RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To explore the burden and clinical correlates of valvular heart disease in Hispanics/Latinos in the United States. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1818 individuals from the population-based study of Latinos/Hispanics from 4 US metropolitan areas (Bronx, New York; Chicago, Illinois; San Diego, California; and Miami, Florida) underwent a comprehensive clinical and echocardiographic examination from October 1, 2011, through June 24, 2014. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the associations of clinical and sociodemographic variables with valvular lesions. RESULTS: The mean age was 55.2±0.2 years; 57.4% were female. The prevalence of any valvular heart disease (AVHD) was 3.1%, with no considerable differences across sex, and a higher prevalence with increasing age. The proportion of US-born vs foreign-born individuals was similar in those with vs without AVHD (P=.31). The weighted prevalence of AVHD was highest in Central Americans (8.4%) and lowest in Mexicans (1.2%). Regurgitant lesions of moderate or greater severity were present in 2.4% of the population and stenotic lesions of moderate or greater severity in 0.2%. Compared with those without AVHD, individuals with AVHD were more likely to have health insurance coverage (59.6% vs 79.2%; P=.007) but similar income (P=.06) and educational status (P=.46). Univariate regression models revealed that regurgitant lesions were associated with lower body mass index whereas stenotic lesions were associated with higher body mass index. CONCLUSION: Our data provide the first population-based estimates of the prevalence of valvular heart disease in Hispanic/Latinos. Valvular heart disease is fairly common in the Hispanic/Latino population and may constitute an important public health problem.
Asunto(s)
Costo de Enfermedad , Ecocardiografía/métodos , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/etnología , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Distribución por Sexo , Estados Unidos , Población UrbanaRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: To review the management of women with mechanical heart valves during pregnancy, from preconception counseling through delivery with a summary of the latest guidelines. RECENT FINDINGS: The hypercoagulability of pregnancy combined with the imperfect choices of anticoagulant agents contribute to a high risk of complications in pregnant women with mechanical heart valves. Valve thrombosis remains a major concern, much of which occurs during the first trimester transition to heparin-based products. The safest method of anticoagulation, with the best balance of maternal and fetal risk, is use of low-dose vitamin K antagonists, but only if therapeutic anticoagulation can be achieved with warfarin doses of ≤ 5 mg/day. Management of mechanical heart valves in pregnancy remains fraught with difficult decisions involving balancing of maternal and fetal risks as well as a high risk of maternal and fetal complications. Preconception counseling and planning is imperative. A risk-benefit discussion with the patient will help guide the choice of anticoagulation and outline the plan for safe delivery options. A multidisciplinary approach to management is advisable with close follow-up and care in a tertiary center.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Female sex is a risk factor for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Previous literature suggests that some diastolic dysfunction (DD) develops during pregnancy and may persist postdelivery. Our objective was to examine the relationship between parity and cardiac structure and function in a population-based cohort. METHODS: Participants included 1172 Hispanic/Latina women, aged ≥45 years, enrolled in the Echocardiographic Study of Latinos from four US communities (Bronx, Miami, San Diego and Chicago). Standard echocardiographic techniques were used to measure cardiac volumes, left ventricular mass, systolic and diastolic function. Using sampling weights and survey statistics, multivariable linear and logistic regression models were constructed adjusting for age, body mass index, diabetes or prediabetes, systolic blood pressure, use of antihypertensive medications, smoking, total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. RESULTS: In the target population, 5.0% were nulliparous (no live births) and 10.5% were grand multiparous (≥5 live births). Among the nulliparous women, 46% had DD as compared with 51%-58% of women with 1-4 live births and 81% of women with ≥5 live births (p<0.01). In full multivariate models, higher parity was significantly associated with greater left ventricular end-systolic volumes, end-diastolic volumes, left atrial volume indices and presence of DD (all p<0.01) but was not associated with ejection fraction. The log odds for having any grade of DD in grand-multiparous women was over three times that seen in nulliparous women (OR=3.4, 95% CI 1.5 to 7.9, p<0.01) in models further adjusted for income and education. CONCLUSIONS: Higher parity is associated with increased cardiac mass, volumes and the presence of DD. Further studies are needed to elucidate this apparent deleterious relation and whether parity can help explain the increased risk of HFpEF in women.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Heart rate-corrected QT (QTc) interval is associated with mortality in the general population, but this association is less clear in individuals with type 2 diabetes. We assessed the association of QTc interval with all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality in the Diabetes Heart Study. