Real-world experience of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: long-term results of the prospective ABItude study.

BACKGROUND: Limited real-world data exist on the effectiveness and safety of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (abiraterone hereafter) in the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) naive to chemotherapy. Most of the few available studies had a retrospective design and included a small number of patients. In the interim analysis of the ABItude study, abiraterone showed good clinical effectiveness and safety profile in the chemotherapy-naive setting over a median follow-up of 18 months. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of chemotherapy-naive mCRPC patients treated with abiraterone as for clinical practice in the Italian, observational, prospective, multicentric ABItude study. mCRPC patients were enrolled at abiraterone start (February 2016-June 2017) and followed up for 3 years; clinical endpoints and PROs, including quality of life (QoL) and pain, were prospectively collected. Kaplan-Meier curves were estimated. RESULTS: Of the 481 patients enrolled, 454 were assessable for final study analyses. At abiraterone start, the median age was 77 years, with 58.6% elderly patients and 69% having at least one comorbidity (57.5% cardiovascular diseases). Visceral metastases were present in 8.4% of patients. Over a median follow-up of 24.8 months, median progression-free survival (any progression reported by the investigators), time to abiraterone discontinuation, and overall survival were, respectively, 17.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 14.1-19.4 months], 16.0 months (95% CI 13.1-18.2 months), and 37.3 months (95% CI 36.5 months-not estimable); 64.2% of patients achieved ≥50% reduction in prostate-specific antigen. QoL assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate, the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 3 Level, and European Quality of Life Visual Analog Scale remained stable during treatment. Median time to pain progression according to Brief Pain Inventory data was 31.1 months (95% CI 24.8 months-not estimable). Sixty-two patients (13.1%) had at least one adverse drug reaction (ADR) and 8 (1.7%) one serious ADR. CONCLUSION: With longer follow-up, abiraterone therapy remains safe, well tolerated, and active in a large unselected population.

A randomized, phase 2 study of cetuximab plus cisplatin with or without paclitaxel for the first-line treatment of patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

BACKGROUND: B490 (EudraCT# 2011-002564-24) is a randomized, phase 2b, noninferiority study investigating the efficacy and safety of first-line cetuximab plus cisplatin with/without paclitaxel (CetCis versus CetCisPac) in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had confirmed R/M SCCHN (oral cavity/oropharynx/larynx/hypopharynx/paranasal sinus) and no prior therapy for R/M disease. Cetuximab was administered on day 1 (2-h infusion, 400 mg/m2), then weekly (1-h infusions, 250 mg/m2). Cisplatin was given as a 1-h infusion (CetCis arm: 100 mg/m2; CetCisPac arm: 75 mg/m2) on day 1 of each cycle for a maximum of six cycles. Paclitaxel was administered as a 3-h infusion (175 mg/m2) on day 1 of each cycle. After six cycles, maintenance cetuximab was administered until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). We assumed a noninferiority margin of 1.40 as compatible with efficacy. RESULTS: A total of 201 patients were randomized 1 : 1 to each regimen; 191 were assessable. PFS with CetCis (median, 6 months) was noninferior to PFS with CetCisPac (median, 7 months) [HR for CetCis versus CetCisPac 0.99; 95% CI: 0.72-1.36, P = 0.906; margin of noninferiority (90% CI of 1.4) not reached]. Median overall survival was 13 versus 11 months (HR = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.53-1.11, P = 0.117). The overall response rates were 41.8% versus 51.7%, respectively (OR = 0.69; 95% CI: 0.38-1.20, P = 0.181). Grade ≥3 adverse event rates were 76% and 73% for CetCis versus CetCisPac, respectively, while grade 4 toxicities were lower in the two-drug versus three-drug arm (14% versus 33%, P = 0.015). No toxic death or sepsis were reported and cardiac events were negligible (1%). CONCLUSION: The two-drug CetCis regimen proved to be noninferior in PFS to a three-drug combination with CetCisPac. The median OS of both regimens is comparable with that observed in EXTREME, while the life-threatening toxicity rate appeared reduced. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: EudraCT# 2011-002564-24.

