Beyond the Recruitment Pipeline: A Call to Action for Centering the Success of Under-represented Minority Trainees in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Just like all aspects of the American experience, racism has had a significant presence in Obstetrics and Gynecology (OBGYN). Black physicians in OBGYN face unique challenges in training programs, having to learn a specialty while combating racial macroaggression and microaggressions constantly and, often, in isolation. We present the stories of black OBGYNs who have sustained such an experience while also offering equitable and actionable solutions to improve clinical training environments.

Neonatal outcomes and rationale for timing of birth in perinatal diabetes: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends delivery in the 39th week of pregnancy for patients with pregestational and medication-controlled gestational diabetes with consideration for earlier delivery among those with poor glucose control. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the impact of birth before 39 weeks' gestation exclusively for diabetes-related indications on neonatal outcomes and clinician rationale for these recommendations. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of all singleton, nonanomalous pregnancies complicated by diabetes. Patients were identified through an obstetrical database containing information of 90,185 births from 2011 to 2021. Patients who delivered in a given week of gestation exclusively for diabetes-related indications were compared with ongoing pregnancies. Recommended births for other obstetrical indications were excluded from the diabetes-related indications cohorts. The primary outcome was neonatal intensive care unit admission. Secondary outcomes included neonatal intensive care unit length of stay, stillbirth, neonatal death, hypoglycemia, respiratory distress syndrome, and shoulder dystocia. For all births before 39 weeks' gestation, the electronic medical records were reviewed to confirm the rationale for the intervention for a diabetes-indicated condition. RESULTS: From the 90,185 recorded births that occurred in 2011 to 2021, 4750 patients with diabetes were identified. Of those, 30.5% (n=1449) had a recommended birth for a diabetes-related indications with 2.2% of those (n=32) occurring at 36 weeks' gestation, 7.9% (n=114) at 37 weeks' gestation, 9.7% (n=141) at 38 weeks' gestation, and 63.0% (n=913) at 39 weeks' gestation. Births that occurred at 36 and 37 weeks' gestation exclusively for diabetes-related indications had higher rates of neonatal intensive care unit admission than the respective ongoing pregnancies (62.5% vs 8.7%; P<.001 and 25.4% vs 7.2%; P<.001). There was no difference in neonatal intensive care unit admission for births at 38 or 39 weeks' gestation when compared with ongoing pregnancy. For neonates born at 36 and 37 weeks' gestation in comparison with ongoing pregnancies, the median neonatal intensive care unit length of stay was 11.0 vs 2.8 days, (P<.001) and 4.4 vs 2.6 days (P=.026), respectively. There were significantly increased rates of neonatal hypoglycemia and respiratory distress syndrome among births that occurred at 36, 37, and 38 weeks' gestation when compared with ongoing pregnancies. There were no differences in the rate of stillbirth in this cohort. Primary factors cited for early birth were poor glycemic control (71.4%), recommendation by a maternal-fetal medicine specialist (38.7%), and suspected fetal macrosomia (27.9%). Overall, 46.7%, 32.8%, and 20.6% of patients had 1, 2, or ≥3 indications, respectively, listed as rationale for early birth. Overall, few objective measures were used to recommend birth before 39 weeks' gestation owing to diabetes. CONCLUSION: In pregnancies complicated by diabetes, early birth exclusively for diabetes-related indications was associated with increased neonatal intensive care unit admission and length of stay and with neonatal morbidity. Little objective data are documented by clinicians to support their recommendations for early birth associated with diabetes. Additional clinical guidelines are needed to define suboptimal glucose control necessitating birth before 39 weeks' gestation.

Perspectives of Stakeholders About an Early Result Acceptance Program to Complement the Residency Match in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Importance: The residency application process is flawed, costly, and distracts from the preparation for residency. Disruptive change is needed to improve the inefficiencies in current selection processes. Objective: To determine interest in an early result acceptance program (ERAP) among stakeholders in obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN), and to estimate its outcome in future application cycles. Design, Setting, and Participants: Surveys of stakeholders in March 2021 queried interest in ERAP across the US. Respondents included OBGYN residency applicants, members of the Association of American Medical Colleges Group on Student Affairs, OBGYN clerkship directors, and residency program directors. Statistical analysis was performed from March to April 2021. Exposures: Respondents completed surveys sent by email from the Association of American Medical Colleges (to OBGYN applicants and members of the Group on Student Affairs), the Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics (to clerkship directors), and the Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology (to program directors). Main Outcomes and Measures: Applicants and program directors indicated their interest in participating in ERAP, and clerkship directors and members of the Group on Student Affairs indicated their likelihood of recommending ERAP using a 5-point Likert scale. Results: Respondents included 879 (34.0%) of 2579 applicants to OBGYN, 143 (50.3%) of 284 residency program directors, 94 (41.8%) of 225 clerkship directors, and 51 (32.9%) of 155 student affairs deans. The majority of respondents reported being either somewhat or extremely likely to participate in ERAP, including 622 applicants (70.7%) and 87 program directors (60.8%). Interest in ERAP was independent of an applicant's reported board scores, medical school type, race, number of applications submitted, or number of interviews completed. Among program directors, those at university programs were more likely to participate. Stakeholders supported a limit of 3 applications for ERAP, to fill 25% to 50% of residency positions. Estimating the outcome of ERAP using these data suggests 26 280 to 52 560 fewer applications could be submitted in the regular match cycle. Conclusions and Relevance: Stakeholders in the OBGYN application process expressed broad support for the concept of ERAP. The majority of applicants and programs indicated that they would participate, with potentially substantial positive impact on the application process. Careful pilot testing and research regarding implementation are essential to avoid worsening an already dysfunctional application process.