Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 4 de 4
1.
Cureus ; 16(1): e51569, 2024 Jan.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38313972

BACKGROUND: Differences in the blood, resulting from the presence or absence of antigens corresponding to specific blood types, have indirect implications for susceptibility to diseases. The aim of this study was to examine the association between the ABO type and obesity in patients with diabetes mellitus. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional observational study that was conducted at King Abdulaziz University Hospital (KAUH) in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Data were collected using a simple random method through hospital records during the period between August and September 2022. Patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and T2DM were included in this study. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify the association between blood group and obesity. RESULTS: A total of 411 patients were involved in this study. More than half of the patients (54.3%; n= 223) are diagnosed with T1DM. O-positive was the most common blood group type among the patients, accounting for 38.6% (n= 161). Only 23.6% (n= 97) of the patients were classified as having normal weight. Around 32.6% (n= 134) of the patients were classified as having the pre-obesity stage. More than one-third of the patients (35.1%; n= 145) were classified as being obese. There was no statistically significant difference between the patients in terms of their blood type group and its association with obesity (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Many diabetics are overweight or obese, according to this study. This shows the importance of weight management for diabetes treatment. Many patients were overweight, emphasizing the importance of obesity prevention and diabetes care. Most patients were O-positive, according to blood type tests. Previous research suggests that blood types may be linked to diabetes. However, this study found no significant relationships. More research is needed to understand the complex link between blood types, weight, and diabetes.

2.
J Infect Public Health ; 17(2): 245-253, 2024 Feb.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38141544

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has killed over 6 million people worldwide, making it the worst global health disaster since the 1918 influenza pandemic. Experts have worked to establish the source, track and analyse the disease, and produce treatment and preventative guidelines. Inactivated vaccines have little evidence of efficacy compared to mRNA and adenoviral vector vaccines; however, three doses of both mRNA and inactivated vaccines appear to provide significant and lasting protection against severe disease and mortality. This study examines inactivated vaccine effectiveness data by disease status, age, gender, primary immunisation, booster doses, and SARS-CoV2 virus types. METHODS: We conducted a quantitative epidemiological meta-analysis study to assess the vaccine effectiveness of inactivated COVID-19 vaccines. Data extraction was performed on the selected studies, and data analysis was conducted using a random-effects model to determine consolidated assessments of vaccine effectiveness. Subgroup analyses were conducted for gender, age, disease level, and vaccine status, and sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the results. RESULTS: The overall effect size of inactivated COVID-19 vaccinations was statistically significant (p-value<0.05), suggesting that complete vaccination should be the primary method of vaccination. Partial vaccination was associated with lower levels of vaccine effectiveness (70.18 95% CI 57.33-83.02) than complete vaccination (79.52 95% CI 67.88-91.71)) and booster vaccination (84.22 95% CI 74.34-94.10), suggesting that it is essential to finish the recommended vaccine series and receive booster doses. Fig.-3: Partially vaccinated individuals showed a vaccine effect size of 70.18 (95% CI 57.33-83.02), indicating that the vaccine was moderately effective in preventing COVID-19 among this group. Fully vaccinated individuals showed a vaccine effect size of 79.52 (95% CI 67.88-91.71), indicating a higher level of vaccine effectiveness. Finally, booster-vaccinated individuals showed a vaccine effect size of 84.22 (95% CI 74.34-94.10), indicating the highest level of vaccine effectiveness. CONCLUSION: Inactivated COVID-19 vaccines are highly effective in preventing COVID-19, and complete vaccination and booster vaccination are associated with higher levels of vaccine effectiveness compared to partial vaccination. These findings highlight the importance of completing the recommended vaccine series and receiving booster doses to provide greater protection against COVID-19.


COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/prevention & control , RNA, Viral , SARS-CoV-2 , RNA, Messenger , Vaccines, Inactivated
3.
Cureus ; 15(10): e47166, 2023 Oct.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38022364

BACKGROUND: Prior research has established noteworthy correlations between inadequate glycemic management and a multitude of problems in individuals diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (DM). METHODS: This is a cross-sectional retrospective study that was conducted at the Jeddah Center for the Care of Diabetes and Blood Pressure Patients, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The medical records of patients diagnosed with DM between 2015 and 2022 were identified and reviewed for the purpose of this study. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to examine the correlation between glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and vitamin D levels. Multiple linear regression analysis was applied to identify the association between HbA1c and vitamin D levels. RESULTS: A total of 152 patients were included in this study. The mean HbA1c level for the patients in this study was 8.2% (SD: 1.7). The median vitamin D level for the patients was 20.9 ng/ml (interquartile range (IQR): 13-30.4). More than half of the patients (n= 92; 60.5%) were found to have vitamin D insufficiency. Pearson correlation coefficient identified that there is an inverse correlation between the level of HbA1c and vitamin D level (r= -0.21 (95%CI -0.36 to -0.06; p-value= 0.007). Multiple linear regression analysis (adjusting for age and type of DM) identified that poor glycaemic control has a negative association with vitamin D level (regression coefficient (B) = -0.027; 95%CI -0.053 to - 0.001; p-value= 0.039). CONCLUSION: Poor glycaemic control is associated with vitamin D deficiency in DM patients. It is recommended that patients with DM adhere to their medications and maintain a healthy lifestyle in order to manage their condition. This will improve their overall health, specifically their vitamin D status.

4.
Cureus ; 15(12): e49771, 2023 Dec.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38161562

Background Interoception refers to the cognitive process of perceiving internal bodily states. This encompasses various physiological indicators, including heart rate fluctuations, stomach distention, internal temperature, hydration levels, sensory input from free nerve terminals in the fascia and muscles, as well as hormonal, stretch, and pain receptors. This study aimed to examine the interoceptive awareness among the general public in Saudi Arabia. Methods A cross-sectional online survey was undertaken in Saudi Arabia to investigate the level of interoceptive awareness within the overall population of the country in October 2023. This research used a previously developed questionnaire named the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness, version 2 (MAIA-2). In a binary logistic regression analysis, the mean interoceptive awareness score of the participants was utilized as the dummy variable to determine the variables that influence interoceptive awareness. Results A total of 814 participants were involved in this study. Overall, the study participants demonstrated a marginal level of interoceptive awareness with a mean score of 94.3 (standard deviation (SD): 29.3) out of 185 (representing 51.0% of the maximum attainable score). The mean interoceptive score was not consistent across different subscales and ranged between 37.7% and 63.3%. The highest mean interoceptive score was observed for the Trusting subscale (9.5 (SD: 4.5) out of 15) (representing 63.3% of the maximum attainable score for this subscale). The lowest mean interoceptive score was observed for the Not-Distracting subscale (11.3 (SD: 6.9) out of 30) (representing 37.7% of the maximum attainable score for this subscale). Binary logistic regression analysis did not identify any statistically significant difference in the likelihood of having a higher level of interoceptive awareness among the participants based on their demographic characteristics (p>0.05). Conclusion The participants in our research demonstrated a modest degree of interoceptive awareness. The study's results suggest that the participants demonstrated a heightened inclination towards internal experiences rather than being attentive to their bodily sensations. Further investigation is required to examine interoceptive awareness across various cohorts.

...