Noninvasive quantitative evaluation of coronary artery stent patency using 64-row multidetector computed tomography.

BACKGROUND: Many studies have used multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) angiography to evaluate coronary stents qualitatively but not quantitatively. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to validate a method of quantitatively evaluating stent patency by using 64-row compared with invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and to evaluate the stent size threshold of MDCT in detecting stent patency. METHODS: Stented lesions (n=122) in 55 patients (age, 65+/-10 years; 90% men) who underwent both 64-row MDCT and ICA were studied. Density measurements in Hounsfield units (HUs) and stent diameters in millimeters were recorded in the stented segments, with the density of the ascending aorta (AO) taken as a reference. The ratio of the average of stent's proximal, middle, and distal densities to mean AO density was defined as the AS/AO HU. Threshold values for the detection of stent patency were examined by using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: One hundred six of 122 stents were interpretable. By ICA, 24 stents were found to have in-stent restenosis (22 interpretable and 2 noninterpretable with MDCT). The ROC curve showed that the optimal cutoff value of AS/AO HU to predict stent patency on MDCT was 0.81 with sensitivity of 90.9%, specificity of 95.2%, and the optimal stent diameter cutoff value was > or = 2.5 mm with a sensitivity of 91.8% and a specificity of 93.8%. CONCLUSION: With 64-row MDCT, coronary stent patency can be evaluated quantitatively with high sensitivity and specificity and with adequate diagnostic accuracy in stents > or = 2.5 mm in diameter.

AngioJet Rheolytic thrombectomy during rescue PCI for failed thrombolysis: a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown the efficacy of AngioJet Rheolytic Thrombectomy (RT) in reducing thrombus burden and improving coronary flow in acute myocardial infarction (MI). No study has specifically evaluated the use of AngioJet RT in patients undergoing rescue percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for failed thrombolysis, a setting that may be particularly beneficial given the extensive thrombus burden. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AngioJet RT during rescue PCI for failed thrombolysis. METHODS: 214 consecutive patients were transferred to Good Samaritan Hospital to undergo rescue PCI for failed thrombolysis from January 2000 to October 2004. From this cohort, 32 patients (age 57 +/- 9, 30% male) undergoing AngioJet RT for rescue PCI (RT group) were identified and matched by initial thrombolysis in MI (TIMI) flow and infarct related artery (IRA) location to 32 patients (age 60 +/- 12, 24% male) undergoing rescue PCI without AngioJet RT (Control group). TIMI frame count and TIMI thrombus grade were assessed at initial and final angiography. Angiographic success (TIMI 3 flow, < 50% residual stenosis) and in-hospital clinical events, including bleeding complications and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) such as death, recurrent MI, target vessel revascularization and emergent bypass surgery were evaluated. Clinical success was defined as angiographic success in the absence of MACE. RESULTS: Baseline clinical characteristics were similar in both groups, except patients undergoing AngioJet RT were more likely to be males and less likely to be intubated on transfer. 30/32 (94%) patients achieved a TIMI thrombus grade of 0 in the RT group, compared to 22/32 (69%) in the Control group. Final IRA TIMI frame count was similar in the RT compared to the Control group (33 +/- 21 vs. 38 +/- 23, p NS, respectively). The occurrence of no reflow was significantly lower in the RT compared to the Control group (13% vs. 56%, p < 0.001, respectively). There was a trend for higher angiographic success in the RT compared to the control group (93% vs. 78%, p = 0.07, respectively). Clinical success was higher in the RT compared to the Control group (91% vs. 71%, p = 0.05, respectively). There were no differences in bleeding complications or MACE between the groups. CONCLUSION: AngioJet RT in high-risk patients undergoing rescue PCI for failed thrombolysis is safe and more effective in decreasing thrombus burden and preventing no reflow than conventional PCI.

Rescue percutaneous coronary intervention for failed thrombolysis.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies of rescue percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for failed thrombolysis yielded conflicting results. In the current era of newer thrombolytic agents, coronary stents, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and aggressive hemodynamic support, the outcome of this high-risk patient group has not been characterized. METHODS: From January 2000 to October 2004, 214 consecutive patients were transferred and underwent emergent coronary angiography following failed thrombolysis. One hundred and fifty five (72%) underwent immediate PCI, 23 (11%) underwent delayed PCI, and 36 (17%) received surgical revascularization or medical therapy. Medical records and angiograms for the entire PCI cohort (n=178) were reviewed for in-hospital events including bleeding complications, stroke, recurrent ischemia or myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and death. RESULTS: Time from symptom onset to thrombolysis (mean +/- standard deviation) was 5.6 +/- 11.9 hr, and time from thrombolysis to angiography was 7.0 +/- 5.5 hr. The study cohort was critically ill, with 9.6% experiencing cardiac arrest, 21% in cardiogenic shock, and 12% intubated prior to transfer. Coronary stents were placed in 88%, Rheolytic thrombectomy was used in 21%, an intraaortic balloon pump was placed in 17%, and a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor was administered in 92%. Patients receiving delayed PCI had higher TIMI 3 flow grade at initial angiography than those receiving immediate PCI (83% vs. 34%, respectively, P < 0.0001). Angiographic success was 90% for the entire PCI cohort, 89% for the immediate PCI group, and 100% for the delayed PCI group. Clinical success (angiographic success and freedom from major adverse cardiac events) was 85% for the entire PCI cohort, 83% for the immediate PCI group, and 100% for the delayed PCI group. Severe and moderate bleeding complications occurred in 7.3%, stroke in 1.7%, recurrent ischemia or MI in 7.3%, and TVR in 3.4%. Overall, in-hospital mortality for the entire PCI cohort was 3.4%. CONCLUSIONS: This observational, consecutive, real-world study of contemporary rescue PCI for failed thrombolysis shows a high use of coronary stents, Rheolytic thrombectomy, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and intraaortic balloon pump placement. Angiographic and clinical success was high with low bleeding complications and low in-hospital mortality, suggesting that prospective, randomized trials using contemporary interventional therapy for rescue PCI be considered.