RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To report cases of cerebral phaeohyphomycosis at a tertiary hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Phaeohyphomycetes are a widely distributed group of fungi whose cell walls contain 1,8 dihydroxynaphthalene-melanin. Cerebral infections caused by these fungi are uncommon and primarily associated with neurotrophic phaeohyphomycetes. METHODS: In January of 2020 we looked back to identify cases of culture-positive cerebral phaeohyphomycosis from our medical records at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Data on demographics, potential risk factors, clinical presentation, treatment, and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Twelve cases of cerebral phaeohyphomycosis were identified, of which 4 were caused by Rhinocladiella mackenziei and the other 8 were caused by various phaeohyphomycetes. There were 2 cases caused by Neoscytalidium dimidiatum, and one case each caused by the following: Acrophialophora fusispora, Chaetomium atrobrunneum, Exophiala dermatitidis, Exerohilum rostratum, Fonsecaea pedrosoi, and Cladophialophora bantiana. Most patients (10 of 12) had underlying immunosuppression. R. mackenziei caused a brain-only infection manifesting as abscess formation. Four patients survived for more than a year after therapy. Surgical evacuation and triazole therapy with posaconazole or itraconazole, alone or in combination with other antifungal agents, were associated with success. CONCLUSION: Cerebral phaeohyphomycosis is an uncommon fungal infection that primarily affects immunocompromised patients and is associated with poor prognosis. R. mackenziei is the most prevalent fungus in our facility and has been linked to a universal mortality.
Asunto(s)
Feohifomicosis Cerebral , Micosis , Humanos , Arabia Saudita/epidemiología , Feohifomicosis Cerebral/tratamiento farmacológico , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Atención Terciaria de Salud , Micosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Micosis/microbiología , Antifúngicos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
AIM: This rapid systematic review aimed to collect the evidence published over the last decade on the effect of empirical antifungal therapy and its early initiation on survival rates. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, Medline, Scopus, and Embase, in addition to a hand search and experts' suggestions. RESULTS: Fourteen cohort studies and two randomized clinical trials reporting the survival outcome of empirical antifungal therapy were included in this review. Two studies reported the association between early empirical antifungal therapy (EAFT) and survival rates in a hematological cancer setting, and fourteen studies reported the outcome in patients in intensive care units (ICU). Six studies reported that appropriate EAFT decreases hospital mortality significantly; ten studies could not demonstrate a statistically significant association with mortality rates. DISCUSSION: The inconsistency of the results in the literature can be attributed to the studies' small sample size and their heterogeneity. Many patients who may potentially benefit from such strategies were excluded from these studies. CONCLUSION: While EAFT is practiced in many settings, current evidence is conflicting, and high-quality studies are needed to demonstrate the true value of this approach. Meanwhile, insights from experts in the field can help guide clinicians to initiate EAFT when indicated.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) of non-fermenting Gram-negative bacteria (NFGNB) is increasingly recognized as urgent healthcare threat. Trend data on AMR of NFGNB in Saudi Arabia are either old or limited. The objective was to estimate the prevalence and resistance trends of isolated NFGNB in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter study involving seven tertiary care hospitals in Saudi Arabia was conducted between 2011 and 2016. Susceptibility testing for non-duplicate isolates was performed according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines in College of American Pathologists accredited diagnostic microbiology laboratories in the participating hospitals. RESULTS: Out of 461,274 isolates, 100,132 (21.7%) were NFGNB which represented 30% of gram-negative pathogens. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common (73.6%), followed by Acinetobacter baumannii (21.0%) and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (5.3%). Resistance trends of P. aeruginosa were increasing for aztreonam (absolute increase during the study was 17.3%), imipenem (12.3%), and meropenem (11.6%). A. baumannii was fully resistant to several beta lactam drugs, and resistance trends were increasing for potential treatments such as tigecycline (25.1%) and tobramycin (15.5%). S. maltophilia was >90% resistant to trimethoprim/ sulfamethoxazole and ciprofloxacin by the end of the study. CONCLUSION: We are reporting high and/or increasing resistance of NFGNB to common treatment options. The current findings call for urgent actions to combat the increasing resistance of NFGNB. Large scale sharing of AMR data collected at different hospitals with the Saudi AMR committee would be critical to set priorities and monitor progress.