Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cancer Treat Res Commun ; 35: 100708, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37126989

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Oral cavity cancer with the masticator space involvement is considered as very advanced localised diseas e and staged as T4b in AJCC 8th edition. NCCN guidelines consider this as inoperable. This study intends to compare the different treatment modalities in T4b oral cavity cancer and their impact on survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 150 patients with T4b oral cavity ca, from 2013to 2015 and follow up data till 31 st July 2019 were collected. All patients had biopsy proven SCC and CT evidence of masticator space involvement. RESULTS: Total of 150 patients were included. 102 patients had received curative treatment and 48 patients had received palliative treatment. In the curative group 84% were treated with surgery and adjuvant treatment and remaining had received RT with or without chemotherapy. 90% patients in the surgically treated group had attained margin negative resection. 4 year OS in the curatively treated group was 58.9% and in the palliative group was 12%. The surgically treated patients in the curative arm had a significant survival advantage over the patients who had received only RT with or without chemotherapy, (63.5% v/s 34%, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Curatively treated oral cavity cancer with masticator space involvement has survival outcome comparable to the published survival data of those without masticator space involvement. Radical intent treatment, preferably surgery should be offered to all patients with masticator space involvement, if negative margin is anticipated from preoperative imaging.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Boca , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias de la Boca/patología , Diagnóstico por Imagen
2.
Indian J Surg Oncol ; 13(4): 783-788, 2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36687252

RESUMEN

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women globally(1). It is usually a disease of old age. The incidence of breast cancer in females younger than 40 years is as low as 0.5%. Disease in patients with age less than or equal to 40 years at diagnosis is usually considered a young breast cancer(2). Occurrence of more adverse pathological features like triple negative and Her2 positive breast cancer as well as lacking reliable screening methods in young women leads to the poor prognosis in this group of patients(3). In the present study we aim to find the clinical and pathological characteristics of breast cancer in young women and their survival outcome for 5 years comparing the same with those characteristics of the older patients. Patients with nonmetastatic carcinoma breast who had registered at Regional Cancer Centre, Trivandrum, during the year 2012 were selected for the study. Patient's details including the clinicopathological features, treatment details, oncologic outcomes including recurrence, and survival data until 31 July 2019 were collected from treatment files kept in the hospital and via telephonic interview. Kaplan-Meier method was employed for survival analysis. Survival comparison was done using the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was done for assessing the risk. Out of 1611 curatively treated patients with carcinoma breast, 281 (17.44%) were young breast cancer (equal to or less than 40 years). The median follow-up period was 82 months. Median age of diagnosis was 51.3 years. Young patients presented with larger tumour size, but nodal stage and composite stage, were not different. They had more TNBC status, 35% vs. 24%, p = 0.001. Young patient group had a drop in 5-year OS but statistically insignificant (75.9% vs. 82.5%, p = 0.179) and marginally significant drop in DFS (68.1% vs. 73.8%, p = 0.064). The proportion of young breast cancer is very high in the Indian population. Age is not an independent risk factor for worse prognosis. T and N stage, Her2nue status, and adequacy of nodal clearance are the most important independent risk factors deciding the 5-year OS.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...