Evaluating Biomarkers as Tools for Early Detection and Prognosis of Heart Failure: A Comprehensive Review.

There is a high prevalence of heart failure (HF) worldwide, which has significant consequences for healthcare costs, patient death and quality of life. Therefore, there has been much focus on finding and using biomarkers for early diagnosis, prognostication and therapy of HF. This overview of the research presents a thorough examination of the current state of HF biomarkers and their many uses. Their function in diagnosing HF, gauging its severity and monitoring its response to therapy are all discussed. Particularly promising in HF diagnosis and risk stratification are the cardiac-specific biomarkers, B-type natriuretic peptide and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide. Markers of oxidative stress, extracellular matrix, renal function, inflammation and cardiac peptides have shown promise in evaluating HF severity and prognosis. MicroRNAs and insulin-like growth factor are two emerging biomarkers that have shown potential in helping with HF diagnosis and prognosis.

Advanced heart failure therapies in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: current status, challenges, and future directions.

While there has been a global decrease in rates of heart failure (HF) prevalence between 1990 and 2019, the Eastern Mediterranean region (EMR) is experiencing an increase. In 2019, approximately 1,229,766 individuals lived with moderate to severe HF in the EMR. Despite the growth in the utilization of advanced heart failure (AHF) therapies in the EMR in the past two decades, current volumes are yet to meet the growing AHF burden in the region. Heart transplantation (HT) volumes in EMR have grown from 9 in the year 2000 to 179 HTs in 2019. However, only a few centers provide the full spectrum of AHF therapies, including durable mechanical circulatory support (MCS) and HT. Published data on the utilization of left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) in the EMR are scarce. Notably, patients undergoing LVAD implantation in the EMR are on average, 13 year younger, and more likely to present with critical cardiogenic shock, as compared to their counterparts in the Western world. Furthermore, AHF care in the region is hampered by the paucity of multidisciplinary HF programs, inherent costs of AHF therapies, limited access to short and long-term MCS, organ shortage, and lack of public awareness and acceptance of AHF therapeutics. All stakeholders in the EMR should work together to strategize tackling the challenging AHF burden in the region.

Red Flags in Acute Myocarditis.

Acute myocarditis is an inflammatory disease of the heart that may occur in the setting of infection, immune system activation or exposure to certain drugs. Often, it is caused by viruses, whereby the clinical course is usually benign; however, it may also present with rapidly progressive fulminant myocarditis, which is associated with high morbidity and mortality. This review highlights the critical red flags - from the clinical, biochemical, imaging and histopathological perspectives - that should raise the index of suspicion of acute myocarditis. We also present an illustrative case of a young female patient with rapidly progressive cardiogenic shock requiring veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to orthotopic heart transplantation. The patient showed no clinical or echocardiographic recovery signs and eventually underwent orthotopic heart transplantation. Furthermore, we elaborate on the classifications of acute myocarditis based on clinical presentation and histopathology classifications, focusing on identifying key red flags that will inform early diagnosis and appropriate management in such challenging cases.

Bempedoic Acid and Ezetimibe for the Treatment of Hypercholesterolemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Phase II/III trials.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: A limited number of trials have evaluated the efficacy of a fixed-dose combination of bempedoic acid and ezetimibe for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. The aim of this meta-analysis of existing studies was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fixed-dose bempedoic acid and ezetimibe combination therapy for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing bempedoic acid and ezetimibe, versus placebo or ezetimibe alone, to 30 August 2020. A meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the efficacy of bempedoic acid and ezetimibe on lipid parameters and highly sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels in patients with hypercholesterolemia or established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Mean differences (MDs) or relative risk (RR) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs), using random-effects models, were used to provide pooled estimates. RESULTS: A total of three phase II and III RCTs, comprising 388 patients, of whom 49.2% were treated with bempedoic acid and ezetimibe, and 197 controls, were identified. The duration of treatment was 12 weeks. Bempedoic acid and ezetimibe significantly reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (MD - 29.14%, 95% CI - 39.52 to - 18.76; p < .001), total cholesterol (MD - 15.78%, 95% CI - 20.84 to - 10.72; p = 0.01), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (MD - 18.36%, 95% CI - 24.60 to - 12.12; p = 0.01), and hsCRP levels (MD - 30.48%, 95% CI - 44.69 to - 16.28; p = 0.04). No significant effects on triglycerides (MD - 8.35%, 95% CI - 16.08 to - 0.63; p = 0.72) and improvement in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (MD 1.63%, 95% CI - 4.03 to 7.28; p = 0.92) were observed with the fixed-dose combination therapy. Regarding safety, bempedoic acid and ezetimibe combination was associated with a non-significant increased risk of drug-related adverse events (RR 1.61, 95% CI 0.86-2.35) and overall adverse events (RR 1.16. 95% CI 0.97-1.35); however, the incidence of discontinuation of therapy (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.35-1.49) was lower. CONCLUSION: This review found bempedoic acid and ezetimibe significantly lowered lipid parameters, attenuated hsCRP levels, and had an acceptable safety profile for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia and ASCVD.

Efficacy of Statin/Ezetimibe for Secondary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in Asian Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: Several clinical trials have investigated the effect of statin/ezetimibe combination therapy on secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in the Asian population. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to summarize study results regarding the effect of statin/ezetimibe combination therapy on lipid parameters and highly sensitive C-reactive protein (HsCRP) biomarkers in ASCVD patients from Asian countries. METHODS: We searched the PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases for relevant papers published from 2008 to June 2020. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that (1) were conducted in ASCVD patients in Asian countries; (2) examined the effects of statin/ezetimibe combination therapies compared with a control group; and (3) reported sufficient data on lipid parameters and HsCRP biomarkers. The results were reported as weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using random-effects models. Funnel plots and Egger's regression test were used to assess publication bias. RESULTS: Twenty-four RCTs were reviewed and 20 were included in the meta-analysis. A total of 4344 participants were included (n = 2197 in the intervention group and n = 2147 in the control group), and the intervention durations ranged from 6 weeks to 3.6 years. Ezetimibe coadministered with statin therapy, compared with control treatment, significantly reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C; n = 20 studies) [WMD - 0.39 mmol/L, 95% CI - 0.73 to - 0.05; p < 0.001], triglycerides (TG; n = 18 studies) [WMD - 0.23 mmol/L, 95% CI - 0.33 to - 0.13; p < 0.001], and total cholesterol (TC; n = 17 studies) [WMD - 0.31 mmol/L, 95% CI - 0.45 to - 0.17; p < 0.001). Although the effect of statin/ezetimibe combinations on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C; n = 17 studies) [WMD 0.02 mmol/L, 95% CI - 0.05 to 0.09; p < 0.001) was very minimal and no effect was observed on HsCRP levels (n = 11 studies). CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that statin/ezetimibe combinations reduced LDL-C, TC, and TG levels but had minimal effects on HDL-C and no effect HsCRP biomarkers in ASCVD patients. The statin/ezetimibe therapy enabled a more effective reduction in LDL-C levels; however, the duration of the treatment was suboptimal.