Analysis of 1430 hand fractures and identifying the 'Red Flags' for cases requiring surgery.

BACKGROUND: Hand fractures constitute 20% of hand injury patients who apply to emergency services. Conservative approaches are satisfactory in the majority of the cases. However, the minority group in need of surgery reaches a serious number of patients considering the frequency of these injuries. Retrospective questioning of the indications of the performed surgeries is a proper way of understanding the decisional process for surgery. PATIENTS/METHODS: Patients treated for hand fractures were retrospectively reviewed. Patient gender, age, finger/fingers involved, soft tissue involvement, treatment method (conservative/surgery) and if operated, devices used for fixation were noted. Plain radiographs of the patient were evaluated. Descriptive statistics of these variables and the effect of each variable on the decision for surgery were analyzed. RESULTS: The study involved 1430 fractures of 1303 patients (1016 male and 287 female). Fifth finger was the most commonly injured digit (31%). Comminuted fractures (29%) followed by transverse fractures (29%) and spiral/oblique fractures (22%) were commonly diagnosed fracture types. Thirteen percent (13%) of the study group needed tendon/nerve/vessel repairs. Male patients, cases with soft tissue involvement, second, third and fourth finger fractures, fractures involving multiple digits, fractures with an intra-articular component, fractures with dislocation more than 4 mm and angulation more than 15° had a significantly higher rate of surgery. CONCLUSION: Less than half of the hand fractures require surgery, and conservative treatment is usually preferred. Certain variables that indicate surgical treatment were identified with our study. These findings may help to weigh the options and choose the right path in doubtful conditions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4, Case-control study.

Impact of COVID-19 outbreak on plastic surgery: Taken precautions, distribution of surgical procedures and changes in admissions to outpatient clinic.

The COVID-19 outbreak is a global problem affecting the world in many respects. In the medical field, its impact on surgical branches as well as clinical branches is inevitable. From the plastic surgery perspective, the COVID-19 outbreak affects the number and distribution of surgeries, patient admissions and educational activities. Although these impacts are predictable, it is beneficial to document these data that would contribute to the proper response to a similar crisis in the future. From this standpoint, the present study aims to analyze the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on plastic surgery practice in some aspects. Epidemiologic data of the two-time frames, routine period, and pandemic period of plastic surgery were reviewed retrospectively. The ratios of the listed data were compared between the two periods; admissions to the outpatient clinic, surgeries, consultations, anesthesia type, hospitalizations, and demographic data. While the number of outpatient clinic patients was 3511 in the routine period, it was 490 in the pandemic period. Compared to the routine period, the number of surgical interventions was decreased from 793 to 129 during the pandemic period. In particular, a statistically significant increase was observed in the rate of hand trauma and maxillofacial trauma cases during the pandemic period compared with the routine period (p < 0.001, and p = 0.032, respectively). Therefore, high rates of hand trauma and maxillofacial trauma should be taken into consideration when making arrangements such as personnel distribution, use of medical resources, and regulation of hospital infrastructure in extraordinary situations like COVID-19 pandemics.