Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 20
Filtrar
1.
Pract Radiat Oncol ; 14(1): e40-e47, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37804882

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Our purpose was to evaluate the clinical consequences of sinoatrial node (SAN) and atrioventricular node (AVN) irradiation in patients undergoing stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for central non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A single-institutional retrospective review of patients with primary NSCLC undergoing definitive SBRT for centrally located thoracic tumors from February 2007 to December 2021 was performed. The SAN and AVN were contoured in accordance with a published contouring atlas, and the maximum dose (Dmax) and mean dose (Dmean) for each structure were calculated. Sequential log rank testing between the 50th and 90th percentiles was used to identify potential cutoff values for the corresponding dosimetric parameters and overall survival. RESULTS: Among 93 eligible patients, the median age was 72.5 years (IQR, 66.6-78.3), and median follow-up was 32.4 months (IQR, 13.0-49.6). The median SAN Dmax and Dmean were 95 cGy (range, 9-5394) and 58 cGy (range, 7-3168), respectively. The median AVN Dmax and Dmean were 45 cGy (range, 4-2121) and 34 cGy (range, 3-1667), respectively. Candidate cutoff values for SAN Dmax and Dmean were 1309 and 836 cGy, respectively. No associations between AVN parameters and survival outcomes were identified. Upon multivariate Cox regression, the SAN Dmax cutoff (hazard ratio [HR], 2.03 [1.09-3.79]; P = .026) and SAN Dmean cutoff (HR, 2.22 [1.20-4.12]; P = .011) were significantly associated with overall survival. For noncancer-associated survival, the SAN Dmax cutoff trended toward significance (HR, 2.02 [0.89-4.57]; P = .092), and the SAN Dmean cutoff remained significantly associated (HR, 2.34 [1.05-5.18]; P = .037). CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing SBRT for NSCLC, SAN Dmax and Dmean were significantly associated with worse overall survival using cut-off values of 1309 and 836 cGy, respectively. Further studies examining the effect of SAN irradiation during SBRT are warranted.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Radiocirugia , Humanos , Anciano , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/cirugía , Radiocirugia/métodos , Nodo Sinoatrial , Dosificación Radioterapéutica
2.
EClinicalMedicine ; 61: 102060, 2023 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37457112

RESUMEN

Background: Historically, survivors of common lymphoid neoplasms (LNs) had increased risks for therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia (tMDS/AML). Despite major treatment advances in the treatment of LNs over the last two decades, a comprehensive evaluation of tMDS/AML trends following both common and rare LNs treated in this contemporary period is lacking. Methods: In US cancer registries during 2000-2018, we identified 1496 tMDS/AML cases among 186,503 adults who were treated with initial chemo/immunotherapy for first primary LN and survived ≥1 year. We quantified tMDS/AML standardized incidence ratios (SIRs), excess absolute risks (EARs, per 10,000 person-years), and cumulative incidence. Findings: The highest tMDS/AML risks occurred after precursor leukemia/lymphoma (SIR = 39, EAR = 30), Burkitt leukemia/lymphoma (SIR = 20, EAR = 24), peripheral T-cell lymphoma (SIR = 12, EAR = 23), chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL; SIR = 9.0, EAR = 27), and mantle cell lymphoma (SIR = 8.5, EAR = 25). Elevated risks (SIRs = 4.2-6.9, EARs = 4.9-15) also were observed after all other LN subtypes except hairy cell leukemia and mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome. Among patients treated more recently, tMDS/AML risks were significantly higher after CLL/SLL (SIR2000-2005 = 4.8, SIR2012-2017 = 10, Ptrend = 0.0043), significantly lower after Hodgkin (SIR2000-2005 = 15, SIR2012-2017 = 6.3, Ptrend = 0.024) and marginal zone (SIR2000-2005 = 7.5, SIR2012-2017 = 2.3, Ptrend = 0.015) lymphomas, and non-significantly lower after mantle cell lymphoma (SIR2000-2005 = 10, SIR2012-2017 = 3.2, Ptrend = 0.054), lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma/Waldenström macroglobulinemia (SIR2000-2005 = 6.9, SIR2012-2017 = 1.0, Ptrend = 0.067), and plasma cell neoplasms (SIR2000-2005 = 5.4, SIR2012-2017 = 3.1, Ptrend = 0.051). EAR and cumulative incidence trends generally were similar to SIR trends. Median survival after tMDS/AML was 8.0 months (interquartile range, 3.0-22.0). Interpretation: Although tMDS/AML risks are significantly elevated after initial chemo/immunotherapy for most LNs, patients treated more recently have lower tMDS/AML risks, except after CLL/SLL. Though rare, the poor prognosis following tMDS/AML emphasizes the importance of continued efforts to reduce treatment-associated toxicity. Funding: This research was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health. LMM, GMD, REC, and CBS verified the data, and all authors had access to the data and made the decision to submit for publication.

