A retrospective study of real-world effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism in Saudi Arabia.

Background: Real-world evidence on factor Xa inhibitor (rivaroxaban) prescribing patterns, safety, and efficacy in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) is rare. Herein, we sought to examine the above outcomes in the largest academic center in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Methods: This is a retrospective observational study designed to examine the prescribing pattern, safety and real-world effectiveness of the factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban in patients with NVAF and VTE. Data on rivaroxaban prescriptions were collected and analyzed. Bleeding outcomes were defined as per the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) definition. Results: A total of 2,316 patients taking rivaroxaban recruited through several departments of King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC). The mean age was 61 years (±17.8) with 55% above the age of 60 and 58% were females. Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (VTE) was the most prevalent reason for prescribing rivaroxaban, followed by NVAF. A total daily dosage of 15 mg was given to 23% of the patients. The incidence rate of recurrent thrombosis and recurrent stroke was 0.2%. Furthermore, rivaroxaban had a 0.04 percent incidence rate of myocardial infarction. Half of the patients with recurrent thrombosis and stroke were taking 15 mg per day. The incidence rate of major bleeding was 1.1%. More over half of the patients who experienced significant bleeding were taking rivaroxaban at a dosage of 20 mg per day. According to the HAS-BLED Score (>2 score), 48 percent of patients who experienced significant bleeding had a high risk of bleeding. Non-major bleeding occurred in 0.6% of cases. Similarly, 40% of patients with non-major bleeding were taking rivaroxaban at a dosage of 20 mg per day. According to the HAS-BLED Score, just 6.6% of these individuals had a high risk of bleeding. 93.4% of the patients, on the other hand, were at intermediate risk. Conclusion: The prescription of rivaroxaban in this real-life cohort study differs from the prescribing label and the outcomes of a phase 3 randomised clinical trial. However, for individuals with VTE and NVAF, the 20 mg dose looked to be more efficacious than the pivotal trial outcomes. Furthermore, among patients with VTE and NVAF, rivaroxaban was linked to a decreased incidence of safety events such as recurrent thrombosis, recurrent stroke, MI, major bleeding, and non-major haemorrhage in a real-world environment.

Hemostatic profile detailing in apparent VWD cases: A cross sectional study.

The von willebrand disease (vWD) accounts to be one of the most common hereditary bleeding ailment that amounts its incidence to almost 1.5% of normal population. It is mostly associated with a defect in primary hemostasis as well as secondary defect in coagulation factor VIII as diagnosis of vwd happened to be challenging with earlier diagnostic criteria's. Testing Vwd in menorrhagia patients was not at ease. A cross-sectional study was conducted in female patients who have visited obstetrics and gynecology clinic at King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The inclusion criteria consist of adult female patients between 16 and 45 years old with menorrhagia. A sample of 45 patients were screened and selected for the above-mentioned study. The SPSS Statistical analysis package was performed to analyze the data's. The fisher's exact test was conducted to compare the demographic variables. The independent samples t-test was conducted to compare the means of subjects. The P value of ≤0.05 considered as statistically significant. The cases manifested with a history of bleeding during periods stretching from 7 to 90 days. The vWD was reported in 6.6 % (n = 3) women out of the total 45 patients. The vWF: Ac mean ± SD (51.4 ± 6.3) and vWF: Ag Mean ± SD (93 ± 67) were significantly lesser in vWD patients with that of non-vWD (98.7 ± 22.6) vs (116 ± 42.4) (p = 0.027) (p = 0.032) respectively. WBC, ESR, MCV, MCH, Hemoglobin, PLT count, INR, PT, APTT and FVIII showed no significant difference among the groups (p > 0.05).