RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study was aimed at identifying differences in the prodromal symptoms and their duration, risk factors and markers of vulnerability in patients presenting a first episode mania (FEM) or psychosis (FEP) with onset in late adolescence or adulthood in order to guide tailored treatment strategies. METHODS: Patients with a FEM or FEP underwent a clinical assessment. Prodromes were evaluated with the Bipolar Prodrome Symptom Scale-Retrospective (BPSS-R). Chi-squared tests were conducted to assess specific prodromal symptoms, risk factors or markers of vulnerability between groups. Significant prodromal symptoms were entered in a stepwise forward logistic regression model. The probabilities of a gradual versus rapid onset pattern of the prodromes were computed with logistic regression models. RESULTS: The total sample included 108 patients (FEM = 72, FEP = 36). Social isolation was associated with the prodromal stage of a FEP whilst Increased energy or goal-directed activity with the prodrome to a FEM. Physically slowed down presented the most gradual onset whilst Increased energy presented the most rapid. The presence of obstetric complications and difficulties in writing and reading during childhood were risk factors for FEP. As for markers of vulnerability, impairment in premorbid adjustment was characteristic of FEP patients. No specific risk factor or marker of vulnerability was identified for FEM. CONCLUSION: Early characteristics differentiating FEP from FEM were identified. These findings might help shape early identification and preventive intervention programmes.
Asunto(s)
Síntomas Prodrómicos , Trastornos Psicóticos , Adolescente , Adulto , Humanos , Manía , Trastornos Psicóticos/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aimed at providing a critical, comprehensive synthesis of international guidelines' recommendations on the long-term treatment of bipolar disorder type I (BD-I). METHODS: MEDLINE/PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched from inception to January 15th, 2019 following PRISMA and PICAR rules. International guidelines providing recommendations for the long-term treatment of BD-I were included. A methodological quality assessment was conducted with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation-AGREE II. RESULTS: The final selection yielded five international guidelines, with overall good quality. The evaluation of applicability was the weakest aspect across the guidelines. Differences in their updating strategies and the rating of the evidence, particularly for meta-analyses, randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies, could be responsible of some level of heterogeneity among recommendations. Nonetheless, the guidelines recommended lithium as the 'gold standard' in the long-term treatment of BD-I. Quetiapine was another possible first-line option as well as aripiprazole (for the prevention of mania). Long-term treatment should contemplate monotherapy, at least initially. Clinicians should check regularly for efficacy and side effects and if necessary, switch to first-line alternatives (i.e. Valproate), combine first-line compounds with different mechanisms of action or switch to second-line options or combinations. CONCLUSIONS: The possibility to monitor improvements in long-term outcomes, namely relapse prevention and inter-episode subthreshold depressive symptoms, based on the application of their recommendations is an unmet need of clinical guidelines. In terms of evidence of clinical guidelines, there is a need for more efficacious treatment strategies for the prevention of bipolar depression.
