British societies guideline on the management of emergencies in implantable left ventricular assist device recipients in transplant centres.

An implantable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is indicated as a bridge to transplantation or recovery in the United Kingdom (UK). The mechanism of action of the LVAD results in a unique state of haemodynamic stability with diminished arterial pulsatility. The clinical assessment of an LVAD recipient can be challenging because non-invasive blood pressure, pulse and oxygen saturation measurements may be hard to obtain. As a result of this unusual situation and complex interplay between the device and the native circulation, resuscitation of LVAD recipients requires bespoke guidelines. Through collaboration with key UK stakeholders, we assessed the current evidence base and developed guidelines for the recognition of clinical deterioration, inadequate circulation and time-critical interventions. Such guidelines, intended for use in transplant centres, are designed to be deployed by those providing immediate care of LVAD patients under conditions of precipitous clinical deterioration. In summary, the Joint British Societies and Transplant Centres LVAD Working Group present the UK guideline on management of emergencies in implantable LVAD recipients for use in advanced heart failure centres. These recommendations have been made with a UK resuscitation focus but are widely applicable to professionals regularly managing patients with implantable LVADs.

Mechanisms of Acute Right Ventricular Injury in Cardiothoracic Surgical and Critical Care Settings: Part 2.

The right ventricle (RV) is intricately linked in the clinical presentation of critical illness; however, the basis of this is not well-understood and has not been studied as extensively as the left ventricle. There has been an increased awareness of the need to understand how the RV is affected in different critical illness states. In addition, the increased use of point-of-care echocardiography in the critical care setting has allowed for earlier identification and monitoring of the RV in a patient who is critically ill. The first part of this review describes and characterizes the RV in different perioperative states. This second part of the review discusses and analyzes the complex pathophysiologic relationships between the RV and different critical care states. There is a lack of a universal RV injury definition because it represents a range of abnormal RV biomechanics and phenotypes. The term "RV injury" (RVI) has been used to describe a spectrum of presentations, which includes diastolic dysfunction (early injury), when the RV retains the ability to compensate, to RV failure (late or advanced injury). Understanding the mechanisms leading to functional 'uncoupling' between the RV and the pulmonary circulation may enable perioperative physicians, intensivists, and researchers to identify clinical phenotypes of RVI. This, consequently, may provide the opportunity to test RV-centric hypotheses and potentially individualize therapies.

Mechanical life support algorithm for emergency management of patient receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

BACKGROUND: There are limited practical advanced life support algorithms to aid teams in the management of cardiac arrest in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). METHODS: In our specialist tertiary referral centre we developed, by iteration, a novel resuscitation algorithm for ECMO emergencies which we validated through simulation and assessment of our multi-disciplinary team. A Mechanical Life Support course was established to provide theoretical and practical education combined with simulation to consolidate knowledge and confidence in algorithm use. We assessed these measures using confidence scoring, a key performance indicator (the time taken to resolve gas line disconnection) and a multiple choice question (MCQ) examination. RESULTS: Following this intervention the median confidence scores increased from 2 (Interquartile range IQR 2, 3) to 4 (IQR 4, 4) out of maximum 5 (n = 53, p < 0.0001). Theoretical knowledge assessed by median MCQ score increased from 8 (6, 9) to 9 (7, 10) out of maximum 11 (n = 53, p0.0001). The use of the ECMO algorithm reduced the time taken by teams in a simulated emergency to identify a gas line disconnection and resolve the problem from median 128 s (65, 180) to 44 s (31, 59) (n = 36, p 0.001) and by a mean of 81.5 s (CI 34, 116, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We present an evidence based practical ECMO resuscitation algorithm that provides guidance to clinical teams responding to cardiac arrest in ECMO patients covering both patient and ECMO troubleshooting.

Donor specific antibodies association with survival and adverse events after heart transplantation: A single center retrospective study between 2006 and 2021.

OBJECTIVE: Newly detected donor HLA-specific antibodies (DSA) are historically known to be associated with reduced survival in heart transplant patients. Our objective is to clarify the modern incidence of DSA and determine its relationship with survival and MACE. METHODS: This retrospective study included all patients undergoing orthotopic heart transplantation at Harefield Hospital, London between January 1, 2006 and May 31, 2021. We identified patients who developed DSA at any point post heart transplantation and its effect on survival and MACE (defined as rejection, coronary event, stroke, and arrhythmia. RESULTS: In total of 232 patients were included with a median follow up time of 4.7 years post heart transplantation. 23.7% of patients included developed DSA post heart transplantation. There was a significantly increased risk of death in patients developing DSA versus not (sub distribution hazard ratio [SHR] 1.83, 95% confidence interval 1.03-3.24, p = .04). At the time of detection of DSA, 38.2% of the cohort had rejection necessitating treatment. A MACE event had occurred in 48.1% by 2 years and 53.7% by 3 years in the DSA cohort. There was a significantly increased risk of MACE in patients developing DSA versus not (SHR 2.48 [1.58-3.89, p < .0001]). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed an increased risk of death and MACE in patients developing DSA post heart transplantation. Further research is required into the optimal management of these patients.

