Characteristics and outcomes of hospitalised patients with acute kidney injury and COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 has spread globally to now be considered a pandemic by the World Health Organisation. Initially patients appeared to have a respiratory limited disease but there are now increasing reports of multiple organ involvement including renal disease in association with COVID-19. We studied the development and outcomes of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with COVID-19, in a large multicultural city hospital trust in the UK, to better understand the role renal disease has in the disease process. METHODS: This was a retrospective review using electronic records and laboratory data of adult patients admitted to the four Manchester University Foundation Trust Hospitals between March 10 and April 30 2020 with a diagnosis of COVID-19. Records were reviewed for baseline characteristics, medications, comorbidities, social deprivation index, observations, biochemistry and outcomes including mortality, admission to critical care, mechanical ventilation and the need for renal replacement therapy. RESULTS: There were 1032 patients included in the study of whom 210 (20.3%) had AKI in association with the diagnosis of COVID-19. The overall mortality with AKI was considerably higher at 52.4% compared to 26.3% without AKI (p-value <0.001). More patients with AKI required escalation to critical care (34.8% vs 11.2%, p-value <0.001). Following admission to critical care those with AKI were more likely to die (54.8% vs 25.0%, p-value <0.001) and more likely to require mechanical ventilation (86.3% vs 66.3%, p-value 0.006). DISCUSSION: We have shown that the development of AKI is associated with dramatically worse outcomes for patients, in both mortality and the requirement for critical care. Patients with COVID-19 presenting with, or at risk of AKI should be closely monitored and appropriately managed to prevent any decline in renal function, given the significant risk of deterioration and death.

Emergency presentations in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

INTRODUCTION: Immune-mediated toxicities are potentially fatal and can affect virtually any organ system. The prevalence of immune-mediated toxicity in patients being treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is well described. However, the reasons for presentation and the prevalence of immune-mediated toxicity in acutely unwell patients being treated with ICIs is less well described. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective analysis of all emergency presentations in patients being treated with ICIs was performed at a specialist oncology hospital in England from 20th May 2018 to 19th May 2019. The primary outcome measure was whether the emergency presentation related to an immune-mediated toxicity. Secondary outcome measures were length of stay associated with immune-mediated toxicities and 7- and 30-day mortalities related to these presentations. RESULTS: During the study period, 300 patients on ICIs presented. The most common primary presenting complaints were dyspnoea 59 (19.7%), diarrhoea 47 (15.7%) and fever 37 (12.3%). Ninety-eight (32.7%) patients were diagnosed with an immune-mediated toxicity of which colitis 38 (38.8%), hepatitis 19 (19.4%) and pneumonitis 14 (14.3%) were the most common. The mean length of inpatient stay for those diagnosed with an immune-mediated presentation was 7.1 (0-45) days compared with 6.2 (0-44) days in those without. Seven patients died within 7 days of the emergency presentation, of whom 2 died from immune-mediated toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: One-third of cancer patients treated with ICIs admitted as an emergence had an immune-mediated toxicity and 2% died because of this. Acute care clinicians managing these patients need to be aware that immune-mediated toxicity is common in this patient population, but it can be challenging to differentiate these from other causes for emergency presentation.

Emergency Ambulatory Management of Low-Risk Febrile Neutropenia: Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer Fits-Real-World Experience From a UK Cancer Center.

BACKGROUND: Emergency patient presentations with febrile neutropenia are a heterogeneous group. A small minority of these patients proceed to develop significant medical complications. Risk stratification using scores, such as the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer score, have been advocated to identify patients who are at low risk of adverse outcome suitable for treatment on an ambulatory care pathway. OBJECTIVES: We sought to report the experience of 100 patients presenting acutely with neutropenic fever managed in an emergency ambulatory fashion. METHODS: Patients presenting as an emergency with low-risk febrile neutropenia managed in an ambulatory setting between January 2017 and February 2019 at a tertiary cancer hospital in England were prospectively studied. Patients with a fever >38.0°C and an absolute neutrophil count <1.0 × 109/L were included. All patients with a Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer score ≥21 and a National Early Warning Score ≤3 were potentially eligible for the pathway. Complications were classified as serious if the patient developed persistent hypotension, respiratory failure, intensive care unit admission, altered mental status, disseminated intravascular coagulation, renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy, electrocardiogram changes requiring antidysrhythmic treatment, and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: One hundred patients with low-risk febrile neutropenia consecutively managed in an emergency ambulatory fashion were prospectively analyzed. Eighty-one patients were female and the median age was 51 y (range 17-79 y). No patients developed serious complications. Eight (8% [95% confidence interval 4.1-15.0%]) patients had a 7-day readmission. CONCLUSION: Outpatient ambulatory care for emergency patients with low-risk febrile neutropenia can be delivered in a safe and effective fashion. Collaboration between acute care physicians and oncologists is required to develop local models based on national guidelines to facilitate individualised care for emergency oncology patients.

Multicenter Validation of the CamGFR Model for Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate.

Important oncological management decisions rely on kidney function assessed by serum creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). However, no large-scale multicenter comparisons of methods to determine eGFR in patients with cancer are available. To compare the performance of formulas for eGFR based on routine clinical parameters and serum creatinine not calibrated with isotope dilution mass spectrometry, we studied 3620 patients with cancer and 166 without cancer who had their glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measured with an exogenous nuclear tracer at one of seven clinical centers. The mean measured GFR was 86 mL/min. Accuracy of all models was center dependent, reflecting intercenter variability of isotope dilution mass spectrometry-creatinine measurements. CamGFR was the most accurate model for eGFR (root-mean-squared error 17.3 mL/min) followed by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration model (root-mean-squared error 18.2 mL/min).

