RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Globally, engaging people who have used drugs, or peers, in decision-making has been increasingly touted as a best practice approach to developing priorities, programs, and policies. Peer engagement ensures decisions are relevant, appropriate, and effective to the affected community. However, ensuring that inclusion is accessible and equitable for those involved remains a challenge. In this study, we examined the perspectives of people who use or have used illicit drugs (PWUD) on peer engagement in health and harm reduction settings across British Columbia (BC), Canada. METHODS: The Peer Engagement and Evaluation Project used a participatory approach to conducting 13 peer-facilitated focus groups (n = 83) across BC. Focus group data were coded and analyzed with five peer research assistants. Themes about the nature of peer engagement were generated. From this analysis, peer engagement barriers and enablers were identified. RESULTS: Barriers to peer engagement included individual, geographical, systemic, and social factors. Issues related to stigma, confidentiality, and mistrust were intensely discussed among participants. Being "outed" in one's community was a barrier to engagement, particularly in rural areas. Participants voiced that compensation, setting, and the right people help facilitate and motivate engagement. Peer networks are an essential ingredient to engagement by promoting support and advocacy. CONCLUSION: PWUD are important stakeholders in decisions that affect them. This cross-jurisdictional study investigated how PWUD have experienced engagement efforts in BC, identifying several factors that influence participation. Meaningful engagement can be facilitated by attention to communication, relationships, personal capacity, and compassion between peers and other professionals.
Asunto(s)
Consumidores de Drogas/psicología , Relaciones Interpersonales , Grupo Paritario , Adolescente , Adulto , Colombia Británica , Consumidores de Drogas/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Reducción del Daño , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Motivación , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Peer Engagement and Evaluation Project (PEEP) aimed to engage, inspire, and learn from peer leaders who represented voices of people who use or have used illicit substances, through active membership on the 'Peeps' research team. Given the lack of critical reflection in the literature about the process of engaging people who have used illicit substances in participatory and community-based research processes, we provide a detailed description of how one project, PEEP, engaged peers in a province-wide research project. METHODS: By applying the Peer Engagement Process Evaluation Framework, we critically analyze the intentions, strategies employed, and outcomes of the process utilized in the PEEP project and discuss the implications for capacity building and empowerment among the peer researchers. This process included: the formation of the PEEP team; capacity building; peer-facilitated data collection; collaborative data analysis; and, strengths-based approach to outputs. RESULTS: Several lessons were learned from applying the Peer Engagement Process Evaluation Framework to the PEEP process. These lessons fall into themes of: recruiting and hiring; fair compensation; role and project expectations; communication; connection and collaboration; mentorship; and peer-facilitated research. CONCLUSION: This project offers a unique approach to engaging people who use illicit substances and demonstrates how participation is an important endeavor that improves the relevance, capacity, and quality of research. Lessons learned in this project can be applied to future community-based research with people who use illicit substances or other marginalized groups and/or participatory settings.
Asunto(s)
Investigación Participativa Basada en la Comunidad/organización & administración , Drogas Ilícitas , Grupo Paritario , Investigadores/psicología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Humanos , Proyectos de Investigación , Investigadores/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: People who use drugs have a significantly higher prevalence of chronic non-cancer pain compared to the general population, yet little is known about how various policy, economic, physical, and social environments may serve as risk or protective factors in the context of concurrent pain and substance use. Therefore, this study sought to explore perspectives, risks, and harms associated with pain among people who use drugs. METHODS: Thirteen focus group interviews were held across British Columbia, Canada, from July to September 2015. In total, 83 people who had lived experience with substance use participated in the study. Using an interpretive description approach, themes were conceptualized according to the Rhodes' Risk Environment and patient-centered care frameworks. RESULTS: Participants described how their experiences with inadequately managed pain in various policy, economic, physical, and social environments reinforced marginalization, such as restrictive policies, economic vulnerability, lack of access to socio-physical support systems, stigma from health professionals, and denial of pain medication leading to risky self-medication. Principles of patient-centered care were often not upheld, from a lack of recognition of patients as experts in understanding their unique pain needs and experiences, to an absence of shared power and decision-making, which often resulted in distrust of the patient-provider relationship. CONCLUSIONS: Various risk environments and non-patient-centered interactions may contribute to an array of health and social harms in the context of inadequately managed pain among people who use drugs.