A comparative study of the C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope and McCoy laryngoscope for oro-tracheal intubation with manual in-line stabilization of neck in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery.

Background and Aims: Airway management in cervical spine injury patients requires manual in-line stabilization (MILS) of the neck to avoid exacerbation of cord injury, which impedes visualization of glottis during laryngoscopy. Specially designed blades such as McCoy and C-MAC D-blades can improve laryngoscopic view in such patients. This study was performed to compare the efficacy of C-MAC D-blades and the McCoy laryngoscope for oro-tracheal intubation using MILS in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery. Material and Methods: This randomized, prospective study was performed in 60 adult patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists grade I-III, either sex, 18 to 60 years of age undergoing elective cervical spine surgery. Patients were randomly categorized into two groups, group D and group M. Intubation was performed using a C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope in group D and a McCoy laryngoscope in group M using MILS. The intubation difficulty scale (IDS) score, laryngoscopy and intubation times, percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score, Cormack Lehane (CL) grading with and without external laryngeal pressure (ELP), need for bougie or change of blade or operator, and change in hemodynamics following intubation were recorded. Results: Group D showed lower mean IDS scores than group M (P value < 0.0001). There were statistically significant differences found in duration of laryngoscopy (group D < group M), CL grading without ELP (group D: CL-1,2a >CL-2b, 3; group M: CL-1,2a group M), need for ELP and lifting force (group D < group M), and hemodynamic responses after intubation (group D < group M). Conclusion: A C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope provides better and rapid visualization of glottis with less intubation difficulties than a McCoy laryngoscope during intubation using MILS in patients with cervical spine injury.

Health Care Disparities in Transsphenoidal Surgery for Pituitary Tumors: An Experience from Neighboring Urban Public and Private Hospitals.

Objectives Few studies have assessed the role of socioeconomic health care disparities in skull base pathologies. We compared the clinical history and outcomes of pituitary tumors at private and public hospitals to delineate whether health care disparities exist in pituitary tumor surgery. Methods We reviewed the records of patients who underwent transsphenoidal pituitary tumor resection at NYU Langone Health and Bellevue Hospital. Seventy-two consecutive patients were identified from each hospital. The primary outcome was time-to-surgery from initial recommendation. Secondary outcomes included postoperative diabetes insipidus, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, and gross total resection. Results Of 144 patients, 23 (32%) public hospital patients and 24 (33%) private hospital patients had functional adenomas ( p = 0.29). Mean ages for public and private hospital patients were 46.5 and 51.1 years, respectively ( p = 0.06). Private hospital patients more often identified as white ( p < 0.001), spoke English ( p < 0.001), and had private insurance ( p < 0.001). The average time-to-surgery for public and private hospital patients were 46.2 and 34.8 days, respectively ( p = 0.39). No statistically significant differences were found in symptom duration, tumor size, reoperation, CSF leak, or postoperative length of stay; however, public hospital patients more frequently required emergency surgery ( p = 0.03), developed transient diabetes insipidus ( p = 0.02), and underwent subtotal resection ( p = 0.04). Conclusion Significant socioeconomic differences exist among patients undergoing pituitary surgery at our institution's hospitals. Public hospital patients more often required emergency surgery, developed diabetes insipidus, and underwent subtotal tumor resection. Identifying these differences is an imperative initial step in improving the care of our patients.

Emerging diagnostic methods and imaging modalities in cushing's syndrome.

