[Current data on rheumatological care: annual report from the National database (NDB) of the regional collaborative arthritis centres in Germany]. / Aktuelle Zahlen zur rheumatologischen Versorgung ­ Jahresbericht aus der Kerndokumentation der regionalen kooperativen Rheumazentren.

In the National database (NDB) of the German regional collaborative arthritis centres, annual data on the rheumatological care of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases have been collected since 1993. This first annual report presents current cross-sectional data on medication and patient-reported outcomes gathered in 2022.

Mental comorbidities in adolescents and young adults with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: an analysis of German nationwide health insurance data.

BACKGROUND: Studies on prevalence rates of mental comorbidities in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) have reported varying results and provided limited information on related drugs. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of selected mental health diagnoses and the range of associated drug prescriptions among adolescents and young adults (AYA) with JIA compared with general population controls. FINDINGS: Nationwide statutory health insurance data of the years 2020 and 2021 were used. Individuals aged 12 to 20 years with an ICD-10-GM diagnosis of JIA in ≥ 2quarters, treated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and/or glucocorticoids were included. The frequency of selected mental health diagnoses (depression, anxiety, emotional and adjustment disorders) was determined and compared with age- and sex-matched controls. Antirheumatic, psychopharmacologic, psychiatric, and psychotherapeutic therapies were identified by Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) codes and specialty numbers. Based on data from 628 AYA with JIA and 6270 controls, 15.3% vs. 8.2% had a diagnosed mental health condition, with 68% vs. 65% receiving related drugs and/or psychotherapy. In both groups, depression diagnosis became more common in older teenagers, whereas emotional disorders declined. Females with and without JIA were more likely to have a mental health diagnosis than males. Among AYA with any psychiatric diagnosis, 5.2% (JIA) vs. 7.0% (controls) received psycholeptics, and 25% vs. 27.3% psychoanaleptics. CONCLUSIONS: Selected mental health conditions among 12-20-year-old JIA patients are diagnosed more frequently compared to general population. They tend to occur more frequently among females and later in childhood. They are treated similarly among AYA regardless of the presence of JIA.

Trends in health care of patients with vasculitides, including giant cell arteritis, Takayasu arteritis, ANCA-associated vasculitis and Behçet's disease: cross-sectional data of the German National Database 2007-2021.

The aim of this study is to present the current care situation of patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA), Takayasu arteritis (TAK), ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) and Behçet's disease (BD). Trends over the last 15 years will reflect improvements and remaining deficits in the management of vasculitides. Consecutive cross-sectional data from patients with vasculitides from the German National Database (NDB) of the Collaborative Arthritis Centres between 2007 and 2021 were included. Medication, physician- and patient-reported outcomes on disease activity and disease burden, inpatient stays and occupational participation are compared for different vasculitis entities and over time. Employment rates were compared to German population rates. Between 502 and 854 vasculitis patients were annually documented. GCA and AAV were the most common vasculitides. Median disease duration ranged from 2 to 16 years. Over the years, glucocorticoids decreased in proportion and dose, most markedly in GCA and TAK, while biologic therapies increased up to 27%. Physicians rated disease activity as low for the vast majority of patients, while patients-reported moderate outcomes in many dimensions. PROs remained largely unchanged. The proportion of employed patients (< 65 years) increased from 47 to 57%. In recent years, biologics are increasingly used in patients with vasculitides, while glucocorticoids decreased significantly. PRO's have not improved. Work participation increased but remains lower than that in the German population.

Systematic review to estimate the prevalence of inflammatory rheumatic diseases in Germany.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to update the prevalence estimates of inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) in Germany. METHODS: A systematic literature search in PubMed and Web of Science (last search 08 November 2022) identified original articles (regional and nationwide surveys and claims data analyses for arthritides, connective tissue diseases, and vasculitides) on prevalences for the period 2014-2022. Data sources, collection period, case definition, and risk of bias are reported. Prevalences were estimated from available national data, with consideration of international data. RESULTS: Screening by two authors yielded 263 hits, of which 18 claims data analyses and 2 surveys met the inclusion criteria. Prevalences ranged from 0.42 to 1.85% (rheumatoid arthritis), 0.32-0.5% (ankylosing spondylitis), 0.11-0.32% (psoriatic arthritis), 0.037-0.14% (systemic lupus erythematosus), 0.07-0.77% (Sjögren's disease/sicca syndrome), 0.14-0.15% (polymyalgia rheumatica, ≥ 40 years), 0.04-0.05% (giant cell arteritis, ≥ 50 years), and 0.015-0.026% (ANCA-associated vasculitis). The risk of bias was moderate in 13 and high in 7 studies. Based on the results, we estimate the prevalence of IRD in Germany to be 2.2-3.0%, which corresponds to approximately 1.5-2.1 million affected individuals. The prevalence of juvenile idiopathic arthritis was reported to be around 0.10% (0.07-0.10%) of 0-18-year-olds, corresponding to about 14,000 children and adolescents in Germany. CONCLUSION: This systematic review shows an increase in the prevalence of IRD in Germany, which is almost exclusively based on claims data analyses. In the absence of multistage population studies, the available data are, overall, uncertain sources for prevalence estimates, with a moderate to high risk of bias.

Risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with conventional synthetic, biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: observational data from the German RABBIT register.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effects of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi), tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), other biologic(b) or conventional synthetic(cs) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) on the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Cohort study analysing episodes of DMARD-treatment initiated between January 2017 and April 2022 in the biologics register Rheumatoid Arthritis: Observation of Biologic Therapy. Incidence rates (IRs) per 100 patient-years with 95% CIs were calculated for overall patients and those with cardiovascular risk (age ≥50 years and ≥1 cardiovascular risk factor). MACE risk was estimated as HRs by inverse probability of treatment weight-adjusted Andersen-Gill models. RESULTS: A total of 154 MACE occurred among 14 203 treatment episodes (21 218 patient-years). IRs were 0.68 (0.47; 0.95), 0.62 (0.45; 0.83), 0.76 (0.53; 1.06) and 0.95 (0.68; 1.29) for JAKi, TNFi, bDMARDs and csDMARDs, respectively. IRs were higher in cardiovascular risk patients. Adjusted HRs (95% CI) comparing JAKi, bDMARDs and csDMARDs with TNFi were 0.89 (0.52 to 1.52), 0.76 (0.45; to1.27) and 1.36 (0.85 to 2.19) in overall, and 0.74 (0.41 to 1.31), 0.75 (0.45 to 1.27) and 1.21 (0.74 to 1.98) in cardiovascular risk patients. HRs were not increased in patients ≥65 years, with cardiovascular history or smokers, and also not when using csDMARD as reference instead of TNFi. IRs for baricitinib, tofacitinib and upadacitinib were 0.49 (0.25 to 0.85), 0.98 (0.58 to 1.55) and 0.53 (0.15 to 1.36), respectively. CONCLUSION: In this German observational cohort study, MACE did not occur more frequently with JAKi compared with other DMARDs. However, individual JAKis showed different unadjusted IRs.

[With RheMIT rheumatology centers can participate in the German national database-Expansion of the long-term rheumatological documentation]. / Mit RheMIT können Rheumazentren an der bundesweiten Kerndokumentation teilnehmen ­ Erweiterung der rheumatologischen Langzeitdokumentation.

The national database (NDB) of the German regional collaborative rheumatology centers was switched to the RheMIT documentation software last year. Rheumatology centers that already use RheMIT for care contracts or other research projects can therefore use the software to also participate in the NDB. Experiences from a hospital, a medical care center and a specialist practice show how the changeover to RheMIT from an existing documentation system or a new participation in the NDB with RheMIT can be implemented. The NDB team at the German Rheumatism Research Center in Berlin (DRFZ) welcomes new participating rheumatology centers.

High burden of polypharmacy and comorbidity in persons with psoriatic arthritis: an analysis of claims data, stratified by age and sex.

OBJECTIVE: To assess polypharmacy in women and men with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: From the German BARMER health insurance database, 11 984 persons with PsA and disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy in 2021 were included and compared with sex-matched and age-matched controls without inflammatory arthritis. Medications were analysed by Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) groups. Polypharmacy (≥5 concomitant drugs) was compared by sex, age and comorbidity using the Rheumatic Disease Comorbidity Index (RDCI) and the Elixhauser Score. The mean difference in the number of medications between persons with PsA and controls was estimated using a linear regression model. RESULTS: Compared with controls, all ATC drug classes were significantly more frequent in persons with PsA, most commonly musculoskeletal (81% vs 30%), immunomodulatory (56% vs 2.6%), cardiovascular (62% vs 48%), alimentary tract/metabolic (57% vs 31%) and nervous system (50% vs 31%) drugs. Polypharmacy was significantly higher in PsA (49%) compared with controls (17%), more frequent in women (52%) compared with men (45%) and strongly increased with age and comorbidity. For each unit increase of the RDCI, the age-adjusted number of medications increased by 0.98 (95% CI 0.95 to 1.01) units in men and 0.93 (95% CI 0.90 to 0.96) units in women. Compared with controls, the number of medications in PsA (mean 4.9 (SD 2.8)) was 2.4 (95%CI 2.34; 2.43) units higher in women and 2.3 (95% CI 2.21 to 2.35) units higher in men. CONCLUSIONS: Polypharmacy is common in PsA and is composed of PsA-specific medication as well as frequent medications for comorbidities, equally affecting women and men.