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We studied 1,020 participants with type 2 diabetes (83% European Americans; 55% women; mean age 61.4 years) who were free of atrial fibrillation, major ventricular conduction defects, and antiarrhythmic therapy at baseline. QT duration was automatically calculated from a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). Following American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation recommendations, a linear scale was used to correct the QT for heart rate. Using Cox regression, risk was estimated per 1-SD increase in QTc interval as well as prolonged QTc interval (>450 ms) vs. normal QTc interval for mortality. RESULTS: At baseline, the mean (SD) QTc duration was 414.9 ms (18.1), and 3.0% of participants had prolonged QTc. After a median follow-up time of 8.5 years (maximum follow-up time 13.9 years), 204 participants were deceased. In adjusted multivariate models, a 1-SD increase in QTc interval was associated with an 18% higher risk for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.18 [95% CI 1.03-1.36]) and 29% increased risk for CVD mortality (1.29 [1.05-1.59]). Similar results were obtained when QTc interval was used as a categorical variable (prolonged vs. normal) (all-cause mortality 1.73 [0.95-3.15]; CVD mortality 2.86 [1.35-6.08]). CONCLUSIONS: Heart rate QTc interval is an independent predictor of all-cause and CVD mortality in this population with type 2 diabetes, suggesting that additional prognostic information may be available from this simple ECG measure.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/mortalidad , Frecuencia Cardíaca , Adulto , Arritmias Cardíacas/mortalidad , Arritmias Cardíacas/fisiopatología , Síndrome de Brugada , Trastorno del Sistema de Conducción Cardíaco , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/fisiopatología , Causas de Muerte , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/fisiopatología , Electrocardiografía , Femenino , Sistema de Conducción Cardíaco/anomalías , Sistema de Conducción Cardíaco/fisiopatología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: With concomitant Doppler echocardiography and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) measuring aortic valve calcification (AVC) load, this study aimed at defining: 1) independent physiologic/structural determinants of aortic valve area (AVA)/mean gradient (MG) relationship; 2) AVC thresholds best associated with severe aortic stenosis (AS); and 3) whether, in AS with discordant MG, severe calcified aortic valve disease is generally detected. BACKGROUND: Aortic stenosis with discordant markers of severity, AVA in severe range but low MG, is a conundrum, unresolved by outcome studies. METHODS: Patients (n = 646) with normal left ventricular ejection fraction AS underwent Doppler echocardiography and AVC measurement by MDCT. On the basis of AVA-indexed-to-body surface area (AVAi) and MG, patients were categorized as concordant severity grading (CG) with moderate AS (AVAi >0.6 cm²/m², MG <40 mm Hg), severe AS (AVAi ≤0.6 cm²/m², MG ≥ 40 mm Hg), discordant-severity-grading (DG) with low-MG (AVAi ≤0.6 cm(2)/m(2), MG <40 mm Hg), or high-MG (AVAi >0.6 cm(2)/m(2), MG ≥40 mm Hg). RESULTS: The MG (discordant in 29%) was strongly determined by AVA and flow but also independently and strongly influenced by AVC-load (p < 0.0001) and systemic arterial compliance (p < 0.0001). The AVC-load (median [interquartile range]) was similar within patients with DG (low-MG: 1,619 [965 to 2,528] arbitrary units [AU]; high-MG: 1,736 [1,209 to 2,894] AU; p = 0.49), higher than CG-moderate-AS (861 [427 to 1,519] AU; p < 0.0001) but lower than CG-severe-AS (2,931 [1,924 to 4,292] AU; p < 0.0001). The AVC-load thresholds separating severe/moderate AS were defined in CG-AS with normal flow (stroke-volume-index >35 ml/m(2)). The AVC-load, absolute or indexed, identified severe AS accurately (area under the curve ≥0.89, sensitivity ≥86%, specificity ≥79%) in men and women. Upon application of these criteria to DG-low MG, at least one-half of the patients were identified as severe calcified aortic valve disease, irrespective of flow. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with AS, MG is often discordant from AVA and is determined by multiple factors, valvular (AVC) and non-valvular (arterial compliance) independently of flow. The AVC-load by MDCT, strongly associated with AS severity, allows diagnosis of severe calcified aortic valve disease. At least one-half of the patients with discordant low gradient present with heavy AVC-load reflective of severe calcified aortic valve disease, emphasizing the clinical yield of AVC quantification by MDCT to diagnose and manage these complex patients.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/patología , Válvula Aórtica/patología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Calcificación Vascular/patología , Anciano , Análisis de Varianza , Velocidad del Flujo Sanguíneo , Ecocardiografía Doppler , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Tomografía Computarizada Multidetector , Análisis Multivariante , Estudios Prospectivos , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
PURPOSE: In a previous study, the 2006 appropriateness criteria (AC) for cardiac CT were applied to 251 patients. It was found that 46% of patients could not be classified, and two observers showed only fair agreement (κ = 0.31) on the assigned appropriateness rating (appropriate, inappropriate, uncertain, or not classifiable). The conclusion was that the 2006 AC were difficult to apply. The AC were revised in 2010. The aim of this study was to determine if the rate of patients not classifiable and interobserver variability had decreased to the point at which the AC could be reasonably applied. METHODS: Medical records of the 251 patients who were classified using the 2006 AC were reviewed by two observers, who attempted to assign the patients' indications using the 2010 AC. Patients for whom no indications could be found were deemed not classifiable. A third observer settled disagreements. The numbers of patients not classifiable using the 2006 and 2010 criteria and the number of patients on whom the two reviewers disagreed on indications were compared using McNemar's test. RESULTS: One hundred fifteen patients (46%) were not classifiable using the 2006 AC. With the 2010 AC, the number of patients not classifiable decreased to 39 (16%) (P < .001). With the 2006 criteria, the observers disagreed on specific indications for 152 patients (61%). With the 2010 criteria, the observers disagreed for 118 patients (47%) (P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Using the 2010 AC, the number of patients not classifiable and the number of disagreements decreased. Although the rate of patients not classifiable has decreased to an acceptable level, the interobserver variability remains concerning.