Endogenous Cushing's syndrome (CS) is a rare disease characterized by prolonged glucocorticoid excess. Timely diagnosis is critical to allow prompt treatment and limit long-term disease morbidity and risk for mortality. Traditional biochemical diagnostic modalities each have limitations and sensitivities and specificities that vary significantly with diagnostic cutoff values. Biochemical evaluation is particularly complex in patients whose hypercortisolemia fluctuates daily, often requiring repetition of tests to confirm or exclude disease, and when delineating CS from physiologic, nonneoplastic states of hypercortisolism. Lastly, traditional pituitary MRI may be negative in up to 60% of patients with adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-secreting pituitary adenomas (termed "Cushing's disease" [CD]) whereas false positive pituitary MRI findings may exist in patients with ectopic ACTH secretion. Thus, differentiating CD from ectopic ACTH secretion may necessitate dynamic testing or even invasive procedures such as bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling. Newer methods may relieve some of the diagnostic uncertainty in CS, providing a more definitive diagnosis prior to subjecting patients to additional imaging or invasive procedures. For example, a novel method of cortisol measurement in patients with CS is scalp hair analysis, a non-invasive method yielding cortisol and cortisone values representing long-term glucocorticoid exposure of the past months. Hair cortisol and cortisone have both shown to differentiate between CS patients and controls with a high sensitivity and specificity. Moreover, advances in imaging techniques may enhance detection of ACTH-secreting pituitary adenomas. While conventional pituitary MRI may fail to identify microadenomas in patients with CD, high-resolution 3T-MRI with 3D-spoiled gradient-echo sequence has thinner sections and superior soft-tissue contrast that can detect adenomas as small as 2 mm. Similarly, functional imaging may improve the identification of ACTH-secreting adenomas noninvasively; Gallium-68-tagged corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) combined with PET-CT can be used to detect CRH receptors, which are upregulated on corticotroph adenomas. This technique can delineate functionality of adenomas in patients with CD from patients with ectopic ACTH secretion and false positive pituitary lesions on MRI. Here, we review emerging methods and imaging modalities for the diagnosis of CS, discussing their diagnostic accuracy, strengths and limitations, and applicability to clinical practice.

Comparison of C-MAC Miller blade video laryngoscope with conventional Miller blade in infants undergoing elective surgery- A prospective randomised trial.

Background and Aims: Endotracheal intubation (ET) in infants is considered a challenging task over the decades. Infants have short safe apnoea time, and this difficulty has been vanquished to some extent by using the videolaryngoscopes (VLs), but there exists a dearth of research particularly in this vulnerable subset. Therefore, this trial was conducted to evaluate intubation times obtained with C-MAC VL and conventional Miller laryngoscopes in infants. Methods: A total of 80 infants aged between 1 month and 1 year with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II requiring ET were randomised in two groups; the C-MAC VL or Miller laryngoscope ML. Anaesthesia was induced with sevoflurane 1-8% and atracurium 0.5 mg/kg IV. The primary outcome was evaluated as the total time taken to intubate. Secondary outcomes were time to achieve best glottic view (TBGV), tube insertion time (TIT), percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score, number of attempts and intubation difficulty score (IDS). Results: The median (interquartile range) of time taken for ET was less in VL; 22.5 (20.75-26) compared to ML; 26 (21.75-31). TBGV was achieved early in VL group than the ML group (6.03 ± 1.33s/7.88 ± 2.44) respectively (P-value < 0.001). POGO was better in VL (99.12 ± 4.795s) compared to ML (85.50 ± 31.13s). IDS was less in the VL group (0.07 ± 0.27) than in ML (0.70 ± 1.14). Other parameters, such as the number of attempts, bougie usage, adverse effects and TIT, were comparable across the two groups. Conclusion: When compared to the ML group, the C-MAC VL group exhibited a decreased intubation time, early TBGV, better POGO score, reduced IDS and subjective intubation difficulty. As a result, we consider VL to be a more efficacious device for intubating the trachea in infants.

Development and Feasibility Testing of a Decision Aid for Acute Appendicitis.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with acute uncomplicated appendicitis will be increasingly asked to choose between surgery and antibiotic management. We developed a novel decision aid for patients in the emergency department (ED) with acute appendicitis who are facing this choice. We describe the development of the decision aid and an initial feasibility study of its implementation in a busy tertiary care ED. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a prepost survey analysis comparing patients before and after standardized implementation of the decision aid. Patients were surveyed about their experience making treatment decisions after discharge from the hospital. The primary outcome measure was the total score on the decisional conflict scale (; 0-100; lower scores better). RESULTS: The study included 24 participants (12 in the predecision aid period; 12 in the post period). Only 33% of participants in each group knew antibiotics were a treatment option prior to arriving at the ED. Prior to implementing the use of decision aid, only 75% of patients reported being told antibiotics were a treatment option, while this increased to 100% after implementation of the decision aid. The mean total decisional conflict scalescores were similar in the pre and post periods (mean difference = 0.13, 95% CI: -13 - 13, P > 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: This novel appendicitis decision aid was effectively integrated into clinical practice and helped toinform patients about multiple treatment options. These data support further large-scale testing of the decision aid as part of standardized pathways for the management of patients with acute appendicitis.