3.
JAMA Oncol ; 9(8): 1119-1123, 2023 08 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37289449

RESUMEN

Importance: Compared with 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) can spare nearby tissue but may result in increased scatter radiation to distant normal tissue, including red bone marrow. It is unclear whether second primary cancer risk varies by radiotherapy type. Objective: To evaluate whether radiotherapy type (IMRT vs 3DCRT) is associated with second primary cancer risk among older men treated for prostate cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this retrospective cohort study of a linked database of Medicare claims and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program population-based cancer registries (2002-2015), male patients aged 66 to 84 diagnosed with a first primary nonmetastatic prostate cancer from 2002 to 2013, as reported to SEER, and who received radiotherapy (IMRT and/or 3DCRT without proton therapy) within the first year following prostate cancer were identified. The data were analyzed from January 2022 through June 2022. Exposure: Receipt of IMRT and 3DCRT, based on Medicare claims. Main Outcomes and Measures: The association between radiotherapy type and development of a subsequent hematologic cancer at least 2 years after prostate cancer diagnosis or a subsequent solid cancer at least 5 years after prostate cancer diagnosis. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs were estimated using multivariable Cox proportional regression. Results: The study included 65 235 2-year first primary prostate cancer survivors (median [range] age, 72 [66-82] years; 82.2% White patients) and 45 811 5-year survivors with similar demographic characteristics (median [range] age, 72 [66-79] years; 82.4% White patients). Among 2-year prostate cancer survivors (median [range] follow-up, 4.6 [0.003-12.0] years), 1107 second hematologic cancers were diagnosed (IMRT, 603; 3DCRT, 504). Radiotherapy type was not associated with second hematologic cancers overall or any specific types evaluated. Among 5-year survivors (median [range] follow-up, 3.1 [0.003-9.0] years), 2688 men were diagnosed with a second primary solid cancer (IMRT, 1306; 3DCRT, 1382). The overall HR for IMRT vs 3DCRT was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.83-0.99). This inverse association was restricted to the earlier calendar year period of prostate cancer diagnosis (HR2002-2005 = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.76-0.94; HR2006-2010 = 1.14; 95% CI, 0.96-1.36), with a similar pattern observed for colon cancer (HR2002-2005 = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.46-0.94; HR2006-2010 = 1.06; 95% CI, 0.59-1.88). Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this large, population-based cohort study suggest that IMRT for prostate cancer is not associated with an increased risk of second primary cancers, either solid or hematologic, and any inverse associations may be associated with calendar year of treatment.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Radioterapia Conformacional , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada , Humanos , Anciano , Masculino , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/epidemiología , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/etiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medicare , Resultado del Tratamiento , Radioterapia Conformacional/efectos adversos , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/efectos adversos , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia
4.
J Cancer Surviv ; 16(3): 514-530, 2022 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33982233