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Dolor/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Colombia Británica/epidemiología , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Reducción del Daño , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/normas , Humanos , Masculino , Metadona/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tratamiento de Sustitución de Opiáceos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/rehabilitación , Dolor/prevención & control , Manejo del Dolor/normas , Atención Dirigida al Paciente , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although income assistance is an important source of support for low income individuals, there is evidence that adverse outcomes may increase when payments are disbursed on the same day for all recipients. The objective of this study was to assess the temporal patterns and causal relation between population-level illicit drug overdose deaths and income assistance payments using daily mortality data for British Columbia over a period of five years. METHODS: Retrospective data on daily mortality due to illicit drug overdose, 2009-2013, were provided by the BC Coroners Service. These data were analyzed using regression models and time series tests for causality in relation to dates of income assistance payments. RESULTS: 1343 deaths due to illicit drug overdose were reported in BC during 2009-2013; 394 occurred during cheque weeks (n=60) and 949 occurred during non-cheque weeks (n=202). Average weekly mortality due to illicit drug overdose was 40% higher during weeks of income assistance payments compared to weeks without payments (P<0.001). Consistent increases in mortality appeared the day after cheque disbursement and were significantly higher for two days, and marginally higher after 3 days, even when controlling for other temporal trends. Granger causality testing suggests the timing of cheque issue was causally linked to increased drug overdose mortality (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings clarify the temporal relation and causal impact of income assistance payments on illicit drug deaths. We estimate 77 avoidable deaths were attributable to the synchronized disbursement of income assistance cheques over the five year period. An important consideration is whether varying the timing of payments among recipients could reduce this excess mortality and the related demands on health and social services.
Asunto(s)
Sobredosis de Droga/epidemiología , Drogas Ilícitas/provisión & distribución , Asistencia Pública , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/mortalidad , Colombia Británica , Causas de Muerte , Sobredosis de Droga/economía , Sobredosis de Droga/mortalidad , Humanos , Drogas Ilícitas/economía , Análisis de Regresión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/economía , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to identify factors that may be associated with help-seeking by witnesses during overdoses where naloxone is administered. SETTING: Overdose events occurred in and were reported from the five regional health authorities across British Columbia, Canada. Naloxone administration forms completed following overdose events were submitted to the British Columbia Take Home Naloxone programme. PARTICIPANTS: All 182 reported naloxone administration events, reported by adult men and women and occurring between 31 August 2012 and 31 March 2015, were considered for inclusion in the analysis. Of these, 18 were excluded: 10 events which were reported by the person who overdosed, and 8 events for which completed forms did not indicate whether or not emergency medical help was sought. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Seeking emergency medical help (calling 911), as reported by participants, was the sole outcome measure of this analysis. RESULTS: Medical help was sought (emergency services-911 called) in 89 (54.3%) of 164 overdoses where naloxone was administered. The majority of administration events occurred in private residences (50.6%) and on the street (23.4%), where reported rates of calling 911 were 27.5% and 81.1%, respectively. Overdoses occurring on the street (compared to private residence) were significantly associated with higher odds of calling 911 in multivariate analysis (OR=10.68; 95% CI 2.83 to 51.87; p<0.01), after adjusting for other variables. CONCLUSIONS: Overdoses occurring on the street were associated with higher odds of seeking emergency medical help by responders. Further research is needed to determine if sex and stimulant use by the person who overdosed are associated with seeking emergency medical help. The results of this study will inform interventions within the British Columbia Take Home Naloxone programme and other jurisdictions to encourage seeking emergency medical help.
