VITREORETINAL OUTCOMES FOLLOWING SECONDARY INTRAOCULAR LENS IMPLANTATION WITH PARS PLANA VITRECTOMY.

BACKGROUND: Retrospective cohort study of 561 adult patients undergoing secondary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation by vitreoretinal surgeons at a single institution from April 2015 to December 2020. METHODS: Patient historical factors, intraoperative/postoperative complications, and outcomes of IOL type (anterior chamber IOL versus scleral sutured IOL versus scleral fixated IOL versus. sulcus) were assessed. Primary outcomes were rates of postoperative retinal tears and rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Secondary outcomes were rates of intraoperative endolaser, intraoperative retinal tear, and further IOL surgery. RESULTS: The incidence of intraoperative retinal tears was 7.3% and not significantly different between techniques. Rates of intraoperative endolaser use were 17.5% among all techniques and not significantly different between techniques. Rates of postoperative retinal tear were low (0%-2.7%). Rates of postoperative rhegmatogenous retinal detachment were not significantly different between techniques (anterior chamber IOL 9/198 [4.5%], SFIOL 1/54 [1.9%], scleral sutured IOL 14/274 [5.1%], sulcus 2/35 [5.7%], total 26/561 [4.6%], P = 0.79). Rates of repeat IOL surgery trended higher in sulcus lenses (anterior chamber IOL 5/198 [2.5%], SFIOL 4/54 [7.4%], scleral sutured IOL 16/274 [5.8%], sulcus 5/35 [14.3%], total 30/561 [5.3%], P = 0.12). CONCLUSION: Intraoperative endolaser use and intraoperative retinal tear are not uncommon in secondary IOL surgery and underscore the importance of careful vitreoretinal management among these patients.

Effectiveness of treatment for iris melanoma: surgical versus radiotherapeutic approaches.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of preventing metastasis for each major treatment modality for iris melanoma. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred consecutive eyes with iris melanoma at a single tertiary referral centre for ocular oncology. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of eyes with iris melanoma, both with (n = 69 eyes) and without (n = 231 eyes) ciliary body extension, was undertaken for metastasis-free survival at 5, 10, and 20 years based on type of treatment, including globe-sparing surgical resection (n = 169 eyes), plaque radiotherapy (n = 74 eyes), or enucleation (n = 57 eyes). RESULTS: For the total population, 5-, 10-, and 20-year metastasis-free survival rates were 95%, 93%, and 87%, respectively, and there was no difference in metastatic rates for tumours with versus without ciliary body extension (p = 0.95). Noninferiority was demonstrated for surgical resection and plaque radiotherapy, with metastasis-free survival rates of 98%, 97%, and 94% for surgical resection and 94%, 94%, and 89% for plaque radiotherapy (p = 0.002). The rates for globe salvage were 94%, 92%, and 90% for surgical resection and 94%, 86%, and 86% for plaque radiotherapy (p = 0.003). However, metastasis-free survival was worse in patients who underwent enucleation (86%, 67%, and NA; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Metastasis-free survival and globe salvage following plaque radiotherapy and surgical resection are not inferior to either, but eyes undergoing enucleation demonstrated a lower metastasis-free survival, likely because enucleation is performed for larger, more extensive melanomas, often with secondary glaucoma. In this analysis, iris melanoma with ciliary body involvement did not increase the risk of metastasis.

Toward Unity and Inclusion in the Clinical Workplace: An Evaluation of Healthcare Workforce Belonging During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: In a challenging time for the healthcare workforce responding to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, it is critical to identify factors contributing to team members' feelings of "belonging" in the workplace. The Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Quintuple Aim's principle of improving healthcare worker well-being could be applied to explore the implications of the increased turnover and stress, which connect to components of belonging. This study applies a qualitative approach to the organizational issues impacting healthcare teams, particularly during a complex and uncertain time. METHODS: To elucidate factors contributing to belonging, we conducted a series of semi-structured interviews with an interdisciplinary cross-sectional sample of healthcare workers. Interviews were conducted with 23 total staff members in two clinical settings, the emergency department and hospital medicine groups at a large urban teaching hospital, to evaluate team members' perspectives of the work environment. RESULTS: Participants discuss their degree of inclusion, excitement, challenges, and respective needs from the organization. Perspectives of workers representing varied professional roles of the healthcare team were gathered to provide robust and unique insights into initiatives that can enhance belonging in the clinical workplace. CONCLUSION: Our findings provide a preliminary framework to identify strategies that can potentially reinforce collective team member belonging and consequently improve staff well-being, morale, and retention.