The application of two drainage angles in neurocritical care patients with complicated pneumonia: a randomized controlled trial.

Background: Although head elevation is an early first-line treatment for elevated intracranial pressure (ICP), the use of the head-down or prone position in managing neurocritical patients is controversial because a change in a position directly affects the intracranial and cerebral perfusion pressure, which may cause secondary brain injury and affect patient outcomes. This study compared the effects of two postural drainage positions (30° head-up tilt and 0° head flat) on the prognosis of neurocritical care patients with complicated pneumonia and a clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS) ≥5 points to provide a reference for selecting appropriate postural drainage positions for patients with pneumonia in neurocritical care units. Methods: A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted with 62 neurocritical care patients with complicated pneumonia. The patients were categorized into control (=31) and experimental (=31) groups in a 1:1 ratio using a simple randomized non-homologous pairing method. Emphasis was placed on matching the baseline characteristics of the two groups, including patient age, sex, height, weight, Glasgow Coma Scale score, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, cough reflex, and mechanical ventilation usage to ensure comparability. Both groups received bundled care for artificial airway management. The control group maintained a standard postural drainage position of 0° head-flat, whereas the experimental group maintained a 30° head-up tilt. The efficacy of the nursing intervention was evaluated by comparing the CPIS and other therapeutic indicators between the two groups after postural drainage. Results: After the intervention, the within-group comparison showed a significant decrease in the CPIS (P < 0.001); procalcitonin levels showed a significant decreasing trend (P < 0.05); the arterial oxygen pressure significantly increased (P < 0.05); the oxygenation index significantly increased (P < 0.001); and the aspiration risk score showed a significant decreasing trend (P < 0.001). A between-group comparison showed no significant differences in any of the indicators before and after the intervention (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Postural drainage positions of 30° head-up tilt and 0° head-flat can improve the CPIS and oxygenation in patients without adverse effects. Therefore, we recommend that patients under neurological intensive care and having pneumonia be drained in a 30° head-up tilt position with good centralized care of the lung infection. Trial registration: The study, "Study of Angles of Postural Drainage in Neurocritical Patients with Pneumonia," was registered in the Protocol Registration Data Element Definitions for Interventional Study database (# ChiCTR2100042155); date of registration: 2021-01-14.

Investigating the effects of tilting the postural drainage lithotripsy system on cerebral blood flow, intracranial pressure, heart rate, and blood pressure.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of the postural drainage lithotripsy system developed by our experimental team on the vital signs of patient with urinary stones during the stone removal process. METHODS: Four groups of 15 subjects (0°, 10°, 40°, and 70°) were subjected to different angles of head-down tilt to measure middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity (MCAv), cerebrovascular conductance coefficient (CVCi), intracranial pressure (nICP), heart rate (HR), and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP). RESULTS: As the angle of HDT changed, MCAv values, nICP values, CVCi values, HR values, and MAP values changed significantly (all P ≤ 0.001), and the difference was statistically significant. During 10°HDT, despite a slight increase in nICP, the other measurements remained stable. During 40°HDT, only the MCAv values did not change significantly, whereas the rest of the measures were significantly altered. During 70°HDT, all indicators changed significantly. CONCLUSIONS: The significant alterations in cerebral blood flow, intracranial pressure, and hemodynamics induced during the treatment of renal residual fragments with postural drainage should be used with caution in individuals with cerebrovascular accidents. CHINA CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY: ChiCTR2300070671; Registration date: 2023-04-18.

[Update on manual bronchial clearance techniques (adults and adolescents)]. / Mise au point sur les techniques manuelles de désencombrement bronchique (adultes et adolescents).

In adults and teenagers, airway clearance physiotherapy techniques (ACPT) are various and numerous. However, they for still awaiting scientific validation. Among ACPTs, Slow Expiration with the Glottis Opened in the Lateral Posture (ELTGOL), Autogenic Drainage (DA), and Active Cycling Breathing Technique (ACBT) present a Grade B level of evidence with weak recommendations. Even though these maneuvers are widely applied, precise description of chest physiotherapy (CP) is largely absent from the scientific literature; it is difficult to standardize its implementation and reproduce the results; scientific validation and faithful execution of the techniques are consequently problematic. In this paper, the authors aim to depict each of the three CP techniques as precisely as possible; with this in mind, graphic modeling of the different respiratory exercises is presented in such a way that they can be easily learned, applied and reproduced by physiotherapists.

