RESUMEN
The objective of this study was to estimate: (i) the sensitivity of cytologists in recognizing abnormal smears; (ii) the sensitivity of cervical cytology as a method of detecting abnormal smears among those obtained in the presence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Study subjects were 61 women with a histologically confirmed CIN identified through colpohistological and cytologic screening. For objective (i) new smears were taken from study subjects just before treatment, mixed with routine preparations, interpreted by unaware cytologists and then blindly reviewed by a group of three expert supervisors, who reached a consensus diagnosis. Cytologists classified as positive for squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) 30 of the 34 smears judged as positive by supervisors (100% of smears classified as high-grade and 67% of smears classified as low-grade SIL by the supervisors). Our approach, based on creating a set of smears with a high a priori probability of being positive, proved to be an efficient way of estimating errors of interpretation. For objective (ii), smears taken at the moment of diagnosis, just before biopsy, were also reviewed by the same supervisors. These CIN cases were identified among asymptomatic women independently of cytological findings and results are therefore not subject to verification bias. Among the 33 histological CINII/III, four (12%) smears had no atypical cells (three negatives and one unsatisfactory) at review. The same proportion was 26% (four negatives and one unsatisfactory) among the 19 histological CINI. No significant differences in smear content were found between the seven 'false negatives' and a sample of 'true positive' and 'true negatives' for a number of formal adequacy criteria (including presence of endocervical cells). Strong differences were found between positive smears taken just before biopsy and those taken just before treatment (in 11 women the first smear only was positive, while the opposite was never observed), suggesting an effect of punch biopsy in removing lesions.
Asunto(s)
Displasia del Cuello del Útero/diagnóstico , Frotis Vaginal/normas , Errores Diagnósticos , Femenino , Humanos , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Displasia del Cuello del Útero/patologíaRESUMEN
A study of 80 cases of dysplasia of the uterine cervix showed the coexistence of HPV infections in 52 cases. This association (65%) shows the important role played by the human papilloma virus in the genesis of cancer of the cervix.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Tumorales por Virus/complicaciones , Displasia del Cuello del Útero/etiología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Papillomaviridae , Displasia del Cuello del Útero/microbiologíaRESUMEN
In the past 10 years, 7,495 cytological breast fine-needle aspirations (FNAs) were performed (4,756 FNAs of solid nodes and 2,739 of cystic nodes). Of these, 2,099 cases underwent surgery; 650 (31%) had histologically proven carcinoma. Sensitivity was 83.9%, specificity was 99.5%, the predictive value for negative results was 93.2% and for positive results was 98.6%, and the accuracy was 94.6%. Inadequate (13.3%) and doubtful samples (8.1%) were excluded from calculation. False-negative results (82 cases) mainly resulted from sampling errors. False suspicious results (six cases) lessened with increasing experience in breast pathology and with the application of strict diagnostic criteria, but most likely they will never reach zero. Frozen-section diagnosis could be bypassed only in selected cases. Guidelines on the role of FNA in management of solid breast lesions are given. FNA deserves further evaluation in diagnosing early stages of breast carcinoma: sensitivity was 7.5% in 57 carcinomas in situ, 67.5% in 55 minimally invasive carcinoma, and 92.7% in 538 nonminimally invasive carcinomas.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Carcinoma/patología , Biopsia con Aguja , Reacciones Falso Negativas , Reacciones Falso Positivas , Femenino , HumanosRESUMEN
Estrogen receptors (ER) were evaluated in 634 breast cancer patients by the dextran-coated charcoal method (DCC). In 206, ER and progesterone receptors (PR) were also tested by cytochemistry (Lee method), and in 124 ER were tested by immunofluorescence (Pertschuk method). The median follow-up is 3.7 years. Comparisons have been made between receptor content and: anatomical and clinical features, disease-free survival (DFS), and survival. The following conclusions can be drawn: there is no correlation between ER determinations by DCC and by immunofluorescence or cytochemical methods; there is no evidence of association between ER and PR determined by Lee's method and anatomical and clinical features; a highly significant positive association was found between ER rich specimens and age, post-menopausal status, lobular and tubular histologic types; there is no association between ER values and TNM stage, WHO grading, pathologic prognostic factors of primary tumor and of lymph nodes; and the DFS was not affected by ER status, except for tumors with more than 50 fmol/mg protein.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/análisis , Receptores de Estrógenos/análisis , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Carbón Orgánico , Dextranos , Femenino , Técnica del Anticuerpo Fluorescente , Histocitoquímica , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática , Menopausia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Receptores de Progesterona/análisisRESUMEN
Frozen section diagnosis (FSD) given in 4436 consecutive breast biopsies performed in 5 years in a single pathology laboratory were checked against the final pathological report. In 4284 cases (96.57%) there was no difference between the FSD and the definitive diagnosis. There were 74 (1.66%) false negative reports and no false positive diagnoses. The diagnosis was deferred to paraffin sections in 78 cases (1.75% of biopsies). The predictive value for positive results was 100% and for negative results 97.5%; the specificity was 100%, the sensitivity 94.6% and the accuracy 98.3%. Minimal breast cancer, in situ (CIS) especially, was the main source of false negative reports. In non minimal invasive cancers (NMIC) FSD was correct in 99.42%. In minimal invasive cancers (MIC) FSD was correct in 80.21%, false negatives and deferred diagnosis increased to 8.79% and 10.98%. In CIS false negatives increased to 76.82% and deferred diagnoses to 12.19%. The sensitivity of fine needle aspiration, performed before biopsy in a portion of the patients, was lower than FSD in NMIC (71.39% versus 99.21%) and in MIC (41.66% versus 80.55%), identical to FSD in CIS (7.40% versus 7.40%). The value of cytodiagnosis in addressing surgery is discussed.