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Increasing number of breast cancer survivors in the USA have led to greater focus on the long-term health outcomes and surveillance care among these women. However limited evidence exists of use of surveillance mammography among breast cancer survivors and how it varies across racial/ethnic groups. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the literature to explore disparities in use of surveillance mammogram among women breast cancer survivors by searching for relevant studies published between 2000 and 2020 from Medline (Ovid), PubMed (National Library of Medicine), and PsycINFO (Ovid) bibliographic databases. Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts of all articles that reported surveillance mammography use across racial/ethnic groups. Data on study design, screening eligibility, sample size, operational definition, and/or measure of the use of a surveillance mammogram among breast cancer survivors and the association between race/ethnicity and use of a surveillance mammogram were summarized in the evidence tables. RESULTS: We identified 1544 records from the three databases, and 30 studies examined the use of surveillance mammograms among breast cancer survivors across race/ethnic groups. Of these, 21 provided adjusted estimates of racial/ethnic disparities in use of surveillance mammograms, and 15 of these reported statistically significant disparities. In summary, most studies reported that non-white women (mainly Blacks and Hispanics) were less likely to receive a timely surveillance mammogram compared to White. CONCLUSION: This study extends the evidence of racial/ethnic disparities beyond completion of initial treatment by finding similar disparities in receipt of surveillance mammograms among breast cancer survivors. IMPLICATION FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Our findings identify a need to improve efforts to increase post-treatment use of surveillance mammography among racial/ethnic minority women to reduce these gaps and improve overall clinical and quality of life outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Supervivientes de Cáncer , Etnicidad , Femenino , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Humanos , Mamografía , Grupos Minoritarios , Calidad de Vida
5.
Cancer Epidemiol ; 74: 101985, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34280845

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Mutually increased risks for thyroid and breast cancer have been reported, but the contribution of etiologic factors versus increased medical surveillance to these associations is unknown. METHODS: Leveraging large-scale US population-based cancer registry data, we used standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) to investigate the reciprocal risks of thyroid and breast cancers among adult females diagnosed with a first primary invasive, non-metastatic breast cancer (N = 652,627) or papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) (N = 92,318) during 2000-2017 who survived ≥1-year. RESULTS: PTC risk was increased 1.3-fold [N = 1434; SIR = 1.32; 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 1.25-1.39] after breast cancer compared to the general population. PTC risk declined significantly with time since breast cancer (Poisson regression = Ptrend <0.001) and was evident only for tumors ≤2 cm in size. The SIRs for PTC were higher after hormone-receptor (HR)+ (versus HR-) and stage II or III (versus stage 0-I) breast tumors. Breast cancer risk was increased 1.2-fold (N = 2038; SIR = 1.21; CI = 1.16-1.26) after PTC and was constant over time since PTC but was only increased for stage 0-II and HR + breast cancers. CONCLUSION: Although some of the patterns by latency, stage and size are consistent with heightened surveillance contributing to the breast-thyroid association, we cannot exclude a role of shared etiology or treatment effects.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Neoplasias de la Tiroides , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Riesgo , Cáncer Papilar Tiroideo/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/etiología
6.
JCO Oncol Pract ; 17(12): e1856-e1865, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34043452

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Patients with cancer frequently encounter financial hardship, yet systematic strategies to identify at-risk patients are not established in care delivery. We assessed sensitivity of distress-based screening to identify patients with cancer-related financial hardship and associated care delivery outcomes. METHODS: A survey of 225 patients at a large cancer center assessed cancer-related financial hardship (0-10 Likert scale; highest quintile scores ≥ 5 defined severe hardship). Responses were linked to electronic medical records identifying patients' distress screening scores 6 months presurvey (0-10 scale) and outcomes of missed cancer care visits and bad debt charges (unrecovered patient charges) within 6 months postsurvey. A positive screen for distress was defined as score ≥ 4. We analyzed screening test characteristics for identifying severe financial hardship within 6 months and associations between financial hardship and outcomes using logistic models. RESULTS: Although patients with positive distress screens were more likely to report financial hardship (odds ratio [OR], 1.21; 1.08-1.37; P < .001), a positive distress screen was only 48% sensitive and 70% specific for identifying severe financial hardship. Patients with worse financial hardship scores were more likely to miss oncology care visits within 6 months (for every additional point in financial hardship score from 0 to 10, OR, 1.28; 1.12-1.47; P < .001). Of patients with severe hardship, 72% missed oncology visits versus 35% without severe hardship (P = .006). Patients with worse hardship were more likely to incur any bad debt charges within 6 months (OR, 1.32; 1.13-1.54; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Systematic financial hardship screening is needed to help mitigate adverse care delivery outcomes. Existing distress-based screening lacks sensitivity.


