Postoperative pain after cesarean section: assessment and management in a tertiary hospital in a low-income country.

BACKGROUND: There is little information about the current management of pain after obstetric surgery at Mulago hospital in Uganda, one of the largest hospitals in Africa with approximately 32,000 deliveries per year. The primary goal of this study was to assess the severity of post cesarean section pain. Secondary objectives were to identify analgesic medications used to control post cesarean section pain and resultant patient satisfaction. METHODS: We prospectively followed 333 women who underwent cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Subjective assessment of the participants' pain was done using the Visual Analogue Scale (0 to 100) at 0, 6 and 24 h after surgery. Satisfaction with pain control was ascertained at 24 h after surgery using a 2-point scale (yes/no). Participants' charts were reviewed for records of analgesics administered. RESULTS: Pain control medications used in the first 24 h following cesarean section at this hospital included diclofenac only, pethidine only, tramadol only and multiple pain medications. There were mothers who did not receive any analgesic medication. The highest pain scores were reported at 6 h (median: 37; (IQR:37.5). 68% of participants reported they were satisfied with their pain control. CONCLUSION: Adequate management of post-cesarean section pain remains a challenge at Mulago hospital. Greater inter-professional collaboration, self-administered analgesia, scheduled prescription orders and increasing availability of analgesic drugs may contribute to improved treatment of postoperative pain with better pain scores.

Why does kidney allograft fail? A long-term single-center experience.

We studied the characteristics and the predictors of survival in Bahraini renal transplant recipients with an allograft that functioned for more than 10 years. Seventy-eight patients underwent renal transplantation between 1982 and 1999. Among them, 56 patients maintained functioning allografts for more than 10 years (range 10-30 years). Characteristics of the surviving patients, data on graft survival, and determinants of outcome were obtained by reviewing all medical records. The mean age at time of renal transplantation was 33.6 ± 15.3 years. The source of the graft in 42 (75%) recipients was from living related donors with a mean age of 31.4 ± 7.7 years, and it was the first graft in 48 recipients. The primary immunosuppression regimen consisted of cyclosporine (CsA) and prednisolone. Azathioprine (AZA) was given to 52 (92.9%) recipients, while four patients received steroids and AZA only. Induction therapy was administered to 30 patients in the CsA group. Acute rejection episodes occurred in eight (14.3%) patients, of whom two experienced two episodes. During the last follow-up in January 2010, the mean serum creatinine was 118.3 ± 46.5 µmol/L. A history of cancer was noted in one patient, whereas hypertension was encountered in 54% and diabetes mellitus in 20.5%. We compared the graft functioning group with the graft failure group and found that the independent determinants of long-term graft survival included time of late acute rejection episodes and histopathologic findings of chronic allograft damage, post-transplant hypertension and serum creatinine at one year. We conclude that renal transplantation even in its earliest years and despite the associated numerous complications has provided a ten-year or more of near-normal life to patients with end-stage renal disease.

Sirolimus-based calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal immunosuppressive regimen in kidney transplantation: a single center experience.

BACKGROUND/AIM: This observational study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the conversion from calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) to sirolimus (SRL)-based immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-four kidney recipients of mean age 38.3 +/- 14.6 years were converted to SRL. The main reasons for conversion were elective in 45 (70.3%) and biopsy-proven chronic allograft nephropathy in 11 (17.2%). The primary CNI used was cyclosporine A in 51 patients. Mean time to conversion was 50.5 months. After conversion, 61 patients received mycophenolate mofetil. We evaluated the impact of conversion on renal function for 5 years post-conversion. The overall mean follow-up time was 72.8 months. RESULTS: The analysis showed significant improvement in renal function at month 3 post-conversion (P < 0.05) with stabilization thereafter. Lipid parameters and blood sugar levels were similar pre- and post-conversion. Abnormal liver function test was transient in 12.8%. Reasons for SRL discontinuation were nephrotic range proteinuria in two patients and mouth ulceration in one. We compared patients with serum creatinine <140 micromol/l and those with serum creatinine > or = 140 micromol/l, and found that serum creatinine was an independent risk factor for chronic allograft dysfunction (P = 0.02). Graft loss occurred in three patients because of cardiovascular death in two and an acute rejection episode in one. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that conversion from CNIs to SRL is an option and of benefit without significant acute rejection episodes or chronic allograft dysfunction especially in well-selected kidney transplant recipients with good graft function.