Asunto(s)
Sobredosis de Droga/tratamiento farmacológico , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Dependencia de Heroína/complicaciones , Naloxona/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas de Narcóticos/administración & dosificación , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Colombia Británica , Sobredosis de Droga/epidemiología , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Dependencia de Heroína/tratamiento farmacológico , Dependencia de Heroína/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía IntravenosaAsunto(s)
Metadona , Tratamiento de Sustitución de Opiáceos , Colombia Británica , Canadá , Química Farmacéutica , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The British Columbia take-home naloxone (BCTHN) program has been in operation since 2012 and has resulted in the successful reversal of over 581 opioid overdoses. The study aims to explore BCTHN program participant perspectives about the program, barriers to participants contacting emergency services (calling "911") during an overdose, and perspectives of law enforcement officials on naloxone administration by police officers. METHODS: Two focus groups and four individual interviews were conducted with BCTHN program participants; interviews with two law enforcement officials were also conducted. Qualitative analysis of all transcripts was performed. RESULTS: Positive themes about the BCTHN program from participants included easy to understand training, correcting misperceptions in the community, and positive interactions with emergency services. Potential barriers to contacting emergency services during an overdose include concerns about being arrested for outstanding warrants or for other illegal activities (such as drug possession) and confiscation of kits. Law enforcement officials noted that warrants were complex situational issues, kits would normally not be confiscated, and admitted arrests for drug possession or other activities may not serve the public good in an overdose situation. Law enforcement officials were concerned about legal liability and jurisdictional/authorization issues if naloxone administration privileges were expanded to police. CONCLUSIONS: Program participants and law enforcement officials expressed differing perspectives about warrants, kit confiscation, and arrests. Facilitating communication between BCTHN program participants and other stakeholders may address some of the confusion and remove potential barriers to further improving program outcomes. Naloxone administration by law enforcement would require policies to address jurisdiction/authorization and liability issues.
Asunto(s)
Aplicación de la Ley , Naloxona/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Narcóticos/uso terapéutico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/rehabilitación , Actitud Frente a la Salud , Colombia Británica , Crimen/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/legislación & jurisprudencia , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tratamiento de Sustitución de Opiáceos/estadística & datos numéricos , PoliciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Engaging people with drug use experience, or 'peers,' in decision-making helps to ensure harm reduction services reflect current need. There is little published on the implementation, evaluation, and effectiveness of meaningful peer engagement. This paper aims to describe and evaluate peer engagement in British Columbia from 2010-2014. METHODS: A process evaluation framework specific to peer engagement was developed and used to assess progress made, lessons learned, and future opportunities under four domains: supportive environment, equitable participation, capacity building and empowerment, and improved programming and policy. The evaluation was conducted by reviewing primary and secondary qualitative data including focus groups, formal documents, and meeting minutes. RESULTS: Peer engagement was an iterative process that increased and improved over time as a consequence of reflexive learning. Practical ways to develop trust, redress power imbalances, and improve relationships were crosscutting themes. Lack of support, coordination, and building on existing capacity were factors that could undermine peer engagement. Peers involved across the province reviewed and provided feedback on these results. CONCLUSION: Recommendations from this evaluation can be applied to other peer engagement initiatives in decision-making settings to improve relationships between peers and professionals and to ensure programs and policies are relevant and equitable.
Asunto(s)
Reducción del Daño , Influencia de los Compañeros , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/prevención & control , Colombia Británica , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria , Humanos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de SaludRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In British Columbia, Canada, methadone maintenance treatment formulation transitioned from the oral liquid compound Tang™-flavoured methadone to the ten-times more concentrated cherry-flavoured Methadose™ in February 2014. We quantitatively describe perceptions and reported consequences among a sample of patients on methadone maintenance treatment following this transition. METHODS: A province-wide survey was used. Bivariable analyses utilized independent samples t-tests, Phi associations, and Chi-square tests. Multivariable logistic regression analyses evaluated factors related to dependent variables - namely, increases in dose, pain, dope sickness, and the need to supplement with additional opioids. RESULTS: Four hundred five methadone maintenance treatment patients from fifty harm reduction sites across British Columbia reported transitioning to Methadose™ in February 2014. The majority (n = 258; 73.1 %) heard about the formulation change from their methadone provider or pharmacist. Adjusted models show worse taste was positively associated with reporting an increasing dose (OR = 2.46; CI:1.31-4.61), feeling more dope sick (OR = 3.39; CI:1.88-6.12), and worsening pain (OR = 4.65; CI:2.45-8.80). Feeling more dope sick was positively associated with dose increase (OR = 2.24; CI:1.37-3.66), and supplementing with opioids (OR = 8.81; CI:5.16-15.05). CONCLUSIONS: Methadone maintenance treatment policy changes in British Columbia affect a structurally vulnerable population who may be less able to cope with transitions and loss of autonomy. There may be a psychosocial component contributing to the perception of Methadose™ tasting worse, and increased dope sickness, pain, and dose. Our study shows the pronounced negative impacts medication changes can have on patients without informed, coordinated efforts. We stress the need to engage all stakeholders allowing for communication about the reasons, risks and consequences of medication policy changes and provision of additional psychosocial support.