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacterias Gramnegativas , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Estudios Retrospectivos , Arabia Saudita/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Combating the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic demands accurate, rapid, and point-of-care testing with fast results to triage cases for isolation and treatment. The current testing relies on reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR), which is routinely performed in well-equipped laboratories by trained professionals at specific locations. However, during busy periods, high numbers of samples queued for testing can delay the test results, impacting efforts to reduce the infection risk. Besides, the absence of well-established laboratories at remote sites and low-resourced environments can contribute to a silent spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). These reasons compel the need to accommodate point-of-care testing for COVID-19 that meets the ASSURED criteria (affordable, sensitive, specific, user-friendly, rapid and robust, equipment-free, and deliverable). This study assessed the agreement and accuracy of the portable Biomeme SARS-CoV-2 system against the gold standard tests. Nasopharyngeal and nasal swabs were used. Of the 192 samples tested using the Biomeme SARS-CoV-2 system, the results from 189 samples (98.4%) were in agreement with the reference standard-of-care RT-PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2. The portable system generated simultaneous results for nine samples in 80 min with high positive and negative percent agreements of 99.0% and 97.8%, respectively. We performed separate testing in a sealed glove box, offering complete biosafety containment. Thus, the Biomeme SARS-CoV-2 system can help decentralize COVID-19 testing and offer rapid test results for patients in remote and low-resourced settings.
Asunto(s)
Prueba de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19/instrumentación , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa/instrumentación , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Middle East Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) is an emerging virus that infects humans and camels with no approved antiviral therapy or vaccine. Some vaccines are in development for camels as a one-health intervention where vaccinating camels is proposed to reduce human viral exposure. This intervention will require an understanding of the prior exposure of camels to the virus and appropriate vaccine efficacy studies in camels. METHODS: We conducted a cross sectional seroprevalence study in young dromedary camels to determine the rate of MERS-CoV seropositivity in young camels. Next, we utilised naturally infected camels as a natural challenge model that can be used by co-housing these camels with healthy naive camels in a ratio of 1 to 2. This model is aimed to support studies on natural virus transmission as well as evaluating drug and vaccine efficacy. RESULTS: We found that 90% of the screened camels have pre-existing antibodies for MERS-CoV. In addition, the challenge model resulted in MERS-CoV transmission within 48 h with infections that continued for 14 days post challenge. CONCLUSIONS: Our finding suggests that the majority of young dromedary camels in Saudi Arabia are seropositive and that naturally infected camels can serve as a challenge model to assess transmission, therapeutics, and vaccine efficacy.
Asunto(s)
Camelus/virología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/veterinaria , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Coronavirus del Síndrome Respiratorio de Oriente Medio/inmunología , Animales , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Estudios Transversales , Arabia Saudita/epidemiología , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Vacunación/veterinariaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Short-term peripheral venous catheters-related bloodstream infections (PVCR-BSIs) rates have not been systematically studied, and data on their incidence by number of device-days is not available. METHODS: Prospective, surveillance study on PVCR-BSI conducted from September 1st, 2013 to 31st Mays, 2019 in 246 intensive care units (ICUs), members of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC), from 83 hospitals in 52 cities of 14 countries in the Middle East (Bahrain, Egypt, Iran, Jordan, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Lebanon, Morocco, Pakistan, Palestine, Sudan, Tunisia, Turkey, and United Arab Emirates). We applied U.S. RESULTS: We followed 31,083 ICU patients for 189,834 bed-days and 202,375 short term peripheral venous catheter (PVC)-days. We identified 470 PVCR-BSIs, amounting to a rate of 2.32/1000 PVC-days. Mortality in patients with PVC but without PVCR-BSI was 10.38%, and 29.36% in patients with PVC and PVCR-BSI. The mean length of stay in patients with PVC but without PVCR-BSI was 5.94 days, and 16.84 days in patients with PVC and PVCR-BSI. The microorganism profile showed 55.2 % of gram-positive bacteria, with Coagulase-negative Staphylococci (31%) and Staphylococcus aureus (14%) being the predominant ones. Gram-negative bacteria accounted for 39% of cases, and included: Escherichia coli (7%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (8%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (5%), Enterobacter spp. (3%), and others (29.9%), such as Serratia marcescens. CONCLUSIONS: PVCR-BSI rates found in our ICUs were much higher than rates published from USA, Australia, and Italy. Infection prevention programs must be implemented to reduce the incidence of PVCR-BSIs.