The Conflict between Regulatory Agencies over the 20,000-Fold Lowering of the Tolerable Daily Intake (TDI) for Bisphenol A (BPA) by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA).

BACKGROUND: The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) recommended lowering their estimated tolerable daily intake (TDI) for bisphenol A (BPA) 20,000-fold to 0.2 ng/kg body weight (BW)/day. BPA is an extensively studied high production volume endocrine disrupting chemical (EDC) associated with a vast array of diseases. Prior risk assessments of BPA by EFSA as well as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have relied on industry-funded studies conducted under good laboratory practice protocols (GLP) requiring guideline end points and detailed record keeping, while also claiming to examine (but rejecting) thousands of published findings by academic scientists. Guideline protocols initially formalized in the mid-twentieth century are still used by many regulatory agencies. EFSA used a 21st century approach in its reassessment of BPA and conducted a transparent, but time-limited, systematic review that included both guideline and academic research. The German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR) opposed EFSA's revision of the TDI for BPA. OBJECTIVES: We identify the flaws in the assumptions that the German BfR, as well as the FDA, have used to justify maintaining the TDI for BPA at levels above what a vast amount of academic research shows to cause harm. We argue that regulatory agencies need to incorporate 21st century science into chemical hazard identifications using the CLARITY-BPA (Consortium Linking Academic and Regulatory Insights on BPA Toxicity) nonguideline academic studies in a collaborative government-academic program model. DISCUSSION: We strongly endorse EFSA's revised TDI for BPA and support the European Commission's (EC) apparent acceptance of this updated BPA risk assessment. We discuss challenges to current chemical risk assessment assumptions about EDCs that need to be addressed by regulatory agencies to, in our opinion, become truly protective of public health. Addressing these challenges will hopefully result in BPA, and eventually other structurally similar bisphenols (called regrettable substitutions) for which there are known adverse effects, being eliminated from all food-related and many other uses in the EU and elsewhere. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP13812.

Pre-clinical safety assessment of biotechnologically produced lacto-N-tetraose (LNT).

Lacto-N-tetraose (LNT) is a human milk oligosaccharide with average concentrations ranging from 0.74 to 1.07 g/L in breastmilk, depending on the lactation stage. In this study, the preclinical safety of LNT produced by the Escherichia coli K-12 E2083 production strain was assessed. LNT was negative in both the bacterial reverse mutation assay and the in vitro micronucleus assay, demonstrating the absence of genotoxic potential for this substance. In the OECD 408 guideline compliant 90-day oral toxicity study rat, LNT did not induce any adverse effects in any treatment group up to and including the highest dose tested, and no LOAEL could be determined. Therefore, the no-observed-adverse effect level (NOAEL) is set at the highest dose level tested, i.e. a dietary level of 5 % (w/w), corresponding to ≥2856 mg/kg bw/day and ≥3253 mg/kg bw/day for males and females, respectively. This might be an underestimation of the NOAEL, caused by the range of dose levels tested. The results obtained in the current study are in good agreement with available data generated using other biotechnologically produced LNT batches and therefore support its safe use as a food ingredient.

No-observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) assessment as an optimized dose of cholinesterase reactivators for the treatment of exposure to warfare nerve agents in mice.

Despite the international convention on the prohibition of chemical weapons ratified in 1997, the threat of conflicts and terrorist attacks involving such weapons still exists. Among these, organophosphorus-nerve agents (OPs) inhibit cholinesterases (ChE) causing cholinergic syndrome. The reactivation of these enzymes is therefore essential to protect the poisoned people. However, these reactivating molecules, mainly named oximes, have major drawbacks with limited efficacy against some OPs and a non-negligible ChE inhibitor potential if administered at an inadequate dose, an effect that they are precisely supposed to mitigate. As a result, this project focused on assessing therapeutic efficacy, in mice, up to the NOAEL dose, the maximum dose of oxime that does not induce any observable toxic effect. NOAEL doses of HI-6 DMS, a reference oxime, and JDS364. HCl, a candidate reactivator, were assessed using dual-chamber plethysmography, with respiratory ventilation impairment as a toxicity criterion. Time-course modeling parameters and pharmacodynamic profiles, reflecting the interaction between the oxime and circulating ChE, were evaluated for treatments at their NOAEL and higher doses. Finally, the therapeutic potential against OPs poisoning was determined through the assessment of protective indices. For JDS364. HCl, the NOAEL dose corresponds to the smallest dose inducing the most significant therapeutic effect without causing any abnormality in ChE activity. In contrast, for HI-6 DMS, its therapeutic benefit was observed at doses higher than its NOAEL, leading to alterations in respiratory function. These alterations could not be directly correlated with ChE inhibition and had no adverse effects on survival. They are potentially attributed to the stimulation of non-enzymatic cholinergic targets by HI-6 DMS. Thus, the NOAEL appears to be an optimal dose for evaluating the efficacy of oximes, particularly when it can be linked to respiratory alterations effectively resulting from ChE inhibition.