Asunto(s)
Angiografía Coronaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Angiografía Coronaria/normas , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/estadística & datos numéricos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/normas , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/epidemiología , Adhesión a Directriz/normas , Humanos , Minnesota/epidemiología , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Aortic valve calcification (AVC) is the intrinsic mechanism of valvular obstruction leading to aortic stenosis (AS) and is measurable by multidetector computed tomography. The link between sex and AS is controversial and that with AVC is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively performed multidetector computed tomography in 665 patients with AS (aortic valve area, 1.05±0.35 cm(2); mean gradient, 39±19 mm Hg) to measure AVC and to assess the impact of sex on the AVC-AS severity link in men and women. AS severity was comparable between women and men (peak aortic jet velocity: 4.05±0.99 versus 3.93±0.91 m/s, P=0.11; aortic valve area index: 0.55±0.20 versus 0.56±0.18 cm(2)/m(2); P=0.46). Conversely, AVC load was lower in women versus men (1703±1321 versus 2694±1628 arbitrary units; P<0.0001) even after adjustment for their smaller body surface area or aortic annular area (both P<0.0001). Thus, odds of high-AVC load were much greater in men than in women (odds ratio, 5.07; P<0.0001). Although AVC showed good associations with hemodynamic AS severity in men and women (all r>0.67; P<0.0001), for any level of AS severity measured by peak aortic jet velocity or aortic valve area index, AVC load, absolute or indexed, was higher in men versus women (all P≤0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In this large AS population, women incurred similar AS severity than men for lower AVC loads, even after indexing for their smaller body size. Hence, the relationship between valvular calcification process and AS severity differs in women and men, warranting further pathophysiological inquiry. For AS severity diagnostic purposes, interpretation of AVC load should be different in men and in women.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Calcinosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada Multidetector/métodos , Anciano , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/epidemiología , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/etiología , Calcinosis/complicaciones , Calcinosis/epidemiología , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/complicaciones , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Distribución por Sexo , Factores Sexuales , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To determine whether increasing epinephrine infusion in an in vivo pig model is associated with an increase in end-systolic magnetic resonance elastography (MRE)-derived effective stiffness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Finite element modeling (FEM) was performed to determine the range of myocardial wall thicknesses that could be used for analysis. Then MRE was performed on five pigs to measure the end-systolic effective stiffness with epinephrine infusion. Epinephrine was continuously infused intravenously in each pig to increase the heart rate in increments of 20%. For each such increase end-systolic effective stiffness was measured using MRE. In each pig, Student's t-test was used to compare effective end-systolic stiffness at baseline and at initial infusion of epinephrine. Least-square linear regression was performed to determine the correlation between normalized end-systolic effective stiffness and increase in heart rate with epinephrine infusion. RESULTS: FEM showed that phase gradient inversion could be performed on wall thickness ≈≥1.5 cm. In pigs, effective end-systolic stiffness significantly increased from baseline to the first infusion in all pigs (P = 0.047). A linear correlation was found between normalized effective end-systolic stiffness and percent increase in heart rate by epinephrine infusion with R(2) ranging from 0.86-0.99 in four pigs. In one of the pigs the R(2) value was 0.1. A linear correlation with R(2) = 0.58 was found between normalized effective end-systolic stiffness and percent increase in heart rate when pooling data points from all pigs. CONCLUSION: Noninvasive MRE-derived end-systolic effective myocardial stiffness may be a surrogate for myocardial contractility.