Conventional chest physiotherapy compared to other airway clearance techniques for cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Cystic fibrosis (CF) is an inherited life-limiting disorder. Over time persistent infection and inflammation within the lungs contribute to severe airway damage and loss of respiratory function. Chest physiotherapy, or airway clearance techniques (ACTs), are integral in removing airway secretions and initiated shortly after CF diagnosis. Conventional chest physiotherapy (CCPT) generally requires assistance, while alternative ACTs can be self-administered, facilitating independence and flexibility. This is an updated review. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness (in terms of respiratory function, respiratory exacerbations, exercise capacity) and acceptability (in terms of individual preference, adherence, quality of life) of CCPT for people with CF compared to alternative ACTs. SEARCH METHODS: We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search was 26 June 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials (including cross-over design) lasting at least seven days and comparing CCPT with alternative ACTs in people with CF. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were 1. pulmonary function tests and 2. number of respiratory exacerbations per year. Our secondary outcomes were 3. quality of life, 4. adherence to therapy, 5. cost-benefit analysis, 6. objective change in exercise capacity, 7. additional lung function tests, 8. ventilation scanning, 9. blood oxygen levels, 10. nutritional status, 11. mortality, 12. mucus transport rate and 13. mucus wet or dry weight. We reported outcomes as short-term (seven to 20 days), medium-term (more than 20 days to up to one year) and long-term (over one year). MAIN RESULTS: We included 21 studies (778 participants) comprising seven short-term, eight medium-term and six long-term studies. Studies were conducted in the USA (10), Canada (five), Australia (two), the UK (two), Denmark (one) and Italy (one) with a median of 23 participants per study (range 13 to 166). Participant ages ranged from newborns to 45 years; most studies only recruited children and young people. Sixteen studies reported the sex of participants (375 males; 296 females). Most studies compared modifications of CCPT with a single comparator, but two studies compared three interventions and another compared four interventions. The interventions varied in the duration of treatments, times per day and periods of comparison making meta-analysis challenging. All evidence was very low certainty. Nineteen studies reported the primary outcomes forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)and forced vital capacity (FVC), and found no difference in change from baseline in FEV1 % predicted or rate of decline between groups for either measure. Most studies suggested equivalence between CCPT and alternative ACTs, including positive expiratory pressure (PEP), extrapulmonary mechanical percussion, active cycle of breathing technique (ACBT), oscillating PEP devices (O-PEP), autogenic drainage (AD) and exercise. Where single studies suggested superiority of one ACT, these findings were not corroborated in similar studies; pooled data generally concluded that effects of CCPT were comparable to those of alternative ACTs. CCPT versus PEP We are uncertain whether CCPT improves lung function or has an impact on the number of respiratory exacerbations per year compared with PEP (both very low-certainty evidence). There were no analysable data for our secondary outcomes, but many studies provided favourable narrative reports on the independence achieved with PEP mask therapy. CCPT versus extrapulmonary mechanical percussion We are uncertain whether CCPT improves lung function compared with extrapulmonary mechanical percussions (very low-certainty evidence). The annual rate of decline in average forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of FVC (FEF25-75) was greater with high-frequency chest compression compared to CCPT in medium- to long-term studies, but there was no difference in any other outcome. CCPT versus ACBT We are uncertain whether CCPT improves lung function compared to ACBT (very low-certainty evidence). Annual decline in FEF25-75 was worse in participants using the FET component of ACBT only (mean difference (MD) 6.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55 to 11.45; 1 study, 63 participants; very low-certainty evidence). One short-term study reported that directed coughing was as effective as CCPT for all lung function outcomes, but with no analysable data. One study found no difference in hospital admissions and days in hospital for exacerbations. CCPT versus O-PEP We are uncertain whether CCPT improves lung function compared to O-PEP devices (Flutter device and intrapulmonary percussive ventilation); however, only one study provided analysable data (very low-certainty evidence). No study reported data for number of exacerbations. There was no difference in results for number of days in hospital for an exacerbation, number of hospital admissions and number of days of intravenous antibiotics; this was also true for other secondary outcomes. CCPT versus AD We are uncertain whether CCPT improves lung function compared to AD (very low-certainty evidence). No studies reported the number of exacerbations per year; however, one study reported more hospital admissions for exacerbations in the CCPT group (MD 0.24, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.42; 33 participants). One study provided a narrative report of a preference for AD. CCPT versus exercise We are uncertain whether CCPT improves lung function compared to exercise (very low-certainty evidence). Analysis of original data from one study demonstrated a higher FEV1 % predicted (MD 7.05, 95% CI 3.15 to 10.95; P = 0.0004), FVC (MD 7.83, 95% CI 2.48 to 13.18; P = 0.004) and FEF25-75 (MD 7.05, 95% CI 3.15 to 10.95; P = 0.0004) in the CCPT group; however, the study reported no difference between groups (likely because the original analysis accounted for baseline differences). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We are uncertain whether CCPT has a more positive impact on respiratory function, respiratory exacerbations, individual preference, adherence, quality of life, exercise capacity and other outcomes when compared to alternative ACTs as the certainty of the evidence is very low. There was no advantage in respiratory function of CCPT over alternative ACTs, but this may reflect insufficient evidence rather than real equivalence. Narrative reports indicated that participants prefer self-administered ACTs. This review is limited by a paucity of well-designed, adequately powered, long-term studies. This review cannot yet recommend any single ACT above others; physiotherapists and people with CF may wish to try different ACTs until they find an ACT that suits them best.

Chest physiotherapy for acute bronchiolitis in paediatric patients between 0 and 24 months old.

BACKGROUND: Acute bronchiolitis is the leading cause of medical emergencies during winter months in infants younger than 24 months old. Chest physiotherapy is sometimes used to assist infants in the clearance of secretions in order to decrease ventilatory effort. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2005 and updated in 2006, 2012, and 2016. OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of chest physiotherapy in infants younger than 24 months old with acute bronchiolitis. A secondary objective was to determine the efficacy of different techniques of chest physiotherapy (vibration and percussion, passive exhalation, or instrumental). SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, LILACS, Web of Science, PEDro (October 2011 to 20 April 2022), and two trials registers (5 April 2022). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which chest physiotherapy was compared to control (conventional medical care with no physiotherapy intervention) or other respiratory physiotherapy techniques in infants younger than 24 months old with bronchiolitis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. MAIN RESULTS: Our update of the searches dated 20 April 2022 identified five new RCTs with 430 participants. We included a total of 17 RCTs (1679 participants) comparing chest physiotherapy with no intervention or comparing different types of physiotherapy. Five trials (246 participants) assessed percussion and vibration techniques plus postural drainage (conventional chest physiotherapy), and 12 trials (1433 participants) assessed different passive flow-oriented expiratory techniques, of which three trials (628 participants) assessed forced expiratory techniques, and nine trials (805 participants) assessed slow expiratory techniques. In the slow expiratory subgroup, two trials (78 participants) compared the technique with instrumental physiotherapy techniques, and two recent trials (116 participants) combined slow expiratory techniques with rhinopharyngeal retrograde technique (RRT). One trial used RRT alone as the main component of the physiotherapy intervention. Clinical severity was mild in one trial, severe in four trials, moderate in six trials, and mild to moderate in five trials. One study did not report clinical severity. Two trials were performed on non-hospitalised participants. Overall risk of bias was high in six trials, unclear in five, and low in six trials. The analyses showed no effects of conventional techniques on change in bronchiolitis severity status, respiratory parameters, hours with oxygen supplementation, or length of hospital stay (5 trials, 246 participants).  Regarding instrumental techniques (2 trials, 80 participants), one trial observed similar results in bronchiolitis severity status when comparing slow expiration to instrumental techniques (mean difference 0.10, 95% confidence interval (C) -0.17 to 0.37).  Forced passive expiratory techniques failed to show an effect on bronchiolitis severity in time to recovery (2 trials, 509 participants; high-certainty evidence) and time to clinical stability (1 trial, 99 participants; high-certainty evidence) in infants with severe bronchiolitis. Important adverse effects were reported with the use of forced expiratory techniques.  Regarding slow expiratory techniques, a mild to moderate improvement was observed in bronchiolitis severity score (standardised mean difference -0.43, 95% CI -0.73 to -0.13; I2 = 55%; 7 trials, 434 participants; low-certainty evidence). Also, in one trial an improvement in time to recovery was observed with the use of slow expiratory techniques. No benefit was observed in length of hospital stay, except for one trial which showed a one-day reduction. No effects were shown or reported for other clinical outcomes such as duration on oxygen supplementation, use of bronchodilators, or parents' impression of physiotherapy benefit. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We found low-certainty evidence that passive slow expiratory technique may result in a mild to moderate improvement in bronchiolitis severity when compared to control. This evidence comes mostly from infants with moderately acute bronchiolitis treated in hospital. The evidence was limited with regard to infants with severe bronchiolitis and those with moderately severe bronchiolitis treated in ambulatory settings. We found high-certainty evidence that conventional techniques and forced expiratory techniques result in no difference in bronchiolitis severity or any other outcome. We found high-certainty evidence that forced expiratory techniques in infants with severe bronchiolitis do not improve their health status and can lead to severe adverse effects. Currently, the evidence regarding new physiotherapy techniques such as RRT or instrumental physiotherapy is scarce, and further trials are needed to determine their effects and potential for use in infants with moderate bronchiolitis, as well as the potential additional effect of RRT when combined with slow passive expiratory techniques. Finally, the effectiveness of combining chest physiotherapy with hypertonic saline should also be investigated.