Considerations for deriving a safe intake of propylene glycol.

The use of propylene glycol (PG) in food and other applications is widespread, and some estimates of dietary exposure to PG approach or exceed the Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) of 25 mg/kg bw-day. The current ADI for PG applies a cumulative uncertainty factor of 100, which includes factors of 10 for both interspecies and intraspecies differences. Available toxicology studies and human data, however, indicate a plausible mode of action (MoA) that would support a chemical-specific adjustment factor (CSAF) of 1 for interspecies toxicodynamic differences, reducing the total uncertainty factor from 100 to 40. The MoA involves an increase in serum PG concentrations after metabolic saturation, leading to serum hyperosmolarity, which can ultimately cause hemolytic changes and red blood cell damage. Therefore, the species similarities in toxicodynamic response for this critical effect could support increasing the ADI from 25 to 62.5 mg/kg bw-day, applicable to both children and adults.

No-observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) clothianidin, a neonicotinoid pesticide, impairs hippocampal memory and motor learning associated with alteration of gene expression in cerebellum.

Neonicotinoid pesticides (NNs) have been associated with numerous neurobehavioral effects in rodents, raising concerns about their impact on cognitive function. Clothianidin (CLO), a type of NN, was orally administered to male mice (10 weeks old, C57BL/6N) at the no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) of 50 mg/kg/day as indicated in the pesticide risk assessment report. Behavioral tests (novel location recognition and rotarod tests) evaluated hippocampal memory and cerebellar motor learning. After each test, plasma monoamines (3-methoxytyramine, histamine, serotonin, tryptamine) were measured by LC-ESI/MS/MS (Liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization/tandem mass spectrometry), and cerebellar mRNA expression was quantified by microarray and qRT-PCR analyses. The NOAEL of CLO was found to impair hippocampal memory, leading to decreased spontaneous locomotor activity and motor function. We reported, for the first time, multiple alterations of gene expression in the cerebellum associated with motor dysfunction.

Effect of clothianidin exposure at the no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) in a mouse model of atopic dermatitis.

The effects of exposure to clothianidin (CLO), a neonicotinoid pesticide (NN), on the thymus and intestinal microbiota were recently revealed. Immune cells express nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs), an NN target, suggesting CLO may disrupt the immune system. However, the relationship between CLO and atopic dermatitis (AD) is unknown. We administered a no-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) dose of CLO to male NC/Nga mice with induced AD and measured, at three time points, key AD symptom indicators: epidermal thickening, mast cell number, total plasma IgE, and histamine levels. CLO increased total plasma IgE levels but reduced epidermal thickening, mast cell number, and plasma histamine levels in the early stages of AD. This demonstrates for the first time that CLO exposure inhibits AD's early symptoms.

Repeat dose and reproductive toxicity of thrombopoietin mimic peptide in Sprague-Dawley rats.

Thrombopoietin mimic peptide (TMP) is a novel thrombopoietin receptor agonist. In this report, we evaluated the potential toxicity of TMP in repeat-dose toxicity and reproductive/developmental toxicity studies (segment Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ). TMP was administered subcutaneously to Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats at 5, 15 or 50 mcg/kg. In repeat-dose toxicity study, the rats were administrated three times a week for 26 week with a 4-week recovery. TMP could produce anti-drug antibodies and induce platelet counts increase, megakaryocyte proliferation. While platelet counts decreased gradually and returned to normal after 4 weeks in male rats. Other significant findings included myelofibrosis of bone marrow, hepatic extramedullary hematopoiesis, splenic lymphocytic depletion and bone hyperostosis. All treatment-related effects were reversed following recovery. The NOAEL of repeat-dose toxicity in female rats is 5 mcg/kg. In the reproductive/developmental toxicity (segment Ⅰ, Ⅲ), no deaths occurred, and no general toxicological effects or abnormal reproductive functions were observed. In embryo-fetal developmental toxicity study (segment Ⅱ), the number of resorbed fetuses in the 50 mcg/kg group was significantly increased. The NOAEL as related to reproductive/developmental toxicity in these rats was 15 mcg/kg.