Efficacy and safety of Everolimus and Exemestane in hormone-receptor positive (HR+) human-epidermal-growth-factor negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer patients: New insights beyond clinical trials. The EVA study.

BACKGROUND: The BOLERO-2 trial reported efficacy and safety of Everolimus (EVE) and Exemestane (EXE) combination in HR+ advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients. The BALLET trial further evaluated the safety of EVE-EXE in HR+ ABC patients, without reporting efficacy data. Aim of the EVA real-life study was to collect data of efficacy and safety of EVE-EXE combination in the clinical setting, as well as exploring efficacy according to EVE Dose-Intensity (DI) and to previous treatment with Fulvestrant. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study aimed to describe the outcome of ABC pts treated with EVE-EXE combination in terms of median duration of EVE treatment and ORR in a real-life setting. RESULTS: From July 2013 to December 2015, the EVA study enrolled 404 pts. Median age was 61 years (33-83). Main metastatic sites were: bone (69.1%), soft tissue (34.7%) and viscera (33.2%). Median number of previous treatments was 2 (1-7). 43.3% of the pts had received Fulvestrant. Median exposure to EVE was 31.0 weeks (15.4-58.3) in the whole population. No difference was observed in terms of EVE exposure duration according to DI (p for trend = 0.27) or type of previous treatments (p = 0.33). ORR and Disease Control Rate (DCR) were observed in 31.6% and 60.7% of the patients, respectively, with the lowest ORRs confined in CHT pre-treated patients or in those who received the lowest DI of EVE. Grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 37.9% of the patients. Main AEs were: stomatitis (11.2%), non-infectious pneumonitis - NIP (3.8%), anaemia (3.8%) and fatigue (3.2%). CONCLUSIONS: The EVA study provided new insights in the use of EVE-EVE combination in HR+ ABC pts many years after the publication of the pivotal trial. The combination is safe and the best response could be obtained in patients receiving the full dose of EVE and/or after hormone-therapy as Fulvestrant in ABC.

Parameters and outcomes in 525 patients operated on for oral squamous cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: This report analyzed the outcomes of patients undergoing surgery for oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) to identify the value of prognostic factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 525 patients were studied who had undergone surgery for oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) between 2000 and 2011, of whom 222 had received postoperative radiation-therapy (PORT) and or chemoradiation-therapy (PORTC). For each patient, personal data, histological findings, treatment and outcome were recorded and analyzed statistically. Survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier algorithm, and the difference in survival among subgroups was examined. RESULTS: The overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) 5-year survival rate in the 525 patients were respectively 71.38% and 73.18%. The differences in the overall survival and disease-specific 5-year survival were significant (p < 0.05) for age < 40 years, site of origin, N status, staging, grading, osseous medullar infiltration, and perineural invasion. In patients undergoing radiation therapy, only perineural invasion negatively influenced the survival prognosis. In 150 pT1 cases of tongue and floor-of-mouth cancer, an infiltration depth (ID) > 4 mm was statistically correlated with poorer prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate an improvement in the 5-year OS and DSS rates during the past decade compared with the previous decade. Univariate analysis revealed that age, tumor staging, and lymph node involvement, extracapsular spread, grading, perineurial invasion, infiltration depth, and osseus medullary invasion were associated significantly with overall survival and disease-specific survival.

Pain management in head and neck cancer patients undergoing chemo-radiotherapy: Clinical practical recommendations.

Pain in head and neck cancer represents a major issue, before, during and after the oncological treatments. The most frequent cause of pain is chemo/radiation related oral mucositis, which involves 80% of the patients and worsens their quality of life inhibiting speaking, eating, drinking or swallowing and sometimes reducing the treatment compliance, the maximum dose intensity and thus the potential efficacy of treatment. Nevertheless pain is still often under estimated and undertreated. An Italian multidisciplinary group of head and neck cancer specialists met with the aim of reaching a consensus on pain management in this setting. The Delphi Appropriateness method was used for the consensus. External expert reviewers evaluated the final statements. The paper contains 30 consensus-reached statements about pain management in HNC patients and offers a review of recent literature in these topics.