Duodenal neuroendocrine tumour associated with minimal change glomerulonephritis.

Paraneoplastic glomerular disease is an increasingly well-recognised entity, and a wide range of both solid and haematological malignancies have been implicated. The most common glomerular disease associated with cancer is membranous nephropathy. Only a few case reports have described an association between neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) and glomerulonephritis and only one paediatric case in relation to minimal change disease. A 76-year-old woman with a well-differentiated duodenal NET presented with nephrotic syndrome and renal biopsy was suggestive of minimal change glomerulonephritis. Standard therapy with corticosteroids brought little benefit, but a dramatic improvement was seen following initiation of systemic anticancer therapy with lanreotide, a somatostatin analogue. Less than 1 month after initiation of lanreotide, the patient was no longer in a nephrotic state, and after a further 2 months of follow-up had shown no sign of relapse.

A novel approach to improving ambulatory outpatient management of low risk febrile neutropenia: an Enhanced Supportive Care (ESC) clinic.

PURPOSE: Outpatient management of low risk febrile neutropenia patients (LRFN) identified by the MASCC score is a safe and effective strategy. Early supportive care has been shown to improve outcomes in patients with care. We developed an innovative ambulatory outpatient "enhanced supportive care" (ESC) clinic combining emergency oncology and supportive care through which we incorporated the management of patients with LRFN. METHODS: An ESC clinic was started in January 2017 at a tertiary cancer hospital in the North West of England. An integral part of the clinic was an ambulatory pathway for patients presenting with LRFN. Patients with a MASCC score ≥ 21 and an Early Warning Score ≤ 3 were potentially eligible for the pathway. Suitable patients were managed with oral amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (500/125 mg TDS) and ciprofloxacin (500 mg BD) or moxifloxacin 400 mg OD if penicillin allergic. All patients had one dose of intravenous meropenem on arrival. RESULTS: In its first year, 68 patients with LRFN were managed through the clinic. Table 1 shows the demographic data of the patients. Six (8.8%) patients had a 7-day readmission. There were no serious complications in the cohort. CONCLUSION: The ESC clinic maybe an effective method for delivering outpatient ambulatory management of patients with LRFN.

Acute medical and specialty support at a tertiary cancer centre: a collaboration to achieve high-quality care for acutely unwell patients with cancer.

There is increasing recognition of the need for collaboration between oncologists, acute physicians and specialists to improve the quality of care and outcomes of acutely unwell patients with cancer. At The Christie, a tertiary oncology hospital, a model has been developed to deliver acute medical and specialty support services. This delivers, among many things, a consultant-led acute medical ward round on weekdays. There has been a significant increase in the number of patients admitted to the oncology assessment unit (OAU) since its introduction, in part due to an increased number of direct discharges from the unit. Collaborative working between oncologists and acute physicians with a shared vision for high-quality care for patients has ensured that this change has been implemented smoothly. This has included development of patient flow models to optimise bed usage, so that a higher number of patients can access these specialist services.

A randomized double-blind controlled trial of taurolidine-citrate catheter locks for the prevention of bacteremia in patients treated with hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: Bacteremia is a major cause of morbidity in patients using intravascular catheters. Interdialytic locking with antibiotics decreases the incidence of bacteremia, but risks antibiotic resistance. Taurolidine is a nontoxic broad-spectrum antimicrobial agent that has not been associated with resistance. Preliminary evidence suggests that taurolidine-citrate locks decrease bacteremia, but cause flow problems in established catheters. STUDY DESIGN: Double-blind randomized controlled trial. INTERVENTION: Interdialytic locking with taurolidine and citrate (1.35% taurolidine and 4% citrate) compared with heparin (5,000 U/mL) started at catheter insertion. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 110 adult hemodialysis patients with tunneled cuffed intravascular catheters inserted at 3 centers in Northwest England. OUTCOMES & MEASUREMENTS: Primary end points were time to first bacteremia episode from any cause and time to first use of thrombolytic therapy. RESULTS: There were 11 bacteremic episodes in the taurolidine-citrate group and 23 in the heparin group (1.4 and 2.4 episodes/1,000 patient-days, respectively; P = 0.1). There was no significant benefit of taurolidine-citrate versus heparin for time to first bacteremia (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.2-1.6: P = 0.4). Taurolidine-citrate was associated with fewer infections caused by Gram-negative organisms than heparin (0.2 vs 1.1 infections/1,000 patient-days; P = 0.02); however, there was no difference for Gram-positive organisms (1.1 vs 1.2 infections/1,000 patient-days; P = 0.8). There was a greater need for thrombolytic therapy in the taurolidine-citrate versus heparin group (hazard ratio, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.3-5.2; P = 0.008). LIMITATIONS: Small sample size. The study included bacteremia from all causes and was not specific for catheter-related bacteremia. CONCLUSIONS: Taurolidine-citrate use did not decrease all-cause bacteremia and was associated with a greater need for thrombolytic treatment. There was a decrease in infections caused by Gram-negative organisms and a trend to a lower frequency of bacteremia, which warrants further study.