Is the distance from punctum a factor in the anatomical and functional success of canalicular laceration repairs?

PURPOSE: The aim is to analyze the influence of the location of lacrimal canalicular laceration over the eventual anatomical and functional success after surgery. METHODS: Retrospective, observational study of proximal canalicular laceration (PCL) and distal canalicular laceration (DCL) repairs by a single surgeon (MS). The distance between lacrimal punctum and the lateral canalicular lacerated end was defined as proximal (<6 mm) and distal (≥6 mm). The operation theater setup, microscopic magnified view, local adrenaline, and pigtail probe were used to locate the medial canalicular lacerated end. All patients underwent lacrimal stenting and the stents were removed after 3 months (12th week visit). After stent removal, a fluorescein dye disappearance test and lacrimal irrigation were performed to assess the anatomical and functional success of the operation. RESULTS: Of 36 canalicular lacerations, 30 (83.33%) were monocanalicular lacerations which were repaired using monocanalicular stents. Of 6 (16.67%) bicanalicular lacerations, three were repaired using bicanalicular stents while in the remaining three, one monocanalicular stent was placed in each lacerated canaliculi. The medial cut end was identified by magnified visualization in 27 (75%), with adjunctive local adrenaline in four (11.11%) and pigtail probe in five (13.89%) patients. The mean post stent removal follow-up was 44 weeks. The DCL (n = 24, 66.67%) showed better functional and complete success as compared to PCL (75% vs. 33.33%, P = 0.03). Eight (22.22%) had spontaneous stent extrusion, two (5.56%) had loop prolapse, four (11.11%) had punctum granuloma, and three (8.33%) had medial canthus dystopia. CONCLUSION: The location of canalicular laceration may help to prognosticate the functional and qualified success rate. We experienced better-qualified success in the distal canalicular laceration group.

Diode laser cyclophotocoagulation paves way to a safer trabeculectomy in eyes with medically uncontrollable intraocular pressure.

High intraocular pressure (IOP) not responding to systemic and topical anti-glaucoma medications renders the eye at risk for both intra- and post-operative complications of glaucoma filtration surgery. Laser cyclophotocoagulation is able to lower IOP in such refractory glaucoma eyes and may make the surgical event safer. This study assessed diode laser cyclophotocoagulation (DLCP) when used as a temporary measure for lowering IOP prior to performing trabeculectomy. This study is a  retrospective analysis of cases planned for trabeculectomy surgery, uncontrolled on maximally tolerable systemic anti-glaucoma medications. They were analysed for response to DLCP in terms of IOP control, vision-related complications, increased inflammation, post-trabeculectomy hypotony and chances of phthisis and ciliary shutdown. Twelve eyes of ten patients aged 35-65 years were identified and all followed up for at least 2 years. One week following DLCP, the IOP (mean ± SD) declined by 51 % from 46.8 ± 5.4 to 22.8 ± 3.3 mmHg. The IOP was further reduced to 15.4 ± 2.7 mmHg at 4 weeks after trabeculectomy; it remained in the mid-teens for a minimum of 2 years in all cases. The mean (±SD) visual acuity improved from 1.4 ± 0.4 to 0.8 ± 0.4 LogMAR equivalents following trabeculectomy. In four eyes, phacoemulsification was performed 5-7 months after trabeculectomy with improvement in best-corrected visual acuity. One patient developed transient hypotony, post-trabeculectomy, which resolved by 6 days. There were no other complications like increased inflammation, prolonged hypotony or suprachoroidal haemorrhage. DLCP is, thus, effective and safe for temporarily controlling IOP; thereby trabeculectomy can be performed in a quieter ocular milieu.