[Gender-specific differences in the diagnosis and treatment of inflammatory rheumatic diseases]. / Geschlechtsspezifische Unterschiede in Diagnostik und Therapie entzündlich-rheumatischer Erkrankungen.

BACKGROUND: Gender differences in the diagnosis and treatment of various diseases are increasingly being researched with the aim of optimizing treatment strategies and improving individual treatment success. METHODS: This paper summarizes the existing literature for gender differences in inflammatory rheumatic diseases. RESULTS: Many, but not all, inflammatory rheumatic diseases occur more frequently in women than in men. Women more often have a longer duration of symptoms until diagnosis than men, which may be due to different clinical and radiological presentations. Across diseases, women more often have lower remission and treatment response rates to antirheumatic medication compared to men. Discontinuation rates are also higher in women than in men. Whether women are more likely to develop anti-drug antibodies to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs is still unclear. For Janus kinase inhibitors, there is no evidence of differential treatment response to date. CONCLUSION: Whether individual dosing regimens and gender-adapted remission criteria are also required in rheumatology cannot be deduced from the evidence available to date.

Interstitial lung disease in rheumatoid arthritis: incidence, prevalence and related drug prescriptions between 2007 and 2020.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate prevalence, incidence and medication of interstitial lung disease (ILD) among German individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Nationwide BARMER claims data from 2007 to 2020 were used. RA-ILD was identified by diagnosis codes, prescription of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and lung diagnostics. ILD was assigned as incident or prevalent relative to the year of the first diagnosis. We identified prescriptions of glucocorticoids, conventional synthetic (cs), biological (b) and targeted synthetic (ts)DMARDs, antifibrotics and rheumatology and/or pulmonology care. RESULTS: Among all persons with RA (40 686 in 2007 to 85 175 in 2020), 1.7%-2.2%/year had ILD with a slight decline since 2013. Incident ILD was 0.13%-0.21% per year and remained stable over time. ILD was more common in seropositive RA, in men and in the elderly (mean age 72 years in 2020). Glucocorticoids (84% to 68%), csDMARD (83% to 55%) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use (62% to 38%) declined, while bDMARDs (16% to 24%) rose. In 2020, 7% received tsDMARDs, 3% antifibrotics, 44% analgesics and 30% opioids. DMARD therapy was more common if a rheumatologist was involved and antifibrotics if a pulmonologist was involved. Opioid use was highest if no specialist was involved (39%) but also common in rheumatology care (32%) and less frequent in pulmonology care (21%). CONCLUSIONS: RA-ILD is rare and mainly affects elderly persons. No trend in incidence was observed but treatment strategies have enlarged. Specialist care is necessary to provide disease-specific therapies. The continuing high analgesic and opioid demand shows unmet needs in these patients.

[Systematic review to estimate the prevalence of inflammatory rheumatic diseases in Germany. German version]. / Systematisches Review zur Schätzung der Prävalenz entzündlich rheumatischer Erkrankungen in Deutschland.

OBJECTIVE: To update the estimated prevalence of inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) in Germany. METHODS: A systematic literature search in PubMed and Web of Science (last search 8 November 2022) identified original articles (regional and nationwide surveys and routine data analyses for arthritides, connective tissue diseases, and vasculitides) on the prevalence for the period 2014-2022. Data sources, collection period, case definition, and risk of bias are reported. The prevalences were estimated from available national data, with consideration of international data. RESULTS: Screening by 2 authors yielded 263 hits, of which 18 routine data analyses and 2 surveys met the inclusion criteria. Prevalence data ranged from 0.42% to 1.85% (rheumatoid arthritis), 0.32-0.5% (ankylosing spondylitis), 0.11-0.32% (psoriatic arthritis), 0.037-0.14% (systemic lupus erythematosus), 0.07-0.77% (Sjoegren's disease/sicca syndrome), 0.14-0.15% (polymyalgia rheumatica, ≥ 40 years), 0.04-0.05% (giant cell arteritis, ≥ 50 years), and 0.015-0.026% (ANCA-associated vasculitis). The risk of bias was moderate in 13 and high in 7 studies. Based on the results, we estimate the prevalence of IRD in Germany to be 2.2-3.0%, which corresponds to approximately 1.5-2.1 million affected individuals. Prevalence data of juvenile idiopathic arthritis was reported to be around 0.10% (0.07-0.10%) of patients 0-18 years old, corresponding to about 14,000 children and adolescents in Germany. CONCLUSION: This systematic review shows an increase in the prevalence of IRD in Germany, which is almost exclusively based on routine data analyses. In the absence of multistage population studies, the available data are overall uncertain sources for prevalence estimates at moderate to high risk of bias.

