Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 3 de 3
1.
Mymensingh Med J ; 32(4): 1096-1102, 2023 Oct.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37777907

Upper back pain is as painful or troublesome as the pain in the lower back or the neck. Myofascial pain syndrome which is most common cause of upper back pain is characterized by localized musculoskeletal pain and tenderness in association with trigger points. The aim of the study was to correlate the improvement of myofascial pain syndrome patients with proper and timely physical therapy. This quasi experimental study was conducted in the department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Bangladesh, from 1st January 2008 to 31st August 2008 to see the role of rehabilitation exercise on myofascial pain syndrome causing upper back pain. Sixty (60) patients of myofascial pain syndrome causing upper back pain were randomly assigned for treatment; out of which 23(38.33%) were male and 37(61.66%) were female. The male and female ratio was 1:1.6. The patients selected for the trial were divided into two groups: Group A and Group B. In group A (n=28) the patients were treated with thermotherapy- Microwave diathermy, non-steroidal anti inflammatory drugs and activities of daily living instructions and in Group B (n=32) with same interventions in addition to rehabilitation exercises. Treatment duration was 6 weeks. The difference of treatment improvement was statistically significant (p<0.05) from 1st week up to 6th week. After complete course of treatment 67.86% patients in Group A and 78.13% patients in group B reported improvement. So rehabilitation exercises can be a valuable adjunct to other modalities of treatment of myofascial pain syndrome causing upper back pain.


Activities of Daily Living , Myofascial Pain Syndromes , Humans , Male , Female , Myofascial Pain Syndromes/therapy , Myofascial Pain Syndromes/drug therapy , Back Pain , Trigger Points , Exercise Therapy , Treatment Outcome
2.
Mymensingh Med J ; 30(2): 262-266, 2021 Apr.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33830101

Low back pain (LBP) is a common problem and is an important public health issue. A major proportion of LBP is concomitant with prolong and repetitive awkward postures, related with occupation like miners, health workers and professional drivers. Physicians are exposed to a wide range of occupational risk factors which results in LBP. A variety of occupational and personal factors are responsible for increased risk of low back pain among physicians. This cross sectional descriptive study was carried out at Mymensingh Medical College Hospital during the period of January 2018 to June 2018, to estimate the proportion of LBP among physicians. Data were collected from purposively selected 102 physicians of different levels by face to face interview using a case record form. Informed written consent of participants was taken prior to interview. Data were analyzed by using SPSS version 20.0. The study results revealed that majority (60.8%) of the physicians were in the age group of 31-50 years. Mean age of the physicians was 49.9 years with a standard deviation (SD) of 3.61 years. More than three fourth (79, 77.5%) of the physicians were male and 23(22.5%) were female. Out of 102 physicians more than two third (70, 68.6%) had LBP while 32(31.4%) did not have any LBP. Proportion of low back pain among physician was 68.6%. Low back pain was found in all age group. Among the physicians having low back pain, 55(78.6%) were male and 15(21.4%) were female. Among 102 physicians, 45(44.1%) had different types of comorbidities while 57(55.9%) did not have any comorbidities. Among the co-morbidities HTN, DM, Dyslipidemia, CHD and asthma were common. Results of the study concluded that 68.6% physicians had low back pain. Physicians of age group 31-60 years (88.5%) and male (78.6%) experienced LBP more. Further multi-centric large scale case control study is recommended to determine the risk factors of LBP among physicians of Bangladesh.


Low Back Pain , Occupational Diseases , Physicians , Adult , Bangladesh/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Low Back Pain/epidemiology , Low Back Pain/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Mymensingh Med J ; 25(3): 421-4, 2016 07.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27612885

Cerebral Palsy (CP) is one of the most common causes of all childhood disorders. There are tone, posture and movements difficulty due to non-progressive damage to the immature brain in CP. The hallmark of CP is a disability in the development of gross motor function (GMF). The influence of gross motor development on fine motor development is more important in early developmental period, specially under three years old and in children with CP. Various therapeutic interventions have been used in the management of GMF development. Among them physical therapy is the most common intervention in CP and is usually a component of mandated programs. Physical therapy means physical stimulations in the form of various therapeutic exercises, touch, massage, limbs and trunk movement, balancing and coordination training, gait and ambulation training, cognitive stimulation as well as speech, language and occupational therapy. Our study focused to see the effect by short term intensive versus non-intensive physical therapy on children GMF development by using gross motor function measure (GMFM) Score sheet, GMFM-88, version 1.0. Study provides the information that physical therapy intervention is effective in GMF development and intensive interventions are more effective in children with spastic CP than non-intensive one. Study also inform that the more early treatment the more effective result.


Cerebral Palsy , Physical Therapy Modalities , Cerebral Palsy/rehabilitation , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Posture
...