Prevalence and correlates of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among the elderly in Qatar: A cross-sectional study.

Older individuals are more vulnerable to severe coronavirus disease 2019 and medical complications. Vaccination stands as an efficient and safe vanguard against infection. However, negative attitudes and perceptions pertaining to available vaccines might hinder community inoculation. The aim of this study was to assess vaccine hesitancy and its psychosocial determinants among the elderly in Qatar. We conducted a cross-sectional study between October 15 and November 15, 2020, using a composite online survey including the Vaccine Attitudes Examination Scale in addition to questions on sociodemographic correlates and the role of healthcare professionals. The vaccine hesitancy rate was 19.5%. The main reasons for willingness to vaccinate included understanding the nature of disease and role of vaccination, in addition to information provided by physicians. Fears mainly centered around vaccine safety. Vaccine hesitators were more likely to be non-Qatari and having received the influenza vaccine at least once. Gender, marital status, socioeconomic status, educational level, and having completed childhood vaccinations were not associated with vaccine hesitancy. Efforts should be directed toward raising awareness of vaccine efficacy and safety profiles. Physicians should additionally be educated about their pivotal role in advocating vaccine acceptance. We recommend reassessing vaccine hesitancy and its associated factors following a year of campaigning and vaccine administration to identify and target vulnerable groups.

Buspirone in the management of refractory irritable bowel syndrome: A case report.

RATIONALE: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a chronic and debilitating functional disorder of the gastrointestinal tract manifested by abdominal pain and bowel habit dysregulation. The pathophysiology is complex and management targets symptom resolution. Therapeutic interventions range from dietary modification, psychological interventions, exercise, to the use of antispasmodics, antibiotics, and antidepressants. Anecdotal reports have suggested that buspirone may be beneficial in the treatment of functional dyspepsia and IBS and its physiological effect of reducing gastric tone provides a rational for its benefit. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 28-year-old man with unremarkable past medical and psychiatric history presented with worsening abdominal pain, bloating, and bowel movement dysregulation of over 6-year duration. DIAGNOSES: Physical examination revealed mild distension and discomfort on deep palpation. Thorough blood investigations, stool analysis and culture, and imaging were unremarkable except for the detection of mucus with stool. The patient was diagnosed with irritable bowel syndrome with mixed habits. INTERVENTIONS: Dietary adjustment and a range of medications (mebeverine, simethicone, loperamide, rifaximin, sertraline and amitriptyline) yielded unsatisfactory response of were not tolerated. Buspirone was eventually introduced. OUTCOMES: Buspirone was associated with a significant and sustained improvement in IBS symptoms and quality of life. LESSONS: This case suggests that buspirone was effective in treating refractory IBS. Further research is needed to assess the role of buspirone in IBS management.

Suspected Agomelatine-induced restless legs syndrome: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) is a sensorimotor disorder characterized by unpleasant and distressing sensations in the lower limbs that are more pronounced in the evening, commence or worsen at rest, and show partial or complete relief following movement. It can occur as a primary disorder, secondary to medical conditions or treatment with medications including but not limited to antidepressants or antipsychotics. CASE PRESENTATION: A 32-year old man with major depressive disorder showed partial response to Escitalopram 10 mg daily. Agomelatine 25 mg at night was added to Escitalopram to treat his residual depressive symptoms, namely insomnia and tiredness. Within two days he developed restlessness and unpleasant sensations in his legs which were worse at night. Symptom severity increased over the following days, prompting an urgent consultation a week later. The patient's presentation met the criteria for RLS. Agomelatine was discontinued leaving the patient on Escitalopram alone. The patient's symptoms improved within 24 h of stopping Agomelatine, with complete resolution four days later. There was no recurrence of RLS during follow-up. The patient scored 6 on Naranjo's adverse drug reaction probability scale, indicating a probable adverse drug reaction caused by Agomelatine. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report of suspected Agomelatine-induced RLS. Clinicians need to be aware of RLS to enable prompt diagnosis and management. We suggest adding Agomelatine to the list of agents that can potentially induce RLS.

Quality of diabetes care in patients with schizophrenia: a case-control study in Qatar.

BACKGROUND: Patients with schizophrenia are at least twice as likely to develop diabetes mellitus compared to the general population. This is of significance in Qatar given the high prevalence of obesity and diabetes. Furthermore, the lifespan of people with schizophrenia is shortened by approximately 15 years, partly due to long-term microvascular and macrovascular complications. High quality diabetes care can significantly reduce morbidity and mortality. We assessed the level of diabetes care delivered to patients in Qatar with schizophrenia and diabetes compared to those with diabetes alone. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with diabetes mellitus with (n = 73) and without (n = 73) schizophrenia. Demographic information and electronic medical records were reviewed to determine adherence to American Diabetes Association standards of diabetes care in the last 6 and 12 months. Optimal diabetes care was defined as having completed glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), lipid profile and retinal examination within 12 months. RESULTS: Optimal diabetes care was significantly lower in patients with schizophrenia and diabetes compared to diabetes alone [26.0% (n = 19/73) vs 52.1% (n = 38/73), p = 0.002]. Patients with diabetes and schizophrenia were also significantly less likely to have had body mass index recorded within 6 months (p = 0.008) and HbA1c (p = 0.006), lipid profile (p = 0.015), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (p = 0.001) and order for retinal examination (p = 0.004) over 12 months. After adjusting for multiple comparisons, only assessment of eGFR (p = 0.01) and order for retinal examination (p = 0.04) remained significant. CONCLUSION: Patients in Qatar with schizophrenia and diabetes, receive sub-optimal diabetes care compared to those with diabetes alone.