Irisin expression and FNDC5 (rs3480) gene polymorphism in type 2 diabetic patients with and without CAD.

BACKGROUND: Irisin was found to correlate with coronary artery disease (CAD) in diabetic patients. This study investigated the association of irisin and FNDC5 (SNP rs3480) with the presence and severity of CAD in T2DM. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 100 patients with T2DM divided into two groups, DM group (n = 50), including patients without CAD and CAD group (n = 50), including those confirmed to have CAD by coronary angiography. Irisin was measured. SNP rs3480 genotyping of FNDC5 was done. RESULTS: Irisin levels were significantly lower in the CAD group (p < 0.001). The CAD group had significantly higher HbA1c and lower HDL (p < 0.001). Patients with controlled DM had significantly higher irisin levels (p < 0.001). single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs3480 was not associated with irisin levels, and the FNDC5 rs3480 AA reference allele was significantly associated with significant CAD. CONCLUSION: Irisin appears to be protective against developing CAD in diabetic patients. Irisin level was an independent predictor of significant CAD in diabetic patients combined with the FNDC5 rs3480 genotype. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04957823.

Comparison of intracoronary versus intravenous adenosine-induced maximal hyperemia for fractional flow reserve measurement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available literature comparing fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements after administration of adenosine using intracoronary (IC) bolus versus standard continuous intravenous (IV) infusion. BACKGROUND: FFR is considered the gold standard for invasive assessment of coronary lesions of intermediate severity. IV adenosine is recommended to induce hyperemia; however, IC adenosine is widely used for convenience. The difference between IV and IC administration in lesions assessment is not well studied. METHODS: We systematically searched MEDLINE and relevant databases for studies comparing IV with IC adenosine administration for FFR measurement. We reviewed data pertaining to adenosine doses, side effects, and FFR values. RESULTS: Eight studies addressing the primary question were identified. Dose of IC adenosine varied between 36 and 600 µg. Compared to IV adenosine infusion, the sensitivity of IC administration is 0.805 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.664-0.896; p < .001), specificity is 0.965 (95% CI: 0.932-0.983; p < .001), positive likelihood ratio is 24.218 (95% CI: 12,263-47.830; p < .001), negative likelihood ratio is 0.117 (95% CI: 0.033-0.411; p < .01), and diagnostic odds ratio is 274.225 [95% CI: 92.731-810.946; p < .001]. Overall, hemodynamic side effects and symptoms were reported more frequently with IV adenosine. CONCLUSIONS: The available literature suggests that IC adenosine is well tolerated and may provide equivalent diagnostic accuracy compared to IV administration. However, variability in dosing regimens does not allow definitive conclusions regarding noninferiority of IC approach compared to IV administration.

Prognostic Value of Anatomical SYNTAX Score and SYNTAX Score II in Veterans With Left Main and/or Three-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease.

Anatomical SYNTAX score (SS1) and SYNTAX score II (SS2) are often utilized to determine the optimal revascularization strategy. Although US veterans have unique characteristics that may affect outcomes after revascularization, the prognostic values of SS1 and SS2 in veterans have not yet been validated. We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive veteran patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for left main and/or 3-vessel disease from 2009 to 2014. SS1 and SS2 were calculated for each patient. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. The prognostic values of SS1 and SS2 were compared by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The predicted 4-year mortality derived from SS2 was compared with the observed 4-year mortality estimated from Kaplan-Meier analysis. After exclusion, 286 patients (99% male) were included. Among 286 patients, 79 patients (27.6%) had left main disease, 151 (52.8%) underwent PCI, and 135 (47.2%) underwent CABG. Overall mortality was 27.6% at a median follow-up of 5.0 years. SS2 had better discriminative ability for all-cause mortality than SS1 (c-index 0.79 vs 0.52, p <0.001). Observed and predicted 4-year mortality correlated well in patients with low and intermediate SS2 in both PCI and CABG cohorts, but observed mortality was higher than predicted in the PCI cohort with high SS2 (observed 54.7% vs predicted 40.5%). In conclusion, observed and predicted 4-year mortality derived from SS2 correlated well in patients with low and intermediate SS2, but SS2 underestimated mortality in the PCI cohort with high SS2.