Preservation of circadian rhythm in hepatocellular cancer.

Circadian rhythms are controlled at the cellular level by a molecular clock consisting of several genes/proteins engaged in a transcription-translation-degradation feedback loop. These core clock proteins regulate thousands of tissue-specific genes. Regarding circadian control in neoplastic tissues, reports to date have demonstrated anomalous circadian function in tumor models and cultured tumor cells. We have extended these studies by analyzing circadian rhythmicity genome-wide in a mouse model of liver cancer, in which mice treated with diethylnitrosamine at 15 days develop liver tumors by 6 months. We injected tumor-bearing and control tumor-free mice with cisplatin every 2 h over a 24-h cycle; 2 h after each injection mice were sacrificed and gene expression was measured by XR-Seq (excision repair sequencing) assay. Rhythmic expression of several core clock genes was observed in both healthy liver and tumor, with clock genes in tumor exhibiting typically robust amplitudes and a modest phase advance. Interestingly, although normal hepatic cells and hepatoma cancer cells expressed a comparable number of genes with circadian rhythmicity (clock-controlled genes), there was only about 10% overlap between the rhythmic genes in normal and cancerous cells. "Rhythmic in tumor only" genes exhibited peak expression times mainly in daytime hours, in contrast to the more common pre-dawn and pre-dusk expression times seen in healthy livers. Differential expression of genes in tumors and healthy livers across time may present an opportunity for more efficient anticancer drug treatment as a function of treatment time.

Mutational scanning identified amino acids of the CLOCK exon 19-domain essential for circadian rhythms.

AIM: In the mammalian circadian clock, the CLOCK/BMAL1 heterodimer binds to E-box enhancer elements in the promoters of its target genes to activate transcription. The classical Clock mice, the first circadian mouse mutant discovered, are behaviourally arrhythmic. In this mutant, CLOCK lacks a 51 amino acid domain corresponding to exon 19 (CLOCKΔ19), which is required for normal transactivation. While the importance of this CLOCK domain for circadian rhythms is well established, the exact molecular mechanism is still unclear. METHODS: Using CRISPR/Cas9 technology, we created a CLOCK knockout - CLOCK rescue system in human circadian reporter cells and performed systematic mutational scanning to assess the functionality of individual amino acids within the CLOCK exon 19-domain. RESULTS: CLOCK knockout cells were arrhythmic, and circadian rhythms could be rescued by introducing wild-type CLOCK, but not CLOCKΔ19. In addition, we identified several residues, whose mutation failed to rescue rhythms in CLOCK knockout cells. Many of these are part of the hydrophobic binding interface of the predicted dimer of the CLOCK exon 19-domain. CONCLUSION: Our data not only indicate that CLOCK/BMAL1 oligomerization mediated by the exon 19-domain is important for circadian dynamics but also suggest that the exon 19-domain provides a platform for binding coactivators and repressors, which in turn is required for normal circadian rhythms.

Generation of Human CRY1 and CRY2 Knockout Cells Using Duplex CRISPR/Cas9 Technology.

Circadian clocks are endogenous oscillators essential for orchestrating daily rhythms in physiology, metabolism and behavior. While mouse models have been instrumental to elucidate the molecular mechanism of circadian rhythm generation, our knowledge about the molecular makeup of circadian oscillators in humans is still limited. Here, we used duplex CRISPR/Cas9 technology to generate three cellular models for studying human circadian clocks: CRY1 knockout cells, CRY2 knockout cells as well as CRY1/CRY2 double knockout cells. Duplex CRISPR/Cas9 technology efficiently removed whole exons of CRY genes by using two guide RNAs targeting exon-flanking intron regions of human osteosarcoma cells (U-2 OS). Resulting cell clones did not express CRY proteins and showed short period, low-amplitude rhythms (for CRY1 knockout), long period rhythms (for CRY2 knockout) or were arrhythmic (for CRY1/CRY2 double knockout) similar to circadian phenotypes of cells derived from classical knockout mouse models.