Oral milrinone for management of refractory right ventricular failure in patients with left ventricular assist devices.

AIMS: We present a single-centre retrospective experience using oral milrinone in patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) and concurrent refractory right ventricular failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients implanted with LVAD between January 2013 and July 2021 from a high-volume advanced heart failure service were reviewed. Eight patients were initiated on oral milrinone during this period. Oral milrinone was started 1.5 [inter-quartile range (IQR) 1-2.3] years after LVAD implantation and continued for 1.2 (IQR 0.5-2.8) years. Therapeutic milrinone levels were achieved (232.2 ± 153.4 ng/mL) with 62.4 ± 18% of time within the therapeutic range. Two patients had adverse events (non-sustained ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation effectively treated by internal cardioverter defibrillator) but did not require milrinone discontinuation. Four deaths occurred, one after transplant and three from disease progression determined to be unrelated to oral milrinone use. Three patients continue oral milrinone therapy in the community. There was no significant difference found after the initiation of oral milrinone on any of the physiological measures; however, there were trends in reduction of New York Heart Association class from 3.4 ± 0.5 to 3.0 ± 0.8 (P = 0.08), reduction of right atrial/wedge pressure from 0.9 ± 0.3 to 0.5 ± 0.2 (P = 0.08), and improvement of right ventricular stroke work index from 3.8 ± 2 to 5.8 ± 2.7 (P = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: Oral milrinone appears safe for long-term use in the outpatient setting when combined with therapeutic monitoring in this complex medical cohort with limited management options. Further study is needed to ascertain whether this treatment is effective in reducing heart failure symptoms and admissions.

Mechanical life support algorithm developed by simulation for inpatient emergency management of recipients of implantable left ventricular assist devices.

Background: Published guidance concerning emergency management of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) recipients is both limited and lacking in consensus which increases the risk of delayed and/or inappropriate actions. Methods: In our specialist tertiary referral centre we developed, by iteration, a novel in-hospital resuscitation algorithm for LVAD emergencies which we validated through simulation and assessment of our multi-disciplinary team. A Mechanical Life Support course was established to provide theoretical and practical education combined with simulation to consolidate knowledge and confidence in algorithm use. We assessed these measures using confidence scoring, a key performance indicator (the time taken to restart LVAD function) and a multiple-choice question (MCQ) examination. Results: The mean baseline staff confidence score in management of LVAD emergencies was 2.4 ± 1.2 out of a maximum of 5 (n = 29). After training with simulation, mean confidence score increased to 3.5 ± 0.8 (n = 13).Clinical personnel who were provided with the novel resuscitation algorithm were able to reduce time taken to restart LVAD function from a mean value of 49 ± 8.2 seconds (pre-training) to 20.4 ± 5 seconds (post-training) (n = 42, p < 0.0001).The Mechanical Life Support course increased mean confidence from 2.5 ± 1.2 to 4 ± 0.6 (n = 44, p < 0.0001) and mean MCQ score from 18.7 ± 3.4 to 22.8 ± 2.6, out of a maximum of 28 (n = 44, p < 0.0001). Conclusion: We present a simplified LVAD Advanced Life Support algorithm to aid the crucial first minutes of resuscitation where basic interventions are likely to be critical in assuring good patient outcomes.

Reducing inappropriate blood testing in haematology inpatients: A multicentre quality improvement project.

Haematology inpatients are subject to extensive blood testing and many of these tests could be deemed inappropriate as they are not indicated for monitoring or clinical symptoms. Unnecessary testing exposes the patient to the risks of phlebotomy and adds resources' strain to the NHS.Our aim was to reduce the number of inappropriate blood tests performed on haematology inpatient wards.Quality improvement projects (QIPs) were performed in four haematology units introducing inpatient blood testing schedules (BTS) or providing staff education on current schedules.A reduction in inappropriate or overall blood testing was achieved at every site where a BTS was implemented, with a median reduction in inappropriate blood testing of 24.7% and estimated cost savings of up to £38,438 per annum.This QIP can be safely adapted to a variety of inpatient settings and is associated with cost savings. This initiative could be extended to other inpatient departments throughout the NHS.