Effectiveness of Autogenic Drainage in Improving Pulmonary Function in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis.

The use of autogenic drainage (AD) in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) has been officially approved; therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the efficiency of the leading therapeutic techniques based on AD in patients with CF; Among patients with CF assessments were made of spirometric parameters, percent blood oxygen saturation, and the general feeling of the patients (Borg, VAS, and mMRC dyspnea scale) before and after therapy using AD, using AD in connection with a belt or a Simeox device and AD in combination with both a belt and Simeox device simultaneously. The best therapeutic effects were generated by the combination of AD with the belt and with the Simeox device. The greatest improvements were observed for FEV1, FVC, PEF, FET, saturation, and patient comfort. In patients <10.5 years of age, the increase in the level of FEV3 and FEV6 was significant in comparison to older patients. Due to their efficacy, therapies connected with AD should be applied not only in hospital departments but also during daily patient care. Given the particular benefits observed in patients <10.5 years of age, it is important to guarantee real accessibility to this form of physiotherapy, especially in this age group.

Exercise versus airway clearance techniques for people with cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: There are many accepted airway clearance techniques (ACTs) for managing the respiratory health of people with cystic fibrosis (CF); none of which demonstrate superiority. Other Cochrane Reviews have reported short-term effects related to mucus transport, but no evidence supporting long-term benefits. Exercise is an alternative ACT thought to produce shearing forces within the lung parenchyma, which enhances mucociliary clearance and the removal of viscous secretions. Recent evidence suggests that some people with CF are using exercise as a substitute for traditional ACTs, yet there is no agreed recommendation for this. Additionally, one of the top 10 research questions identified by people with CF is whether exercise can replace other ACTs. Systematically reviewing the evidence for exercise as a safe and effective ACT will help people with CF decide whether to incorporate this strategy into their treatment plans and potentially reduce their treatment burden. The timing of this review is especially pertinent given the shifting landscape of CF management with the advent of highly-effective small molecule therapies, which are changing the way people with CF are cared for. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effect of exercise to other ACTs for improving respiratory function and other clinical outcomes in people with CF and to assess the potential adverse effects associated with this ACT. SEARCH METHODS: On 28 February 2022, we searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register, compiled from electronic database searches and handsearching of journals and conference abstract books. We also searched the reference lists of relevant articles and reviews. We searched online clinical trial registries on 15 February 2022. We emailed authors of studies awaiting classification or potentially eligible abstracts for additional information on 1 February 2021. SELECTION CRITERIA: We selected randomised controlled studies (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing exercise to another ACT in people with CF for at least two treatment sessions. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias for the included studies. They assessed the certainty of the evidence using GRADE. Review authors contacted investigators for further relevant information regarding their publications. MAIN RESULTS: We included four RCTs. The 86 participants had a wide range of disease severity (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) ranged from 54% to 95%) and were 7 to 41 years old. Two RCTs were cross-over and two were parallel in design. Participants in one RCT were hospitalised with an acute respiratory exacerbation, whilst the participants in three RCTs were clinically stable. All four RCTs compared exercise either alone or in combination with another ACT, but these were too diverse to allow us to combine results. The certainty of the evidence was very low; we downgraded it due to low participant numbers and high or unclear risks of bias across all domains. Exercise versus active cycle of breathing technique (ACBT) One cross-over trial (18 participants) compared exercise alone to ACBT. There was no change from baseline in our primary outcome FEV1, although it increased in the exercise group before returning to baseline after 30 minutes; we are unsure if exercise affected FEV1 as the evidence is very low-certainty. Similar results were seen for other measures of lung function. No adverse events occurred during the exercise sessions (very low-certainty evidence). We are unsure if ACBT was perceived to be more effective or was the preferred ACT (very low-certainty evidence). 24-hour sputum volume was less in the exercise group than with ACBT (secondary outcome). Exercise capacity, quality of life, adherence, hospitalisations and need for additional antibiotics were not reported. Exercise plus postural drainage and percussion (PD&P) versus PD&P only Two trials (55 participants) compared exercise and PD&P to PD&P alone. At two weeks, one trial narratively reported a greater increase in FEV1 % predicted with PD&P alone. At six months, the other trial reported a greater increase with exercise combined with PD&P, but did not provide data for the PD&P group. We are uncertain whether exercise with PD&P improves FEV1 as the certainty of evidence is very low. Other measures of lung function did not show clear evidence of effect. One trial reported no difference in exercise capacity (maximal work rate) after two weeks. No adverse events were reported (1 trial, 17 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Adherence was high, with all PD&P sessions and 96% of exercise sessions completed (1 trial, 17 participants; very low-certainty evidence). There was no difference between groups in 24-hour sputum volume or in the mean duration of hospitalisation, although the six-month trial reported fewer hospitalisations due to exacerbations in the exercise and PD&P group. Quality of life, ACT preference and need for antibiotics were not reported. Exercise versus underwater positive expiratory pressure (uPEP) One trial (13 participants) compared exercise to uPEP (also known as bubble PEP). No adverse events were recorded in either group (very low-certainty evidence). Trial investigators reported that participants perceived exercise as more fatiguing but also more enjoyable than bubble PEP (very low-certainty evidence). There were no differences found in the total weight of sputum collected during treatment sessions. The trial did not report the primary outcomes (FEV1, quality of life, exercise capacity) or the secondary outcomes (other measures of lung function, adherence, need for antibiotics or hospitalisations). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: As one of the top 10 research questions identified by clinicians and people with CF, it is important to systematically review the literature regarding whether or not exercise is an acceptable and effective ACT, and whether it can replace traditional methods. We identified an insufficient number of trials to conclude whether or not exercise is a suitable alternative ACT, and the diverse design of included trials did not allow for meta-analysis of results. The evidence is very low-certainty, so we are uncertain about the effectiveness of exercise as an ACT. Longer studies examining outcomes that are important to people with CF are required to answer this question.

