Population pharmacokinetics of vancomycin in very low birth weight neonates.

Introduction: Vancomycin dosing in very low birth weight (VLBW) neonates is challenging. Compared with the general neonatal population, VLBW neonates are less likely to achieve the vancomycin therapeutic targets. Current dosing recommendations are based on studies of the general neonatal population, as only a very limited number of studies have evaluated vancomycin pharmacokinetics in VLBW neonates. The main aim of this study was to develop a vancomycin population pharmacokinetic model to optimize vancomycin dosing in VLBW neonates. Methods: This multicenter study was conducted at six major hospitals in Saudi Arabia. The study included VLBW neonates who received vancomycin and had at least one vancomycin serum trough concentration measurement at a steady state. We developed a pharmacokinetic model and performed Monte Carlo simulations to develop an optimized dosing regimen for VLBW infants. We evaluated two different targets: AUC0-24 of 400-600 or 400-800 µg. h/mL. We also estimated the probability of trough concentrations >15 and 20 µg/mL. Results: In total, we included 236 neonates, 162 in the training dataset, and 74 in the validation dataset. A one-compartment model was used, and the distribution volume was significantly associated only with weight, whereas clearance was significantly associated with weight, postmenstrual age (PMA), and serum creatinine (Scr). Discussion: We developed dosing regimens for VLBW neonates, considering the probability of achieving vancomycin therapeutic targets, as well as different toxicity thresholds. The dosing regimens were classified according to PMA and Scr. These dosing regimens can be used to optimize the initial dose of vancomycin in VLBW neonates.

The impact of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors use on the clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with COVID-19: A multicenter, cohort study.

Background: The cardiovascular complications of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) may be attributed to the hyperinflammatory state leading to increased mortality in patients with COVID-19. HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors (statins) are known to have pleiotropic and anti-inflammatory effects and may have antiviral activity along with their cholesterol-lowering activity. Thus, statin therapy is potentially a potent adjuvant therapy in COVID-19 infection. This study investigated the impact of statin use on the clinical outcome of critically ill patients with COVID-19. Methods: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study of all adult critically ill patients with confirmed COVID-19 who were admitted to Intensive Care Units (ICUs) between March 1, 2020, and March 31, 2021. Eligible patients were classified into two groups based on the statin use during ICU stay and were matched with a propensity score based on patient's age and admission APACHE II and SOFA scores. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality, while 30 day mortality, ventilator-free days (VFDs) at 30 days, and ICU complications were secondary endpoints. Results: A total of 1,049 patients were eligible; 502 patients were included after propensity score matching (1:1 ratio). The in-hospital mortality [hazard ratio 0.69 (95% CI 0.54, 0.89), P = 0.004] and 30-day mortality [hazard ratio 0.75 (95% CI 0.58, 0.98), P = 0.03] were significantly lower in patients who received statin therapy on multivariable cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Moreover, patients who received statin therapy had lower odds of hospital-acquired pneumonia [OR 0.48 (95% CI 0.32, 0.69), P < 0.001], lower levels of inflammatory markers on follow-up, and no increased risk of liver injury. Conclusion: The use of statin therapy during ICU stay in critically ill patients with COVID-19 may have a beneficial role and survival benefit with a good safety profile.

The safety and effectiveness of tocilizumab in older adult critically ill patients with COVID-19: a multicenter, cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Evidence supports tocilizumab (TCZ) benefit and safety in adult patients with severe COVID-19. However, its effectiveness in critically ill older adult patients remains questionable. Thus, the study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of TCZ in older critically ill patients with COVID-19. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective study for all critically ill older adults (aged ≥65 years) with confirmed COVID-19 infection and admitted to the intensive care units (ICUs). Eligible patients were categorized into two groups based on TCZ use during ICU stay (control vs TCZ). Propensity score (PS) matching was used (1:1 ratio) based on the selected criteria. The primary outcome was the in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: A total of 368 critically ill older adult patients were included in the study. Fifty one patients (13.8%) received TCZ. The in-hospital mortality was lower in the TCZ group (HR 0.41; 95% CI 0.22-0.76, P-value = 0.005). Patients who received TCZ had lower odds of respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation (OR [95% CI]: 0.32 [0.10-0.98], P-value = 0.04). No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups for 30-days mortality, ventilator-free days, length of stay, and complications during ICU stay. CONCLUSION: Tocilizumab use in critically ill older adult patients with COVID-19 is associated with lower in-hospital mortality and a similar safety profile.

Superinfection rate among the patients treated with carbapenem versus piperacillin/tazobactam: Retrospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Superinfection is a new isolate pathogen after 48 h of antibiotic treatment or within one week of treatment discontinuation. In many studies carbapenem and piperacillin-tazobactam were associated with high risk of superinfection. AIM: To evaluate the rate of superinfections during carbapenem and piperacillin/tazobactam treatment. Also, to identify risk factors for superinfections. METHODS: A Retrospective observational study was conducted in King Abdulaziz Medical City. Approval from the institutional Review Board was obtained. The study included all adult patient treated with carbapenem or piperacillin/tazobactam for more than 72 h. Univariate and multivariate analysis was conducted to compare piperacillin/tazobactam versus carbapenems and to identify the associated risk factor to develop superinfection. FINDING: 507 patients were included in this study. The mean age of the patients was 61 years ± 19.33. Of these, 278 received carbapenems and 229 received piperacillin/tazobactam. In univariate analysis superinfections were significantly higher with carbapenems compared with piperacillin-tazobactam (28.77% versus 20.96%; P value = 0.044). After adjustment of cofounders in multivariate analysis, presence of tracheostomy, endotracheal ventilation, foley catheter and duration of antibiotic were associated with higher risk to developed superinfection adjusted odd ratio (aOR) 3.23 (95% CI,1.39-7.52) P < 0.01, aOR 2.556 (95% CI,1.30-5.02) P < 0.01, aOR 2.20 (95% CI,1.35-3.61) P < 0.001, aOR 1.051(95% CI,1.02-1.08) P < 0.001 respectively, but not carbapenems use aOR 1.052 (95% CI,0.657-1.685). CONCLUSIONS: The use of carbapenems were not associated with higher risk to developed superinfection. The most important risk factors associated with superinfection were presence of tracheostomy, endotracheal mechanical ventilation, Foley catheter and the duration of antibiotics.