Phase I dose-escalation study of brostallicin, a minor groove binder, in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: Brostallicin is a DNA minor groove binder which shows enhanced antitumor activity in cells which are resistant to several anticancer agents due to their high glutathione S-transferase (GST)/glutathione content. Phase I and II clinical trials of single-agent brostallicin have shown that myelotoxicity is the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), while hints of antitumor activity were mainly observed in soft tissue sarcoma. Preclinical studies showing a more than additive antitumor effect of the cisplatin-brostallicin combination paved the way to clinical combination studies. In particular, we set up the first clinical combination study of brostallicin and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors. This study was to be followed by a phase II study in patients with recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). METHODS: Escalating doses of brostallicin were administered in combination with a fixed dose of cisplatin (75 mg/m(2)) in patients with recurrent or metastatic advanced solid tumors who had previously received a cumulative dose of cisplatin not higher than 475 mg/m(2). The recommended dose of brostallicin was expanded in order to have a better estimate of antitumor activity and to better define the safety profile of the combination. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were treated. Two DLTs (grade 3 fatigue and febrile neutropenia) were observed at dose level 3 (brostallicin 9 mg/m(2)). Dose level 2 (brostallicin 7 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2)) was recommended for future phase II studies. Main toxicity was hematologic; in fact, only 1 patient out of 21 did not develop neutropenia and only 2 patients did not have thrombocytopenia. Grade 3-4 neutropenia was observed in 90.5% of patients, grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia in 38.1%, grade 3-4 anemia in 23.8%. The cycle 1 nadir (ANC < 500 x 10(9)/L) for neutrophils was Day 14 (median; range 11-17) with recovery to an ANC of >1,500 3.5 days after nadir (median; range 2-4) at dose level 3. The cycle 1 nadir (median of 51,000 x 10(9)/L) for platelets occurred on Day 13 (median; range 10-15) with recovery to a platelet count of >100,000 4 days after nadir (median; range 2-8). No objective responses were observed, but seven patients had a long lasting (>18 weeks) stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: Further studies of the combination of brostallicin and cisplatin are warranted.

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of gemcitabine and 2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine-5'-triphosphate after prolonged infusion in patients affected by different solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: The study determined pharmacokinetic parameters, toxicity profile and preliminary clinical activity of gemcitabine administered i.v. at different infusion rates in patients with a range of solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients were enrolled for both pharmacokinetic and clinical studies. Gemcitabine 300 mg/m(2) was administered during 1 h, 2 h or 3 h, and as a conventional dose of 1000 mg/m(2) during 30 min infusion. Administration was on days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks. RESULTS: Patients were randomly assigned to one of the four arms. After 30 min infusion of 1000 mg/m(2) gemcitabine the plasma concentration remained above the saturation level of 10-20 microM, whereas after 1, 2 or 3 h infusion 300 mg/m(2) gemcitabine it remained below the saturation level for most of the time (being in the range 2.5-10 microM). Gemcitabine triphosphate was determined in the four arms in white blood cells; for infusion times from 0.5 to 3 h there was a progressive enhancement of gemcitabine triphosphate levels. In all evaluable patients the toxicity was mild, myelosuppression being the main toxicity. No grade 3 or 4 toxicities occurred. Clinical response was similar in patients receiving 300 mg/m(2) gemcitabine in 2 and 3 h and in the 1000 mg/m(2) arm. CONCLUSIONS: 300 mg/m(2) gemcitabine during 3 h infusion produced the highest accumulation of gemcitabine triphosphate. Thus, to achieve the highest possible gemcitabine triphosphate level, prolonged infusion time would appear to be more important than a high dose administered as a short infusion. However, there was no substantial difference in toxicity or antitumoral activity in the all different patient groups.

Current role of chemotherapy in exclusive and integrated treatment of malignant tumours of salivary glands.