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos , Trastorno Bipolar , Algoritmos , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Trastorno Bipolar/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Fumarato de Quetiapina/uso terapéutico , Ácido Valproico/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Diagnostic criteria for a major depressive episode capture heterogeneous presentations across unipolar (UD) and bipolar (BD) and first-onset (FDE) depression. We evaluated the contribution of each depressive and (hypo)manic symptom to worse functioning in UD/BD/FDE subgroups. METHODS: A post-hoc analysis of the BRIDGE-II-Mix study. Acutely depressed patients were stratified into UD, BD and FDE. Each (hypo)manic or depressive symptom was included in a diagnosis-specific logistic regression model with functioning as dependent variable. Better/worse functioning was set with median diagnosis-specific GAF scores cutoffs. All p values were two-tailed. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 2768/2811 depressed individuals were enrolled. In BD (Nâ¯=â¯716), "recurrent thoughts of death" (OR 2.48, p < 0.0001) and "feelings of worthlessness" (OR 2.28, p < 0.0001) among depressive symptoms, "aggressiveness" (OR 1.67, pâ¯=â¯0.022) as the unique (hypo)manic symptom, significantly contributed to worse functioning. In UD (Nâ¯=â¯1357), "depressed mood" (OR 5.6, pâ¯=â¯0.031) and "diminished interest or pleasure" (OR 4.77, p < 0.0001) among depressive, "grandiosity" (OR 3.5, pâ¯=â¯0.014) among (hypo)manic symptoms, most significantly contributed to worse functioning. In FDE (Nâ¯=â¯677) "recurrent thoughts of death" (OR 1.99, p < 0.0001) and "insomnia/hypersomnia" (OR 1.88, pâ¯=â¯0.039) among depressive, "grandiosity" (OR 5.98, pâ¯=â¯0.038) as (hypo)manic symptoms significantly contributed to worse functioning. LIMITATIONS: The post-hoc and cross-sectional design do not allow for prognostic or causal inferences. CONCLUSIONS: Key depressive and (hypo)manic symptoms distinctively associate with worse functional outcome in acute depression, with differential diagnostic-specific magnitude of effect. Core depressive symptoms are associated with worse functioning in unipolar depression, but not in bipolar or first-episode depression.
Asunto(s)
Síntomas Afectivos/diagnóstico , Trastorno Bipolar/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/diagnóstico , Funcionamiento Psicosocial , Evaluación de Síntomas , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Síntomas Afectivos/psicología , Trastorno Bipolar/psicología , Estudios Transversales , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/psicología , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Trastornos de Somnolencia Excesiva/psicología , Emociones , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/psicologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type (SAD) and bipolar disorder I (BD) present a large clinical overlap. In a 1-year follow-up, we aimed to evaluate days to hospitalization (DTH) and predictors of relapse in a SAD-BD cohort of patients. METHODS: A 1-year, prospective, naturalistic cohort study considering DTH as primary outcome and incidence of direct and indirect measures of psychopathological compensation as secondary outcomes. Kaplan-Meyer survival analysis with Log-rank Mantel-Cox test compared BD/SAD subgroups as to DTH. After bivariate analyses, Cox regression was performed to assess covariates possibly associated with DTH in diagnostic subgroups. RESULTS: Of 836 screened patients, 437 were finally included (SAD = 105; BD = 332). Relapse rates in the SAD sample was n = 26 (24.8%) vs. n = 41 (12.3%) in the BD sample (p = 0.002). Mean ± SD DTH were 312.16 ± 10.6 (SAD) vs. 337.62 ± 4.4 (BD) days (p = 0.002). Patients with relapses showed more frequent suicide acts, violent behaviors, and changes in pharmacological treatments (all p < 0.0005) in comparison to patients without relapse. Patients without relapses had significantly higher mean number of treatments at T0 (p = 0.010). Cox regression model relating the association between diagnosis and DTH revealed that BD had higher rates of suicide attempts (HR = 13.0, 95%CI = 4.0-42.0, p < 0.0005), whereas SAD had higher rates of violent behavior during psychotic episodes (HR = 12.0, 95%CI = .3.3-43.5, p > 0.0005). CONCLUSIONS: SAD patients relapse earlier with higher hospitalization rates and violent behavior during psychotic episodes whereas bipolar patients have more suicide attempts. Psychiatric/psychological follow-up visits may delay hospitalizations by closely monitoring symptoms of self- and hetero-aggression.