A toxicological assessment of spermidine trihydrochloride produced using an engineered strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Spermidine is a polyamine consumed in the diet, endogenously biosynthesized in most cells, and produced by the intestinal microbiome. A variety of foods contribute to intake of spermidine along with other polyamines. Spermidine trihydrochloride (spermidine-3HCl) of high purity can be produced using an engineered strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Spermidine has a demonstrated history of safe use in the diet; however, limited information is available in the public literature to assess the potential toxicity of spermidine-3HCl. To support a safety assessment for this spermidine-3HCl as a dietary source of spermidine, authoritative guideline and good laboratory practice (GLP) compliant in vitro genotoxicity assays (bacterial reverse mutation and mammalian micronucleus assays) and a 90-day oral (dietary) toxicity study in rats were conducted with spermidine-3HCl. Spermidine-3HCl was non-genotoxic in the in vitro assays, and no adverse effects were reported in the 90-day oral toxicity study up to the highest dose tested, 12500 ppm, equivalent to 728 mg/kg bw/day for males and 829 mg/kg bw/day for females. The subchronic no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) is 728 mg/kg bw/day.

Using in vitro data to derive acceptable exposure levels: A case study on PBDE developmental neurotoxicity.

BACKGROUND: Current acceptable chemical exposure levels (e.g., tolerable daily intake) are mainly based on animal experiments, which are costly, time-consuming, considered non-ethical by many, and may poorly predict adverse outcomes in humans. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a method using human in vitro data and biological modeling to calculate an acceptable exposure level through a case study on 2,2',4,4'-tetrabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-47) developmental neurotoxicity (DNT). METHODS: We reviewed the literature on in vitro assays studying BDE-47-induced DNT. Using the most sensitive endpoint, we derived a point of departure using a mass-balance in vitro disposition model and benchmark dose modeling for a 5% response (BMC05) in cells. We subsequently used a pharmacokinetic model of gestation and lactation to estimate administered equivalent doses leading to four different metrics of child brain concentration (i.e., average prenatal, average postnatal, average overall, and maximum concentration) equal to the point of departure. The administered equivalent doses were translated into tolerable daily intakes using uncertainty factors. Finally, we calculated biomonitoring equivalents for maternal serum and compared them to published epidemiological studies of DNT. RESULTS: We calculated a BMC05 of 164 µg/kg of cells for BDE-47 induced alteration of differentiation in neural progenitor cells. We estimated administered equivalent doses of 0.925-3.767 µg/kg/day in mothers, and tolerable daily intakes of 0.009-0.038 µg/kg/day (composite uncertainty factor: 100). The lowest derived biomonitoring equivalent was 19.75 ng/g lipids, which was consistent with reported median (0.9-23 ng/g lipids) and geometric mean (7.02-26.9 ng/g lipids) maternal serum concentrations from epidemiological studies. CONCLUSION: This case study supports using in vitro data and biological modeling as a viable alternative to animal testing to derive acceptable exposure levels.

Evidence evaluated by European Food Safety Authority does not support lowering the temporary tolerable daily intake for bisphenol A.

The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) recently derived a tolerable daily intake (TDI) for bisphenol A (BPA) of 0.2 ng/kg bw/day. There are several issues with EFSA's hazard assessment review process, including that it was based on a limited subset of relevant studies. Multiple public commenters on EFSA's draft evaluation of BPA, including several European regulatory agencies, noted these issues, yet they were not adequately addressed by EFSA in the final evaluation. The TDI for BPA was based on an intermediate immunotoxicity endpoint in mice that has not been observed in other species; there is no evidence that it is a precursor event to any downstream pathological outcome. The TDI is several orders of magnitude lower than estimates of safe doses of BPA established by agencies worldwide, including EFSA's temporary TDI (t-TDI) for BPA established in 2015. Overall, the EFSA hazard assessment review process has led to a conclusion that there are low-dose effects of BPA based on very few, lower quality experimental animal studies. This conclusion is not supported by the totality of the available evidence, which includes multiple high-quality studies not considered by EFSA and indicates that the t-TDI established in 2015 is protective of human health.