In the management of salivary glands carcinomas, surgery is the treatment of choice. Post-operative radiotherapy is indicated in cases with high risk of loco-regional relapse. Radiotherapy is also standard treatment in cases that are inoperable at onset. Chemotherapy plays a palliative role. Today, the integration between radiotherapy and chemotherapy, which provides increased local control, represents a significant step forward. This integration is important since 5-year survival in tumours with high grade histology is approximately 50%. Overall incidence of metastases is approximately 25%. Primary locations of metastases are lungs, liver, bone, central nervous system and other organs. In cases of metastatic disease, chemotherapy plays only a palliative role.

HIV/HCV co-infection: natural history.

HIV and HCV share common transmission pathways, but HCV is more efficiently transmitted through blood than with sexual exposure. Thus HCV coinfection is frequent in HIV seropositives, mainly in those with history of injection drug use and/or transfusion. HIV coinfection increases HCV replication rate, the rate of HCV vertical transmission and accelerates the course of hepatitis C towards cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The evidence of an effect of HCV on HIV disease progression is less convincing. The results of several studies suggest that HCV coinfection does not hasten the progression of HIV infection towards AIDS. However two recent studies showed that HCV coinfection is independently associated with a lower restoration of CD4 counts during combination antiretroviral treatment. However this finding should be confirmed by additional studies.

Ifosfamide in the treatment of head and neck cancer.

Ifosfamide (IFO) has demonstrated activity in recurrent/metastatic squamous cell head and neck carcinoma with an overall response rate of 24-26%. Better results are reported for chemotherapy-naive patients; in heavily pretreated cases results are poor and toxicity unacceptable. Cisplatin-IFO combination in stage III-IV is probably more active than IFO alone (ORR = 60-72 vs. 50%) but is indicated in patients who desire aggressive treatment and are physically able to tolerate the drugs. The carboplatin-IFO scheme is better tolerated than the cisplatin-IFO regimen with superimposable clinical results (ORR = 69%; CR = 15%). Carboplatin-taxol-IFO is one of the most active regimens in recurrent (ORR = 59%; CR = 17%) and in locally advanced (ORR = 81%; CR = 31%) head and neck cancer. Its role in the multidisciplinary treatment of advanced head and neck cancer is under investigation. In recurrent/metastatic undifferentiated nasopharygeal carcinoma, IFO combinations have proven to be effective as first- and second-line treatment.

Update and perspectives on non-surgical treatment of salivary gland malignancies.

Surgery is the treatment of choice for major and minor salivary gland malignancies. Herein, the role of radiation and medical treatment in the multidisciplinary management of salivary gland tumours is discussed. Neutron irradiation and hyperfractionated external beam mega voltage irradiation improve local control. Combination of three dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensive-modulated radiation therapy provide better local tumour delineation, better field design to encompass the tumour allowing dose escalation to target while sparing the surrounding normal tissue. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy provides a response rate > or = 45%, in a palliative setting. Concomitant chemo-radiotherapy could improve local control. Recent studies evaluated the expression of molecular targets in salivary gland carcinomas (c-kit = 53-90%, EGFR = 25-85%, c-erb-B2 = 11-58%, p53 = 11-67%, H ras = 18%); these targets are very important since new targeted drugs are now available. Anti-androgen therapy might have a role in the management of patients with ductal carcinoma. These new targeted drugs could be integrated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced/metastatic salivary gland malignancies.

Oropharyngeal carcinoma during pregnancy: clinical and psycho-oncological aspects.

Cancer is uncommon in pregnancy, occurring in approximately one out of 1000 pregnancies, although it has been noted that one out of 118 women diagnosed with cancer is pregnant at the time of diagnosis. In the last 10 years, two oropharyngeal carcinomas, (1 squamous cell carcinoma and 1 adenoid cystic carcinoma) which developed during pregnancy, have been diagnosed and treated in our Department. No cases of oropharyngeal cancer, during pregnancy, have so far been reported in the literature with the exception of one case of oral cancer. This report focuses not only on the clinical history but also the management of oropharyngeal carcinoma during pregnancy, in terms of choice and timing of treatment. A scrupulous psycho-oncological analysis was also carried out in order to throw further light on psychological repercussions of head and neck cancer in the pregnant woman.

