Comparison of drug retention of TNF inhibitors, other biologics and JAK inhibitors in RA patients who discontinued JAK inhibitor therapy.

OBJECTIVES: JAK Inhibitors (JAKi) are recommended DMARDs for patients with moderate-to-severe RA who failed first-line therapy with methotrexate. There is a lack of data allowing an evidence-based choice of subsequent DMARD therapy for patients who had discontinued JAKi treatment. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of TNF inhibitor (TNFi) therapy vs JAKi vs other mode of action (OMA) biologic DMARD (bDMARD) in RA patients who were previously treated with a JAKi. METHODS: RA patients who discontinued JAKi treatment within the Swiss RA registry SCQM were included for this observational prospective cohort study. The primary outcome was drug retention for either TNFi, OMA bDMARD or JAKi. The hazard ratio for treatment discontinuation was calculated adjusting for potential confounders. A descriptive analysis of the reasons for discontinuation was performed. RESULTS: Four hundred treatment courses of JAKi were included, with a subsequent switch to either JAKi, TNFi or OMA bDMARD. The crude overall drug retention was higher in patients switching to another JAKi as compared with TNFi and comparable to OMA. A significant difference of JAKi vs TNFi persisted after adjusting for potential confounders. CONCLUSION: In a real-world population of RA patients who discontinued treatment with a JAKi, switching to another JAKi resulted in a higher drug retention than switching to a TNFi. A switch to a second JAKi seems an effective therapeutic option.

Growth differentiation factor 15 is increased in stable MS.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether serum concentrations of the anti-inflammatory cytokine growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15) differ in patients with highly active multiple sclerosis (MS) vs patients with stable MS and healthy controls (HCs). METHODS: GDF-15 concentrations were measured by ELISA in serum and CSF in a cross-sectional cohort of patients with MS, patients with other inflammatory neurologic diseases (OIND), patients with noninflammatory neurologic diseases (NIND), and healthy controls (HC). Serum GDF-15 concentrations were measured in a longitudinally sampled cohort of clinically and radiologically well-characterized patients with MS and corresponding controls. RESULTS: Cross-sectionally measured median serum GDF-15 concentrations were significantly higher in patients with OIND (n = 42) (600 pg/mL, interquartile range [IQR] = 320-907 pg/mL) compared with HCs (n = 29) (325 pg/mL, IQR = 275-419 pg/mL; p = 0.0007), patients with NIND (n = 46) (304 pg/mL, IQR = 245-493 pg/mL; p = 0.0002), or relapsing MS (n = 42) (356 pg/mL, IQR = 246-460 pg/mL; p = 0.0002). CSF and serum concentrations of GDF-15 were correlated (r = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.25-0.56, p < 0.0001). In a longitudinally sampled cohort of patients with MS (n = 48), deeply phenotyped with quantitative clinical and MRI assessments, mean GDF-15 concentrations were significantly higher in patients with a stable disease course (405 pg/mL, SD = 202) than in patients with intermittent MRI activity (333 pg/mL, SD = 116; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Serum GDF-15 concentrations are increased in patients with MS with a stable disease course. These data suggest that GDF-15 may serve as a biomarker for disease stability in MS.