The effectiveness of the active cycle of breathing technique in patients with chronic respiratory diseases: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Active cycle breathing technique (ACBT), which includes cycle of breathing control, thoracic expansion exercises and forced expiratory technique (FET), appears to have beneficial effects in patients with a variety of respiratory diseases. This systematic review provides an update on the new related studies, expanding the evidence base through the last 12 years and specifically evaluating the effectiveness of ACBT on pulmonary function-related outcome variables in patients with chronic respiratory diseases. METHODS: MEDLINE/Pubmed, PEDro, and Cochrane Library for Randomized Controlled Trials were searched between September 2008 and December 2021, in continuance of a previous systematic review, to identify randomized clinical trials and/or crossover studies comparing ACBT to other respiratory treatment techniques in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases, cystic fibrosis, or bronchiectasis. RESULTS: Eleven studies were included and the quality of most of them was moderate to good. The outcomes most frequently assessed were forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), sputum wet weight, forced vital capacity (FVC), and peak expiratory flow rate. Secondary outcomes were quality of life and dyspnea. Various comparators were identified and most of them assessed the ACBT as an effective method in comparison with other respiratory treatment modalities. Most studies revealed that ACBT/FET had at least an equally beneficial short-term effect on sputum wet weight, FEV1 and FVC compared to other treatment methods. CONCLUSION: The results of this updating review reinforced the data of a previous systematic review regarding the beneficial impact of ACBT for the short-term improvement in respiratory tract secretions clearance and pulmonary function. ACBT is effective in increasing the expectorated sputum volume, in reducing viscoelasticity of the secretion and in relieving symptoms such as dyspnea.

Application of Precise Positioning for Sputum Expectoration in ICU Patients with Pulmonary Infection.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the application value of precise positioning for sputum expectoration in intensive care unit (ICU) hospitalized patients with pulmonary infection (PI). METHODS: A total of 183 patients with PI treated in the ICUs of Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University from June 2019 to June 2020 were divided into a control group (n = 91) and an observation group (n = 92), all of whom received conventional drug therapy. The control group was given routine nursing intervention, based on which, the observation group was supplemented with precise positioning for sputum expectoration. The 24-hour sputum volume, respiratory rate (RR), blood gas analysis indexes, inflammatory indicators, Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS), Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale score, and quality of life (36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, SF-36) were observed in both arms before and after intervention. The incidence of adverse reactions was counted. RESULTS: The observation group showed better mMRC scores than the control group (P < 0.05). Compared with the control group, the sputum volume, RR, and CPIS score were lower, and the SF-36 score was higher in the observation group 7 days after intervention (P < 0.05). After intervention, the oxygen saturation (SaO2) and partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) were higher, while the carbon dioxide partial pressure (PaCO2), C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), and leukocyte count were lower in the observation group compared with the control group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two arms (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The application of precise positioning for sputum expectoration in nursing intervention of ICU patients with PI can alleviate the severity of PI and dyspnea, reduce inflammatory reaction, and improve the quality of life of patients.

Fisioterapia com dispositivo individual de pressão expiratória positiva do tipo máscara (PEP)/pressão expiratória nas vias aéreas (EPAP) para o tratamento da Fibrose Cística / Physiotherapy with individual pressure device positive expiratory mask type (PEP)/pressure expiratory airway (EPAP) for the treatment of Cystic Fibrosis

INTRODUÇÃO: A FC é uma doença genética, com incidência nacional de aproximadamente 1:7.576 nascidos vivos. A FC é uma doença complexa e multissistêmica, de característica progressiva e potencialmente letal, que afeta o epitélio do sistema respiratório, gastrointestinal, hepático e geniturinário e que ocorre mais frequentemente em populações descendentes de caucasianos. As manifestações pulmonares da doença são a principal causa de morbimortalidade. A fisioterapia respiratória tem por objetivo preservar a capacidade respiratória e física, e deve ser iniciada logo após o diagnóstico. Existem vários tipos de fisioterapia respiratória, as quais auxiliam no processo de remoção muco. Algumas devem ser realizadas por profissionais treinados, enquanto outras podem ser realizadas pelo próprio paciente após treinamento. A escolha de uma técnica em detrimento da outra leva em conta a idade, o estilo de vida e a preferência do paciente, uma vez que a adesão ao tratamento é responsável pelo sucesso terapêutico. A fisioterapia respiratória deve almejar a independência e autonomia do paciente. TECNOLOGIA: Fisioterapia com dispositivo individual de pressão expiratória positiva do tipo máscara (PEP)/pressão expiratória nas vias aéreas (EPAP) para o tratamento da Fibrose Cística. PERGUNTA: A fisioterapia com equipamento fisioterápico de pressão expiratória positiva de uso individu