Investigation of the miRNA levels changes to acceptable daily intake dose pesticide mixture exposure on rat mesentery and pancreas.

Consumers are constantly exposed to a variety of chemical mixtures as part of their everyday activities and lifestyle. Food, water and commercial products are only some examples of the possible ways people get exposed to these mixtures. However, following federal and local guidelines for risk assessment related to chemical exposure, risk analysis focuses on a single substance exposure scenario and not on a mixture, as in real life. Realizing the pronounced gap of this methodology, the real-life risk simulation scenario approach tries to address this problem by investigating the possible effect of long-term exposure to chemical mixtures closely resembling the actual circumstances of modern life. As part of this effort, this study aimed to identify the cumulative effects of pesticides belonging to different classes and commonly used commercial products on long-term exposure with realistic doses. Sprague Dawley rats were given a pesticide mix of active ingredients and formulation chemicals in a daily acceptable dose (ADI) and 10xADI for 90 days. Following thorough everyday documentation of possible side-effects, after 90 days all animals were sacrificed and their organs were examined. Exposure to pesticides particularly affects the miRNA levels at that point will provide us with more information about whether they can be potential biomarkers.

Ninety-day toxicity and genotoxic effects of synthetically derived fully saturated forms of anacardic acid in mice.

Organically synthesized fully saturated form of Anacardic acid (AA) has previously shown to be effective in the treatment of inflammatory autoimmune disease. In this study, organically synthesized fully saturated form of AA was orally administered to male and female Swiss albino mice for 90 consecutive days at doses of 25, 50 and 100 mg/kg BW (n = 20 per sex/group). Administration of AA was well tolerated at all dose levels. The treated animals did not show a dose-response toxicity in their hematology, liver, or metabolic profile. Minimally significant changes in serum biochemistry and hematology parameters were noted, but these were not considered to be of biological or toxicological importance and were not outside the known accepted ranges. Sporadic differences in organ weights were observed between groups, but all were minimal (<10%) and unlikely to indicate toxicity. The incidence of histopathological lesions was comparable between treated and control groups across all tested organs. Based upon these findings, the no-observed-adverse-effect level was determined to be ≥ 100 mg/kg BW, which was the highest dose tested. There were no genotoxic (mutagenic and clastogenic) effects seen in In-vivo micronucleus test, In-vitro chromosomal aberration test and Bacterial reverse mutation test. These results support, no genotoxicity and no toxicity associated with oral consumption of AA in mice as a dietary supplement for beverages and food.

An updated evaluation of reported no-observed adverse effect levels for chrysotile, amosite, and crocidolite asbestos for lung cancer and mesothelioma.

This analysis updates two previous analyses that evaluated the exposure-response relationships for lung cancer and mesothelioma in chrysotile-exposed cohorts. We reviewed recently published studies, as well as updated information from previous studies. Based on the 16 studies considered for chrysotile (<10% amphibole), we identified the "no-observed adverse effect level" (NOAEL) for lung cancer and/or mesothelioma; it should be noted that smoking or previous or concurrent occupational exposure to amphiboles (if it existed) was not controlled for. NOAEL values ranged from 2.3-<11.5 f/cc-years to 1600-3200 f/cc-years for lung cancer and from 100-<400 f/cc-years to 800-1599 f/cc-years for mesothelioma. The range of best-estimate NOAELs was estimated to be 97-175 f/cc-years for lung cancer and 250-379 f/cc-years for mesothelioma. None of the six cohorts of cement or friction product manufacturing workers exhibited an increased risk at any exposure level, while all but one of the six studies of textile workers reported an increased risk at one or more exposure levels. This is likely because friction and cement workers were exposed to much shorter chrysotile fibers. Only eight cases of peritoneal mesothelioma were reported in all studies on predominantly chrysotile-exposed cohorts combined. This analysis also proposed best-estimate amosite and crocidolite NOAELs for mesothelioma derived by the application of relative potency estimates to the best-estimate chrysotile NOAELs for mesothelioma and validated by epidemiology studies with exposure-response information. The best-estimate amosite and crocidolite NOAELs for mesothelioma were 2-5 f/cc-years and 0.6-1 f/cc-years, respectively. The rate of peritoneal mesothelioma in amosite- and crocidolite-exposed cohorts was between approximately 70- to 100-fold and several-hundred-fold higher than in chrysotile-exposed cohorts, respectively. These findings will help characterize potential worker and consumer health risks associated with historical and current chrysotile, amosite, and crocidolite exposures.

