Background Brachial plexus injuries are frequently encountered in the domain of plastic surgery, mostly secondary to road traffic accidents, gunshot injuries, or falls from a height. Many modalities have been described in the management, depending on the level and duration of the injury. C5, C6 and C5, C6, C7 are two common patterns in which nerve repair and transfers are described. At our center, we practice spinal accessory to suprascapular nerve transfer in all patients with upper trunk brachial plexus injury. There are two described approaches for the spinal accessory nerve to suprascapular nerve transfer, i.e. anterior or dorsal. The rationale for doing the posterior approach is that this approach avoids damaging the suprascapular nerve at its entrance in the suprascapular notch under the suprascapular ligament during exploration due to traction. Materials and methods This is a retrospective study with a consecutive sampling of 23 patients presenting at Liaquat National Hospital, Karachi, with upper trunk brachial plexus injuries during the time period from January 2016 to December 2017, i.e. two years. We divided these 23 patients into two groups, one with the anterior approach and the other with a dorsal approach for spinal accessory to suprascapular nerve transfer for shoulder abduction. The mean duration of post-surgical follow-up was from 18 to 24 months and recovery and functional outcomes were assessed. Results Out of the 23 patients that were included, 10 patients were operated on with an anterior approach and 13 with a posterior approach. Fifty percent (50%) of patients operated with the anterior approach and 84% of patients with the posterior showed the best motor grade recovery of M4, respectively, with better performance in patients with the posterior approach as compared to the anterior approach. Conclusion We advocate taking a posterior approach for spinal accessory to suprascapular nerve transfer for shoulder abduction, as it has shown better results with reliable outcomes concerning shoulder abduction, angle of abduction, and range of motion.
Background: Brachial plexus injuries are common after both blunt and penetrating traumas resulting in upper limb weakness. The nerve transfer to the affected nerve distal to the injury site is a good option where proximal stump of the nerve is unhealthy or absent which has shown early recovery and better results. Commonly used procedures to restore elbow flexion are ipsilateral phrenic or ipsilateral intercostal nerves (ICNs) in global plexus injuries. The use of both intercostal and phrenic nerves for elbow flexion is well described and there is no definite consensus on the superiority of one on another. Methods: All patients presented in the outpatient department of LNH and MC from January 2014 to December 2017 with pan plexus or upper plexus injury with no signs of improvement for at least 3 months were included in the study. After 3 months of conservative trial; surgery offered to patients. Results: A total of 25 patients (n = 25) were operated from January 2015 to December 2017. Patients were followed to record Medical Research Council (MRC) grades at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months. The patients achieved at least MRC Grade 3; 70% at 12 months follow-up to 80% at 18 months in the phrenic nerve transfer group. While in the ICN transfer group, it is 86% and 100% at 12 and 18 months postoperative, respectively. Conclusion: Our study has shown better results with ICN transfers to musculocutaneous nerve, recorded on MRC grading system.
Introduction/background Metacarpal fractures comprise approximately 35.5% of cases in daily emergencies, mostly due to road traffic accidents (RTA), fall, and assault. The classification is based on the site and pattern of fracture. High-level evidence is lacking for the management of metacarpal fractures. The primary goals of treatment are to achieve acceptable alignment, stable reduction, strong bony union, and unrestricted motion. It can be managed by non-operative methods like close reduction and splintage. Operative management will be required if there is shortening, rotation, and angulation in different planes including close reduction and fixation with percutaneous intramedullary pining/k-wires and open reduction and fixation with screws, plates (compression/locking), and external fixators. This study was done to compare the efficacy of k-wire, screws, and plates in the management of metacarpal fractures and their outcomes based on their union, postoperative pain, range of movement, and grip strength in a tertiary care center, i.e., Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College. Methods It was a retrospective study conducted at the Department of Plastics and Reconstruction Surgery, of a tertiary care hospital. A total of 113 patients who were operated upon for metacarpal fracture were included in the study (open/close) without soft tissue loss or tendon injury, were divided into three groups according to the technique of fracture fixation, i.e., group 1 (k-wire), group 2 (screw), and group 3 (plates). The data like post-operative pain (visual analog scale, VAS) and radiological evidence of union were extracted from the registry. All the patients were called for follow-up in the outpatient department. Out of 113, 97 patients showed up for follow-up and were examined by a hand surgeon, and range of movement (goniometer) and grip strength (sphygmomanometer method) were assessed. Results A total of 97 patients were included in the study (male 66%, female 34%). Group 1 (K-wire) includes n = 61 (62.9%), group 2 (screw) n = 15 (15.5%), and group 3 (plate) n = 21 (21.6%). The mean follow-up time was 12 + 2 weeks after the surgery for post-operative pain and radiological evidence of union while 24 + 6 months for a range of movement and grip strength. Less post-operative pain was noted in group 1 patients while no significant difference was noted in the evidence of radiological union in all groups. Range of movement was better in group 1 patients (89.74 + 0.750) than in group 2 (80 + 0.37°) or group 3 (80.2 + 0.62°). The grip strength (compared to the normal contralateral hand) was normal in the majority of the patients in group 1, i.e., 94% while it was 80% in group 2 and 82% in group 3. Conclusion The significance of these reported findings suggests that open reduction and internal fixation with screw or plate might be a less preferable surgical technique in comparison to k-wire fixation in the treatment of a metacarpal fracture.
Introduction Cleft lip and cleft palate are among the most common birth defects. These deformities lead to profound psychosocial and functional effects on cleft palate patients. Several surgical techniques have been described for the repair of the cleft. The defects lateral to mucoperiosteal flaps closure are sometimes covered with sterile gauze soaked with soft paraffin or tincture of benzoin or are left open for mucolization by means of secondary intention. The buccal fat pad (BFP) is used as a pedicled graft to cover the exposed bone of the lateral palatal defect, and it is associated with proposed benefits of early healing and fewer effects on transverse growth of the maxilla. Materials and methods This was a prospective study involving 42 cleft palate patients who underwent cleft palate repair; 21 patients received BFP as an additional step to cover lateral palatal defect while the rest of the patients (n=21) underwent conventional surgical cleft palate repair and the defect was covered with Surgicel (Ethicon, Inc., Bridgewater, NJ). Postoperative follow-up was conducted at first, second, and third weeks postoperatively to assess the time required for mucolization. Results Our cohort of 42 patients included an equal number of complete and incomplete cleft palate patients. Follow-up at the first postoperative week showed an equal number (n=21, 100%) patients with incomplete mucolization on both groups, while at the second postoperative follow-up, only one (4.8%) of the patients who underwent conventional cleft palate repair had complete mucolization while 20 (95.2%) among the patients who underwent BFP had complete mucolization. At the third-week postoperative follow-up, three (14.3%) patients from the conventional group had complete mucolization, while 18 (85.7%) had incomplete mucolization. Only two patients (4.8%) developed recipient area complications, and they were managed conservatively. Conclusion BFP is a good source of vascularized tissue to cover the hard palate bones after primary cleft repair. It is easy to harvest as a local tissue with a low learning curve. The epithelialization rate is faster than conventional methods with minimal complication rates.