Autogenic drainage for airway clearance in cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Autogenic drainage is an airway clearance technique that was developed by Jean Chevaillier in 1967. The technique is characterised by breathing control using expiratory airflow to mobilise secretions from smaller to larger airways. Secretions are cleared independently by adjusting the depth and speed of respiration in a sequence of controlled breathing techniques during exhalation. The technique requires training, concentration and effort from the individual but it has previously been shown to be an effective treatment option for those who are seeking techniques to support and promote independence.  However, at a time where the trajectory and demographics of the disease are changing, it is important to systematically review the evidence demonstrating that autogenic drainage is an effective intervention for people with cystic fibrosis. OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical effectiveness of autogenic drainage in people with cystic fibrosis with other physiotherapy airway clearance techniques. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register, compiled from electronic database searches and handsearching of journals and conference abstract books. We also searched the reference lists of relevant articles and reviews, as well as two ongoing trials registers (02 February 2021). Date of most recent search of the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register: 06 July 2021. SELECTION CRITERIA: We identified randomised and quasi-randomised controlled studies comparing autogenic drainage to another airway clearance technique or no therapy in people with cystic fibrosis for at least two treatment sessions. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data extraction and assessments of risk of bias were independently performed by three authors. The authors assessed the quality of the evidence using the GRADE system. The authors contacted seven teams of investigators for further information pertinent to their published studies. MAIN RESULTS: Searches retrieved 64 references to 37 individual studies, of which eight (n = 212) were eligible for inclusion. One study was of parallel design with the remaining seven being cross-over in design; participant numbers ranged from 4 to 75. The total study duration varied between four days and two years. The age of participants ranged between seven and 63 years with a wide range of disease severity reported. Six studies enrolled participants who were clinically stable, whilst participants in two studies received treatment whilst hospitalised with an infective exacerbation. All studies compared autogenic drainage to one (or more) other recognised airway clearance technique. Exercise is commonly used as an alternative therapy by people with cystic fibrosis; however, there were no studies identified comparing exercise with autogenic drainage. The certainty of the evidence was generally low or very low. The main reasons for downgrading the level of evidence were the frequent use of a cross-over design, outcome reporting bias and the inability to blind participants. The review's primary outcome, forced expiratory volume in one second, was the most common outcome measured and was reported by all eight studies; only three studies reported on quality of life (also a primary outcome of the review). One study reported on adverse events and described a decrease in oxygen saturation levels whilst performing active cycle of breathing techniques, but not with autogenic drainage. Seven of the eight included studies measured forced vital capacity and three of the studies used mid peak expiratory flow (per cent predicted) as an outcome. Six studies reported sputum weight. Less commonly used outcomes included oxygen saturation levels, personal preference, hospital admissions, intravenous antibiotics and pseudomonas gene expression. There were no statistically significant differences found between any of the techniques used with respect to the outcomes measured except when autogenic drainage was described as being the preferred technique of the participants in one study over postural drainage and percussion. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Autogenic drainage is a challenging technique that requires commitment from the individual. As such, this intervention merits systematic review to ensure its effectiveness for people with cystic fibrosis, particularly in an era where treatment options are changing rapidly. From the studies assessed, autogenic drainage was not found to be superior to any other form of airway clearance technique. Larger studies are required to better evaluate autogenic drainage in comparison to other airway clearance techniques in view of the relatively small number of participants in this review and the complex study designs. The studies recruited a range of participants and were not powered to assess non-inferiority. The varied length and design of the studies made the analysis of pooled data challenging.

Eficacia y seguridad del drenaje pleural con SET de drenaje torácico digital en pacientes adultos con derrame pleural maligno o fístula pulmonar / Efficacy and safety of pleural drainage with digital chest drainage SET in adult patients with malignant pleural effusion or pulmonary fistula

