Reproducibility and usability assessment of the novel Fine Birth device for threatened preterm labor diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Preterm delivery is considered the leading cause of mortality worldwide in children under 5 years old. Approximately 45 million pregnant women are hospitalized yearly for threatened preterm labor. However, only 50% of pregnancies complicated by threatened preterm labor end in delivery before the estimated date, classifying the rest as false threatened preterm labor. The ability of current diagnostic methods to predict threatened preterm labor is low (low positive predictive value), ranging between 8% and 30%. This highlights the need for a solution that accurately detects and differentiates between false and real threatened preterm labors in women who attend obstetrical clinics and hospital emergency departments with delivery symptoms. OBJECTIVE: Primarily, this aimed to assess the reproducibility and usability of a novel medical device, the Fine Birth, aimed at accurately diagnosing threatened preterm labor through the objective quantification of pregnant women's cervical consistency. Secondarily, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of training and the incorporation of a lateral microcamera on the device's reliability and usability outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 77 singleton pregnant women were recruited during their follow-up visits to the obstetrical and gynecologic departments at 5 Spanish hospitals. The eligibility criteria included pregnant women aged ≥18 years; women with a normal fetus and uncomplicated pregnancy; women without prolapse of membranes, uterine anomalies, previous cervical surgery, or latex allergy; and women signing the informed written consent. Cervical tissue stiffness was assessed using the Fine Birth device, whose technology is based on the propagation of torsional waves through the studied tissue. Cervical consistency measurements were taken for each woman until obtaining 2 valid measurements by 2 different operators. The intraobserver and interobserver reproducibilities of the Fine Birth measurements were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficients with a 95% confidence interval and the Fisher test P value. The usability was evaluated on the basis of the clinicians' and participants' feedback. RESULTS: There was good intraobserver reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.84-0.95; Fisher test P value<.05). As the results obtained for the interobserver reproducibility did not reach the desired acceptable values (intraclass correlation coefficient of <0.75), a lateral microcamera was added to the Fine Birth intravaginal probe, and the operators involved in the clinical investigation received the corresponding training with the modified device. The analysis of 16 additional subjects demonstrated excellent interobserver reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-0.97) and an improvement after the intervention (P<.0001). CONCLUSION: The robust reproducibility and usability results obtained after the insertion of a lateral microcamera and the corresponding training make the Fine Birth a promising novel device to objectively quantify the patient's cervical consistency, diagnose threatened preterm labor, and, thus, predict the risk of spontaneous preterm birth. Further research is needed to demonstrate the clinical utility of the device.

Effect of maternal obesity on pregnancy outcomes in women delivering singleton babies: a historical cohort study.

Background Obesity in pregnancy is increasing worldwide, reaching epidemic proportions in many countries and frequently creating challenges for obstetricians. We conducted this study to assess the effects of maternal obesity on maternal and perinatal outcomes. Methods A historical cohort study was performed on 16,609 women who delivered singleton babies in a 5-year period (2013-2017). Data were retrieved from the Cruces Perinatal Database (CPD) and only women whose prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) was known were included. Women were categorized according to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification: normal weight (BMI 20-24.9 kg/m2) and obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2). Obstetric, perinatal and neonatal outcomes were compared, and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated using the normal-weight group as the reference. Results Compared to women of normal weight (n = 9778), obese women (n = 2207) had a higher risk of preeclampsia (aOR 2.199, 95% CI: 1.46-3.29), rectovaginal group B streptococcus colonization (aOR 1.299, 95% CI: 1.14-1.47), induction of labor (aOR 1.593, 95% CI: 1.44-1.75), cesarean section (aOR 2.755, 95% CI: 2.46-3.08), cesarean section in women with a history of cesarean delivery (aOR 1.409, 95% CI: 1.03-1.92), fetal weight ≥4000 g (aOR 2.090, 95% CI: 1.803-2.422) and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) (aOR 1.341, 95% CI: 1.12-1.59). No association was found with preterm birth (aOR 0.936, 95% CI: 0.77-1.13), stillbirth (aOR 0.921, 95% CI: 0.41-2.02) or neonatal mortality (aOR 2.205, 95% CI: 0.86-5.62). Conclusion Maternal obesity is associated with a higher risk of adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes. Pregnancy in this population of women should be considered and managed as high risk.