Identification of rheumatoid arthritis in German claims data using different algorithms: Validation by cross-sectional patient-reported survey data.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate different algorithms for the identification of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in claims data using patient-reported diagnosis as reference. METHODS: Within longitudinal data from a large German statutory health insurance, we selected a random sample of persons with ICD-10 code for RA (M05/M06) in ≥2 quarters in 2013. The sample was stratified for age, sex, and M05/M06. Persons were asked to confirm RA diagnosis (gold standard), which was linked to claims data given consent. Analyses were weighted to represent the total RA population of the database. Positive predictive values (PPVs) and discriminative properties were calculated for different algorithms: ICD-10 code only, additional examination of inflammatory markers, prescription of specific medication, rheumatologist appointment, or combination of these. RESULTS: Of 6193 persons with a claims diagnosis of RA, 3184 responded (51%). Overall, PPV for the ICD-10 code was 81% (95% confidence interval 79%-83%) with 94% (92%-95%) for M05 and 76% (73%-79%) for M06. PPVs increased (with loss of case numbers) if inflammatory markers (82% [80%-84%]), rheumatology visits (85% [82%-87%]) or specific medication (89% [87%-91%]) had been used in addition. Specific medication had the best discriminative properties (diagnostic odds ratio of 3.0) among persons with RA diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The ICD-10 codes M05 and (less optimal) M06 have high PPVs and are valuable to identify RA in German claims data. Depending on the respective research question, researchers should use different criteria for identification of RA.

Perioperative management of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases : Updated recommendations of the German Society for Rheumatology.

BACKGROUND: Prior to surgical interventions physicians and patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases remain concerned about interrupting or continuing anti-inflammatory medication. For this reason, the German Society for Rheumatology has updated its recommendations from 2014. METHODS: After a systematic literature search including publications up to 31 August 2021, the recommendations on the use of of glucocorticoids, conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and biologics (bDMARDs) were revised and recommendations on newer drugs and targeted synthetic (ts)DMARDs were added. RESULTS: The glucocorticoid dose should be reduced to as low as possible 2-3 months before elective surgery (in any case <10 mg/day) but should be kept stable 1-2 weeks before and on the day of surgery. In many cases csDMARDs can be continued, exceptions being a reduction of high methotrexate doses to ≤15 mg/week and wash-out of leflunomide if there is a high risk of infection. Azathioprine, mycophenolate and ciclosporin should be paused 1-2 days prior to surgery. Under bDMARDs surgery can be scheduled for the end of each treatment interval. For major interventions Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors should be paused for 3-4 days. Apremilast can be continued. If interruption is necessary, treatment should be restarted as soon as possible for all substances, depending on wound healing. CONCLUSION: Whether bDMARDs increase the perioperative risk of infection and the benefits and risks of discontinuation remain unclear based on the currently available evidence. To minimize the risk of a disease relapse under longer treatment pauses, in the updated recommendations the perioperative interruption of bDMARDs was reduced from at least two half-lives to one treatment interval.

[Continue or interrupt? Antirheumatic treatment in elective surgery]. / Fortsetzen oder Pausieren? Die antirheumatische Therapie bei elektiven Operationen.

In patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases, a decision is needed prior to elective surgery on whether the medicinal treatment can be continued or whether the dose needs to be changed or interrupted. The German Society for Rheumatology (DGRh) has developed updated recommendations that specify a course of action for disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) and glucocorticoids. The recommendations for action can be adapted to the individual situation and coordinated with the interdisciplinary treating physicians and the patient. Depending on the dose, glucocorticoids have a high risk of infection and should be set as low as possible in the preoperative period. Most of the conventional synthetic (cs)DMARDs can be continued. Under biologic (b)DMARDs treatment surgery can be scheduled for the end of each treatment interval. It is recommended that Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors should be interrupted for 3-4 days before major interventions. Treatment should be restarted as soon as possible, depending on the wound healing.