INTRODUCCIÓN: El presente documento de evaluación de tecnología sanitaria (ETS) expone la evaluación de la eficacia y seguridad del drenaje pleural con set de drenaje torácico digital (SDTD) en pacientes adultos con derrame pleural maligno (DPM) o fístula pulmonar en comparación con el set de drenaje torácico convencional (SDTC). El derrame pleural maligno (DPM) y las fistulas broncopleurales (FBP) son condiciones amenazantes para la vida del paciente. El DPM es una condición que ocurre en su mayoría en pacientes en etapas avanzadas de cáncer y cuya expectativa de vida es muy baja. Por otro lado, las FBP son comunicaciones patológicas entre el árbol bronquial y espacio pulmonar, que aparecen como consecuencia de una cirugía de reseccion pulmonar, por lo general por causas oncológicas, y con menor frecuencia debido a quimioterapias y radioterapias. El DPM y las FBP pueden producir la invasión de colecciones líquidas y aire en el espacio pleural; causando desestabilización de su presión negativa1 y consecuentemente colapso pulmonar y disnea respiratoria. Ambas condiciones deben ser tratadas a tiempo para favorecer el restablecimiento del espacio pleural y reexpansión pulmonar. Uno de los tratamientos del DPM o las FBP es el drenaje pleural, que permite descomprimir el espacio pleural del exceso de líquido o aire, permitiendo una mejor respiración, así como menor compromiso de otros órganos vitales. En el contexto de EsSalud, los pacientes con diagnóstico de DPM o FBP son tratados con la tecnología set de drenaje torácico convencional (SDTC); sin embargo, los médicos especialistas del Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins (HNERM) han solicitado la incorporación al Petitorio de EsSalud de la tecnología sanitaria set de drenaje torácico digital (SDTD). La justificación de la inclusión de esta tecnología según los especialistas es que el SDTC requiere de un sistema de succión de pared, que limitaría la movilidad del paciente. Además, la lectura de los indicadores de drenaje y fuga aérea con esta tecnología debe ser realizada cualitativamente por un profesional, pudiendo existir subjetividad de la evaluación, así como variabilidad interobservador. Por el contrario, señalan que el SDTD cuenta con un sistema de succión portátil, y además, permite un registro digital evolutivo de los indicadores de ausencia de drenaje y fuga aérea en estos pacientes, lo que podría traducirse en un mayor beneficio clínico para ellos, en términos de recuperación y tiempo de estancia hospitalaria. METODOLOGÍA: Se realizó una búsqueda sistemática de información con el objetivo de identificar la mejor evidencia disponible a la fecha (02 de marzo de 2020) sobre la eficacia y seguridad del drenaje pleural con SDTD, comparado con SDTC, en pacientes adultos con DPM o FBP. Se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica avanzada en las bases de datos de PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews y Literatura Latinoamericana y del Caribe en Ciencias de la Salud (LILACS). La búsqueda sistemática fue suplementada con una búsqueda manual en la lista de referencias bibliográficas de la evidencia incluida en el presente dictamen. Además, se realizó una búsqueda de literatura gris en el motor de búsqueda Google, a fin de poder identificar GPC y ETS de relevancia que pudiesen haber sido omitidas por la estrategia de búsqueda o que no hayan sido publicadas en las bases de datos consideradas. Asimismo, se realizó una búsqueda dentro de bases de datos pertenecientes a grupos que realizan ETS y GPC, incluyendo, el National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), la Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH), la Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS), el Institut für Qualitát und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen (IQWiG), además de la Base Regional de Informes de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud de las Américas (BRISA) y páginas web de sociedades especializadas en el manejo del DPM y las FBP. Por último, se realizó una búsqueda de estudios clínicos en ejecución o aún no publicados en las páginas web de ClinicalTrials.gov y del International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (ICTRP). RESULTADOS: A través de la búsqueda bibliográfica en las bases de datos, se identificaron 420 documentos. Luego de eliminar los documentos duplicados, 401 fueron elegibles para tamizaje por título y resumen. De ellos, 20 documentos fueron elegibles para evaluación a texto completo. Finalmente, dos documentos fueron elegidos para incluirse en el presente dictamen. Como producto de la búsqueda bibliográfica y selección sistemática de la evidencia, se han incluido dos GPC que emiten recomendaciones para el tratamiento de pacientes con DPM (Tabla 1). No se encontraron RS con o sin MA, ECA o estudios observacionales elegibles para evaluación. A continuación se reporta brevemente el cuerpo de evidencia de acuerdo con la pirámide de jerarquía de Haynes, siguiendo lo indicado en los criterios de elegibilidad. CONCLUSIONES: El presente dictamen preliminar tuvo por objetivo realizar una síntesis de la mejor evidencia disponible a la fecha (02 de marzo del 2021) sobre la eficacia y seguridad del drenaje pleural empleando SDTD en comparación con SDTC en pacientes con DPM o FBP con indicación de drenaje pleural. En el contexto de EsSalud, los pacientes con DPM o FBP son tratados con drenaje pleural empleando SDTC; sin embargo, los especialistas de la entidad han propuesto la incorporación de SDTD debido a que este superaría algunos potenciales inconvenientes de la tecnología de uso actual en EsSalud, como el riesgo de evaluación subjetiva de ausencia de drenaje y fuga aérea, y la necesidad de estar conectada a un sistema de succión de pared. Por ello, se realizó una evaluación de la eficacia y seguridad de SDTD, en comparación con SDTC, para el manejo de estos pacientes. Luego de la búsqueda sistemática de información (02 de marzo del 2021) se incluyeron dos GPC sobre el manejo de pacientes con DPM para su evaluación (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence 2019, Feller-Kopman et al. 2018). No se encontraron GPC sobre el manejo de pacientes con FBP. Tampoco se encontraron ECA, RS con o sin MA, o estudios obseservacionales que comparen a las tecnologías SDTD y SDTC en procedimientos de drenaje pleural en pacientes con DPM o FBP. Ninguna de las GPC evaluadas mencionó al SDTD o SDTC entre sus recomendaciones de drenaje pleural para el manejo paliativo de pacientes con DPM. Aunque una de las GPC recomienda la colocación de catéter permanente (tecnología que puede ser conectada a SDTD o SDTC) para realizar el drenaje pleural, no se mencionó a qué sistema de drenaje se debe conectarse el dispositivo para realizar el procedimiento (Feller-Kopman et al. 2018). Asimismo, ninguno de los estudios empleados como sustento para estas recomendaciones menciona que sistema de drenaje se utilizó para llevar a cabo el drenaje pleural. En consecuencia, existe incertidumbre sobre cuál es el sistema de drenaje de elección (SDTD o SDTC) para llevar a cabo estos procedimientos. Durante la búsqueda de la literatura se observaron estudios de bajo nivel metodológico (reportes de casos y resúmenes de congreso) que evaluaron el uso de la tecnología SDTD en pacientes con DPM o FBP. Esto se condice con lo mencionado por la literatura acerca de la escasa evidencia de alto nivel metodológico para el cuidado paliativo de pacientes, como es el caso de pacientes con DPM. En ese sentido, para realizar una evaluación objetiva de la eficacia y seguridad de la tecnología SDTD es necesario contar con ECA bien diseñados. Por otro lado, aunque existen estudios de alto nivel metodológico (i.e. ECA) que comparan a las tecnologías SDTD y SDTC, estos fueron realizados en pacientes con marcadas diferencias en la fisiopatología, pronóstico, necesidad de tratamiento y objetivo del drenaje pleural, en comparación con la población de pacientes con DPM o FBP. Por lo tanto, los resultados de estos estudios no pueden extrapolarse a los pacientes con DPM o FBP. De igual manera, es preciso señalar que, según el fabricante de la tecnología SDTD solicitada, la indicación de uso de la misma es para drenaje torácico y pleural de pacientes sometidos a cirugía torácica o cardiaca, la cual difiere de la población de interés para la PICO, y explicaría la ausencia de estudios de alto nivel metodológico en esta población. Por todo lo expuesto, debido a que a la fecha no existen argumentos técnicos que apoyen el uso de la tecnología SDTD en pacientes con DPM o FBP, y que además, la indicación de uso de la tecnología no incluye a esta población, sino a pacientes sometidos a cirugía torácica y cardiaca, el IETSI no aprueba el uso de SDTD en pacientes adultos con derrame pleural maligno o fístula pulmonar.

