RESUMEN
Background Chorionic bump is a rare condition defined as a bulge or protrusion from the choriodecidual surface into the gestational sac. The limited literature on this infrequent entity suggests that the pregnancies with multiple chorionic bumps mostly result in fetal demise. Aims To review the available literature and the patients from our institute having sonographic findings of chorionic bump and making the sonographers and radiologists aware of this known cause of first-trimester pregnancy loss. Study design A retrospective review of the cases diagnosed at our institute during the last four years. Methods and materials Single-center institutional data for four years (January 2016-December 2019) was accessed using ICD codes. IRB approval was waived owing to the anonymized use of patient data. Results Six female patients diagnosed with chorionic bump were included, with a mean age of 29.83±12 years. The average gestational age at the time of diagnosis was 8.16±3 weeks. The most common sonographic findings were a protrusion from the chorionic wall into the gestational sac cavity, having a central hypoechoic region with peripheral hyperechoic rim (isoechoic to the chorion) and having no vascularity (n=5), and the less common finding was a hyperechoic protrusion with no vascularity (n=1). n=5 had a single lesion, and n=1 had two lesions. The average diameter of the lesion in the largest dimension was 18±11 mm. n=3 pregnancies resulted in a first-trimester miscarriage, and n=3 pregnancies delivered healthy babies at term. Conclusions A chorionic bump significantly increases the risk of a first-trimester miscarriage.
RESUMEN
Heterotopic pregnancy is defined as the simultaneous presence of intrauterine and ectopic pregnancies. It is a rare condition, but due to the increasing use of artificial reproductive techniques, the incidence of heterotopic pregnancy is increasing. Most of the patients with heterotopic pregnancy have a previous history of infertility or tubal diseases. In this case series, we are presenting six cases of heterotopic pregnancy. Three of them had a history of assisted reproductive technique: one patient had in vitro fertilization with three embryos transferred, and two patients received follicular stimulating hormone therapy. In one of the cases, heterotopic pregnancy was missed on an initial transabdominal scan, and in the following weeks, it was diagnosed on transvaginal ultrasound. Five patients underwent laparoscopic salpingectomy, and one patient had laparotomy and then a salpingectomy was done. Follow-up ultrasound scans for intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) showed abortion of the IUP, except in one patient who delivered a healthy full-term baby via spontaneous vaginal delivery. Therefore, there is a need to develop diagnostic criteria to rule out heterotopic pregnancy if the patient underwent any type of assisted reproductive techniques. We are emphasizing the need for more careful scanning of the adnexa via transvaginal ultrasound, especially in high-risk patients, even if the intrauterine gestation is confirmed.