A sequence-dependent combination of docetaxel and vinorelbine: pharmacokinetic interactions.

We studied possible pharmacokinetic interactions between docetaxel (DTX) and vinorelbine (VNR) in patients affected by different types of cancer. Patients with metastatic breast cancer or recurrent head and neck cancer received the following schedules: Protocol A: 11 patients were i.v. infused for 1 h with DTX (80 mg/m2) at once, followed by VNR (25 mg/m2) as slow i.v. bolus; Protocol B: VNR (25 mg/m2) as a slow 10 min i.v. bolus was administered to 12 patients, immediately followed by 1 h i.v. infusion of DTX (80 mg/m2). In both schedules, VNR and DTX plasma concentrations versus time were analysed by HPLC obtaining the corresponding non-compartmental pharmacokinetic parameters. VNR appeared pharmacokinetically affected by the sequential administration of DTX, since with protocol B, Cmax and AUC were significantly higher and clearance lower than in protocol A. Moreover, a significant increase in the VNR plasma level was observed in correspondence with the peak plasma level of DTX. By contrast, Cmax, AUC and clearance of DTX did not vary in the two protocols. Also the number of neutrophils at nadir on day 8 of treatment varied significantly in the two schedules. In conclusion we observed altered pharmacokinetic parameters between protocol A (DTX, VNR) and protocol B (VNR/DTX). In particular, patients following protocol B seemed to be exposed to higher VNR plasma concentration and to higher haematological toxicity.

A preliminary pharmacokinetic study of docetaxel, carboplatin and concurrent radiotherapy for regionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

This work investigates the pharmacokinetics and toxicity resulting from the concomitant use of low dose carboplatin (CBCA)/docetaxel (DTX) plus concurrent radiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer. The study comprised 11 patients with stage III-IV head and neck cancer. All patients received 2 Gy radiotherapy daily, 5 fractions per week, up to a planned total of 70 Gy over 7 weeks. CBCA (AUC 0.4 mg/ml, min/day) was also administrated as 20 min i.v. infusion, starting 1 day before the first radiotherapy fraction. CBCA was administered for 5 consecutive days every 2 weeks (weeks 1, 3, 5 and 7). DTX 30 mg/m2 (1 h i.v. infusion) was given as a single dose on days 10, 24 and 38. CBCA on day 1 and DTX on day 10 were analysed to determine the concentration-time curves during the first 24 h. CBCA Cmax and Cmin in 2-5 days and on day 15 and 29, as well as total plasma platinum on days 2, 3, 4, 5, 29 and 43 were also assayed. By calculating the non-compartmental pharmacokinetic parameters of the two drugs from the available plasma concentrations we found in the first week values similar to those reported in the literature as single agents. In contrast, during subsequent weeks (weeks 3 and 5), a significant and progressive increase of platinum levels was observed. So, it could be assumed that after 2 weeks of CBCA and DTX treatment a bias in dose calculation occurred because the linear relationship between creatinine clearance (used to calculate the expected AUC through the Calvert formula) and CBCA clearance was no longer observed.

Concomitant chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in parotid gland undifferentiated carcinoma.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Undifferentiated carcinoma of the parotid gland is a poor-prognosis lesion. Results in unresectable lesions, treated with radiotherapy alone, are very disappointing. METHODS: Six patients with T3-4 N0-1 inoperable lesions were treated with conventional radiotherapy (64-70 Gy, 2 Gy per fraction 5 times a week) and concomitant cisplatin (100 mg/m2, days 1, 22 and 43). Four weeks after radiotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy (cisplatin, 80 mg/m2, day 1, + VP16, 100 mg/m2, days 1, 3 and 5, q = 3 weeks, for 3 cycles) was given. RESULTS: A median dose of 66 Gy (range, 64-70 Gy) was delivered, and all patients received 3 courses of cisplatin during radiotherapy. Five of 6 patients received all three chemotherapeutic adjuvant courses. Two months after the end of treatment, 3 CR (50%), 2 PR (33%) and 1 NC (16%) was observed. Median CR and PR duration was 26+ and 10 months, respectively. Median overall survival was 18 months. No severe acute or late toxicity was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in advanced unresectable undifferentiated parotid carcinoma is feasibile and well tolerated. The high percentage of long-lasting CR is encouraging.