The effects of the addition of a new airway clearance device to chest physiotherapy in children with cystic fibrosis pulmonary exacerbations.

BACKGROUND: Chest physiotherapy plays a crucial role in managing cystic fibrosis, especially during pulmonary exacerbations. This study evaluated the effects of adding a new airway clearance device to chest physiotherapy in subjects with cystic fibrosis hospitalised due to pulmonary exacerbations. METHODS: This prospective open-label study was carried out at the Pediatric Cystic Fibrosis Centre in Poland between October 2017 and August 2018. Cystic fibrosis patients aged 10 to 18 years who were admitted to the hospital and required intravenous antibiotic therapy due to pulmonary exacerbations were consecutively allocated (1:1) to either chest physiotherapy alone or chest physiotherapy with a new airway clearance device (Simeox; PhysioAssist). Patients performed spirometry and multiple-breath nitrogen washout for lung clearance index assessment upon admission and prior to discharge. RESULTS: Forty-eight cystic fibrosis patients were included (24 in each group). Spirometry parameters in both groups improved significantly after intravenous antibiotic therapy. A significant improvement in the maximum expiratory flow at 25% of forced vital capacity was observed only in the group with a new airway clearance device (p < 0.01 vs. baseline). Trends towards a lower lung clearance index ratio were similar in both groups. No adverse events were observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Spirometry parameters increased significantly in cystic fibrosis patients treated for pulmonary exacerbations with intravenous antibiotic therapy and intensive chest physiotherapy. The new airway clearance device was safe and well tolerated when added to chest physiotherapy and may be another option for the treatment of pulmonary exacerbation in cystic fibrosis.

Rehabilitation Therapy for a COVID-19 Patient Who Received Mechanical Ventilation in Japan.

A 65-yr-old man visited a primary care hospital with a continued fever of 38°C for 3 days. As his fever did not improve until 8 days after, he was admitted into another acute care hospital, where his respiratory condition rapidly worsened. Therefore, the patient was transferred to our hospital. On the day of transfer (day 1), he was started on mechanical ventilation. COVID-19 was diagnosed using a polymerase chain reaction assay 6 days after admission (day 6). The rehabilitation therapy was begun on day 6. The initial rehabilitation programs focused on positioning and postural drainage. The patient was extubated on day 19, and he began standing and stepping on the same day. Gait exercises began on day 22, and endurance training was initiated on day 28. The patient was discharged from our hospital on day 34 as he met the physical function milestones. One month after discharge, the Medical Research Council sum score and Barthel Index had each improved; therefore, muscle strength and daily activities had returned to normal. It was assumed that mobilization should be performed as soon as possible after the end of sedation during the acute phase of severe COVID-19 infection in patients receiving mechanical ventilation.

Effectiveness Active Cycle of Breathing Technique (ACBT) with Pursed Lips Breathing Technique (PLBT) to tripod position in increase oxygen saturation in patients with COPD, West Sumatera

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a chronic lung disease characterized by obstruction or obstruction of airflow in a reversible or partial nonreversible airway. Dyspnea is a common symptom in COPD sufferers; this can cause problems with oxygen saturation, or the oxygen saturation value is below normal. Non-pharmacological actions given in the form of breathing exercises can be done by a nurse to help reduce shortness of breath in COPD patients. The exercise is given by adjusting the resting position that is comfortable and comfortable so that the extra breath muscles can work well. The position that can do the position of the tripod with Active Cycle of Breathing and Pursed lips are breathing so that shortness of breath is reduced and SaO2 can have increased so that more oxygen has obtained in Lung Hospital, West Sumatra. This research is quantitative research, with quasi-experimental research methods. They used two pre-test-posttest design groups. The sample in this study amounted to 30 people with quota sampling technique. In this study showed that there was a difference in the increase in oxygen saturation of COPD patients which was effective in the tripod position group with Active Cycle Breathing Technique (ACBT) with a p-value of 0.00 while in the tripod position group with the Active Respiratory and Lip Cycle there was a difference of p-value 0.023. It has concluded that the tripod position with ACT and PBLT could increase oxygen saturation and nasal breathlessness reduced, but the tripod position with ACT is more effective in COP patients because with chronic respiratory patients who are short of breath due to sputum buildup, then with ACT will clean the airway and the flow of the road effective breathing so that shortness of breath have reduced and oxygen saturation increases. Furthermore, it has recommended that in hospitals, especially nurses, in dealing with COPD patients in addition to the correct position of breathing exercises with ACT to help patients

No disponible

Bubble-positive expiratory pressure device and sputum clearance in bronchiectasis: A randomised cross-over study.

OBJECTIVES: The bubble-positive expiratory pressure (PEP) device may be used for sputum clearance in people with daily sputum production. However, this device has never been studied in people with bronchiectasis. Hence, the objective of this study was to compare the effect of bubble-PEP device, the active cycle of breathing technique (ACBT) and no intervention (control) on sputum clearance in people with bronchiectasis. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomised cross-over trial with concealed allocation, assessor blinding and intention-to-treat analysis. Adult participants with stable bronchiectasis and productive of sputum daily were recruited. Participants performed 30-min of bubble-PEP, ACBT or control in random order whilst sitting, followed by 60-min of quiet sitting, on three separate days at the same time within a 10-day period. Primary outcome measure was wet weight of expectorated sputum during 30-min intervention, 60-min post intervention and total wet weight (30 min plus 60 min). RESULTS: Thirty-five-participants (11 males, mean [standard deviation] age 75 [8] years, forced expiratory volume in 1 s 72 [20] % predicted) were recruited and 34 completed the study. There was no significant difference in sputum wet weight between bubble-PEP and ACBT during 30-min intervention (mean difference [95% confidence interval]) -0.59 g [-1.37, 0.19] and total wet weight (0.74 g [-0.54, 2.02]). Sputum wet weight was significantly greater in bubble-PEP than ACBT at 60-min post intervention (1.33 g [0.19, 2.47]). CONCLUSION: Sputum wet weight was significantly greater with bubble-PEP than control at all time periods, and greater than ACBT at 60-min-post. Bubble-PEP could be considered an alternative sputum clearance technique to ACBT.

