Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 12356, 2024 05 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38811661

RESUMEN

Assessing unmet needs is crucial to achieving quality care and patient satisfaction. Between September and December 2021, we assessed unmet supportive care needs in a consecutive sample of adult survivors of childhood cancer at KHCC (King Hussien Cancer Center). Two hundred and ninety-seven adult survivors of childhood cancer completed the study questionnaire. The average needs score across all domains was 24.80 (SD = 19.65), with the financial domain scoring the highest 30.39 (SD = 31.95) and sexuality scoring the lowest 7.67 (SD = 19.67). Using a multivariate linear regression model, female gender was independently associated with significantly high scores in all need domains (p < 0.001), except for sexuality. Monthly income, comorbidities, socioeconomic challenges, time since diagnosis, and age at diagnosis have emerged as predictors of needs in many domains. Mean quality of life (QoL) was significantly and inversely associated with the mean score in multiple domains: psychological (p < 0.001), sexuality (p = 0.038), financial (p < 0.001), and overall needs (p = 0.004). Following a content analysis of qualitative data, educational difficulties, and work-related challenges were identified as other unmet needs. Cancer experiences during childhood significantly influence supportive care needs in adulthood. There is a need for more tailored studies assessing different populations of cancer survivors and avoiding the one-size-fits-all survivorship care.


Asunto(s)
Supervivientes de Cáncer , Neoplasias , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Supervivientes de Cáncer/psicología , Adulto , Neoplasias/psicología , Neoplasias/terapia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven , Medio Oriente/epidemiología , Adolescente , Niño , Persona de Mediana Edad , Instituciones Oncológicas , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud
2.
Semin Ophthalmol ; 39(4): 251-260, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37849309

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of brolucizumab in diabetic macular edema (DME) and diabetic retinopathy (DR). METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, an electronic search was done to acquire all articles describing brolucizumab use in patients with DME and DR. The review was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022382625). Collected articles were filtered through two stages by independent reviewers. Data were extracted from the included articles and then analyzed accordingly. RESULTS: Brolucizumab induced significant improvement in best-corrected visual acuity and was either better or non-inferior to other types of anti-VEGF (MD -0.64 mu, 95% CI [-1.15, -0.13], P = .01); the same observation was noted with regards to central subfield macular thickness (CSMT) (MD -138.6 mu, 95% CI [-151.9, -125.3], P = .00001). Brolucizumab was reported to be relatively safe for use in diabetic patients, with few adverse events observed, with a higher frequency of adverse events in relation to the 3 mg dose compared to the 6 mg dose. CONCLUSION: Brolucizumab is a new drug that has potential advantages in efficacy over other anti-VEGF agents in the treatment of DME and DR. It showed significant improvement in BCVA and CSMT with the possibility of a lower dosing schedule compared to other agents. Although observed in low frequency, sight-threatening adverse effects appear to occur more frequently compared to other anti-VEGF agents. The main observed adverse event was retinal vasculitis which was seen more commonly with the 3 mg dose versus the 6 mg dose.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Diabetes Mellitus , Retinopatía Diabética , Edema Macular , Humanos , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis , Retinopatía Diabética/tratamiento farmacológico , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Edema Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Ranibizumab , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular
3.
Clin Ophthalmol ; 17: 2309-2322, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37593358

