Beliefs, awareness, use, and factors associated with herbal supplements usage among patients with chronic diseases-A cross-sectional insight from Alkharj, Saudi Arabia.

BACKGROUND: Herbal supplements (HSs) are used to treat a variety of diseases and ailments. Individuals with chronic diseases are at a higher risk of having adverse events and drug interactions from the use of HSs. AIM: This study determined the beliefs, awareness, use, and factors associated with HSs usage among patients with chronic diseases in Alkharj, Saudi Arabia. METHOD: A cross-sectional study was conducted among patients with chronic diseases between February and June 2019. Face-to-face interviews were conducted at various out-patient clinics in different hospitals. Patients diagnosed with chronic diseases were included in the study. Data were analyzed by descriptive, comparative, and inferential statistics using SAS ver. 9.4. RESULTS: The study participants were consisted of 533 patients, with mean age 53.6 ±12.9 years. The most prevalent chronic diseases were diabetes mellitus (67.7%), followed by hypertension (54.8%), and hyperlipidemia (53.8%). Among the studied participants, 336 (63%) had used at least one HS, whereby the most commonly used HSs were ginger (74.7%), mint (72%), and cumin (66.7%). Almost 78% of HSs users did not consult any healthcare provider about their use. HSs use varied significantly between female and male participants (p<0.05), whereby 61.5% of female participants used HSs in comparison to the male participants (38.5%). Gender (AOR 0.328; 95% CI 0.139-0.772; p = 0.0107), number of chronic diseases (AOR 1.585; 95% CI 1.084-2.318; p = 0.0312), and hyperlipidemia (AOR 2.818; 95% CI 1.507-5.269; p = 0.0.0012) were the pure factors of HSs use among the studied patients. CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed that HSs usage was high among patients with chronic diseases in Saudi Arabia. Concurrent usage of HSs with drugs should be well-discussed with healthcare providers to avoid potential adverse events or drug interactions especially among patients with chronic diseases.

Effect of Accommodation on Peripheral Eye Lengths of Emmetropes and Myopes.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of accommodation on central and peripheral axial lengths in young adult emmetropes and myopes. METHODS: On-axis and peripheral axial lengths were measured with the Haag-Streit Lenstar in 83 young adult participants for 0D and 6D accommodation demands. A Badal system was used to both correct refractive errors and induce accommodation. Participants were emmetropes (n = 29, mean spherical equivalent refraction +0.35 ± 0.35D), low myopes (32, -1.38 ± 0.73D), and higher myopes (22, -4.30 ± 0.73D). Ages were similar for all groups (22 ± 2 years). Pupils were dilated with 2.5% phenylephrine to allow a large field of measurement while maintaining active accommodation. Axial lengths were measured in 5° steps to ±30° across the horizontal visual field. RESULTS: With accommodation, axial length increased for all refractive groups at all positions, but with lessening effect away from fixation. Axial length changes were greater for higher myopes than for emmetropes on-axis (higher myopes 41 ± 14 µm, emmetropes 30 ± 12 µm, P = .005), for higher myopes than for low myopes at 30° nasal (P = .03), and for the higher myopes than for the other groups at 20° nasal (P < .05). There were significant correlations between myopia and changes in axial length at all positions, with the highest correlation on-axis (R = 0.30, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: During accommodation, eye length increased out to at least ±30° visual angle in young adult myopes and emmetropes. The increase was significantly greater for higher myopes than for the other groups at some positions. At all positions, there were significant correlations between myopia and accommodation-induced changes in axial length.