Asunto(s)
Estrés Financiero , Neoplasias , Atención a la Salud , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Humanos , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
7.
Cancer Causes Control ; 32(8): 803-813, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33877513

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The role of established breast cancer risk factors and clinical characteristics of the first breast cancer in the development of contralateral breast cancer (CBC) among postmenopausal women is unclear. METHODS: We identified 10,934 postmenopausal women diagnosed with a first primary breast cancer between 1995 and 2011 in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study. CBC was defined as a second primary breast cancer diagnosed in the contralateral breast ≥ 3 months after the first breast cancer. Exposures included pre-diagnosis risk factors (lifestyle, reproductive, family history) and clinical characteristics of the first breast cancer. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 6.8 years, 436 women developed CBC. We observed an increasing trend in CBC risk by age (p-trend = 0.002) and decreasing trend by year of diagnosis (p-trend = 0.001) of the first breast cancer. Additional risk factor associations were most pronounced for endocrine therapy (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53-0.87) and family history of breast cancer (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.06-1.80, restricted to invasive first breast cancer). No associations were found for lifestyle (body mass index, physical activity, smoking, alcohol) or reproductive factors (age at menarche, parity, age at first birth, age at menopause). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that clinical characteristics of the first breast cancer and family history of breast cancer, but not pre-diagnosis lifestyle and reproductive factors, are strongly associated with CBC risk among postmenopausal women. Future studies are needed to understand how these factors contribute to CBC etiology and to identify further opportunities for prevention.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Supervivientes de Cáncer , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/etiología , Posmenopausia , Anciano , Índice de Masa Corporal , Dieta , Femenino , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Menarquia , Menopausia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Historia Reproductiva , Factores de Riesgo
8.
JNCI Cancer Spectr ; 5(2): pkaa102, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33875976

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have been reported to have double the case fatality rate of the general population. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central was done for studies on cancer patients with COVID-19. Pooled proportions were calculated for categorical variables. Odds ratio (OR) and forest plots (random-effects model) were constructed for both primary and secondary outcomes. RESULTS: This systematic review of 38 studies and meta-analysis of 181 323 patients from 26 studies included 23 736 cancer patients. Our meta-analysis shows that cancer patients with COVID-19 have a higher likelihood of death (n = 165 980, OR = 2.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.47 to 4.42), which was largely driven by mortality among patients in China. Cancer patients were more likely to be intubated. Among cancer subtypes, the mortality was highest in hematological malignancies (n = 878, OR = 2.39, 95% CI = 1.17 to 4.87) followed by lung cancer (n = 646, OR = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.00 to 3.37). There was no association between receipt of a particular type of oncologic therapy and mortality. Our study showed that cancer patients affected by COVID-19 are a decade older than the normal population and have a higher proportion of comorbidities. There was insufficient data to assess the association of COVID-19-directed therapy and survival outcomes in cancer patients. CONCLUSION: Cancer patients with COVID-19 disease are at increased risk of mortality and morbidity. A more nuanced understanding of the interaction between cancer-directed therapies and COVID-19-directed therapies is needed. This will require uniform prospective recording of data, possibly in multi-institutional registry databases.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/complicaciones , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/terapia , Anciano , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/virología , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/complicaciones , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Humanos , Hepatopatías/complicaciones , Enfermedades Pulmonares/complicaciones , Masculino , Enfermedades Metabólicas/complicaciones , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Pandemias , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , SARS-CoV-2/fisiología
9.
BMC Cancer ; 19(1): 964, 2019 Oct 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31623592

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: CpG Island Methylator Phenotype (CIMP) is an epigenetic phenotype in CRC characterized by hypermethylation of CpG islands in promoter regions of tumor suppressor genes, leading to their transcriptional silencing and loss of function. While the prevalence of CRC differs across geographical regions, no studies have compared prevalence of CIMP-High phenotype across regions. The purpose of this project was to compare the prevalence of CIMP across geographical regions after adjusting for variations in methodologies to measure CIMP in a meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Medline, and Embase for articles focusing on CIMP published from 2000 to 2018. Two reviewers independently identified 111 articles to be included in final meta-analysis. We classified methods used to quantify CIMP into 4 categories: a) Classical (MINT marker) Panel group b) Weisenberg-Ogino (W-O) group c) Human Methylation Arrays group and d) Miscellaneous group. We compared the prevalence of CIMP across geographical regions after correcting for methodological variations using meta-regression techniques. RESULTS: The pooled prevalence of CIMP-High across all studies was 22% (95% confidence interval:21-24%; I2 = 94.75%). Pooled prevalence of CIMP-H across Asia, Australia, Europe, North America and South America was 22, 21, 21, 27 and 25%, respectively. Meta-regression analysis identified no significant differences in the prevalence of CIMP-H across geographical regions after correction for methodological variations. In exploratory analysis, we observed variations in CIMP-H prevalence across countries. CONCLUSION: Although no differences were found for CIMP-H prevalence across countries, further studies are needed to compare the influence of demographic, lifestyle and environmental factors in relation to the prevalence of CIMP across geographical regions.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Islas de CpG/genética , Metilación de ADN/genética , Fenotipo , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/efectos adversos , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/genética , Estudios de Cohortes , República Checa , Silenciador del Gen , Heterogeneidad Genética , Humanos , India , Prevalencia , Regiones Promotoras Genéticas/genética , Sesgo de Publicación , Factores de Riesgo
10.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 17(10): 1184-1192, 2019 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31590147