Reducing vaccine hesitancy by explaining vaccine science.

Vaccine hesitancy in the COVID-19 pandemic remained a problem long after mRNA vaccines became available. This may be due in part to misunderstandings about the vaccines, arising from complexities of the science involved. Two experiments, conducted on unvaccinated Americans at two periods postvaccine rollout in 2021, demonstrated that providing explanations, expressed in everyday language, and correcting known misunderstandings, reduced vaccine hesitancy compared to a no-information control group. Four explanations addressing misunderstandings about mRNA vaccine safety and effectiveness were tested in Experiment 1 (n = 3,787). Some included expository text while others included refutational text, explicitly stating and refuting the misunderstanding. Vaccine effectiveness statistics were expressed either as text or an icon array. Although all four explanations reduced vaccine hesitancy, the refutational format of those addressing vaccine safety (explaining the mRNA mechanism and mild side effects) was the most effective. These two explanations were retested individually and jointly in Experiment 2 (n = 1,476) later in the summer of 2021. Again, vaccine hesitancy was significantly reduced by all explanations despite differences in political ideology, trust, and prior attitudes. These results suggest that nontechnical explanations of critical issues in vaccine science can reduce vaccine hesitancy, especially when accompanied by refutational text. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Association between Risk Communication Format and Perceived Risk of Adverse Events after COVID-19 Vaccination among US Adults.

The format used to communicate probability-verbal versus numerical descriptors-can impact risk perceptions and behaviors. This issue is salient for the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), where concerns about vaccine-related risks may reduce uptake and verbal descriptors have been widely used by public health, news organizations and on social media, to convey risk. Because the effect of risk-communication format on perceived COVID-19 vaccine-related risks remains unknown, we conducted an online randomized survey among 939 US adults. Participants were given risk information, using verbal or numerical descriptors and were asked to report their perceived risk of experiencing headache, fever, fatigue or myocarditis from COVID-19 vaccine. Associations between risk communication format and perceived risk were assessed using multivariable regression. Compared to numerical estimates, verbal descriptors were associated with higher perceived risk of headache (ß = 5.0 percentage points, 95% CI = 2.0-8.1), fever (ß = 27 percentage points, 95% CI = 23-30), fatigue (ß = 4.9 percentage points, 95% = CI 1.8-8.0) and myocarditis (ß = 4.6 percentage points, 95% CI = 2.1-7.2), as well as greater variability in risk perceptions. Social media influence was associated with differences in risk perceptions for myocarditis, but not side effects. Verbal descriptors may lead to greater, more inaccurate and variable vaccine-related risk perceptions compared to numerical descriptors.

Verbal Descriptions of the Probability of Treatment Complications Lead to High Variability in Risk Perceptions: A Survey Study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether different methods for communicating the probability of treatment complications for operative and nonoperative appendicitis treatments result in differences in risk perception. BACKGROUND: Surgeons must communicate the probability of treatment complications to patients, and how risks are communicated may impact the accuracy and variability in patient risk perceptions and ultimately their decision making. METHODS: A series of online surveys of American adults communicated the probability of complications associated with surgical or antibiotic treatment of acute appendicitis. Probability was communicated with verbal descriptors (eg, "uncommon"), point estimates (eg, "3% risk"), or risk ranges (eg, "1% to 5%"). Respondents then estimated the probability of a complication for a "typical patient with appendicitis." The Fligner-Killeen test of homogeneity of variance was used to compare the variability in respondent risk estimates based on the method of probability communication. RESULTS: Among 296 respondents, variance in probability estimates was significantly higher when verbal descriptions were used compared to point estimates ( P < 0.001) or risk ranges ( P < 0.001). Identical verbal descriptors produced meaningfully different risk estimates depending on the complication being described. For example, "common" was perceived as a 45.6% for surgical site infection but 61.7% for antibiotic-associated diarrhea. CONCLUSION: Verbal probability descriptors are associated with widely varying and inaccurate perceptions about treatment risks. Surgeons should consider alternative ways to communicate probability during informed consent and shared decision-making discussions.