SARS-CoV-2 and ECMO: early results and experience.

INTRODUCTION: In this paper, we describe our experience and early outcomes with critically unwell severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) patients who required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). We present our standard practices around ECMO decision-making, retrieval, cannulation, ventilation, anticoagulation, tracheostomy, imaging and steroids. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using data from the hospital notes on all SARS-CoV-2 patients who required extracorporeal support at St Bartholomew's Hospital between 1 March 2020 and 31 July 2020. In total, this included 18 patients over this time period. RESULTS: In total, 18 patients were managed with extracorporeal support and of these 14 survived (78%) with 4 deaths (22%). The mean duration from hospital admission to intubation was 4.1 ± 3.4 days, mean time from intubation to ECMO 2.3 ± 2 days and mean run on ECMO 17.7 ± 9.4 days. Survivor mean days from intubation to extubation was 20.6 ± 9.9 days and survivor mean days from intubation to tracheostomy decannulation 46.6 ± 15.3 days. Time from hospital admission to discharge in survivors was a mean of 57.2 ± 25.8 days. Of the patients requiring extracorporeal support, the initial mode was veno-venous (VV) in 15 (83%), veno-arterial (VA) in 2 (11%) and veno-venous-arterial (VVA) in 1 (6%). On VV extracorporeal support, 2 (11%) required additional VVA. Renal replacement therapy was required in 10 (56%) of the patients. Anticoagulation target anti-Xa of 0.2-0.4 was set, with 10 (56%) patients having a deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism detected and 2 (11%) patients suffering an intracranial haemorrhage. Tracheostomy was performed in 9 (50%) of the patients and high-dose methylprednisolone was given to 7 (39%) of the patients. CONCLUSION: In our cohort of patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 respiratory failure, a long period of invasive ventilation and extracorporeal support was required but achieving good outcomes despite this. There was a significant burden of thromboembolic disease and renal injury. A significant proportion of patients required tracheostomy and steroids to facilitate weaning.

Saving the NHS one blood test at a time.

As a team of junior doctors our aim has been to save costs in day to day work so that money can be reallocated to improving nursing staff levels on our wards. Stem cell units have regular blood collection schedules in order to monitor organ response to chemotherapy and to look for complications in immunocompromised patients. We set out to reduce the number of biochemical investigations to a minimum that would be clinically indicated. We designed a new blood collection proforma for nursing staff to follow and audited all blood tests taken during a 2 week period before and after its introduction. The number of inappropriate blood tests were recorded as those that were not clinically indicated or not present on the collection schedule. After the introduction of the change the number of inappropriate tests were reduced by 937 over the 2 week period, with a cost saving of £1,478.42. Similar strategies for reducing unnecessary investigations and focusing on tests that will change management could help the NHS cope with a difficult financial future and provide continued safe staffing levels and quality care.

Epilepsy and the subsequent risk of cerebral tumour: record linkage retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Studies suggest that seizures may precede the detection of cerebral tumour by several years. Aim To quantify the risk of cerebral tumour after new onset seizures, with particular interest in long term risk. METHODS: Using the Oxford Record Linkage Study (ORLS, 1963-1998) and English national linked Hospital Episode Statistics (1999-2005), cohorts of people with a first admission for epilepsy were constructed. Subsequent admissions with cerebral tumour were identified. The rate of occurrence of subsequent cerebral tumour in each epilepsy cohort was compared with that in a comparison cohort and expressed as a rate ratio (RR). RESULTS: The RR for cerebral tumour after epilepsy, relative to the rate of cerebral tumour in the comparison cohort, was 19.9 (95% CI 17.2 to 22.9) in the ORLS cohort and 19.7 (18.3-21.1) in the England cohort. The RR for malignant tumours were, respectively, 25.6 (21.7 to 30.0) and 27.3 (25.2 to 29.6). The RR for benign tumours were 10.1 (7.38 to 13.6) and 10.4 (9.07 to 11.8), respectively. The risk was highest for those aged 15-44 years at initial admission for epilepsy both in Oxford (24.2, 18.5 to 31.5) and England (38.1, 32.8 to 44.2). The risk of cerebral tumour was still raised several years after initial admission for epilepsy: in the ORLS cohort at 15 years or more, the RR was 3.29 (1.39 to 6.66) and, in the England cohort 5-7 years after initial admission, the RR was 5.27 (3.87 to 7.06). CONCLUSIONS: Seizures may herald the development of cerebral tumour, remote in time as well as soon after onset, with implications for guidelines on continued surveillance of those with new onset seizures.