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres , Infección Hospitalaria , Hospitales , Sepsis , África del Norte/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Medio Oriente/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Sepsis/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Short-term peripheral venous catheter-related bloodstream infection (PVCR-BSI) rates have not been systematically studied in resource-limited countries, and data on their incidence by number of device days are not available. METHODS: Prospective, surveillance study on PVCR-BSI conducted from September 1, 2013, to May 31, 2019, in 727 intensive care units (ICUs), by members of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC), from 268 hospitals in 141 cities of 42 countries of Africa, the Americas, Eastern Mediterranean, Europe, South East Asia, and Western Pacific regions. For this research, we applied definition and criteria of the CDC NHSN, methodology of the INICC, and software named INICC Surveillance Online System. RESULTS: We followed 149,609 ICU patients for 731,135 bed days and 743,508 short-term peripheral venous catheter (PVC) days. We identified 1,789 PVCR-BSIs for an overall rate of 2.41 per 1,000 PVC days. Mortality in patients with PVC but without PVCR-BSI was 6.67%, and mortality was 18% in patients with PVC and PVCR-BSI. The length of stay of patients with PVC but without PVCR-BSI was 4.83 days, and the length of stay was 9.85 days in patients with PVC and PVCR-BSI. Among these infections, the microorganism profile showed 58% gram-negative bacteria: Escherichia coli (16%), Klebsiella spp (11%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (6%), Enterobacter spp (4%), and others (20%) including Serratia marcescens. Staphylococcus aureus were the predominant gram-positive bacteria (12%). CONCLUSIONS: PVCR-BSI rates in INICC ICUs were much higher than rates published from industrialized countries. Infection prevention programs must be implemented to reduce the incidence of PVCR-BSIs in resource-limited countries.
Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Bacteriemia/etiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Comités Consultivos , África/epidemiología , Américas/epidemiología , Asia Sudoriental/epidemiología , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/microbiología , Ciudades , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Hospitales , Humanos , Control de Infecciones , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Islas del Mediterráneo/epidemiología , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Islas del Pacífico/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Vigilancia de GuardiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We report the results of International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) surveillance study from January 2012 to December 2017 in 523 intensive care units (ICUs) in 45 countries from Latin America, Europe, Eastern Mediterranean, Southeast Asia, and Western Pacific. METHODS: During the 6-year study period, prospective data from 532,483 ICU patients hospitalized in 242 hospitals, for an aggregate of 2,197,304 patient days, were collected through the INICC Surveillance Online System (ISOS). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-National Healthcare Safety Network (CDC-NHSN) definitions for device-associated health care-associated infection (DA-HAI) were applied. RESULTS: Although device use in INICC ICUs was similar to that reported from CDC-NHSN ICUs, DA-HAI rates were higher in the INICC ICUs: in the medical-surgical ICUs, the pooled central line-associated bloodstream infection rate was higher (5.05 vs 0.8 per 1,000 central line-days); the ventilator-associated pneumonia rate was also higher (14.1 vs 0.9 per 1,000 ventilator-days,), as well as the rate of catheter-associated urinary tract infection (5.1 vs 1.7 per 1,000 catheter-days). From blood cultures samples, frequencies of resistance, such as of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to piperacillin-tazobactam (33.0% vs 18.3%), were also higher. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a significant trend toward the reduction in INICC ICUs, DA-HAI rates are still much higher compared with CDC-NHSN's ICUs representing the developed world. It is INICC's main goal to provide basic and cost-effective resources, through the INICC Surveillance Online System to tackle the burden of DA-HAIs effectively.