Imaging-based stratification of adult gliomas prognosticates survival and correlates with the 2021 WHO classification.

BACKGROUND: Because of the lack of global accessibility, delay, and cost-effectiveness of genetic testing, there is a clinical need for an imaging-based stratification of gliomas that can prognosticate survival and correlate with the 2021-WHO classification. METHODS: In this retrospective study, adult primary glioma patients with pre-surgery/pre-treatment MRI brain images having T2, FLAIR, T1, T1 post-contrast, DWI sequences, and survival information were included in TCIA training-dataset (n = 275) and independent validation-dataset (n = 200). A flowchart for imaging-based stratification of adult gliomas(IBGS) was created in consensus by three authors to encompass all adult glioma types. Diagnostic features used were T2-FLAIR mismatch sign, central necrosis with peripheral enhancement, diffusion restriction, and continuous cortex sign. Roman numerals (I, II, and III) denote IBGS types. Two independent teams of three and two radiologists, blinded to genetic, histology, and survival information, manually read MRI into three types based on the flowchart. Overall survival-analysis was done using age-adjusted Cox-regression analysis, which provided both hazard-ratio (HR) and area-under-curve (AUC) for each stratification system(IBGS and 2021-WHO). The sensitivity and specificity of each IBSG type were analyzed with cross-table to identify the corresponding 2021-WHO genotype. RESULTS: Imaging-based stratification was statistically significant in predicting survival in both datasets with good inter-observer agreement (age-adjusted Cox-regression, AUC > 0.5, k > 0.6, p < 0.001). IBGS type-I, type-II, and type-III gliomas had good specificity in identifying IDHmut 1p19q-codel oligodendroglioma (training - 97%, validation - 85%); IDHmut 1p19q non-codel astrocytoma (training - 80%, validation - 85.9%); and IDHwt glioblastoma (training - 76.5%, validation- 87.3%) respectively (p-value < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Imaging-based stratification of adult diffuse gliomas predicted patient survival and correlated well with 2021-WHO glioma classification.

Implementation of a formal sleep center-based screening protocol for primary aldosteronism in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

BACKGROUND: There is a bidirectional association between primary aldosteronism and obstructive sleep apnea, with evidence suggesting that the treatment of primary aldosteronism can reduce obstructive sleep apnea severity. Current guidelines recommend screening for primary aldosteronism in patients with comorbid hypertension and obstructive sleep apnea, identifying potential candidates for treatment. However, emerging data suggest current screening practices are unsatisfactory. Moreover, data regarding the true incidence of primary aldosteronism among this population are limited. This study aimed to assess the primary aldosteronism screening rate among patients with obstructive sleep apnea and hypertension at our institution and estimate the prevalence of primary aldosteronism among this population. METHODS: Sleep studies conducted at our institution between January and September 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Adult patients with a sleep study diagnostic of obstructive sleep apnea (respiratory disturbance index ≥5) and a diagnosis of hypertension were included. Patient medical records were reviewed and laboratory data of those with biochemical screening for primary aldosteronism were assessed by an experienced endocrinologist. Screening rates were compared before and after initiation of a screening protocol in accordance with the 2016 Endocrine Society guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 1,005 patients undergoing sleep studies were reviewed; 354 patients had comorbid obstructive sleep apnea and hypertension. Patients were predominantly male (67%), with a mean age of 58 years (standard deviation = 12.9) and mean body mass index of 34 (standard deviation = 8.1). The screening rate for primary aldosteronism among included patients was 19% (n = 67). The screening rate was significantly higher after initiation of a dedicated primary aldosteronism screening protocol (23% vs 12% prior; P = .01). Fourteen screens (21%) were positive for primary aldosteronism, whereas 45 (67%) were negative and 8 (12%) were indeterminate. Four had prior abdominal cross-sectional imaging, with 3 revealing an adrenal adenoma. Compared with patients without primary aldosteronism, patients with positive primary aldosteronism screens were more likely to have a history of hypokalemia (36% vs 4.4%; P = .002). The frequency of hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, and left ventricular hypertrophy did not differ between patients with positive versus negative screens. CONCLUSION: Current screening practices for primary aldosteronism among patients with comorbid obstructive sleep apnea and hypertension are suboptimal. Patients evaluated at sleep centers may represent an optimal population for screening, as the prevalence of primary aldosteronism among this cohort appears high.