Is the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) score a meaningful instrument for other inflammatory rheumatic diseases? A cross-sectional analysis of data from the German National Database.

ObjectiveTo analyse the performance of the rheumatoid arthritis impact of disease (RAID) score in patients with ankylosing spondylitis, polymyalgia rheumatica, systemic lupus erythematosus, primary Sjögren's syndrome, idiopathic inflammatory myositis and systemic sclerosis, as compared with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).MethodsA total of 12 398 patients from the German National Database were included. For each diagnosis, we calculated age-adjusted/sex-adjusted partial correlation coefficients between RAID and patient global (PtGl) health, PtGl disease activity, physician global (PhGl) disease activity, Well-Being Index (WHO-5) and EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D). As a measure of agreement, the mean differences between the RAID and other outcomes were compared with the respective differences for RA. The effect of each diagnosis on the difference between RAID and the other scores was assessed with linear regression, with RA as the reference.ResultsAcross all diagnoses, RAID correlated strongly with PtGl health (0.71-0.83), moderately to strongly with PtGl disease activity (0.59-0.79), WHO-5 (0.65-0.81) and EQ-5D (0.68-0.73) and weakly with PhGl disease activity (0.23-0.38). Mean differences were calculated for RAID and PtGl disease activity (0 to -0.6), PtGl health (-0.4 to -0.9), WHO-5 (-0.7 to -1.3), EQ-5D (1.1 to 1.7) and PhGl disease activity (1.4 to 2.2). Discrepancies between other scores and RAID were comparable to RA. Linear regression revealed no clinically relevant effect of any of the diagnoses on the difference between RAID and the other outcomes.ConclusionThe RAID score performs comparably across all diagnoses investigated. This supports the use of RAID for measuring the impact also of other rheumatic diseases.

[Is the prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis truly on the rise?] / Steigt die Prävalenz der rheumatoiden Arthritis wirklich an?

A growing number of health insurance data analyses show an increase in the prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Germany. The studies refer to the claims diagnosis of RA, which is more frequent in recent years compared to earlier periods. Depending on the case definition, the numbers vary between 0.6% and 1.4% of the adult population. In this paper, the different studies are reviewed with regard to their data sources, the case definitions of RA and the frequency of the diagnosis. Due to the lack of clinical validation, the prevalence cannot be precisely determined from claims data.

[Celebrating 33 years of the DRFZ: Epidemiology and Health Services Research]. / 33 Jahre DRFZ: Epidemiologie und Versorgungsforschung.

The scientific focus of the DRFZ's Programme Area Epidemiology and Health Services Research is, on the one hand, investigating the health care situation of people with rheumatic diseases in Germany, including its deficits, progress and trends. On the other hand, an essential goal is to uncover risk factors for unfavourable disease trajectories, but also protective factors, through the long-term observation of disease courses in large cohorts. With the approval of innovative, targeted therapies at the beginning of this millennium, the question of the real-world safety and effectiveness of the various anti-rheumatic therapies became a key issue for doctors and patients. The biologics registers have developed into central instruments of the programme area, which enable questions on comparative drug safety, but also on therapy effectiveness and risk reduction through effective therapy, to be answered in a robust manner.In this article, selected results of epidemiological research at the DRFZ are presented. The overall goal of the research was and is to contribute to improving the quality of life of children and adults with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases. This is the purpose of clinical-evaluative health services research as well as the acquisition of knowledge that supports effective, individualised therapy. Large, long-term patient cohorts and a stable network with clinical rheumatologists and those affected have proven to be indispensable instruments.