Asunto(s)
Agresión/psicología , Trastorno Bipolar/terapia , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Psicóticos/terapia , Adulto , Trastorno Bipolar/psicología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Trastornos Psicóticos/psicología , Recurrencia , Intento de Suicidio/psicologíaRESUMEN
Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics (LAIs) are used to overcome non-compliance in psychoses, mainly schizophrenia spectrum disorders. We aimed to summarize available evidence of studies comparing the efficacy of LAIs to placebo or oral medications for Bipolar Disorder (BD) and/or Schizoaffective Disorder (SAD). We searched six databases from inception to 28-March-2018, using the strategy: long-acting antipsychotics AND (bipolar disorder OR schizoaffective disorder OR mania OR manic OR bipolar depression). We included peer-reviewed double-blind comparisons of LAIs for any clinical outcome occurrence in BD, or open mirror studies with same prospective as retrospective assessment periods. We excluded studies reporting on mixed schizophrenia/SAD populations without reporting results separately. The pooled records amounted to 642. After duplicate removal and inclusion/exclusion criteria application, we included 15 studies, 6 double-blind and 9 open, 13 assessing BD and 2 SAD. Depot neuroleptics prevented manic, but not depressive recurrences and may worsen depressive symptoms. Risperidone long-acting injectable was found to be effective in protecting from any mood/manic symptom compared to placebo, but not from depressive recurrences. Add-on or monotherapy paliperidone palmitate in SAD patients protected from psychotic, depressive, and manic symptoms. In patients with BD-I with a manic episode at study enrolment, aripiprazole monohydrate significantly delayed time to recurrence of manic episodes without inducing depressive episodes. LAIs are effective and well-tolerated maintenance treatments for BD and SAD. They showed better efficacy in preventing mania than depression. LAIs may be first-line for BD-I and SAD patients with a manic predominant polarity and with non-adherence problems.
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Trastorno Bipolar/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Psicóticos/tratamiento farmacológico , Antipsicóticos/administración & dosificación , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada/administración & dosificación , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Inyecciones Intramusculares , RecurrenciaRESUMEN
Personalized treatment is defined as choosing the "right treatment for the right person at the right time." Although psychiatry has not yet reached this level of precision, we are on the way thanks to recent technological developments that may aid to detect plausible molecular and genetic markers. At the moment there are some models that are contributing to precision psychiatry through the concept of staging. While staging was initially presented as a way to categorize patients according to clinical presentation, course, and illness severity, current staging models integrate multiple levels of information that can help to define each patient's characteristics, severity, and prognosis in a more precise and individualized way. Moreover, staging might serve as the foundation to create a clinical decision-making algorithm on the basis of the patient's stage. In this review we will summarize the evolution of the bipolar disorder staging model in relation to the new discoveries on the neurobiology of bipolar disorder. Furthermore, we will discuss how the latest and future progress in psychiatry might transform current staging models into precision staging models.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Rapid cycling (RC) bipolar disorder (BD) is associated with more disability and worse global functioning than non-rapid cycling BD (NRC) and is understudied. This study aims to investigate clinical characteristics associated to RC in a Latin-American sample and secondarily, to generate a clinical model to test the likelihood of RC in BD. METHODS: 250 BD patients were enrolled between 2007 and 2015. All patients met DSM-IV criteria for BD type I, II or NOS. The sample was dichotomized into RC and NRC subgroups, and compared in terms of sociodemographic and clinical variables by bivariate analyses. A binary logistic regression was performed to generate a model and explain variance associated with the likelihood of presenting RC. RESULTS: Final sample included 235 patients, of which forty-four (18.7%) met RC criteria. When compared to NRC, a significantly higher proportion of RC patients were female (81.4% vs. 58.9% pâ¯=â¯0.006), BD type II (58.1% vs. 29.7% pâ¯=â¯0.002), presented more manic/hypomanic episodes (43.6⯱â¯35.8â¯vs. 12.8⯱â¯58.9, pâ¯=â¯0.001), and had less psychotic symptoms (20.9% vs. 42.2%, pâ¯=â¯0.010). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) was a significant comorbidity in RC (23.7% vs. 8.3%, pâ¯=â¯0.007). No differences were found in suicidality, mixed symptoms, and seasonal pattern. After logistic regression, variables significantly associated with RC were presence of ADHD (OR 4.6 [95% CI 1.54-13.93] pâ¯=â¯0.006) and female gender (OR 3.55 [95% CI, 1.32-9.56] pâ¯=â¯0.012). LIMITATIONS: It is a cross-sectional study. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that ADHD comorbidity, and female gender are risk factors for RC in BD.