cuidados intensivos. Desde la conexión a la ventilación mecánica, comúnmente se utiliza ventilación controlada sin la consecuente participación de los músculos respiratorios del paciente, con el fin de favorecer la protección pulmonar. El retiro de la ventilación mecánica implica un periodo de transición hacia la respiración espontánea, utilizando principalmente ventilación mecánica asistida. En esta transición, el desafío de los clínicos es evitar la sub y sobre asistencia ventilatoria, minimizando el esfuerzo respiratorio excesivo, daño diafragmático y pulmonar inducidos por la ventilación mecánica. La monitorización con balón esofágico permite mediciones objetivas de la actividad muscular respiratoria en tiempo real, pero aún hay limitaciones para su aplicación rutinaria en pacientes ventilados mecánicamente en la unidad de cuidados intensivos. Al igual que el balón esofágico, la electromiografía de los músculos respiratorios y la ecografía diafragmática son herramientas que permiten monitorizar la actividad muscular de la respiración, siendo mínimamente invasivas y con requerimiento de entrenamiento específico. Particularmente, durante la actual pandemia de enfermedad por coronavirus se ha extendido el uso de herramientas no invasivas disponibles en los ventiladores mecánicos para monitorizar el impulso (drive), esfuerzo y trabajo respiratorio, para promover una ventilación mecánica ajustada a las necesidades del paciente. Consecuentemente, el objetivo de esta revisión es identificar las definiciones conceptuales de impulso, esfuerzo y trabajo respiratorio utilizadas en el contexto de la unidad de cuidados intensivos, e identificar las maniobras de medición no invasivas disponibles en los ventiladores de cuidados intensivos para monitorizar impulso, esfuerzo y trabajo respiratorio. La literatura destaca que, aunque los conceptos de impulso, esfuerzo y trabajo respiratorio se perciben intuitivos, no existe una definición clara. Asimismo, destacados autores los definen como conceptos diferentes.

Impulso, esfuerzo y trabajo respiratorio: revisión de definiciones y herramientas no invasivas de ventiladores de cuidados intensivos durante tiempos de pandemia / Respiratory drive, inspiratory effort, and work of breathing: review of definitions and non-invasive monitoring tools for intensive care ventilators during pandemic times

Los avances tecnológicos de la ventilación mecánica han sido parte esencial del aumento de la sobrevida en las unidades de cuidados intensivos. Desde la conexión a la ventilación mecánica, comúnmente se utiliza ventilación controlada sin la consecuente participación de los músculos respiratorios del paciente, con el fin de favorecer la protección pulmonar. El retiro de la ventilación mecánica implica un periodo de transición hacia la respiración espontánea, utilizando principalmente ventilación mecánica asistida. En esta transición, el desafío de los clínicos es evitar la sub y sobre asistencia ventilatoria, minimizando el esfuerzo respiratorio excesivo, daño diafragmático y pulmonar inducidos por la ventilación mecánica. La monitorización con balón esofágico permite mediciones objetivas de la actividad muscular respiratoria en tiempo real, pero aún hay limitaciones para su aplicación rutinaria en pacientes ventilados mecánicamente en la unidad de cuidados intensivos. Al igual que el balón esofágico, la electromiografía de los músculos respiratorios y la ecografía diafragmática son herramientas que permiten monitorizar la actividad muscular de la respiración, siendo mínimamente invasivas y con requerimiento de entrenamiento específico. Particularmente, durante la actual pandemia de enfermedad por coronavirus se ha extendido el uso de herramientas no invasivas disponibles en los ventiladores mecánicos para monitorizar el impulso (drive), esfuerzo y trabajo respiratorio, para promover una ventilación mecánica ajustada a las necesidades del paciente. Consecuentemente, el objetivo de esta revisión es identificar las definiciones conceptuales de impulso, esfuerzo y trabajo respiratorio utilizadas en el contexto de la unidad de cuidados intensivos, e identificar las maniobras de medición no invasivas disponibles en los ventiladores de cuidados intensivos para monitorizar impulso, esfuerzo y trabajo respiratorio. La literatura destaca que, aunque los conceptos de impulso, esfuerzo y trabajo respiratorio se perciben intuitivos, no existe una definición clara. Asimismo, destacados autores los definen como conceptos diferentes.

Technological advances in mechanical ventilation have been essential to increasing the survival rate in intensive care units. Usually, patients needing mechanical ventilation use controlled ventilation to override the patient's respiratory muscles and favor lung protection. Weaning from mechanical ventilation implies a transition towards spontaneous breathing, mainly using assisted mechanical ventilation. In this transition, the challenge for clinicians is to avoid under and over assistance and minimize excessive respiratory effort and iatrogenic diaphragmatic and lung damage. Esophageal balloon monitoring allows objective measurements of respiratory muscle activity in real time, but there are still limitations to its routine application in intensive care unit patients using mechanical ventilation. Like the esophageal balloon, respiratory muscle electromyography and diaphragmatic ultrasound are minimally invasive tools requiring specific training that monitor respiratory muscle activity. Particularly during the coronavirus disease pandemic, non invasive tools available on mechanical ventilators to monitor respiratory drive, inspiratory effort, and work of breathing have been extended to individualize mechanical ventilation based on patient's needs. This review aims to identify the conceptual definitions of respiratory drive, inspiratory effort, and work of breathing and to identify non invasive maneuvers available on intensive care ventilators to measure these parameters. The literature highlights that although respiratory drive, inspiratory effort, and work of breathing are intuitive concepts, even distinguished authors disagree on their definitions.

Work of breathing at different tidal volume targets in newborn infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia.

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) results in varying degrees of pulmonary hypoplasia. Volume targeted ventilation (VTV) is a lung protective strategy but the optimal target tidal volume in CDH infants has not previously been studied. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that low targeted volumes would be better in CDH infants as determined by measuring the work of breathing (WOB) in CDH infants, at three different targeted tidal volumes. A randomised cross-over study was undertaken. Infants were eligible for inclusion in the study after surgical repair of their diaphragmatic defect. Targeted tidal volumes of 4, 5, and 6 ml/kg were each delivered in random order for 20-min periods with 20-min periods of baseline ventilation between. WOB was assessed and measured by using the pressure-time product of the diaphragm (PTPdi). Nine infants with a median gestational age at birth of 38 + 4 (range 36 + 4-40 + 6) weeks and median birth weight 3202 (range 2855-3800) g were studied. The PTPdi was higher at 4 ml/kg than at both 5, p = 0.008, and 6 ml/kg, p = 0.012. CONCLUSION: VTV of 4 ml/kg demonstrated an increased PTPdi compared to other VTV levels studied and should be avoided in post-surgical CDH infants. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Lung injury secondary to mechanical ventilation increases the mortality and morbidity of infants with CDH. • Volume targeted ventilation (VTV) reduces 'volutrauma' and ventilator-induced lung injury in other neonatal intensive care populations. WHAT IS NEW: • A randomised cross-over trial was carried out investigating the response to different VTV levels in infants with CDH. • Despite pulmonary hypoplasia being a common finding in CDH, a VTV of 5ml/kg significantly reduced the work of breathing in infants with CDH compared to a lower VTV level.