[Prescription frequency of physical therapy for inflammatory rheumatic diseases]. / Verordnungshäufigkeit von physikalischer Therapie bei entzündlich rheumatischen Erkrankungen.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the frequency of outpatient physical therapy (PT) in persons with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), axial spondylarthritis (axSpA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) between 2005 and 2020. METHODS: Adult insured persons of the BARMER health insurance fund with a diagnosis of RA (ICD-10: M05, M06), axSpA (M45), PsA (M07.0-3) or SLE (M32.1,8,9) were included. The prescription of PT was identified via the national item number index for therapeutic products. The proportion of persons with at least 1 prescription in the years 2005 to 2020 is reported as well as PT prescriptions by age and gender groups. In addition, the number and duration of prescriptions were compared and it was analyzed whether persons in specialist care received PT more frequently. RESULTS: In 2020, 43% (SLE), 46% (RA, PsA) and 49% (axSpA) received at least 1 PT prescription. Physiotherapy was prescribed most frequently (37%), followed by manual therapy (14%) and thermotherapy (10%). Since 2005 the number of insured persons receiving PT has not changed. Manual therapy is increasingly prescribed (+7%), while massage (-10%), thermotherapy (-7%) and electrotherapy (3% in 2005, 2% in 2020) have been decreasing (data relating to RA). The number of prescriptions has not relevantly changed since 2010. Persons in orthopedic care received PT more frequently than persons in general or rheumatological care. Female patients 61-80 years old were most frequently treated with PT. CONCLUSION: Slightly less than half of all persons with an RA, axSpA, PsA or SLE diagnosis received outpatient PT. This proportion has hardly changed in the last 15 years.

Risk of herpes zoster (shingles) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis under biologic, targeted synthetic and conventional synthetic DMARD treatment: data from the German RABBIT register.

OBJECTIVE: To compare event and incidence rates of herpes zoster (HZ), also known as shingles, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis under treatment with conventional synthetic (cs), targeted synthetic (ts) or biologic (b) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). METHODS: Patients were prospectively enrolled from 2007 until October 2020. Reported HZ events were assigned to ongoing treatments or those terminated within 1 month prior to the HZ event. Exposure-adjusted event rates (EAERs) of HZ were calculated per 1000 patient years (py) and adjusted HRs with 95% CIs computed. Inverse probability weights (IPW) were used to adjust for confounding by indication. RESULTS: Data of 13 991 patients (62 958 py) were analysed, with 559 HZ events reported in 533 patients. The EAER of HZ was highest for tsDMARDs (21.5, 95% CI 16.4 to 27.9), followed by B cell targeted therapy (10.3, 95% CI 8.0 to 13.0), monoclonal antitumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) antibodies (9.3, 95% CI 7.7 to 11.2), interleukin 6 inhibitors (8.8, 95% CI 6.9 to 11.0), soluble TNF receptor fusion protein (8.6, 95% CI 6.8 to 10.8), T cell costimulation modulator (8.4, 95% CI 5.9 to 11.8) and csDMARDs (7.1, 95% CI 6.0 to 8.3). Adjusted for age, sex and glucocorticoids and weighted with IPW, tsDMARDs (HR 3.66, 95% CI 2.38 to 5.63), monoclonal anti-TNF antibodies (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.28) and B cell targeted therapy (HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.40) showed a significantly higher risk compared with csDMARDs. CONCLUSION: Our results provide evidence for a 3.6-fold increased risk of HZ associated with tsDMARDs and an increased risk of HZ under bDMARDs compared with csDMARDs.

[Perioperative management of treatment of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases : Updated recommendations of the German Society of Rheumatology]. / Perioperativer Umgang mit der Therapie von Patienten mit entzündlich rheumatischen Erkrankungen : Aktualisierte Empfehlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie.

BACKGROUND: Prior to surgical interventions physicians and patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases remain concerned about interrupting or continuing anti-inflammatory medication. For this reason, the German Society for Rheumatology has updated its recommendations from 2014. METHODS: After a systematic literature search including publications up to 31 August 2021, the recommendations on the use of of glucocorticoids, conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and biologics (bDMARDs) were revised and recommendations on newer drugs and targeted synthetic (ts)DMARDs were added. RESULTS: The glucocorticoid dose should be reduced to as low as possible 2-3 months before elective surgery (in any case <10 mg/day) but should be kept stable 1-2 weeks before and on the day of surgery. In many cases csDMARDs can be continued, exceptions being a reduction of high methotrexate doses to ≤15 mg/week and wash-out of leflunomide if there is a high risk of infection. Azathioprine, mycophenolate and ciclosporin should be paused 1-2 days prior to surgery. Under bDMARDs surgery can be scheduled for the end of each treatment interval. For major interventions Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors should be paused for 3-4 days. Apremilast can be continued. If interruption is necessary, treatment should be restarted as soon as possible for all substances, depending on wound healing. CONCLUSION: Whether bDMARDs increase the perioperative risk of infection and the benefits and risks of discontinuation remain unclear based on the currently available evidence. To minimize the risk of a disease relapse under longer treatment pauses, in the updated recommendations the perioperative interruption of bDMARDs was reduced from at least two half-lives to one treatment interval.