Retrospective analysis of dog study data from food and color additive petitions.

As part of the US FDA CFSAN's efforts to explore alternatives to animal testing, we retrospectively analyzed a sample of food additive (FAP) and color additive petitions (CAP) submitted to the FDA for the utility of dog study data in safety assessment. FAPs and CAPs containing dog studies (161 petitions) were classified as decisive (38%), supportive (27%), supplemental (29%) or undermined (6%) based on the impact the dog study data had on the final safety decision. Petitions classified as decisive were further categorized based on if the dog study data were used to a) address a safety concern (35/61); b) calculate an acceptable daily intake (ADI) (11/61); c) withdraw a petition (4/61); d) the effect was unique to the dog (2/61); or e) unclear (9/61). Of 11 petitions where the dog study was used to set an ADI, 7 contained studies where the points of departure (POD) from the dog studies were within an 8-fold range of the rodent with differences in study design likely contributing to the difference in PODs. Future research should include the development and use of qualified alternative studies to replace the use of animal testing for food and color additive safety assessment while ensuring human safety.

A 26-week repeated dose toxicity evaluation of sporoderm-removed Ganoderma lucidum spores in rats.

Ganoderma lucidum spore powder is a traditional Chinese medicine with a variety of health benefits. Sporoderm-removed Ganoderma lucidum spores (RGLS) can be more effectively absorbed and utilized by the body. Due to the extensive clinical application and lack of long-term (>30 days) safety evaluation of RGLS, it is necessary to evaluate its repeated dose toxicity during a longer administration period. Here, we conducted a 26-week repeated dose toxicity test of RGLS in Sprague‒Dawley (SD) rats. The male and female rats were orally administered RGLS at doses of 0, 0.4, 1.2, and 4.0 g/kg once daily for a period of 26 weeks. The safety profile of RGLS was assessed through in vivo observations of survival, body weight, and food consumption; hematological, biochemical, and urine analyses; immunotoxicity assays; and histopathological examinations. The results showed that no significant systemic toxicity was observed following 26 weeks of repeated RGLS administration. Our data showed a no-observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) of 4.0 g/kg, which is approximately 20 times higher than the human equivalent dose. Our results support that RGLS can be considered a safe medicinal or food product that can be added to a healthy diet.

The no-observed-adverse-effect level of phthalates promotes proliferation and cell cycle progression in normal human breast cells.

OBJECTIVE: The data on the association between phthalates and breast cancer risk remains inconsistent. This study aimed to explore the possible mechanism of low-dose exposures of phthalates, including Butyl benzyl phthalate (BBP), di(n-butyl) phthalate (DBP), and di(20ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), on breast tumorigenesis. METHODS AND METHODS: MCF-10A normal breast cells were treated with phthalates (10 and 100 nM) and 17ß-estradiol (E2, 10 nM), which were co-cultured with fibroblasts from normal mammary tissue. Cell viability, cycle, and apoptosis were detected by MTT assay, flow cytometry, and TUNEL assay respectively. The expression levels of related proteins were determined by Western blot. RESULTS: Like E2, both 10 nM and 100 nM phthalates exerted significantly higher cell viability, lower apoptosis, and increased cell numbers in the S and G2/M phases with up-regulation of cyclin D/CDK4, cyclin E/CDK2, cyclin A/CDK2, cyclin A/CDK1, and cyclin B/CDK1, compared with the control group. Significant increase in PDK1, P13K, p-AKT, p-mTOR, and BCL-2 expression and a decrease in Bax protein, cytochrome C, caspase 8, and caspase 3 levels were noted in cells treated with 10 nM and 100 nM phthalates and E2, compared with the control group and MCF-10A cells co-cultured with fibroblasts. The effects of the three phthalates were noted to be dose-dependent. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that phthalates at a level below its no-observed-adverse-effect concentration, as defined by the current standards, still induce cell cycle progression and proliferation as well as inhibit apoptosis of normal breast cells. Thus, the possibility of breast tumorigenesis through chronic phthalate exposure should be considered.