The Cost Effectiveness of Implementation of a Postoperative Endocrinopathy Management Protocol after Resection of Pituitary Adenomas.

Purpose After developing a protocol for evaluating, diagnosing, and treating postoperative endocrinopathy both during the hospitalization and during the immediate discharge period following resection of pituitary adenomas, we sought to assess the impact of this protocol on quality outcomes. Methods An IRB-exempt, quality improvement initiated, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)-compliant retrospective comparison of a pre-and-post-protocol cohort of all patients undergoing endoscopic endonasal resection of pituitary adenomas at NYU Langone Medical Center from January 2013 to December 2018. Demographic characteristics of the patients and their tumors with their postoperative outcomes were recorded. Quality outcomes regarding number of laboratory studies sent, rate of diabetes insipidus, length of stay, and readmission rate were also recorded. Statistical analysis was performed between the pre- and post-protocol groups. Results There was a significant reduction in laboratory studies sent per patient (55.66 vs. 18.82, p <0.001). This corresponded with an overall cost reduction in laboratory studies of $255.95 per patient. There was a decrease in the overall number of patients treated with DDAVP (21.4% in the pre-protocol group vs. 8.9% in the post-protocol group, p = 0.04). All post-protocol patients requiring DDAVP at discharge were identified by 48 hours. There was no significant change in length of stay or need for hydrocortisone supplementation postoperatively between the two groups. Length of stay was driven mostly by need for reoperation during initial hospitalization. There was no significant change in the rate of 30-day readmission. Conclusion Implementation of a postoperative management protocol results in a more efficient diagnosis and management of endocrinopathy after pituitary adenoma surgery which translates to decreased cost.

Metabolic effects of prolactin and the role of dopamine agonists: A review.

Prolactin is a polypeptide hormone that is well known for its role in reproductive physiology. Recent studies highlight its role in neurohormonal appetite regulation and metabolism. Elevated prolactin levels are widely associated with worsening metabolic disease, but it appears that low prolactin levels could also be metabolically unfavorable. This review discusses the pathophysiology of prolactin related metabolic changes, and the less commonly recognized effects of prolactin on adipose tissue, pancreas, liver, and small bowel. Furthermore, the effect of dopamine agonists on the metabolic profiles of patients with hyperprolactinemia are discussed as well.

Attenuation of Human Growth Hormone-Induced Rash With Graded Dose Challenge.

Adult growth hormone (GH) deficiency is rare and requires replacement with extrinsic/synthetic injection. GH hypersensitivity has been reported; specifically, atopic patients may develop rashes from somatotropin therapy. Allergic and non-allergic skin reactions to recombinant human GH are uncommon and infrequently reported. We describe a graded-dose challenge with intravenous Norditropin® in a 65-year-old atopic adult woman who developed a severe whole-body rash with Norditropin FlexPro® administration on several occasions but was negative on skin-prick testing to Norditropin® percutaneously and intradermally, but the patch testing was positive for gold and nickel. The patient was registered as a direct admission to the emergency room at a university hospital for a rapid antigen coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) testing after having received two COVID-19 vaccinations and re-testing four months after vaccination. She was then directly admitted to a non-COVID-19 intensive care unit with direct bedside supervision by a registered nurse and a physician board certified in internal medicine, allergy/immunology, and pulmonary diseases. The patient brought a Norditropin® pen which our pharmacy team attached to a compatible syringe for dilutions. A graded dose challenge at a final dosage of 0.1 mL was performed and the patient was monitored for allergic and other adverse drug reactions, which did not occur. At the time of writing this case report, the patient has been maintained on Norditropin FlexPro® 0.1 mL and has not experienced any adverse reactions, including recurrent skin eruptions. The case presented is the first to describe a patient who successfully tolerated a graded dose challenge of an adult patient to GH replacement therapy (as Norditropin®) under supervision in an intensive care unit, whereas prior to reporting of this case, a graded dose challenge to GH replacement therapy had only been successfully performed in a child using another formulation of somatotropin (Humatrope®). Hence, this case lends support that graded dose challenge with somatotropin analogs may be considered for patients with isolated GH deficiency such as in the case presented here.