Drenaje peritoneal como tratamiento de la ascitis maligna, una revisión de la literatura / Peritoneal drainage as a treatment for malignant ascites: a literature review / Drenagem peritoneal como tratamento para ascite maligna, revisão da literatura

Introducción: La ascitis maligna es la acumulación anormal de fluido en la cavidad peritoneal como consecuencia de patologías como el cáncer, además es un factor desencadenante de clúster de síntomas (dolor, disnea, pérdida de apetito, náuseas, reducción a la movilidad y cambios en el aspecto físico) que se convierten en un problema clínico de difícil manejo. Dentro de los tratamientos encaminados al mejoramiento de esta condición se encuentra la paracentesis terapéutica, procedimiento médico cuya técnica se hace mediante drenaje y que en ocasiones se requiere practicar de manera repetitiva, pudiendo ser un síntoma refractario que conlleva al requerimiento de la implantación de un catéter peritoneal como una medida paliativa para el mejoramiento de la calidad de vida del paciente y su familia. Materiales y Métodos: Se realiza una revisión de la literatura existente, estableciéndose una búsqueda inicial donde se obtuvieron 747 artículos de los cuales se incluyen 277 potencialmente relevantes, a los que se le verificaron el cumplimiento de los criterios de inclusión, y posterior a la depuración de la información y de eliminar artículos duplicados y se incluyeron en la revisión los 8 estudios que cumplieron la totalidad de estos parámetros. Resultados: La técnica del catéter peritoneal es 100% exitosa, no presenta complicaciones inmediatas, óptima medida paliativa para los pacientes con ascitis refractaria permitiendo más de 30 días de durabilidad del dispositivo, además, de un fácil uso por profesionales, paciente y familia, permitiendo un manejo ambulatorio que disminuye costos, reingresos por complicaciones tardías potencialmente prevenibles e identificables como lo son filtración, desplazamiento, infecciones, oclusión del dispositivo hospitalarios y proporcionando confort y control de síntomas de manera inmediata. Discusión y Conclusiones: Con los resultados expuestos en la presente revisión se define el catéter peritoneal óptimo en el manejo de la ascitis maligna como medida paliativa. En el tratamiento de esta y de los demás síntomas desencadenados en pacientes con patologías oncológicas avanzadas, permitiendo un mejoramiento en la calidad de vida de las personas.

Introduction: Malignant ascites is the abnormal accumulation of fluid in the peritoneal cavity as a consequence of pathologies such as cancer. It is also a trigger factor for a symptom cluster (pain, dyspnea, loss of appetite, nausea, reduced mobility and changes in physical appearance) that becomes a clinical problem that is difficult to deal with. One of the treatments aimed at improving this condition is the therapeutic paracentesis, a medical procedure that uses a drainage technique that sometimes requires repeated practice. It can be a refractory symptom that leads to the requirement of the implantation of a peritoneal catheter as a palliative measure to improve the quality of life of patients and their family. Materials and Methods: A review of the existing literature was carried out in which an initial search was established obtaining 747 articles, of which 277 were classified as potentially relevant, which were later verified to meet the inclusion criteria. After filtering information and deleting duplicated articles, 8 studies were included in the literature review as they were found to meet all these parameters. Results: The peritoneal catheter technique is 100% successful without immediate complications, being an optimal palliative measure for patients with refractory ascites as it ensures device durability greater than 30 days. In addition, it is easy to use by professionals, patients and families, which allows outpatient management reducing costs, readmissions for late complications that are potentially preventable and identifiable such as filtration, displacement, infections, occlusion of the device, and hospital complications, which provide immediate comfort and symptom control. Discussion and Conclusions: Based on the results obtained in this review, the optimal peritoneal catheter is defined is as a palliative measure in the treatment of malignant ascites symptoms triggered in patients with advanced oncological pathologies, allowing an improvement in the quality of life of people.

Introdução: Ascite maligna é o acúmulo anormal de líquido na cavidade peritoneal como resultado de patologias como o câncer, é também um gatilho para um conjunto de sintomas (dor, dispneia, perda de apetite, náusea, mobilidade reduzida e alterações no aspecto físico) que se tornam um problema clínico difícil. Entre os tratamentos que visam melhorar essa condição, está a paracentese terapêutica, procedimento médico cuja técnica é realizada por drenagem e que às vezes requer prática repetida, e pode ser um sintoma refratário que leva à necessidade de implante de cateter peritoneal como medida paliativa para a melhoria da qualidade de vida do paciente e de sua família. Materiais e Métodos: É realizada uma revisão da literatura existente, estabelecendo uma pesquisa inicial onde foram obtidos 747 artigos, dos quais 277 potencialmente relevantes foram incluídos, os quais foram verificados o cumprimento dos critérios de inclusão e após a purificação das informações e para eliminar artigos duplicados e os 8 estudos que cumpriram todos esses parâmetros foram incluídos na revisão. Resultados: A técnica do cateter peritoneal é 100% bem-sucedida, não apresenta complicações imediatas, medida paliativa ideal para pacientes com ascite refratária, permitindo mais de 30 dias de durabilidade do dispositivo, além de facilitar o uso por profissionais, paciente e família, permitindo gerenciamento ambulatorial que reduz custos, readmissões por complicações tardias potencialmente evitáveis ​​e identificáveis, como filtragem, deslocamento, infecções, oclusão de dispositivos hospitalares e proporcionando conforto e controle dos sintomas imediatamente. Discussão e Conclusões: Com os resultados apresentados nesta revisão, o cateter peritoneal ideal é definido no tratamento de ascites malignas como uma medida paliativa. No tratamento deste e de outros sintomas desencadeados em pacientes com patologias oncológicas avançadas, permitindo uma melhora na qualidade de vida das pessoas.