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer experience financial toxicity from the costs of treatment, as well as material and psychologic stress related to this burden. A synthesized understanding of predictors and outcomes of the financial burdens associated with cancer care is needed to underpin strategic responses in oncology care. This study systematically reviewed risk factors and outcomes associated with financial burdens related to cancer treatment. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, PsychINFO, and the Cochrane Library were searched from study inception through June 2018, and reference lists were scanned from studies of patient-level predictors and outcomes of financial burdens in US patients with cancer (aged ≥18 years). Two reviewers conducted screening, abstraction, and quality assessment. Variables associated with financial burdens were synthesized. When possible, pooled estimates of associations were calculated using random-effects models. RESULTS: A total of 74 observational studies of financial burdens in 598,751 patients with cancer were identified, among which 49% of patients reported material or psychologic financial burdens (95% CI, 41%-56%). Socioeconomic predictors of worse financial burdens with treatment were lack of health insurance, lower income, unemployment, and younger age at cancer diagnosis. Compared with patients with health insurance, those who were uninsured demonstrated twice the odds of financial burdens (pooled odds ratio [OR], 2.09; 95% CI, 1.33-3.30). Financial burdens were most severe early in cancer treatment, did not differ by disease site, and were associated with worse health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and nearly twice the odds of cancer medication nonadherence (pooled OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.13-2.56). Only a single study demonstrated an association with increased mortality. Studies assessing the comparative effectiveness of interventions to mitigate financial burdens in patients with cancer were lacking. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence showed that financial burdens are common, disproportionately impacting younger and socioeconomically disadvantaged patients with cancer, across disease sites, and are associated with worse treatment adherence and HRQoL. Available evidence helped identify vulnerable patients needing oncology provider engagement and response, but evidence is critically needed on the effectiveness of interventions designed to mitigate financial burden and impact.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias/economía , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Costo de Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 104(2): 383-391, 2019 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30716524

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Older women with nonmetastatic breast cancer can often choose from several surgery and radiation treatment options. Little is known regarding how these choices contribute to decisional regret, which is a negative emotion reflecting the idea that another surgery or radiation decision might have been preferable. We sought to characterize the burden of and examine potential risk factors for local therapy decisional regret among a population-based cohort of older breast cancer survivors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: National Medicare claims for age ≥67 female breast cancer incident in 2009 identified patients treated with lumpectomy plus whole-breast irradiation, brachytherapy, or endocrine therapy or mastectomy with or without radiation. We sampled 330 patients per treatment group (N = 1650), of whom 1253 agreed to receive a paper survey including the Decisional Regret Scale and EQ-5D-3L Health-Utility Scale. Local therapy regret was defined as neutral or worse response to questions regarding surgery- or radiation-related decisional regret. Local therapy regret risk factors were evaluated using a multivariable generalized linear model. Association of local therapy regret with health utility was modeled using multivariable linear regression. RESULTS: The response rate was 30.2% (n = 498 of 1650); 421 surveys were included in this analysis. Median diagnosis age was 72 years, and surveys were completed 6 years after diagnosis. Overall, 23.8% of respondents (n = 100) reported experiencing local therapy decisional regret. Type of local therapy was not associated with local therapy regret. Predictors of increased regret included black race (risk ratio [RR], 2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33-3.29), high school education or less (RR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.27-2.75), and axillary nodal dissection (RR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.33-3.41). Local therapy regret was not associated with health utility (P = .37). CONCLUSIONS: Local therapy regret afflicts nearly one quarter of our cohort of older breast cancer survivors, and it is associated with black race, less education, and more extensive nodal dissection, but not breast surgery. Regret is distinct from health utility, suggesting that it is a unique psychosocial construct that merits further study and mitigation strategies.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Toma de Decisiones , Emociones , Prioridad del Paciente/psicología , Anciano , Población Negra/psicología , Braquiterapia/psicología , Conducta de Elección , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Terapia Combinada/psicología , Escolaridad , Femenino , Humanos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/psicología , Mastectomía/psicología , Mastectomía Segmentaria/psicología , Medicare , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Satisfacción del Paciente , Radioterapia/métodos , Radioterapia/psicología , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos
13.
BMC Cancer ; 18(1): 1174, 2018 Nov 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30482179