RESUMEN

Purpose: Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) is fairly common in newborns. The main aim of this cross-sectional study is to assess the preferred practice patterns of CNLDO among ophthalmologists in Jordan. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted across all ophthalmological practices in Jordan, using convenience sampling. An online questionnaire, designed through Google Forms, was distributed through social media. The survey contained four domains: baseline characteristics of participants and the diagnosis (7 items), medical management (3 items), and surgical management (11 items) of CNLDO. Descriptive statistics were conducted using SPSS (IBM SPSS Corp, SPSS Statistics ver. 26, USA). Results: Eighty-three physicians responded to the survey, with an average age of 40.6 ± 8.6. More than half of the participants (53.0%, n = 44) were general ophthalmologists. Only 37.3% of our sample (n = 31) regularly evaluated the refraction of a child presenting with epiphora suggestive of CNLDO. Criggler's nasolacrimal duct massage was recommended by 62.7% of respondents (n = 52) for up to 12 months. In addition, 72.3% of respondents (n = 60) recommended 12 months as the minimum age for primary probing of CNLDO. Silicon intubation was considered for primary probing starting at 24 months by 31.3% of ophthalmologists (n = 20). Monocanalicular stent was preferred by 42.2% of respondents (n = 27) while 31.3% (n = 20) preferred bicanalicular stent. Conclusion: There is considerable variability in preferred practice patterns regarding the diagnosis and management of CNLDO in Jordan. Our findings highlight the gaps in optimum practices which need to be addressed for better management.

4.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol ; 261(8): 2103-2116, 2023 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36795160

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Foldable capsular vitreous body (FCVB) is an emerging vitreous substitute that has been recently introduced to treat various advanced vitreoretinal conditions including severe ocular trauma, complicated retinal detachment (RD), and proliferative vitreoretinopathy. METHODS: Review protocol was prospectively registered at PROSPERO (CRD42022342310). A systematic literature search using PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Google Scholar for articles published until May 2022 was performed. The search included the following keywords: foldable capsular vitreous body, FCVB, artificial vitreous substitutes, and artificial vitreous implants. Outcomes included indications of FCVB, anatomical success rates, postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and complications. RESULTS: A total of 17 studies that utilized FCVB up to May 2022 were included. FCVB was used intraocularly as a tamponade or extraocularly as a macular/scleral buckle for various retinal conditions including severe ocular trauma, simple and complex RD, silicone oil-dependent eyes, and highly myopic eyes with foveoschisis. FCVB was reported to be successfully implanted in the vitreous cavity of all patients. Final retinal reattachment rate ranged from 30 to 100%. Postoperative IOP improved or was maintained in most eyes, with low postoperative complication rates. Improvement in BCVA ranged from 0 to 100% of subjects. CONCLUSION: Indications of FCVB implantation have recently widened to include multiple advanced ocular conditions such as complex RD, but also include simpler conditions as uncomplicated RD. FCVB implantation showed good visual and anatomical outcomes, few IOP fluctuations, and a good safety profile. Larger comparative studies are required to further evaluate FCVB implantation.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Oculares , Desprendimiento de Retina , Vitreorretinopatía Proliferativa , Cuerpo Vítreo , Desprendimiento de Retina/cirugía , Vitrectomía/métodos , Lesiones Oculares/cirugía , Vitreorretinopatía Proliferativa/cirugía , Humanos , Implantes Orbitales , Presión Intraocular
5.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 10(12)2022 Dec 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36560553

RESUMEN

The main aim of this study is to investigate the current evidence regarding the association between COVID-19 vaccination and ocular vascular events. The protocol is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022358133). On 18 August 2022, an electronic search was conducted through five databases. All original articles reporting individuals who were vaccinated with COVID-19 vaccines and developed ophthalmic vascular events were included. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the NIH tool. A total of 49 studies with 130 ocular vascular cases were included. Venous occlusive events were the most common events (54.3%), which mostly occurred following the first dose (46.2%) and within the first five days following vaccination (46.2%). Vascular events occurred more with the Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccines (81.6%), and mostly presented unilaterally (73.8%). The most frequently reported treatment was intravitreal anti-VEGF (n = 39, 30.4%). The majority of patients (90.1%) demonstrated either improvement (p = 0.321) or persistence (p = 0.414) in the final BCVA. Ophthalmic vascular events are serious vision-threatening side effects that have been associated with COVID-19 vaccination. Clinicians should be aware of the possible association between COVID-19 vaccines and ocular vascular events to provide early diagnosis and treatment.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...