RESUMEN
Despite significant pharmacological advancements, hypertension management remains challenging, with varying quality of primary care. Digital tools and other non-pharmacological interventions hold promise in addressing this challenge. Consequently, a thorough examination of these interventions is recommended. This meta-analysis focuses on clinician-oriented strategies aimed at improving hypertension management, to assess the most effective approaches for improving antihypertensive prescribing and blood pressure control for secondary prevention. This was done through a systematic review of randomized controlled trials published in PubMed and Embase since the beginning of 2010 that aimed to enhance antihypertensive medication prescription in primary care settings for hypertensive patients with secondary complications while reporting changes in blood pressure or target achievement. We screened 6305 records. Four studies met the inclusion criteria, with reported interventions including physician education and the implementation of electronic decision support systems. All studies showed that the control group had a statistically significant lower systolic blood pressure, but the effect on diastolic blood pressure was not statistically significant. The overall mean difference was 2.12 mmHg (95% CI = 0.98; 3.26, P-value = 0.0003) for systolic blood pressure in favor of the control group and 1.22 mmHg (95% CI = -0.48; 3.26, P-value = 0.16) for diastolic blood pressure, which was not statistically significant. Despite considerable efforts to control hypertension, it remains a significant obstacle to optimal cardiovascular risk reduction. This review is also limited by a scarcity of studies.
RESUMEN
The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of inferior oblique anterior transposition (IOAT) versus inferior oblique myectomy (IOM) in patients with primary inferior oblique overaction (IOOA) or secondary IOOA to superior nerve palsy. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) Guidelines and an electronic search was conducted to identify studies comparing IOAT versus IOM for IOOA. Residual inferior oblique function, reduction in hypertropia and post-operative complications were identified as primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included superior oblique function, head tilt improvement, effect on the contralateral eye, operation time and macular changes. The analysis was based on fixed or random-effects modelling. Eleven studies enrolling 729 patients were identified. Inferior oblique function was not significantly different between both interventions, namely the elimination of IOOA (Odds Ratio[OR] = 0.97, P = 0.97), reduction in IOOA (Mean Difference[MD] = -0.06, P = 0.68), post-operative inferior oblique under-action (OR = 1.06, P = 0.83) and residual overaction (OR = 0.71, P = 0.15). Similarly, no significant difference was noted between both groups in reducing hypertropia. Regarding post-operative complications, no significant difference was observed, including the incidence of anti-elevation syndrome (P = 0.10). No significant difference was noted regarding superior oblique function, improvement in head tilt, effect on the contralateral eye and macular changes, although surgical time was shorter in the IOM group. In conclusion, IOAT and IOM are both effective surgical procedures in the management of IOOA as they produced comparable outcomes in the improvement in hypertropia, post-operative inferior oblique function and incidence of complications.