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cachexia is a multisystem syndrome characterized by weight loss, anorexia, loss of muscle mass, systemic inflammation, insulin resistance, and functional decline. Management of cachexia involves addressing multiple underlying biological mechanisms. Previous review on pharmacological management of cancer cachexia identified progestins and corticosteroids as effective agents for treatment of cachexia. However, to date no consensus exists on a single effective or standard treatment for management of cachexia. The aim of this systematic review is to determine the effectiveness of pharmacological treatments used to manage cachexia among adult cancer patients. METHODS: We performed literature searches of PubMed (NLM), Embase (Ovid), and Medline(Ovid) to identify clinical trials focused on pharmacological management of cancer cachexia among adult cancer patients from 2004 to 2018. Three reviewers screened a random selection of abstracts to measure for interrater reliability. After this step, each screener screened two-thirds of all abstracts and 177 studies were identified for full text review. The primary outcome was impact of pharmacological management on change in either weight or lean body mass in cancer patients. RESULTS: We identified 19 articles (representing 20 RCTs) that focused on pharmacological management of cancer cachexia. Agents showing promising results included Anamorelin and Enobosarm. Anamorelin at 50 or 100 mg per day for 12 weeks showed a consistent benefit across all studies and resulted in significant improvement in weight as compared to baseline among cancer patients. Enobosarm at 1 and 3 mg per day was also effective in improving lean body mass and QOL symptoms among advancer stage cancer patients. Finally, use of combination agents provide evidence for targeting multiple pathways underlying cachexia mechanism to achieve maximum benefit. No agents showed functional improvement in cancer patients. CONCLUSION: Anamorelin as a single agent shows promising results in improving cachexia related weight loss among cancer patients. Further research on combination therapies may be helpful to address critical gaps in cachexia management.


Asunto(s)
Caquexia/tratamiento farmacológico , Caquexia/etiología , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Citocinas/metabolismo , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Hidrazinas/uso terapéutico , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Oligopéptidos/uso terapéutico , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
Transl Oncol ; 11(5): 1188-1201, 2018 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30071442

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) tumors, comprising 20% of colorectal cancers, are associated with female sex, age, right-sided location, and BRAF mutations. However, other factors potentially associated with CIMP have not been robustly examined. This meta-analysis provides a comprehensive assessment of the clinical, pathologic, and molecular characteristics that define CIMP tumors. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search of the literature from January 1999 through April 2018 and identified 122 articles, on which comprehensive data abstraction was performed on the clinical, pathologic, molecular, and mutational characteristics of CIMP subgroups, classified based on the extent of DNA methylation of tumor suppressor genes assessed using a variety of laboratory methods. Associations of CIMP with outcome parameters were estimated using pooled odds ratio or standardized mean differences using random-effects model. RESULTS: We confirmed prior associations including female sex, older age, right-sided tumor location, poor differentiation, and microsatellite instability. In addition to the recognized association with BRAF mutations, CIMP was also associated with PIK3CA mutations and lack of mutations in KRAS and TP53. Evidence of an activated immune response was seen with high rates of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (but not peritumoral lymphocytes), Crohn-like infiltrates, and infiltration with Fusobacterium nucleatum bacteria. Additionally, CIMP tumors were associated with advance T-stage and presence of perineural and lymphovascular invasion. CONCLUSION: The meta-analysis highlights key features distinguishing CIMP in colorectal cancer, including molecular characteristics of an active immune response. Improved understanding of this unique molecular subtype of colorectal cancer may provide insights into prevention and treatment.