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/microbiología , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Salud Global , Control de Infecciones , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Infecciones Bacterianas/prevención & control , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Catéteres de Permanencia/microbiología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) shedding and antibody responses are not fully understood, particularly in relation to underlying medical conditions, clinical manifestations, and mortality. We enrolled MERS-CoV-positive patients at a hospital in Saudi Arabia and periodically collected specimens from multiple sites for real-time reverse transcription PCR and serologic testing. We conducted interviews and chart abstractions to collect clinical, epidemiologic, and laboratory information. We found that diabetes mellitus among survivors was associated with prolonged MERS-CoV RNA detection in the respiratory tract. Among case-patients who died, development of robust neutralizing serum antibody responses during the second and third week of illness was not sufficient for patient recovery or virus clearance. Fever and cough among mildly ill patients typically aligned with RNA detection in the upper respiratory tract; RNA levels peaked during the first week of illness. These findings should be considered in the development of infection control policies, vaccines, and antibody therapeutics.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/inmunología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Interacciones Huésped-Patógeno/inmunología , Coronavirus del Síndrome Respiratorio de Oriente Medio/fisiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Femenino , Genes Virales , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Coronavirus del Síndrome Respiratorio de Oriente Medio/clasificación , Vigilancia en Salud Pública , ARN Viral , Arabia Saudita/epidemiología , Evaluación de Síntomas , Carga ViralRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate a Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) outbreak event involving multiple healthcare facilities in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; to characterize transmission; and to explore infection control implications. DESIGN: Outbreak investigation. SETTING: Cases presented in 4 healthcare facilities in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: a tertiary-care hospital, a specialty pulmonary hospital, an outpatient clinic, and an outpatient dialysis unit. METHODS: Contact tracing and testing were performed following reports of cases at 2 hospitals. Laboratory results were confirmed by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) and/or genome sequencing. We assessed exposures and determined seropositivity among available healthcare personnel (HCP) cases and HCP contacts of cases. RESULTS: In total, 48 cases were identified, involving patients, HCP, and family members across 2 hospitals, an outpatient clinic, and a dialysis clinic. At each hospital, transmission was linked to a unique index case. Moreover, 4 cases were associated with superspreading events (any interaction where a case patient transmitted to ≥5 subsequent case patients). All 4 of these patients were severely ill, were initially not recognized as MERS-CoV cases, and subsequently died. Genomic sequences clustered separately, suggesting 2 distinct outbreaks. Overall, 4 (24%) of 17 HCP cases and 3 (3%) of 114 HCP contacts of cases were seropositive. CONCLUSIONS: We describe 2 distinct healthcare-associated outbreaks, each initiated by a unique index case and characterized by multiple superspreading events. Delays in recognition and in subsequent implementation of control measures contributed to secondary transmission. Prompt contact tracing, repeated testing, HCP furloughing, and implementation of recommended transmission-based precautions for suspected cases ultimately halted transmission.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Infección Hospitalaria/transmisión , Coronavirus del Síndrome Respiratorio de Oriente Medio/aislamiento & purificación , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Secuencia de Bases , Trazado de Contacto , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/virología , Brotes de Enfermedades , Femenino , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Coronavirus del Síndrome Respiratorio de Oriente Medio/genética , ARN Viral/genética , Arabia Saudita/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) is a novel zoonotic coronavirus that was identified in 2012. MERS-CoV infection in humans can result in an acute, severe respiratory disease and in some cases multi-organ failure; the global mortality rate is approximately 35â%. The MERS-CoV spike (S) protein is a major target for neutralizing antibodies in infected patients. The MERS-CoV microneutralization test (MNt) is the gold standard method for demonstrating prior infection. However, this method requires the use of live MERS-CoV in biosafety level 3 (BSL-3) containment. The present work describes the generation and validation of S protein-bearing vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) pseudotype particles (VSV-MERS-CoV-S) in which the VSV glycoprotein G gene has been replaced by the luciferase reporter gene, followed by the establishment of a pseudoparticle-based neutralization test to detect MERS-CoV neutralizing antibodies under BSL-2 conditions. Using a panel of human sera from confirmed MERS-CoV patients, the VSV-MERS-CoV particle neutralization assay produced results that were highly comparable to those of the microneutralization test using live MERS-CoV. The results suggest that the VSV-MERS-CoV-S pseudotype neutralization assay offers a highly specific, sensitive and safer alternative method to detect MERS-CoV neutralizing antibodies in human sera.
