Prophylactic Medication during Radioembolization in Metastatic Liver Disease: Is It Really Necessary? A Retrospective Cohort Study and Systematic Review of the Literature.

PURPOSE: Trans-arterial radioembolization is a well-studied tumoricidal treatment for liver malignancies; however, consensus and evidence regarding periprocedural prophylactic medication (PPM) are lacking. METHODS: A single-center retrospective analysis from 2014 to 2020 was performed in patients treated with 90Y-glass microspheres for neuroendocrine or colorectal liver metastases. Inclusion criteria were the availability of at least 3 months of clinical, biochemical, and imaging follow-up and post-treatment 90Y-PET/CT imaging for the determination of the whole non-tumorous liver absorbed dose (Dh). Logistic regression models were used to investigate if variables (among which are P/UDCA and Dh) were associated with either clinical toxicity, biochemical toxicity, or hepatotoxicity. Additionally, a structured literature search was performed in November 2022 to identify all publications related to PPM use in radioembolization treatments. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients received P/UDCA as post-treatment medication, while 19 did not. No correlation was found between toxicity and P/UDCA use. Dh was associated with biochemical toxicity (p = 0.05). A literature review resulted in eight relevant articles, including a total of 534 patients, in which no consistent advice regarding PPM was provided. CONCLUSION: In this single-center, retrospective review, P/UDCA use did not reduce liver toxicity in patients with metastatic liver disease. The whole non-tumorous liver-absorbed dose was the only significant factor for hepatotoxicity. No standardized international guidelines or supporting evidence exist for PPM in radioembolization.

Dose-Response and Dose-Toxicity Relationships for Glass 90Y Radioembolization in Patients with Liver Metastases from Colorectal Cancer.

Radioembolization based on personalized treatment planning requires established dose-response and dose-toxicity relationships. The aim of this study was to investigate dose-response and dose-toxicity relationships in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) treated with glass 90Y-microspheres. Methods: All CRLM patients treated with glass 90Y-microspheres in our institution were retrospectively analyzed. The tumor-absorbed dose was calculated for each measurable metastasis (i.e.,18F-FDG-positive and more than a 5-cm3 tumor volume) on posttreatment 90Y PET. Metabolic tumor response was determined on 18F-FDG PET/CT by measuring the total lesion glycolysis at baseline and at 3 mo after treatment. The relationship between tumor-absorbed dose and metabolic response was determined on a per-lesion and per-patient basis using a linear mixed-effects regression model. Clinical toxicity and laboratory toxicity were correlated with healthy liver-absorbed dose. Results: Thirty-one patients were included. The median tumor-absorbed dose of 85 measurable metastases was 133 Gy (range, 20-1001 Gy). Per response category, this was 196 Gy for complete response (CR), 177 Gy for partial response (PR), 72 Gy for stable disease, and 95 Gy for progressive disease (PD). A significant dose-response relationship was found on a tumor level, with a significantly higher tumor-absorbed dose in metastases with CR (+94%) and PR (+74%) than in metastases with PD (P < 0.001). A similar relationship was found on a patient level, with PR having a higher tumor-absorbed dose than did PD (+58%, P = 0.044). A tumor-absorbed dose of more than 139 Gy predicted a 3-mo metabolic response with the greatest accuracy (89% specificity and 77% sensitivity), whereas a tumor-absorbed dose of more than 189 Gy predicted response with 97% specificity and 45% sensitivity. The median healthy liver-absorbed dose was 63 Gy (range, 24-113 Gy). Toxicity was limited mostly to grades 1 and 2, with 1 case of radioembolization-induced liver disease in a patient who received the highest healthy liver-absorbed dose. A positive trend was seen for most laboratory parameters in our dose-toxicity analysis. Conclusion: A significant relationship was observed between dose and response in CRLM patients treated with glass 90Y radioembolization.

The Efficacy of Coil Embolization to Obtain Intrahepatic Redistribution in Radioembolization: Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of coil embolization to obtain intrahepatic redistribution in patients undergoing radioembolization. MATERIALS AND METHOD: All patients treated with radioembolization at our institute were retrospectively analyzed, and all cases in which a tumor-feeding vessel was coil-embolized were selected. Two nuclear medicine physicians visually assessed the effect of redistribution. Furthermore, the redistribution of microspheres was measured by quantifying the activity distributed to the coil-embolized (dependent) segment relative to the other (non-dependent) segments and to the tumor(s) in that segment. Quantitative analysis was performed on post-treatment 90Y-PET and 166Ho-SPECT using Simplicit90Y software. Lesion response was measured according to RECIST 1.1 criteria at 3 months post-treatment. RESULTS: Out of 37 cases, 32 were suitable for quantitative analysis and 37 for qualitative analysis. In the qualitative analysis, redistribution was deemed successful in 69% of cases. The quantitative analysis showed that the median ratio of the activity to the dependent embolized segments and the non-dependent segments was 0.88 (range 0.26-2.05) and 0.80 (range 0.19-1.62) for tumors in dependent segments compared with tumors in non-dependent segments. Using a cutoff ratio of 0.7 (30% lower activity concentration in comparison with the rest of the liver), 57% of cases were successful. At 3 months post-treatment, 6% of dependent tumors had partial response, 20% progressive disease, and 74% stable disease. In non-dependent tumors, this was, respectively, 16%, 20%, and 64%. CONCLUSION: Coil embolization of hepatic arteries to induce redistribution of microspheres has a limited success rate. Qualitative assessment tends to overrate redistribution.

Angiogenesis in 90Y-Radioembolization of Colorectal Liver Metastases.

In order to evaluate the role of angiogenesis in 90Y-radioembolization for colorectal cancer liver metastasis an overview was provided of angiogenic growth factors and their function, the angiogenic mechanisms in colorectal cancer, the role of hypoxia, and the advances in antiangiogenic therapy. Last, the use of circulating angiogenic growth factors in 90Y-radioembolization was reviewed. Two literature searches were conducted. A search query in PubMed on angiogenesis in colorectal cancer, and a systematic search in PubMed (Medline), Embase, and the Cochrane Library (October 2018) with synonyms for "radioembolization" and "angiogenic growth factor." The first search yielded 3 relevant publications on the role of angiogenic growth factors in colorectal cancer, hypoxia, and antiangiogenic therapy. The second search yielded two prospective studies on circulating angiogenic factors and their relationship with response and survival after 90Y-radioembolization for colorectal cancer liver metastases. Rises in circulating angiogenic growth factors after radioembolization were seen in both studies. High baseline values of Ang-2 and IL-8 correlated with shorter survival and post 90Y-radiembolization rises in Ang-2 and HGF correlated with early progression. Various angiogenic growth factors play a role in the development and progression of colorectal cancer. Several factors show correlation with poor outcomes after 90Y-radioembolization and might be used for patient selection in the future, however, validation in larger comparative studies is required.