Asunto(s)
Química Farmacéutica , Metadona/uso terapéutico , Tratamiento de Sustitución de Opiáceos/métodos , Tratamiento de Sustitución de Opiáceos/psicología , Pacientes/psicología , Adulto , Anciano , Colombia Británica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Metadona/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tratamiento de Sustitución de Opiáceos/efectos adversos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Fentanyl-detected illicit drug overdose deaths in British Columbia (BC) recently increased dramatically from 13 deaths in 2012 to 90 deaths in 2014, signaling an emerging public health concern. Illicit fentanyl is sold as pills or powders, often mixed with other substances like heroin or oxycodone; reports from coroners suggested that fentanyl was frequently taken unknowingly by people who use drugs. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and characteristics of fentanyl use among clients accessing harm reduction (HR) services in BC. METHODS: Participants attending HR services at 17 sites across BC were invited to complete an anonymous questionnaire describing drugs they have used within the last 3 days and provide a urine sample to test for fentanyl. Data from eligible participants were analyzed using descriptive, bivariate, and multivariate statistical methods. RESULTS: Surveys from 17 HR sites were received, resulting in analysis of responses from 242 eligible participants. Most participants used multiple substances (median = 3), with crystal meth (59%) and heroin (52%) use most frequently reported. Seventy participants (29%) tested positive for fentanyl, 73% of whom did not report using fentanyl. Controlling for age, gender, and health authority, reported use of fentanyl (odds ratio (OR) = 6.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) = [2.52, 15.78], p < 0.001) and crystal methamphetamine (OR = 3.82, 95% CI = [1.79, 8.63], p < 0.001) use were significantly associated with fentanyl detection. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of those testing positive who did not report knowingly using fentanyl represents a considerable public health concern. The risk of overdose among this vulnerable population highlights the need for targeted HR strategies, such as increased accessibility to naloxone, overdose education, and urine screens.
Asunto(s)
Fentanilo/orina , Narcóticos/orina , Detección de Abuso de Sustancias/métodos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/orina , Adulto , Colombia Británica , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Youth Injection Prevention (YIP) project aimed to identify factors associated with the prevention of transitioning to injection drug use (IDU) among street-involved youth (youth who had spent at least 3 consecutive nights without a fixed address or without their parents/caregivers in the previous six months) aged 16-24 years in Metro Vancouver, British Columbia. METHODS: Ten focus groups were conducted by youth collaborators (peer-researchers) with street-involved youth (n = 47) from November 2009-April 2010. Audio recordings and focus group observational notes were transcribed verbatim and emergent themes identified by open coding and categorizing. RESULTS: Through ongoing data analysis we identified that youth produced risk and deficiency rather than resiliency-based answers. This enabled the questioning guide to be reframed into a strengths-based guide in a timely manner. Factors youth identified that prevented them from IDU initiation were grouped into three domains loosely derived from the risk environment framework: Individual (fear and self-worth), Social Environment (stigma and group norms - including street-entrenched adults who actively discouraged youth from IDU, support/inclusion, family/friend drug use and responsibilities), and Physical/Economic Environment (safe/engaging spaces). Engaging youth collaborators in the research ensured relevance and validity of the study. CONCLUSION: Participants emphasized having personal goals and ties to social networks, supportive family and role models, and the need for safe and stable housing as key to resiliency. Gaining the perspectives of street-involved youth on factors that prevent IDU provides a complementary perspective to risk-based studies and encourages strength-based approaches for coaching and care of at-risk youth and upon which prevention programs should be built.