Comparative study of Baska mask with proseal LMA in adult patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia with controlled ventilation.

Background and Aims: Several supraglottic airway devices (SGD) are available nowadays. But none has been found to be better than Proseal laryngeal mask (PLMA) in terms of oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP). We aimed to compare OLP of newly introduced Baska® Mask with PLMA in patients undergoing elective surgical procedures under general anesthesia. Material and Methods: Totally, 80 consecutive adult patients of either sex requiring general anesthesia were randomized into two groups Group B (Baska mask, n = 40) or Group P (PLMA. n = 40). After standardized induction with propofol 2 - 2.5 mg/kg-1 and fentanyl 2 mgkg-1, and muscle relaxation with vecuronium 0.1 mgkg-1 one of the two devices was placed. OLP (primary outcome) was measured 5 minutes and 30 minutes post induction. The time needed to achieve effective airway, anatomical alignment of the device, number of attempts, leak fraction, and postoperative laryngopharyngeal morbidity were noted. Results: Both the devices could be inserted in first attempt in all the patients, but the time needed to achieve effective airway was significantly less in Group B (12.58 ± 1.81 sec vs 17.92 ± 2.45 sec, P < 0.001). The mean OLP was better in Group B at 5 min (37.6 ± 2.43 cm H2O vs 30.82 ± 3.96 cm H2O) and at 30 min (38.83 ± 1.72 cm H2O vs 30.82 ± 3.96 cm H2O; P < 0.001). Anatomical alignment of SGD with glottis (FOB grade 3 or 4 view) was significantly better in group B (34/40) as compared to group P (25/40) (p = 0.009). There was no difference in laryngopharyngeal morbidity in the two groups. Conclusion: Baska mask provided higher OLP, better alignment to the glottis and faster placement time as compared to PLMA.

DNA Methylation Profiling in Rare Sellar Tumors.

The histologic diagnosis of sellar masses can be challenging, particularly in rare neoplasms and tumors without definitive biomarkers. Moreover, there is significant inter-observer variability in the histopathological diagnosis of many tumors of the CNS, and some rare tumors risk being misclassified. DNA methylation has recently emerged as a useful diagnostic tool. To illustrate the clinical utility of machine-learning-based DNA methylation classifiers, we report a rare case of primary sellar esthesioneuroblastoma histologically mimicking a non-functioning pituitary adenoma. The patient had multiple recurrences, and the resected specimens had unusual histopathology. A portion of the resected sellar lesion was profiled using clinically validated whole-genome DNA methylation and classification. DNA was extracted from the tissue, hybridized on DNA methylation chips, and analyzed using a clinically validated classifier. DNA methylation profiling of the lesion showed that the tumor classified best with the esthesioneuroblastoma reference cohort. This case highlights the difficulty in diagnosing atypical sellar lesions by standard histopathological methods. However, when phenotypic analyses were nonconclusive, DNA methylation profiling resulted in a change in diagnosis. We discuss the growing role of DNA methylation profiling in the classification and diagnosis of CNS tumors, finding that utilization of DNA methylation studies in cases of atypical presentation or diagnostic uncertainty may improve diagnostic accuracy with therapeutic and prognostic implications.

Approach to the Patient: Diagnosis of Cushing Syndrome.

Cushing syndrome results from supraphysiological exposure to glucocorticoids and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The pathogenesis includes administration of corticosteroids (exogenous Cushing syndrome) or autonomous cortisol overproduction, whether or not ACTH-dependent (endogenous Cushing syndrome). An early diagnosis of Cushing syndrome is warranted; however, in clinical practice, it is very challenging partly because of resemblance with other common conditions (ie, pseudo-Cushing syndrome). Initial workup should start with excluding local and systemic corticosteroid use. First-line screening tests including the 1-mg dexamethasone suppression test, 24-hour urinary free cortisol excretion, and late-night salivary cortisol measurement should be performed to screen for endogenous Cushing syndrome. Scalp-hair cortisol/cortisone analysis helps in the assessment of long-term glucocorticoid exposure as well as in detection of transient periods of hypercortisolism as observed in cyclical Cushing syndrome. Interpretation of results can be difficult because of individual patient characteristics and hence requires awareness of test limitations. Once endogenous Cushing syndrome is established, measurement of plasma ACTH concentrations differentiates between ACTH-dependent (80%-85%) or ACTH-independent (15%-20%) causes. Further assessment with different imaging modalities and dynamic biochemical testing including bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling helps further pinpoint the cause of Cushing's syndrome. In this issue of "Approach to the patient," the diagnostic workup of Cushing syndrome is discussed with answering the questions when to screen, how to screen, and how to differentiate the different causes. In this respect, the latest developments in biochemical and imaging techniques are discussed as well.

