RESUMEN
Optimizing the use of organic and mineral fertilizer in rain-fed maize production is crucial for sustainable food production in sub-Saharan Africa. This study investigates the effect of hill-placement of two nutrient sources (farmyard manure and synthetic fertilizer) on nutrient- and water-use efficiencies of maize crops i.e. recovery efficiency (NUEre), internal utilization efficiency (NUEie) and water use efficiency (WUE). A four-year trial was conducted in the tropical sub-humid zone of the northern Benin with a factorial combination of farmyard manure at three levels (0, 3 and 6 t ha-1, hereafter NM, 3M and 6M, respectively) and three levels of fertilizer [0% (NF), 50% (50F) and 100% (100F) of the recommended rate (76 kg N + 13.1 kg P + 24.9 kg K ha-1) by the national center for agricultural research. The NUEre decreased with increasing rate of manure and/or fertilizer, but the decreasing rate was lower under combined manure and fertilizer application. However, the NUEie increased with the increasing manure and fertilizer amounts. The WUE was significantly higher in 3M and 6M treatments than in NM treatment, and higher in 50F and in 100F than in NF treatments. The combination of 3000 kg ha-1 farmyard manure with half recommended fertilizer rate (100 kg ha-1) could be suggested as an optimal nutrient management practice for maize production in the Northern Benin. Future studies should target the other agro-ecological zones in Benin, and also consider other widely cultivated crops in the study area for reducing yield gaps and promote food security.
RESUMEN
Heavy metal pollution is becoming recurrent and threatens biota biosafety in many agricultural fields. Diverse solutions explore the application of amendments to enable remediation. Sulfur represents a nonmetallic chemical element that actively affects heavy metals phytoextraction, and promotes and alternatively mitigates soil functions. In this study, we conduct a meta-analysis to synthesize the current knowledge on the influence of sulfur amendments on plants heavy metals uptake from contaminated soil media. Random-effects model was used to summarize effect sizes from 524 data points extracted from 30 peer reviewed studies. The phytoextraction of cadmium, chromium and nickel were 1.6-, 3.3-, and 12.6-fold, respectively, higher when sulfur amendment was applied; while copper uptake was 0.3-fold lower. Irrespective of the sulfur type, heavy metal extraction increased with the raising sulfur stress. Individual organs showed significant differences of heavy metal uptake between sulfur applied and non-sulfur treatments, and combined organs did not. The heavy metals uptake in leaves and roots were higher in sulfur applied than non-sulfur applied treatments, while those in grain, husk, and stalks were lower. The heavy metals phytoextraction (response ratio) followed the order roots > leaves > stalk > grain > husk. Moreover, heavy metals uptake was 2-fold higher in the sulfur applied than the non-sulfur treatments under ideal (5.5-8) and alkaline conditions (8-14), and 0.2-fold lower under acidic pH (1-5.5). Cadmium, manganese and nickel, and chromium were the most extracted under sulfur application by Vicia sp., Sorghum sp. and Brassica sp., respectively; while chromium, manganese, and iron were the most uptake without sulfur amendments by Oryza sp., Zea sp. and Sorghum sp., respectively. Our study highlights that the influence of sulfur on heavy metal phytoextraction depends on the single or combined effects of sulfur stress intensity, sulfur compounds, plant organ, plant type, and soil pH condition.
