The Relation Between Endoscopic and Subjective Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Signs, Vocal Tract Discomfort, Voice Handicap, and Voice Disorder Type: Same Yet Different?

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the relation between subjective voice-related symptoms and endoscopic findings in patients with different etiology of voice disorder and vocally healthy subjects with and without laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study. METHODS: The study involved 149 participants (106 female, 43 male) including 125 with various voice disorders (functional, structural, and neurogenic) and 24 vocally healthy individuals. For self-rating the German versions of the Voice Handicap Index (VHI), Vocal Tract Discomfort (VTD) Scale, and Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) were applied, while endoscopic evaluations utilized the Reflux Finding Score (RFS) and Reflux Sign Assessment (RSA). Statistical analyses incorporated ANOVA with Bonferroni posthoc tests to identify group variations. Correlations between VTD Scale, VHI, RSI, RFS, and RSA were evaluated using Pearson's correlation coefficient. To examine test sensitivity and specificity for the VTD Scale and RSA, we performed a receiver operating characteristics analysis. Youden's-Index was applied to determine the cut-off-value with best discriminatory abilities. The diagnosis of LPR was assumed when the criteria of RFS > 7 AND RSI > 13 was met. RESULTS: Significant differences for all voice diagnosis groups and vocally healthy individuals for RFS and all three self-rating questionnaires were found. Moreover, there was significant correlation between VTD Scale and VHI and RSI as well as RSI and RFS, which was moderate, negative in the group of persons with LPR. However, there was no significant difference for RSA results between the vocally healthy or any diagnosis group. CONCLUSION: Thus, the RFS may be more suitable to predict reflux and voice-related symptoms. The VTD Scale is a useful instrument in screening voice disorders but also LPR and can therefore be used as a tool for decision-making when transferring to a specialist.

Quality of life, HPV-status and phase angle predict survival in head and neck cancer patients under (chemo)radiotherapy undergoing nutritional intervention: Results from the prospective randomized HEADNUT-trial.

PURPOSE: To analyze the impact of quality of life (QoL), nutritional and clinical indicators on overall survival in patients with head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) undergoing (chemo)radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: At the beginning, at the end of (chemo)radiotherapy and during follow-up, QoL was prospectively assessed using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 and -QLQ-H&N35 questionnaires. Data were analyzed in 58 out of 220 screened patients, who were randomized into a control and intervention group. All patients received a nutritional assessment including bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), laboratory testing, and a screening for malnutrition based on the questionnaires MUST, NRS-2002 and Nutriscore at baseline and at the end of therapy. The intervention consisted of an individualized nutritional counseling every 2 weeks. RESULTS: Except for emotional functioning, dyspnea, financial difficulties, dental problems and weight gain, all other scales from the EORTC-QLQ-C30 and -H&N35 deteriorated during (chemo)radiotherapy. At first follow-up, patients of the control group experienced more nausea and vomiting compared to those of the intervention group (p = 0.02). After performing a multivariable model, dental problems at the end of therapy (HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 1-1.06; p = 0.03), HPV negativity (HR: 18.19, 95% CI: 1.61-204.17; p = 0.02), and baseline phase angle (HR: 0.09; 95% CI: 0.01-0.82; p = 0.03) were identified as predictors for overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Factors influencing overall survival in patients with HNSCC undergoing (chemo)radiotherapy are complex and multifactorial. We were able to identify QoL-related (dental problems), clinical (HPV status) and nutritional (phase angle) factors as negative predictors for survival. This study was registered within the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00016862).

Cross-Validation and Normative Values for the German Vocal Tract Discomfort Scale.

Purpose The Vocal Tract Discomfort Scale (VTD Scale) is a self-rating questionnaire investigating physical symptoms in the larynx associated with vocal pathology. The aim of this work was to investigate the reliability, validity, sensitivity, and specificity of the first German version and to provide normative data with thresholds for pathology and a scaling scheme. Study Design A retrospective multicenter study was performed. Method A total of 571 participants (409 female and 162 male), with a mean age of 47.2 years, were recruited at three German centers; of these, there were 447 participants with voice disorder and 124 vocally healthy participants. The clinical examination consisted of patient history, visual laryngeal examination, acoustic and aerodynamic assessment, perceptual analysis by the Grading-Roughness-Breathiness-Asthenia-Strain Scale, and subjective evaluation using the VTD Scale and the Voice Handicap Index (VHI). Statistics included group comparisons (t test and analysis of variance), Pearson correlation coefficient (between VTD Scale and VHI), and Cronbach's alpha to assess validity and reliability. Analysis of receiver operating characteristics was performed to examine VTD Scale's discriminatory ability and provide a cutoff score. Additionally, percentiles were applied to provide VTD Scale ranges. Results There were highly significant differences between healthy participants and participants with voice disorder regarding the total score and both subscales of the VTD Scale. Internal consistency was excellent (α = .928). We found moderate, positive correlation between the VTD Scale and VHI (ρ = .596, p < .001). Receiver operating characteristics analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.876 (p < .001, 95% confidence interval [0.846, 0.906]). VTD Scale ranges were no (score: 0-13), mild (score: 14-26), moderate (score: 27-40), and severe (score: 41-96) disorder. Conclusions Results confirm an excellent reliability and validity of the German VTD Scale. It provides additional and independent diagnostic information and is a useful instrument to complement voice assessment. The scaling into four severity subgroups allows the tool to be used for screening patients and considers a transferral to a voice specialist.

Head and neck cancer patients under (chemo-)radiotherapy undergoing nutritional intervention: Results from the prospective randomized HEADNUT-trial.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: Patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck undergoing (chemo-)radiotherapy are at high risk of malnutrition. Nevertheless, there is still a lack of prospective, randomized trials investigating the influence of nutritional status on therapy-related toxicity and patients' outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between October 2018 and October 2020, 61 patients were randomized into an intervention and control group. Questionnaires (MUST, NRS-2002, and Nutriscore), clinical examinations, laboratory analyses, and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) were used to assess nutritional status for all patients at the beginning and end of therapy as well as every 2 weeks during therapy. The intervention consisted of an individualized nutritional counseling every 2 weeks during therapy. RESULTS: Median baseline BMI for all participants was 23.8 (14.5-37.2) kg/m2 and dropped to 22.9 (16.8-33) kg/m2 after therapy (p < 0.001). In all patients, median baseline fat-free mass index (FFMI) was 18.1 (14-24.7) kg/m2 and decreased to 17.8 (13.4-21.6) kg/m2 till the end of therapy (p < 0.001). Compliant patients with a BMI < 22 kg/m2 presented with less weight loss in the intervention group compared to the control (p = 0.015, CI: 0.33-2.95). At baseline, MUST was the only screening-test which showed both good sensitivity (86%) and specificity (88%) in detecting malnutrition. Median follow-up was 15 (1-26) months and is still ongoing. 2-year overall survival rate was 70% in the control and 79% in the intervention group (log-rank p = 0.79). Pretherapeutic phase angle, posttherapeutic FFMI and albumin level were prognostic indicators for overall survival (log-rank p = 0.002, p = 0.008 and p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Malnutrition negatively impacts patients' outcome under (chemo-)radiotherapy. Baseline phase angle, posttherapeutic FFMI and albumin level are proposed as reliable indicators for overall survival. This study was registered within the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00016862).