Applying Behavioral Nudges in a Dietary Comparator for Surgical Trials: Developing the MediDiet.

INTRODUCTION: Dietary interventions are increasingly being proposed as alternatives to surgery for common gastrointestinal conditions. Integrating aspects of cognitive psychology (e.g., behavioral nudges) into dietary interventions is becoming popular, but evidence is lacking on their effectiveness and unintended effects. We assessed the effects of including nudges in the development of a dietary intervention based on the Mediterranean diet. METHODS: We conducted two-arm randomized surveys of United States adults. After a validated dietary questionnaire, participants received feedback about dietary consistency with a Mediterranean diet with (A) no nudge versus (B) one of several nudges: peer comparison, positive affect induction + peer comparison, or defaults. Participants rated their negative and positive emotions, motivation for dietary change, and interest in recipes. Responses were analyzed using baseline covariate-adjusted regression. RESULTS: Among 1709 participants, 56% were men and the median age was 36 y. Nudges as a class did not significantly affect the extent of negative or positive emotions, motivation, or interest. However, specific nudges had different effects: compared to no nudge, peer comparison blunted negative emotions and increased motivation, although decreased interest in recipes, while defaults increased interest in recipes but reduced motivation. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot, behavioral nudges as a class of strategies did not improve participants' reactions to dietary feedback nor did they promote negative reactions. However, specific nudges may be better considered separately in their effects. Future testing should explore whether specific nudges including peer comparison and defaults improve dietary intervention effectiveness, especially in people with the specific gastrointestinal conditions of interest.

Living Donor Kidney Transplantation in a Covid-19-Recovered Donor- Recipient Pair: A Case Report.

Deciding on proceeding with solid organ transplant in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) era is difficult both for the transplant unit and the transplant candidate. However, with no signs of the pandemic coming to an end and given the plight of patients with chronic diseases, it becomes necessary to take the challenging path. We report a case of living donor kidney transplantation in a COVID-19-recovered donor-recipient pair with a good early posttransplant outcome. Immunosuppression was used in the usual dose as per our unit's protocol. Thorough pretransplant evaluation to rule out active SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) infection in both the donor and the recipient seems to be the key to avoid COVID-19 in the recipient and the transplant unit.

Effects of opioid addiction risk information on Americans' agreement with postoperative opioid minimization and perceptions of quality.

BACKGROUND: Judicious opioid prescribing and patient counseling, including in the postoperative context, are important efforts to address the U.S. opioid crisis. In discussions with patients and loved ones, there is commonly an emphasis on addiction risk. From a behavioral science standpoint, presenting addiction risk information represents a fear appeal. Clinicians may also seek to build trust and confidence by presenting balanced views of benefits and risks. However, little is known about if and how addiction risk information evokes negative emotions, affects perceptions of quality, and influences perspectives on judicious opioid prescribing. METHODS: We conducted a four-arm, randomized survey of U.S. adults involving a vignette about post-appendectomy pain management for a friend, including the quantity of opioids commonly prescribed. Participants were given either no additional information (control), addiction risk information, addiction plus health risk information, or addiction plus death risk information. We compared evoked affect, agreement with a reduced opioid prescription compared to common practice, and perceptions of quality. RESULTS: Among 1,546 participants (56% men, mean age 39), 78% agreed with reducing the quantity of opioids prescribed, relative to common practices. Compared to the control, providing addiction risk information did not impact the degree of evoked negative emotions or the likelihood of agreement with reduced opioid prescriptions. Providing opioid risk information increased the likelihood of high surgeon quality ratings. CONCLUSIONS: Among a sample of U.S. adults, presenting addiction risk did not effectively appeal to fear, nor increase agreement with judicious opioid prescribing. Alternative communication strategies may be needed for those purposes.