RESUMEN
The Gulf Cooperation Council Center for Infection Control (GCC-IC) has moved forward over the past several years on the antimicrobial resistance (AMR) agenda. Many of the GCC countries have now developed a national plan to combat AMR and have engaged the leadership of the involved sectors in the discussion on how to mitigate this threat. During the first meeting for the GCC-IC center on AMR, which took place early 2015, the roadmap for combating AMR was developed [1] and since then much more has been done. We present here the discussion that took place during the second GCC-IC center meeting on AMR where not only have the countries presented their progress, but we conducted 2 round table discussions inviting international and regional experts in the field to share their thoughts, progress and knowledge on this topic [2]. Within is the 2nd round table discussion at the 2017 GCC AMR meeting which took place in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, April 2017. Where the 1st round table discussion during this meeting addressed the role of leadership in managing AMR [2].
Asunto(s)
Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos/organización & administración , Farmacorresistencia Microbiana , Utilización de Medicamentos/normas , Salud Única , Mundo Árabe , Política de Salud , HumanosRESUMEN
Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) is associated with a wide range of clinical presentations, from asymptomatic or mildly ill to severe respiratory illness including death. We describe isolation of infectious MERS-CoV from the upper respiratory tract of a mildly ill 27-year-old female in Saudi Arabia 15 days after illness onset.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To analyze the impact of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) Multidimensional Approach (IMA) and use of INICC Surveillance Online System (ISOS) on ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) rates in Saudi Arabia from September 2013 to February 2017. METHODS: A multicenter, prospective, before-after surveillance study on 14,961 patients in 37 intensive care units (ICUs) of 22 hospitals. During baseline, we performed outcome surveillance of VAP applying the definitions of the CDC/NHSN. During intervention, we implemented the IMA and the ISOS, which included: (1) a bundle of infection prevention practice interventions, (2) education, (3) outcome surveillance, (4) process surveillance, (5) feedback on VAP rates and consequences and (6) performance feedback of process surveillance. Bivariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed using generalized linear mixed models to estimate the effect of intervention. RESULTS: The baseline rate of 7.84 VAPs per 1000 mechanical-ventilator (MV)-days-with 20,927 MV-days and 164 VAPs-, was reduced to 4.74 VAPs per 1000 MV-days-with 118,929 MV-days and 771 VAPs-, accounting for a 39% rate reduction (IDR 0.61; 95% CI 0.5-0.7; P 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Implementing the IMA was associated with significant reductions in VAP rates in ICUs of Saudi Arabia.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas/epidemiología , Infecciones Bacterianas/prevención & control , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Paquetes de Atención al Paciente/métodos , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/epidemiología , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ciudades/epidemiología , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz , Hospitales , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Arabia Saudita/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To analyse the impact of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) Multidimensional Approach (IMA) and INICC Surveillance Online System (ISOS) on central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates in five intensive care units (ICUs) from October 2013 to September 2015. DESIGN: Prospective, before-after surveillance study of 3769 patients hospitalised in four adult ICUs and one paediatric ICU in five hospitals in five cities. During baseline, we performed outcome and process surveillance of CLABSI applying CDC/NHSN definitions. During intervention, we implemented IMA and ISOS, which included: (1) a bundle of infection prevention practice interventions; (2) education; (3) outcome surveillance; (4) process surveillance; (5) feedback on CLABSI rates and consequences; and (6) performance feedback of process surveillance. Bivariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: During baseline, 4468 central line (CL) days and 31 CLABSIs were recorded, accounting for 6.9 CLABSIs per 1000 CL-days. During intervention, 12,027 CL-days and 37 CLABSIs were recorded, accounting for 3.1 CLABSIs per 1000 CL-days. The CLABSI rate was reduced by 56% (incidence-density rate, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.72; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Implementing IMA through ISOS was associated with a significant reduction in the CLABSI rate in the ICUs of Saudi Arabia.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We report the results of International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) surveillance study from January 2010-December 2015 in 703 intensive care units (ICUs) in Latin America, Europe, Eastern Mediterranean, Southeast Asia, and Western Pacific. METHODS: During the 6-year study period, using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Healthcare Safety Network (CDC-NHSN) definitions for device-associated health care-associated infection (DA-HAI), we collected prospective data from 861,284 patients hospitalized in INICC hospital ICUs for an aggregate of 3,506,562 days. RESULTS: Although device use in INICC ICUs was similar to that reported from CDC-NHSN ICUs, DA-HAI rates were higher in the INICC ICUs: in the INICC medical-surgical ICUs, the pooled rate of central line-associated bloodstream infection, 4.1 per 1,000 central line-days, was nearly 5-fold higher than the 0.8 per 1,000 central line-days reported from comparable US ICUs, the overall rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia was also higher, 13.1 versus 0.9 per 1,000 ventilator-days, as was the rate of catheter-associated urinary tract infection, 5.07 versus 1.7 per 1,000 catheter-days. From blood cultures samples, frequencies of resistance of Pseudomonas isolates to amikacin (29.87% vs 10%) and to imipenem (44.3% vs 26.1%), and of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates to ceftazidime (73.2% vs 28.8%) and to imipenem (43.27% vs 12.8%) were also higher in the INICC ICUs compared with CDC-NHSN ICUs. CONCLUSIONS: Although DA-HAIs in INICC ICU patients continue to be higher than the rates reported in CDC-NSHN ICUs representing the developed world, we have observed a significant trend toward the reduction of DA-HAI rates in INICC ICUs as shown in each international report. It is INICC's main goal to continue facilitating education, training, and basic and cost-effective tools and resources, such as standardized forms and an online platform, to tackle this problem effectively and systematically.
Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/etiología , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Salud Global , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
During July-August 2015, the number of cases of Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) reported from Saudi Arabia increased dramatically. We reviewed the 143 confirmed cases from this period and classified each based upon likely transmission source. We found that the surge in cases resulted predominantly (90%) from secondary transmission largely attributable to an outbreak at a single healthcare facility in Riyadh. Genome sequencing of MERS coronavirus from 6 cases demonstrated continued circulation of the recently described recombinant virus. A single unique frameshift deletion in open reading frame 5 was detected in the viral sequence from 1 case.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales , Coronavirus del Síndrome Respiratorio de Oriente Medio , Estaciones del Año , Animales , Camelus/virología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/historia , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Genoma Viral , Historia del Siglo XXI , Humanos , Coronavirus del Síndrome Respiratorio de Oriente Medio/clasificación , Coronavirus del Síndrome Respiratorio de Oriente Medio/genética , Coronavirus del Síndrome Respiratorio de Oriente Medio/aislamiento & purificación , Filogenia , Vigilancia de la Población , Arabia Saudita/epidemiología , Secuenciación Completa del GenomaRESUMEN
[No Abstract Available].
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Transmisibles Emergentes/epidemiología , Infección por el Virus Zika/epidemiología , Enfermedades Transmisibles Emergentes/prevención & control , Enfermedades Transmisibles Emergentes/virología , Humanos , Arabia Saudita/epidemiología , Virus Zika , Infección por el Virus Zika/prevención & controlRESUMEN
BACKGROUND Since the first isolation of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) in Saudi Arabia in 2012, sporadic cases, clusters, and sometimes large outbreaks have been reported. OBJECTIVE To describe the recent (2015) MERS-CoV outbreak at a large tertiary care hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. METHODS We conducted an epidemiologic outbreak investigation, including case finding and contact tracing and screening. MERS-CoV cases were categorized as suspected, probable, and confirmed. A confirmed case was defined as positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction test for MERS-CoV. RESULTS Of the 130 suspected cases, 81 (62%) were confirmed and 49 (38%) were probable. These included 87 patients (67%) and 43 healthcare workers (33%). Older age (mean [SD], 64.4 [18.3] vs 40.1 [11.3] years, P<.001), symptoms (97% vs 58%, P<.001), and comorbidity (99% vs 42%, P<.001) were more common in patients than healthcare workers. Almost all patients (97%) were hospitalized whereas most healthcare workers (72%) were home isolated. Among 96 hospitalized cases, 63 (66%) required intensive care unit management and 60 (63%) required mechanical ventilation. Among all 130 cases, 51 (39%) died; all were patients (51 [59%]) with no deaths among healthcare workers. More than half (54%) of infections were believed to be caught at the emergency department. Strict infection control measures, including isolation and closure of the emergency department, were implemented to interrupt the chain of transmission and end the outbreak. CONCLUSION MERS-CoV remains a major healthcare threat. Early recognition of cases and rapid implementation of infection control measures are necessary. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;1-9.