Asunto(s)
Jóvenes sin Hogar/psicología , Personas con Mala Vivienda/psicología , Drogas Ilícitas , Resiliencia Psicológica , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa/prevención & control , Adolescente , Conducta del Adolescente/psicología , Colombia Británica , Femenino , Personas con Mala Vivienda/estadística & datos numéricos , Jóvenes sin Hogar/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Asunción de Riesgos , Apoyo Social , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa/psicología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/prevención & control , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
We used whole-genome sequencing to investigate a dual-genotype outbreak of measles occurring after the XXI Olympic Winter Games in Vancouver, Canada. By sequencing 27 complete genomes from H1 and D8 genotype measles viruses isolated from outbreak cases, we estimated the virus mutation rate, determined that person-to-person transmission is typically associated with 0 mutations between isolates, and established that a single introduction of H1 virus led to the expansion of the outbreak beyond Vancouver. This is the largest measles genomics project to date, revealing novel aspects of measles virus genetics and providing new insights into transmission of this reemerging viral pathogen.
Asunto(s)
Brotes de Enfermedades , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa , Genoma Viral , Genotipo , Virus del Sarampión/clasificación , Sarampión/epidemiología , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , Canadá/epidemiología , Aglomeración , Humanos , Sarampión/transmisión , Virus del Sarampión/genética , Virus del Sarampión/aislamiento & purificación , Epidemiología Molecular , Datos de Secuencia MolecularRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Regional health bodies in British Columbia (BC) issue drug alerts to the public when health risks associated with drug quality are identified, such as increased illicit drug deaths, overdoses or other harms. There is a lack of evidence-based guidelines for producing timely, effective public health alerts to mitigate these harms. This study sought to understand (1) the practices used by people who use drugs (PWUD) to assess the quality of street drugs and reduce harms from adulterants and (2) how drug alerts could be better communicated to PWUD. METHODS: Guided by interpretive and descriptive methodology, this study consisted of brief questionnaires and in-depth focus groups with 32 PWUD. RESULTS: Findings suggest the most effective and trusted information about drug quality was primarily from: (a) trusted, reputable dealers or (b) peer-based social networks. Most PWUD thought information received through health service providers was not timely and did not discuss drug quality with them. A number of concrete guidelines were suggested by participants to improve the effectiveness of drug alert modes and methods of communication in the community, including the use of language on drug alert postings that implies harm, indicates what drug effects to look for, and suggests appropriate responses to overdose, such as the use of naloxone. Participants also emphasized the need to date posters and remove them in a timely manner so as to not desensitize the community to such alerts. CONCLUSION: Since it is difficult to control adulteration practices in an unregulated drug market, this study suggests methods of effectively producing and communicating drug alerts among PWUD to mitigate harms associated with drug use.
Asunto(s)
Comunicación , Contaminación de Medicamentos , Consumidores de Drogas/psicología , Educación en Salud/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Grupos Focales , Personal de Salud/psicología , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Grupo Paritario , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In August 2012, the British Columbia Take Home Naloxone (BCTHN) program was introduced to help to reduce opioid overdose and its consequences. This study evaluates the BCTHN program, identifying the successes and challenges of implementing a provincial program in Canada. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we reviewed the records of the BCTHN administrative program to report on program outcomes (participation and overdose reversals). Focus groups and individual interviews were conducted with 40 clients in Vancouver; 12 individual interviews were completed with service providers, police officers and parents of people who use opioids from both the Vancouver and Interior regions of British Columbia. Qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis and a qualitative descriptive approach. RESULTS: As of March 13, 2014, the BCTHN program had been implemented at 40 sites, trained 1318 participants in overdose prevention, recognition and response, distributed 836 kits to clients and received reports of 85 overdose reversals. Stakeholders were supportive of the program, and clients reported greater confidence in response to overdose. Service providers found the program training materials easy to use and that training increased client engagement. Some of the challenges included difficulty in identifying physician willing to prescribe, recruitment of some at-risk populations (e.g., long-term opioid users and patients with chronic pain), and clients' reluctance to call 911. We also found that the police had some misconceptions about BCTHN. INTERPRETATION: The BCTHN program was easy to implement, empowering for clients and was responsible for reversing 85 overdoses in its first 20 months. We suggest communities across Canada should consider implementing take-home naloxone programs and evaluate their findings.
RESUMEN
Two new cyclic depsipeptides, turnagainolides A (1) and B (2), have been isolated from laboratory cultures of a marine isolate of Bacillus sp. The structures of 1 and 2, which are simply epimers at the site of macrolactonization, were elucidated by analysis of NMR data and chemical degradation. A total synthesis of the turnagainolides confirmed their structures. Turnagainolide B (2) showed activity in a SHIP1 activation assay.