Disparities in HPV Vaccination Among Adolescents by Health Care Facility Type.

Importance: Approximately 31 000 cases of human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated cancers are diagnosed annually in the US. The HPV vaccine can prevent more than 90% of these cancers, yet national uptake remains lower than the Healthy People 2030 target of 80% completion. To devise targeted interventions to increase the uptake of HPV vaccines, it is crucial to understand the vaccination rates across various health care settings. Objective: To examine the association between health care facility type and adolescent HPV vaccine uptake and clinician recommendation for the vaccine in the US. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study uses a complex sampling design of data from the 2020 National Immunization Survey-Teen. The study included adolescents aged 13 to 17 years. The data analysis was completed between March 1 and May 31, 2022. Exposure: Health care facility type classified as public, hospital-based, private, mixed (more than 1 type), and other facilities (eg, military health care facility; Women, Infants, and Children clinic; school-based health center; pharmacy). Main Outcomes and Measures: Initiation of HPV vaccination was defined as the receipt of at least 1 dose of the HPV vaccine and completion as receipt of at least 2 or 3 doses, depending on age of initiation. Parent or guardian self-reported clinician recommendation was categorized as yes or no. Weighted, multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds of initiating and completing the HPV vaccine series and receiving clinician recommendation by health care facility type adjusted for adolescent and maternal characteristics. Results: A total of 20 162 adolescents (mean [SD] age, 14.9 [1.4] years; 51.0% male) were included. Clinician recommendation for the HPV vaccine was received by 81.4% of adolescents, and 75.1% initiated and 58.6% completed the HPV vaccine series. In the adjusted analyses, adolescents who received recommended vaccinations at public facilities had lower odds of initiating (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.71; 95% CI, 0.58-0.88) and completing (AOR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.51-0.76) HPV vaccination compared with those who received recommended vaccinations at private facilities. Similarly, adolescents who received recommended vaccinations at public facilities (AOR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.51-0.77) had lower odds of receiving a clinician recommendation for the HPV vaccine compared with those who received recommended vaccinations at private facilities. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings reveal health disparities in HPV vaccination among adolescent populations served by public health care facilities, suggesting that a greater focus is needed on vaccine recommendations and uptake in public facilities.

Application of team science best practices to the project management of a large, multi-site lung cancer screening research consortium.

Research is increasingly conducted through multi-institutional consortia, and best practices for establishing multi-site research collaborations must be employed to ensure efficient, effective, and productive translational research teams. In this manuscript, we describe how the Population-based Research to Optimize the Screening Process Lung Research Center (PROSPR-Lung) utilized evidence-based Science of Team Science (SciTS) best practices to establish the consortium's infrastructure and processes to promote translational research in lung cancer screening. We provide specific, actionable examples of how we: (1) developed and reinforced a shared mission, vision, and goals; (2) maintained a transparent and representative leadership structure; (3) employed strong research support systems; (4) provided efficient and effective data management; (5) promoted interdisciplinary conversations; and (6) built a culture of trust. We offer guidance for managing a multi-site research center and data repository that may be applied to a variety of settings. Finally, we detail specific project management tools and processes used to drive collaboration, efficiency, and scientific productivity.

Comparing Smoking Cessation Interventions among Underserved Patients Referred for Lung Cancer Screening: A Pragmatic Trial Protocol.

Smoking burdens are greatest among underserved patients. Lung cancer screening (LCS) reduces mortality among individuals at risk for smoking-associated lung cancer. Although LCS programs must offer smoking cessation support, the interventions that best promote cessation among underserved patients in this setting are unknown. This stakeholder-engaged, pragmatic randomized clinical trial will compare the effectiveness of four interventions promoting smoking cessation among underserved patients referred for LCS. By using an additive study design, all four arms provide standard "ask-advise-refer" care. Arm 2 adds free or subsidized pharmacologic cessation aids, arm 3 adds financial incentives up to $600 for cessation, and arm 4 adds a mobile device-delivered episodic future thinking tool to promote attention to long-term health goals. We hypothesize that smoking abstinence rates will be higher with the addition of each intervention when compared with arm 1. We will enroll 3,200 adults with LCS orders at four U.S. health systems. Eligible patients include those who smoke at least one cigarette daily and self-identify as a member of an underserved group (i.e., is Black or Latinx, is a rural resident, completed a high school education or less, and/or has a household income <200% of the federal poverty line). The primary outcome is biochemically confirmed smoking abstinence sustained through 6 months. Secondary outcomes include abstinence sustained through 12 months, other smoking-related clinical outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes. This pragmatic randomized clinical trial will identify the most effective smoking cessation strategies that LCS programs can implement to reduce smoking burdens affecting underserved populations. Clinical trial registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04798664). Date of registration: March 12, 2021. Date of trial launch: May 17, 2021.