Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Hum Mutat ; 41(1): 332-341, 2020 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31471937

RESUMEN

Microsatellite instability (MSI) testing of colorectal cancers (CRCs) is used to screen for Lynch syndrome (LS), a hereditary cancer-predisposition, and can be used to predict response to immunotherapy. Here, we present a single-molecule molecular inversion probe and sequencing-based MSI assay and demonstrate its clinical validity according to existing guidelines. We amplified 24 microsatellites in multiplex and trained a classifier using 98 CRCs, which accommodates marker specific sensitivities to MSI. Sample classification achieved 100% concordance with the MSI Analysis System v1.2 (Promega) in three independent cohorts, totaling 220 CRCs. Backward-forward stepwise selection was used to identify a 6-marker subset of equal accuracy to the 24-marker panel. Assessment of assay detection limits showed that the 24-marker panel is marginally more robust to sample variables than the 6-marker subset, detecting as little as 3% high levels of MSI DNA in sample mixtures, and requiring a minimum of 10 template molecules to be sequenced per marker for >95% accuracy. BRAF c.1799 mutation analysis was also included to streamline LS testing, with all c.1799T>A variants being correctly identified. The assay, therefore, provides a cheap, robust, automatable, and scalable MSI test with internal quality controls, suitable for clinical cancer diagnostics.


Asunto(s)
Marcadores Genéticos , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Pruebas Genéticas , Ensayos Analíticos de Alto Rendimiento , Inestabilidad de Microsatélites , Repeticiones de Microsatélite , Alelos , Biomarcadores de Tumor , Línea Celular , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Reparación de la Incompatibilidad de ADN , Estudios de Asociación Genética/métodos , Pruebas Genéticas/métodos , Pruebas Genéticas/normas , Genotipo , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento , Ensayos Analíticos de Alto Rendimiento/métodos , Ensayos Analíticos de Alto Rendimiento/normas , Humanos , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular , Fosforilación , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
3.
Hum Mutat ; 31(5): 578-87, 2010 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20186688

RESUMEN

Heterozygous mutations in PMS2 are involved in Lynch syndrome, whereas biallelic mutations are found in Constitutional mismatch repair-deficiency syndrome patients. Mutation detection is complicated by the occurrence of sequence exchange events between the duplicated regions of PMS2 and PMS2CL. We investigated the frequency of such events with a nonspecific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) strategy, co-amplifying both PMS2 and PMS2CL sequences. This allowed us to score ratios between gene and pseudogene-specific nucleotides at 29 PSV sites from exon 11 to the end of the gene. We found sequence transfer at all investigated PSVs from intron 12 to the 3' end of the gene in 4 to 52% of DNA samples. Overall, sequence exchange between PMS2 and PMS2CL was observed in 69% (83/120) of individuals. We demonstrate that mutation scanning with PMS2-specific PCR primers and MLPA probes, designed on PSVs, in the 3' duplicated region is unreliable, and present an RNA-based mutation detection strategy to improve reliability. Using this strategy, we found 19 different putative pathogenic PMS2 mutations. Four of these (21%) are lying in the region with frequent sequence transfer and are missed or called incorrectly as homozygous with several PSV-based mutation detection methods.


Asunto(s)
Adenosina Trifosfatasas/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales Hereditarias sin Poliposis/genética , Enzimas Reparadoras del ADN/genética , Proteínas de Unión al ADN/genética , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/métodos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Humanos , Endonucleasa PMS2 de Reparación del Emparejamiento Incorrecto , Mutación , Seudogenes/genética
4.
Rev Esp Cardiol ; 59(1): 33-40, 2006 Jan.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16434002

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: A low-to-moderate level of agreement on the interpretation of dobutamine echocardiography has been reported, but there are no similar findings on exercise echocardiography. The objectives of this study were to assess the level of agreement between centers on the use of exercise echocardiography and to evaluate the accuracy of the technique when used in a blinded manner. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Six institutions with experience in exercise echocardiography each sent 25 study results to the other centers. Of these, 15 were positive or negative studies on consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography, and 10 were on non-diabetic patients who had non-coronary chest pain or were asymptomatic and whose pretest probability of coronary artery disease was < 10%. Each institution evaluated 150 studies: 125 blinded and 25 of their own with knowledge of clinical data. RESULTS: For 116 patients (78%), four or more of the five centers blindly evaluating each study agreed with the positive or negative result. The average kappa coefficient was 0.48 (intercenter range 0.45-0.52). The percentage agreement was higher with three-vessel disease (93%, range 85%-95%), with left anterior descending coronary artery disease (83%, range 80%-86%), and when the referring institution reported baseline dyssynergy (86%, range 82%-90%), dyssynergy in left anterior descending coronary artery territory (81%, range 76%-84%), or a peak wall motion score index > 1.50 (88%, range 85%-90%). When the technique was used blinded to detect > or = 50% coronary narrowing in > or = 1 vessel, its sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 68%, 66% and 67%, respectively, with wide variability between centers. CONCLUSIONS: There was moderate agreement between centers on the interpretation of exercise echocardiography. When used blinded, the technique's accuracy was lower than that reported when clinical data is known.


Asunto(s)
Ecocardiografía de Estrés/estadística & datos numéricos , Prueba de Esfuerzo/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
5.
Rev. esp. cardiol. (Ed. impr.) ; 59(1): 33-40, ene. 2006. tab, graf
Artículo en Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-042485

RESUMEN

Introducción y objetivos. Se ha demostrado un acuerdo bajo-moderado en la interpretación de la ecocardiografía con dobutamina, pero no se ha realizado un estudio similar con ejercicio. El objetivo fue evaluar la concordancia intercentros de la ecocardiografía de ejercicio y la precisión de la técnica realizada de forma «ciega». Pacientes y método. Cada uno de los 6 centros remitió 25 casos a los demás centros: 15 eran pacientes consecutivos en los que se había realizado una coronariografía y 10 eran no diabéticos, asintomáticos o con dolor precordial atípico y con una probabilidad pretest 1,50 (88%; rango, 85-90%). La sensibilidad, la especificidad y la precisión diagnóstica media de la técnica «a ciegas» para estenosis coronaria ≥ 50% en ≥ 1 vaso fue del 68, el 66 y el 67%, respectivamente, pero con una amplia variabilidad intercentros. Conclusiones. La concordancia intercentros de la ecocardiografía de ejercicio es moderada. La precisión diagnóstica «a ciegas» es inferior a la comunicada cuando se conocen los datos clínicos


Introduction and objectives. A low-to-moderate level of agreement on the interpretation of dobutamine echocardiography has been reported, but there are no similar findings on exercise echocardiography. The objectives of this study were to assess the level of agreement between centers on the use of exercise echocardiography and to evaluate the accuracy of the technique when used in a blinded manner. Patients and method. Six institutions with experience in exercise echocardiography each sent 25 study results to the other centers. Of these, 15 were positive or negative studies on consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography, and 10 were on non-diabetic patients who had non-coronary chest pain or were asymptomatic and whose pretest probability of coronary artery disease was 1.50 (88%, range 85%-90%). When the technique was used blinded to detect =50% coronary narrowing in =1 vessel, its sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 68%, 66% and 67%, respectively, with wide variability between centers. Conclusions. There was moderate agreement between centers on the interpretation of exercise echocardiography. When used blinded, the technique's accuracy was lower than that reported when clinical data is known


Asunto(s)
Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Humanos , Enfermedad Coronaria/diagnóstico , Ecocardiografía de Estrés , Ejercicio Físico , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Método Simple Ciego
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...