Twenty-four-hour temporal trend of melamine and its derivatives in urine in association with meal consumption: a panel study in Shanghai, China.

Timing of sampling is important for the exposure assessment of melamine (MEL) and its derivatives. This study aimed to investigate whether MEL and its derivatives in spot urine can effectively represent individual exposure levels throughout the day in adults and to explore their temporal trend before and after meal consumption for helping understand the timing of sampling and for assessing the potential exposure risk. This is a 2-day panel study with 43 college students being enrolled to provide urine specimens in 24 h (from the morning of the first day to the second day) and to answer a questionnaire on demographic characteristics, physical measurements, and time of having meal. Spearman correlation and Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used to examine the associations of the urinary concentrations of MEL and its derivatives in different sampled times and compare the concentrations' differences before and after meal consumption. Urinary concentrations of MEL and its derivatives (ammeline (AMN), ammelide (AMD), and cyanuric acid (CYA)) in the first-morning urine at the second day and randomly selected spot urine were positively associated with the average concentrations in the previous 24-h urine (all P ≤ 0.002). Urinary MEL concentration increased rapidly after meal consumption, reaching a maximum at approximately 3 h and then decreased gradually towards baseline (P = 0.006). Two subjects (4.65%) had a cumulative daily intake exceeding the severest tolerable daily intake. MEL and its three derivatives in spot urine can effectively represent the average concentrations in the previous 24-h urine in adults. Meal consumption is still a notable source of exposure to MEL for humans. These findings are important for choosing a better sampling strategy of performing exposure assessment. Meanwhile, the acute elevation in urinary MEL concentration following meal consumption may pose a potential health risk.

Glutamic acid intake by formula-fed infants: are acceptable daily intakes appropriate?

The 2017 European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) recommendation of an acceptable daily intake (ADI) of 30 mg glutamic acid/kg bw/day did not take into consideration the primary energy sources during infancy, including infant formulas. In the present study, we determined total daily intakes of glutamic acid in a contemporary cohort of healthy infants who were fed either cow milk formula (CMF) or extensive protein hydrolysate formula (EHF); the formulas differed substantially in glutamic acid content. The infants (n = 141) were randomized to be fed either CMF or EHF. Dietary intakes were determined from weighed bottle methods and/or prospective diet records, and body weights were measured on 14 occasions from 0.5 to 12.5 months. Secondary data analysis determined the glutamic acid content of the diet over time. The trial was registered at  http://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ as NCT01700205, 3 October 2012. Glutamic acid intake from formula and other foods was significantly higher in infants fed EHF when compared to CMF. As glutamic acid intake from formula decreased, intake from other nutritional sources steadily increased from 5.5 months. Regardless of formula type, every infant exceeded the ADI of 30 mg/kg bw/day from 0.5 to 12.5 months.   Conclusion: Given that the ADI recommendation was not based on actual intake data of primary energy sources during infancy, the present findings on the growing child's ingestion of glutamic acid from infant formula and the complementary diet may be of interest when developing future guidelines and communications to parents, clinical care providers, and policy makers. WHAT IS KNOWN: • The 2017 re-evaluation of the safety of glutamic acid-glutamates and the recommended acceptable daily intake (ADI) of 30 mg/kg bw/d by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) did not include actual intake data of the primary energy sources during infancy. WHAT IS NEW: • During the first year, glutamic acid intake from infant formula and other food sources exceeded the ADI of 30 mg/kg bw/day.

Transgenerational effects of developmental neurotoxicity induced by exposure to a no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) of neonicotinoid pesticide clothianidin.

Neonicotinoid pesticides (NNs) transfer rapidly from mother to offspring, which exhibit neurobehavioral effects. However, no studies have investigated NNs' transgenerational effects. We exposed F0 generation mice (mothers) to a no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) of clothianidin (CLO) during gestation and lactation, and examined the adult neurobehavioral effects of three generations of offspring (F1, F2, F3). F1 had lower birth weight, decreased locomotor activity, and increased anxiety-like behavior. In F2, body weight was affected, and there was a decreasing trend in locomotor activity and an increasing trend in anxiety-like behavior. In F3, locomotor activity tended to increase. Thus, even when only the mothers were exposed, the effects of CLOs were still observed in F1, F2, and F3 but the effects became smaller.