15.
J Cancer Surviv ; 12(5): 659-668, 2018 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30043339

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Given the increasing number and diversity of cancer survivors in the USA and persistent racial/ethnic disparities in breast cancer care, we sought to examine the role of acculturation in adherence to recommended surgical treatment and survivorship care recommendations. METHODS: Study participants included 343 Mexican American women with stage I to III breast cancer who participated in the Ella Binational Breast Cancer Study and were treated at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas, between March 2007 and June 2011. Participants completed a questionnaire measuring acculturation, and clinical and demographic variables were obtained from an institutional database. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to examine differences in surgical procedures received and adherence to long-term survivorship care by acculturation level. RESULTS: Bilingual (odds ratio [OR] = 1.85; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.85-4.02, P = .11) and English-dominant women (OR = 2.39; 95% CI = 1.02-5.61, P = .04) were more likely to receive breast-conserving surgery (versus mastectomy) than were Spanish-dominant women. Among all patients, adherence to surveillance mammography and clinic visits decreased over time; the decline in clinic visit adherence was statistically significant (P = .005). Although no statistically significant association was found between acculturation and adherence to long-term survivorship care, receipt of breast-conserving surgery (versus mastectomy) was significantly associated with higher adherence to surveillance mammograms. CONCLUSION: Acculturation may play a role in decision-making about surgical management of breast cancer, and further studies with larger samples are needed to explore its role in adherence to survivorship care recommendations. Findings from this study may help identify patients requiring additional support while making decisions pertaining to their cancer treatment and survivorship care.


Asunto(s)
Aculturación , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Supervivencia , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Supervivientes de Cáncer , Femenino , Humanos , Mastectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Americanos Mexicanos , Texas
16.
J Cancer Surviv ; 11(4): 477-485, 2017 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28229275

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: A randomized pilot trial evaluated the hypothesis that early intervention lessens sexual dysfunction in the first year on aromatase inhibitors. A secondary aim was comparing the efficacy of two vaginal moisturizers. METHODS: Fifty-seven postmenopausal women with early stage breast cancer starting aromatase inhibitors were randomized to three treatment groups. All received a handout on managing sexual and other side effects. The Usual Care group received no additional therapy. The Active Treatment groups received a 6-month supply of a vaginal moisturizer (hyaluronic acid-based in Active Group-H and prebiotic in Active Group-P) and a vaginal lubricant and dilator, plus access to an educational website and phone coaching. Questionnaires completed at baseline, 6, and 12 months included the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), Menopausal Sexual Interest Questionnaire (MSIQ), Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised (FSDS-R), and a menopausal symptom scale. RESULTS: Forty-nine women (86%) provided follow-up data. Mean age was 59 and 77% were non-Hispanic Caucasian. Sexual function was impaired at baseline, but remained stable over 12 months for all groups. The combined active treatment group had less dyspareunia (P = 0.07) and sexual distress (P = 0.02) at 6 months than the Usual Care group. At 6 months, the Active-H group improved significantly more than the Active-P group on FSFI total score (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Sexual counseling helped women maintain stable sexual function on aromatase inhibitors. Active intervention resulted in better outcomes at 6 months. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: This promising pilot trial suggests a need for more research on preventive counseling to maintain sexual function during aromatase inhibitor treatment.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Aromatasa/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Conducta Sexual/psicología , Sobrevivientes/psicología , Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Posmenopausia , Conducta Sexual/efectos de los fármacos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
17.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 23(6): 967-75, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24740200

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: African Americans suffer disproportionately from the adverse consequences of behavioral risk factors for cancer relative to other ethnic groups. Recent studies have assessed how financial strain might uniquely contribute to engagement in modifiable behavioral risk factors for cancer, but not among African Americans. The current study examined associations between financial strain and modifiable cancer risk factors (smoking, at-risk alcohol use, overweight/obesity, insufficient physical activity, inadequate fruit and vegetable intake, and multiple risk factors) among 1,278 African American adults (age, 46.5 ± 12.6 years; 77% female) and explored potential mediators (stress and depressive symptoms) of those associations. METHODS: Logistic regression models were used to examine associations between financial strain and cancer risk factors. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, partner status, income, educational level, and employment status. Analyses involving overweight/obesity status additionally controlled for fruit and vegetable intake and physical activity. Nonparametric bootstrapping procedures were used to assess mediation. RESULTS: Greater financial strain was associated with greater odds of insufficient physical activity (P < 0.003) and smoking (P = 0.005) and was positively associated with the total number of cancer risk factors (P < 0.0001). There was a significant indirect effect of both stress and depressive symptoms on the relations of financial strain with physical inactivity and multiple risk factors, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Future interventions aimed at reducing cancer disparities should focus on African Americans experiencing higher financial strain while addressing their stress and depressive symptoms. IMPACT: Longitudinal studies are needed to assess the temporal and causal relations between financial strain and modifiable behavioral cancer risk factors among African Americans.


Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano , Neoplasias/economía , Neoplasias/etnología , Asunción de Riesgos , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo
18.
Am J Health Behav ; 38(3): 340-50, 2014 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24636030

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To explore associations between financial strain and self-rated health among 1341 black adults. METHODS: Associations were investigated using a covariate-adjusted linear regression model. Mediation (via stress and/or depressive symptoms) was explored in additional models using a nonparametric bootstrapping procedure. RESULTS: Higher financial strain was associated with poorer self-rated health (p < .001). Stress and depressive symptoms were each significant mediators of this relation in both single and multiple mediator models (p values < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Financial strain may contribute to poorer health among black adults, partially via greater stress and depressive symptoms. Potential theoretical, intervention, and policy implications are discussed. Future studies with longitudinal designs are needed to confirm these results.


Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano , Autoevaluación Diagnóstica , Estado de Salud , Clase Social , Adulto , Negro o Afroamericano/psicología , Intervalos de Confianza , Depresión/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Autoinforme , Estrés Psicológico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
19.
Am J Health Behav ; 38(4): 481-91, 2014 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24636110

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To explore relations between loneliness and self-rated health among African-American adults of diverse ages. METHODS: Associations between loneliness and self-rated health were investigated using covariate-adjusted linear regression models. Perceived social support was examined as a moderator. The potential indirect effects of stress and/or depressive symptoms were examined using nonparametric bootstrapping procedures. RESULTS: Greater loneliness was associated with poorer self-rated health (p = .008), and social support did not moderate. Stress and depressive symptoms yielded significant indirect effects in single and multiple mediator models (p values ≤ .05). CONCLUSIONS: Loneliness may contribute to poorer health among African Americans. Results suggest that greater stress and depressive symptoms might underlie these associations, but longitudinal studies are needed to assess causal relations.


Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano/psicología , Estado de Salud , Aislamiento Social/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cristianismo , Depresión/etnología , Autoevaluación Diagnóstica , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Apoyo Social , Estrés Psicológico/etnología , Adulto Joven
20.
Cancer ; 120(6): 894-900, 2014 Mar 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24258799

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Adherence to guidelines for surveillance mammography and clinic visits is an important component of breast cancer survivorship care. Identifying ethnic disparities in adherence may lead to improved care delivery and outcomes. METHODS: Records were evaluated for 4535 patients who were treated for stage I, II, or III breast cancer at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, cancer center between January 1997 and December 2006. Generalized estimating equations and Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to evaluate ethnic differences in missed mammograms and clinic visits up to 4 years of follow-up and the impact of those differences on overall survival. RESULTS: Nonadherence to guidelines for mammography (P = .0002) and clinic visits (P < .0001) increased over time. Hispanic and black patients were more likely to be nonadherent to guidelines for mammography (odds ratio [OR] = 1.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.10-1.65; OR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.11-1.66, respectively) and clinic visits (OR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.27-2.06; OR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.13-1.86, respectively) than white patients. There was an interaction between Hispanic ethnicity and endocrine therapy on nonadherence to mammography guidelines (P = .001). Nonadherence to mammography and clinic visit guidelines was not associated with overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Withdrawal from breast cancer survivorship care increases over time, and black and Hispanic patients are more likely to be nonadherent. An understanding of the reasons for ethnic disparities in adherence to guidelines for mammography and clinic visits is needed to improve retention in survivorship care.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Adhesión a Directriz , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Mamografía , Cooperación del Paciente , Anciano , Atención a la Salud , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Etnicidad , Femenino , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sobrevida , Tasa de Supervivencia , Texas , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...