Economic and Humanistic Burden of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results From the US National Survey Data 2018-2020.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to estimate the economic and humanistic burden among US adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: This study analyzed results from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey from 2018 to 2020. Adults (aged ≥18 years) self-reporting with RA or with the presence of the International Classification of Disease, 10th Revision clinical modification codes were identified. Healthcare expenditures (inpatient care, outpatient care, emergency department, office visits, prescription medications, home health, and others) were measured. The Short Form 12 Health Survey physical component summary (PCS), mental component summary (MCS), activities of daily living (ADL), and instrumental ADL (IADL) were measured. Two-part models assessed the incremental increase in the health care expenditures for the RA group compared to the non-RA group. In addition, the multivariable linear regression was used to evaluate the marginal difference in PCS and MCS between those with RA and those without RA, whereas the multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association between ADL and IADL by RA status. RESULTS: Annually, 4.27 million adults with RA were identified. The two-part model showed significantly higher total annual healthcare expenditures in the RA group than non-RA group (mean $3,382.971 [95% confidence interval (CI) $1,816.50-$4,949.44]). Compared to the non-RA group, the RA group was associated with lower PCS scores (mean 4.78 [95% CI 3.47-6.09]) and similarly lower MCS scores (mean -0.84 [95% CI -2.18 to 0.50]), as well as increased odds of requesting ADL (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.02 [95% CI 1.59-2.56]) and IADL assistance (aOR 2.11 [95% CI 1.57-2.84]). CONCLUSION: RA was associated with higher health care expenditures, particularly prescription medication costs, and was associated with suboptimal quality of life.

Telemedicine for Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in a Publicly Funded Hospital System: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease that requires frequent clinic and laboratory visits. However, patients with SLE, particularly those that are under-resourced, have unacceptably high rates of no-shows. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine no-show rates associated with telemedicine visits during the COVID-19 pandemic in comparison to no show rates associated with contemporaneous and historic in-person. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study in a publicly funded county hospital system in Houston, Texas. We identified a cohort of established SLE patients by International Classification of Diagnosis (ICD) codes that were independently confirmed as SLE by review of medical records. We identified patients who were seen from March to December in 2018, 2019, and 2020 (to reflect the height of the COVID-19 pandemic and account for seasonal changes in disease activity). Our primary outcome was percentage of no-shows for rheumatology clinic appointments. Our secondary outcome was laboratory utilization adherence, which was defined as lupus-specific blood and urine studies conducted within 30 days of the scheduled appointment. Covariates included age, gender, race, ethnicity, and SLE-related prescription drugs. RESULTS: We included 156 SLE patients in our analysis. Most were female (90.4%), Hispanic (49.3%) and had a median age of 43. In 2020, the no-show rate for telemedicine was 5.5% compared to a no-show rate of 16.2% for in-person visits (p=0.002). After multivariable adjustment for covariates, the odds of no-show was lower for telemedicine visits (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.20-0.77). There were no differences in adherence to laboratory testing. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine visits had decreased odds of no-shows without difference in laboratory testing adherence after adjustment for covariates. More research is needed to determine the clinical impact of telemedicine on patients with SLE.

Opioid Treatment for Adults With and Without Systemic Autoimmune/Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases: Analysis of 2006-2019 United States National Data.

OBJECTIVES: This study compared opioid prescribing among ambulatory visits with systemic autoimmune/inflammatory rheumatic diseases (SARDs) or without and assessed factors associated with opioid prescribing in SARDs. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey between 2006 and 2019. Adult (≥18 years) visits with a primary diagnosis of SARDs, including rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, or systemic lupus erythematosus were included in the study. Opioid prescribing was compared between those with vs without SARDs using multivariable logistic regression accounting for the complex survey design and adjusting for predisposing, enabling, and need factors within Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use. Another multivariable logistic regression examined the predictors associated with opioid prescribing in SARDs. RESULTS: Annually, an average of 5.20 million (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.58-6.82) visits were made for SARDs, whereas 780.14 million (95% CI 747.56-812.72) visits were made for non-SARDs. The SARDs group was more likely to be prescribed opioids (22.53%) than the non-SARDs group (9.83%) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.65; 95% CI 1.68-4.18). Among the SARDs visits, patient age from 50 to 64 (aOR 1.95; 95% CI 1.05-3.65 relative to ages 18-49) and prescribing of glucocorticoids (aOR 1.75; 95% CI 1.20-2.54) were associated with an increased odd of opioid prescribing, whereas private insurance relative to Medicare (aOR 0.50; 95% CI 0.31-0.82) was associated with a decreased odds of opioid prescribing. CONCLUSION: Opioid prescribing in SARDs was higher compared to non-SARDs. Concerted efforts are needed to determine the appropriateness of opioid prescribing in SARDs.

Acute encephalitis, myoclonus and Sweet syndrome after mRNA-1273 vaccine.

A patient presented with fever, generalised rash, confusion, orofacial movements and myoclonus after receiving the first dose of mRNA-1273 vaccine from Moderna. MRI was unremarkable while cerebrospinal fluid showed leucocytosis with lymphocyte predominance and hyperproteinorrachia. The skin evidenced red, non-scaly, oedematous papules coalescing into plaques with scattered non-follicular pustules. Skin biopsy was consistent with a neutrophilic dermatosis. The patient fulfilled the criteria for Sweet syndrome. A thorough evaluation ruled out alternative infectious, autoimmune or malignant aetiologies, and all manifestations resolved with glucocorticoids. While we cannot prove causality, there was a temporal correlation between the vaccination and the clinical findings.