Bases moleculares de resistencia de Mycobacterium tuberculosis / Molecular mechanism of resistance in Mycobacterium

No disponible

Bases moleculares de resistencia de VHB / Molecular mechanism of resistance in HBV

No disponible

Feasibility and long-term results of autologous PBSC transplantation in recurrent undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma (UNPC) is a chemosensitive illness. Here we report long-term results of high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) as late intensification, with autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) support. METHODS: Six patients (5 men, 1 woman; median age 41years; median ECOG PS = 0) with recurrent UNPC (local, 2; local + nodal, 2; bone metastasis, 2) have been enrolled. All patients had been previously treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy; 3 of 4 local relapses had received a re-irradiation. Every patient received three courses of cisplatin + epirubicin and 1 cycle of epirubicin followed by PBSC collection. A median of 7.2 x 10(6)/kg (range, 4.5-18) CD34+ cells were reinfused. HDC was according ICE scheme: ifosfamide, 2.5 g/m(2)/d, + carboplatin, 300 mg/m(2)/d, + VP-16, 300 mg/m(2)/d days 1 through 4. RESULTS: After conventional chemotherapy, we had 1 CR (16%), 3 PR (50%), and 2 NC (34%). After HDC, we had 4 CR (66%),1 PR (17%), and 1 MR (17%). Toxicity was manageable. After a median follow-up of 30 months (range, 14-50), two patients are alive without disease (34%), one is alive with bone disease (16%), and three (50%) died of disease at 16, 18, and 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: HDC has an acceptable toxicity, can convert PR in CR, and seems effective, with long-lasting CRs.

HIV-1 multi-dideoxynucleoside resistance mutation (Q151M): prevalence, associated resistance mutations and response to antiretroviral salvage treatment.

The prevalence and clinical implications of the Q151M multidrug-resistance mutation gene (mut) to antiretroviral drugs in the HIV reverse transcriptase (RT) gene have not yet been fully explained. In the present study three out of 350 (0.85%) of HIV-infected patients who underwent a drug-resistance genotyping assay because of therapeutic failure showed the Q151M mut. All these patients had been previously treated with zidovudine in association with didanosine. One such patient failed to respond to all salvage regimens tried and was shown to harbour some of the characteristic mut associated with Q151M (77L and 116Y). Another two patients partially responded to salvage regimens, both virologically and immunologically, and harboured the M184V mut in the RT gene. The prevalence of Q151M mut in our group was less (0.85%) than in other studies, which ranged from 2 to 19%. The M184V mut seemed to confer some viro-immunological benefit when associated with the Q151M mutation, compared with the latter alone.

Survival in patients with recurrent squamous cell head and neck carcinoma treated with bio-chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: We have shown that rIL-2 administration in recurrent head and neck cancers induces a tumor-specific T-lymphocyte reactivity and tumor regression; in a pilot study we have shown a safe and effective administration of rIL2 after cisplatin + 5-fluorouracil. Long-term results are not known. METHODS: Thirty patients with recurrent-persistent head and neck cancer were treated with cisplatin (100 mg-m(2)) d.1,5-fluorouracil (1 gr-m(2)-d c.i. 96 h), and SQ rIL-2 (4.5 M IU day 8 to 12 and 15 to 19) every 3 weeks. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 53.3% (95% CI; 34.4-72.3%): 26.6% complete response (CR) (8 patients) and 26.6% partial response (PR) (8 patients); 6 patients had SD (20%), 8 had PD (26.6%). The median follow-up was 36 months (range, 28-44). The median CR duration is 16.2 months (8.5-39+); the median survival duration of this group has not been reached. The median PR duration was 7.2 months (3-10); the median survival was 13.3 months (10-26). The median overall survival was 14 months. CONCLUSIONS: The most impressive finding is the very long survival of CRs patients. This outcome has been reported in other cancer patients with a CR after IL-2 therapy.